Faculty Bibliography

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2) who have intact ipsilateral cochlear nerves can have open-set speech discrimination following cochlear implantation. METHODS: Records of 7 patients with documented NF2 were reviewed to determine speech discrimination outcomes following cochlear implantation. Outcomes were measured using consonant-nucleus-consonant words and phonemes; Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet; and City University of New York sentences in quiet and in noise. RESULTS: Preoperatively, none of the patients had open-set speech discrimination. Five of the 7 patients had previously undergone excision of ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS). One of the patients who received a cochlear implant had received radiation therapy for ipsilateral VS, and another was undergoing observation for a small ipsilateral VS. Following cochlear implantation, 4 of 7 patients with NF2 had open-set speech discrimination following cochlear implantation during extended follow-up (15-120 months). Two of the 3 patients without open-set speech understanding had a prolonged period between ipsilateral VS resection and cochlear implantation (120 and 132 months), and had cochlear ossification at the time of implantation. The other patient without open-set speech understanding had good contralateral hearing at the time of cochlear implantation. Despite these findings, 6 of the 7 patients were daily users of their cochlear implants, and the seventh is an occasional user, indicating that all of the patients subjectively gained some benefit from their implants. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation can provide long-term auditory rehabilitation, with open-set speech discrimination for patients with NF2 who have intact ipsilateral cochlear nerves. Factors that can affect implant performance include the following: 1) a prolonged time between VS resection and implantation; and 2) cochlear ossification

HYPOTHESIS: When cochlear implant (CI) users are allowed to self-select the 'most intelligible' frequency-to-electrode table, some of them choose one that differs from the default frequency table that is normally used in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: CIs reproduce the tonotopicity of normal cochleas using frequency-to-electrode tables that assign stimulation of more basal electrodes to higher frequencies and more apical electrodes to lower frequency sounds. Current audiologic practice uses a default frequency-to-electrode table for most patients. However, individual differences in cochlear size, neural survival, and electrode positioning may result in different tables sounding most intelligible to different patients. No clinical tools currently exist to facilitate this fitting. METHODS: A software tool was designed that enables CI users to self-select a most intelligible frequency table. Users explore a 2-dimensional space that represents a range of different frequency tables. Unlike existing tools, this software enables users to interactively audition speech processed by different frequency tables and quickly identify a preferred one. Pilot testing was performed in 11 long-term, postlingually deaf CI users. RESULTS: The software tool was designed, developed, tested, and debugged. Patients successfully used the tool to sample frequency tables and to self-select tables deemed most intelligible, which for approximately half of the users differed from the clinical default. CONCLUSION: A software tool allowing CI users to self-select frequency-to-electrode tables may help in fitting postlingually deaf users. This novel approach may transform current methods of CI fitting

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether children implanted in the first year of life show higher levels of speech perception than later-implanted children, when compared at the same ages and to investigate the time course of sensitive periods for developing speech perception skills. More specifically, to determine whether faster gains in speech perception are made by children implanted before 1 year old relative to those implanted at 2 or 3 years. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS: 117 children with congenital profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, with no additional identified disabilities. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation in the first, second, or third year of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Development curves showing Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) word identification scores as a function of age. RESULTS: Children implanted within the first year of life have a mean advantage of 8.2% LNT-easy word scores over those implanted in the second year (p < 0.001) and a 16.8% advantage in LNT-easy word scores over those implanted in the third year of life (p < 0.001). These advantages remained statistically significant after accounting for sex, residual hearing, and bilateral cochlear implant use. When speech perception scores were expressed as a function of 'hearing age' rather than chronological age, however, there were no significant differences among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: There is a clear speech perception advantage for earlier-implanted children over later-implanted children when compared at the same age but not when compared at the same time after implantation. Thus, the sensitive period for developing word identification seems to extend at least until age 3 years

Objectives: To report changes in survival probabilities as patients survive one or more years with head and neck melanoma, and to characterize prognostic factors for this conditional survival statistic. Study Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study. Methods: All subjects from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER 17) database of the National Cancer Institute with head and neck cutaneous melanoma were analyzed. Using the life table actuarial method, conditional 5 year disease specific survival (DSS) and relative survival were determined for patients surviving one to ten years after diagnosis. Grouped comparisons were performed for anatomic subsites within the head and neck and the rest of the body. Probabilities were also stratified by histologic subtype, thickness of invasion and lymph node status. Results: Five year DSS for scalp and neck melanomas increases from 83.1% to 93.9% for patients surviving five years, compared to an increase from 89.2% to 96.2% for other anatomic sites. Nodular melanoma displayed the worst initial survival among histologic subtypes (73.4%) but improves to 91% at five years. Conditional DSS for node positive patients improves from 47.9% to 83.1%. Survival at diagnosis is stratified by tumor thickness from 96.7% (T1) to 62.3% (T4), but tends to converge between five to ten years of survivorship. Conclusions: For patients with head and neck melanoma who have survived several years, conditional survival provides accurate and useful prognostic information. In general, expected survival increases with time survived since diagnosis, and for low and high T-stage patients, conditional survival statistics converge over time

HYPOTHESIS: The current hybrid electrode can be inserted without trauma to the temporal bone and, after insertion, assumes a position within the scala tympani near the outer cochlear wall just beneath the basilar membrane. BACKGROUND: Conservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant electrode insertion requires a special insertion technique and an atraumatic short electrode. This allows electroacoustic stimulation in ears with significant residual hearing. METHODS: Human cadaveric temporal bones were implanted with soft surgical technique under fluoroscopic observation. Dehydrated and resin-impregnated bones are dissected. Real-time electrode insertion behavior and electrode position were evaluated. The bones are examined for evidence of insertion-related trauma. RESULTS: No gross trauma was observed in the implanted bones, and the electrode dynamics evaluation revealed smooth scala tympani insertions. CONCLUSION: Atraumatic insertion of the 10-mm hybrid electrode can be accomplished using an appropriate cochleostomy and insertion technique

CONCLUSION: Neither speech understanding nor frequency discrimination ability was better in Nucleus Contour users than in Nucleus 24 straight electrode users. Furthermore, perimodiolar electrode placement does not result in better frequency discrimination. OBJECTIVES: We addressed three questions related to perimodiolar electrode placement. First, do patients implanted with the Contour electrode understand speech better than with an otherwise identical device that has a straight electrode? Second, do these groups have different frequency discrimination abilities? Third, is the distance of the electrode from the modiolus related to frequency discrimination ability? SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Contour and straight electrode users were matched on four important variables. We then tested these listeners on CNC word and HINT sentence identification tasks, and on a formant frequency discrimination task. We also examined X-rays and measured the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus to determine whether there is a relationship between this factor and frequency discrimination ability. RESULTS: Both speech understanding and frequency discrimination abilities were similar for listeners implanted with the Contour vs a straight electrode. Furthermore, there was no linear relationship between electrode-modiolus distance and frequency discrimination ability. However, we did note a second-order relationship between these variables, suggesting that frequency discrimination is worse when the electrodes are either too close or too far away from the modiolus