Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:The incidence of human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer is rising, but public knowledge about this diagnosis remains low. This study aimed to investigate the quality and readability of online information about HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. STUDY DESIGN:Cross-sectional website analysis. METHODS:This study conducted a total of 12 web searches across Google, Yahoo, and Bing to identify websites related to HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. The QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) was used to measure quality based on seven website criteria. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) were used to measure readability, with scores estimating the education level a reader would require to understand a piece of text. Readability improves as FRES increases and FKGL decreases. RESULTS:Twenty-seven unique web pages were evaluated. The mean USA reading grade level as measured by FKGL was 10.42 (standard deviation = 1.54). There was an inverse relationship between quality and readability, with a significant positive correlation between QUEST score and FKGL (r = 0.343, P = .040) and a significant negative correlation between QUEST score and FRES (r = -0.537, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS:With a mean USA reading grade level more than four grades above the American Medical Association's recommendation and results indicating that readability suffers as quality improves, these findings suggest that the currently available online information about HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer is insufficient. Improved patient education practices and resources about this diagnosis are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:NA Laryngoscope, 131:87-94, 2021.

OBJECTIVE:To analyze the role of transoral robotic base-of-tongue mucosectomy in a cohort of patients with human papilloma virus negative unknown primary carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective database analysis. METHODS:A retrospective database review from 2012 to 2018 was performed at two large tertiary centers to study patients with human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative unknown primary carcinoma who underwent transoral robotic base-of-tongue mucosectomy. P16 testing was used as a surrogate for HPV status. Patients were included that had squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the lateral neck based on fine needle aspiration or open biopsy. Preoperatively, all patients were classified as having an unknown primary based on normal clinical and flexible endoscopic exam, normal operative endoscopy, nonlocalizing imaging, and tonsillectomy. All patients underwent robotic base-of-tongue mucosectomy. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of pathologic identification of a mucosal primary. RESULTS:Twenty-three patients with p16-negative unknown primary carcinoma were identified and studied. All patients underwent transoral robotic base-of-tongue mucosectomy. Median age was 60 years at the time of diagnosis, and 18 of 23 (78.2%) were male. Pathologic analysis of the base-of-tongue specimens showed a primary tumor in only three of 23 (13.0%) of patients. CONCLUSION:Despite prior evidence suggesting a high rate of primary site identification in HPV-related disease, robotic base-of-tongue mucosectomy may not be indicated for HPV-negative unknown primary carcinoma based on a low likelihood of finding the primary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:4 Laryngoscope, 131:78-81, 2021.

Management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma necessitates a multimodal approach. The neck dissection has evolved over many years but is well established as the key surgical intervention for management of nodal disease in the neck. The open neck dissection has many varieties based on location and degree of disease but is the gold standard surgical technique. Robot-assisted neck dissections have emerged in recent years as an alternative. More research is required to establish long-term oncologic outcomes achieved with robot-assisted surgery and to assess whether cost and operative times decrease with experience.

PURPOSE:Understanding the role of transoral surgery in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) requires prospective, randomized multi-institutional data. Meticulous evaluation of surgeon expertise and surgical quality assurance (QA) will be critical to the validity of such trials. We describe a novel surgeon credentialing and QA process developed to support the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E3311 (E3311) and report outcomes related to QA. PATIENTS AND METHODS:E3311 was a phase II randomized clinical trial of transoral surgery followed by low- or standard-dose, risk-adjusted post-operative therapy with stage III-IVa (AJCC 7th edition) HPV-associated OPC. In order to be credentialed to accrue to this trial, surgeons were required to demonstrate active hospital credentials and technique-specific surgical expertise with ≥20 cases of transoral resection for OPC. In addition, 10 paired operative and surgical pathology reports from the preceding 24 months were reviewed by an expert panel. Ongoing QA required <10% rate of positive margins, low oropharyngeal bleeding rates, and accrual of at least one patient per 12 months. Otherwise surgeons were placed on hold and not permitted to accrue until re-credentialed using a new series of transoral resections. RESULTS:120 surgeons trained in transoral minimally invasive surgery applied for credentialing for E3311 and after peer-review, 87 (73%) were approved from 59 centers. During QA on E3311, positive final pathologic margins were reported in 19 (3.8%) patients. Grade III/IV and grade V oropharyngeal bleeding was reported in 29 (5.9%) and 1 (0.2%) of patients. CONCLUSIONS:We provide proof of concept that a comprehensive credentialing process can support multicenter transoral head and neck surgical oncology trials, with low incidence of positive margins and *grade III/V oropharyngeal bleeding.