Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study at a single institution. OBJECTIVE:To analyze the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF) and bilateral minimally invasive (MIS) Wiltse approach TLIF (Wil-TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Several studies have compared Open TLIF to MIS TLIF, however, comparing the techniques using a large cohort of one-level TLIFs has not been fully explored. METHODS:We reviewed the charts of patients undergoing a single-level primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2012 and 2017. The cases were categorized as Open TLIF (traditional midline exposure including lateral exposure of transverse processes) or bilateral paramedian Wiltse TLIF approach. Differences between groups were assessed by t-tests. RESULTS:227 patients underwent one-level primary TLIF (116 O-TLIF, 111 Wil-TLIF). There was no difference in age, gender, ASA or BMI between groups. Wil-TLIF had the lowest EBL (197 mL vs. 499 mL O-TLIF, p =  < .001), LOS (2.7 days vs. 3.6 days O-TLIF, p =  < .001), overall complication rate (12% vs. 24% O-TLIF, p = .015), minor complication rate (7% vs. 16% O-TLIF, p = .049), and 90-day readmission rate (1% vs. 8% O-TLIF, p = .012). Wil-TLIF was associated with the higher fluoroscopy time (83 sec vs. vs. 24 sec O-TLIF, p =  < .001). There was not a significant difference in operative time, intraoperative or neurological complications, extubation time, reoperation rate, or infection rate. CONCLUSIONS:In comparing Wiltse MIS TLIF to Open TLIF, the minimally invasive paramedian Wiltse approach demonstrated the lowest EBL, LOS, readmission rates and complications, but longer fluoroscopy times when compared to the traditional open approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Objective of this study is to evaluate demographics, risk factors, and incidence of instrumentation related complications (IRC) in spinal surgeries from 2009-2012. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality (M&M) database has tremendous value in orthopaedic surgery. SRS gathers surgeon-reported complications, including instrumentation failure, visual complications, neurological deficits, infections, and death. Limited literature exists on the incidence of perioperative instrumentation complications in deformity surgery. We utilized the SRS database to evaluate demographics, risk factors, and incidence of IRC in spinal surgeries from 2009-2012. Methods/UNASSIGNED:The SRS M&M database was queried for IRC in patients undergoing surgery for scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, and kyphosis from 2009-2012. Demographics, comorbidities, diagnoses, curve magnitude, and intraoperative characteristics were analyzed. Intraoperative characteristics included surgical approach, performance of fusion or osteotomy, operative times, blood loss, instrumentation used, and documented instrumentation complication. Results/UNASSIGNED:0.11%, P<0.001), experienced significantly more IRC. IRC included implant failure (23.3%), migration (28.3%), and malpositioned implants (48.6%). New perioperative neurologic deficits were reported in 146 (46.9%) patients, and 84 (27%) of these implants were removed. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:IRC occur in approximately 18.5 per 10,000 deformity patients, with a rate significantly higher in patients with kyphosis. The potentially avoidable occurrence of implant malpositioning represents nearly 50% of these complications. Closer attention to posterior bony anatomy, improved intraoperative imaging with utilization of navigation or robotic guidance may decrease these complications.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes on osteoporosis among first-time spine surgery patients. Methods/UNASSIGNED:An electronic survey consisting of demographics, prior experience with osteoporosis, and the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz (FOOQ) was sent via email to first-time spine surgery patients. Patients were then randomized into 2 groups: 1 received a brief osteoporosis information packet prior to beginning the FOOQ, and 1 proceeded directly to the survey. Results/UNASSIGNED:value of .068. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our study demonstrates high FOOQ scores among all first-time spine patients as compared to historical scores in general at-risk populations. No statistical differences between FOOQ scores were noted between the group that received the information packet and the control group. This study demonstrates that patients new to spine care have a good understanding of osteoporosis and are thus willing to participate in osteoporosis treatment as part of their spine care.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Evaluate the current evidence in meta-analyses on posterior thoracolumbar minimally invasive surgery techniques and outcomes for degenerative conditions. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A systematic review of the literature from 1950 to 2015. Results/UNASSIGNED:The review of the literature yielded 34 meta-analysis studies evaluating posterior thoracolumbar minimally invasive techniques and outcomes for degenerative conditions. There were 11 studies included which investigated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open posterior lumbar decompressions. There were 14 studies included which investigated MIS versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Finally, there were 9 studies focused on navigation techniques and radiation safety within MIS procedures. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:There are 34 meta-analysis studies evaluating minimally invasive to open thoracolumbar surgery for degenerative disease. The studies show a trend toward decreased estimated blood loss, decreased length of stay, decreased complications, similar fusion rates, improved accuracy, and decreased radiation when minimally invasive techniques are used.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective review of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) morbidity and mortality (M&M) database. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to investigate visual related complications in spinal deformity patients undergoing spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:The SRS compiles surgeon-reported complications into an M&M database, tracking postoperative complications including visual loss, neurological deficits, infections, and death. Limited literature exists on postoperative visual complications, a rare but devastating complication following spine surgery. METHODS:We utilized the SRS M&M database to determine demographics, perioperative risk factors, and prognosis for visual related complications in spinal deformity patients undergoing corrective spine surgery from 2009 to 2012. RESULTS:A total of 167,972 spinal deformity patients from 2009 to 2012 were identified with a visual acuity complication (VAC) rate of 0.01%, or 12.5 per 100,000 patients. VAC rates for patients with kyphosis were significantly higher than patients with scoliosis (0.049% vs. 0.010%, P = 0.002) and spondylolisthesis (0.049% vs. 0.005%, P = 0.001). Postoperative visual loss rates significantly decreased from 2010 to 2012 (0.022% vs. 0.004%, P = 0.029). Twenty-one patients identified with VACs had a mean age of 34.8 ± 24.3 years. Two (9.5%) patients had preoperative vision changes, two (9.5%) were diabetic, two (9.5%) had vascular disease, one (4.8%) had a history of thromboembolic disease, and five (23.8%) had hypertension. Extent of VAC was bilateral-partial in four (19.0%), bilateral-total in five (23.8%), unilateral-partial in eight (38.1%), and unilateral-total in three (14.3%) patients. Four (19.0%) patients developed anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, four (19.0%) had posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION), five (23.8%) had central retinal artery occlusion, and five (23.8%) developed cortical blindness (CB). Greater than 50% of the VACs occurred on, or before, the first postoperative day. Ten (47.6%) patients recovered complete vision and four (19.0%) improved. All patients with CB and 50% with posterior ischemic optic neuropathy experienced complete resolution. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:VACs occur in approximately 12.5 per 100,000 deformity patients, with a rate five times higher in patients with kyphosis. More than 50% of these complications occur within 24 hours postoperatively. Nearly half of these complications resolve completely, and another 19% improve postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4.

Study Design/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective database study. Objectives/UNASSIGNED:Analysis of economic and demographic data concerning interspinous device (ID) placement throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization. Methods/UNASSIGNED:The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for patients who underwent insertion of an interspinous process spinal stabilization device (ICD-9-CM 84.80) between 2008 and 2014 across 44 states. Demographic and economic data were obtained which included the annual number of surgeries, age, sex, insurance type, location, and frequency of routine discharge. The NIS database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals, which is weighted to provide national estimates. Results/UNASSIGNED:There was a 73% decrease in ID implanted from 2008 to 2014. The mean cost associated with insertion of the device increased 28% from $13 653 in 2008 to $17 515 in 2014. The mean length of stay (LOS) increased from 1.8 to 2.4 days. Patients aged 45 to 64 years increased from 14.1% to 34.3% while patients aged 65 to 84 years decreased from 74.4% to 60.6%. By region, 34% of ID placement occurred in the South followed by 19.7% that occured in the Northeast. When stratifying by median income for patient zip code, the procedure was performed more in cities designated as higher rather than lower income areas (74.2% and 19.5%, respectively). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Throughout the United States, there was a progressive decline in the insertion of interspinous spacers by 73% over the study period. The total costs for the procedure increased by 28% while the aggregate national charges decreased by 55.6% between 2008 and 2014.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort chart review. OBJECTIVE:To determine the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) following posterior segmental spinal instrumented fusion (PSSIF) of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with LIV at L2 or above. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Few studies evaluate the optimal LIV based on rotation or center sacral vertical line (CSVL). METHODS:A radiographic assessment of 544 thoracic major AIS patients (average age 14.7 years) with minimum 2 years' follow-up (average 4.1 years) after PSSIF was performed. The LIV was divided by CSVL: stable vertebra 1 (SV-1) if the CSVL fell between the medial walls of the LIV pedicles; SV-2 if between stable vertebra 1 and 3; and SV-3 if the CSVL did not touch the LIV. LIV was divided by rotation into: neutral vertebra 0 (NV-0) if the LIV was at or distal to the neutral vertebra; NV-1 if one vertebra proximal to the NV; NV-2 if two vertebrae proximal; and NV-3 if three vertebrae proximal to the NV. RESULTS:The prevalence of adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) at ultimate follow-up was 13.6%. Patients with AO or DJK had a higher rate of open triradiate cartilage, LIV not touching the CSVL, and more proximal to the NV (p < .05). Risk factors were SV-3 (39% vs. SV-2 14%, SV-1 9%, p < .05), NV-3 (35% vs. NV-2 9%, NV-1 6%, NV-0 12%, p = .000), open triradiate cartilage (43% vs. closed 13%, p < .05), lumbar C modifier (22% vs. B modifier 8%, A modifier 13%, p < .05), and Risser stage 0 (19% vs. 12% Risser 1-5, p < .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up of PSSIF for AIS with LIV at L2 or above was 13.6%. Risk factors included the CSVL outside the LIV, LIV 3 or more proximal to the NV, open triradiate cartilage, lumbar C modifier, and Risser stage 0. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Controversy exists over the ability of various lumbar interbody fusion techniques to realign global and regional balance and their effect on patient outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study to compare thirty-day postoperative outcomes between anterior and posterior interbody fusion techniques within a large national database. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database included 2,372 (29.9%) single-level anterior/direct lateral interbody fusions (ALIF/DLIF) and 5,563 (70.1%) single-level posterior/transforaminal lateral interbody fusions (PLIF/TLIF) between 2013 and 2014. Emergent cases, fracture cases, and preoperative compromised wounds were not analyzed. Primary thirty-day outcomes included mortality, return to operating room, readmission, length of stay, and other major complications. Minor outcomes included urinary tract infection, superficial incisional site infection, and perioperative blood transfusion within 72 hours. Results/UNASSIGNED:0.6%, P=0.025), which persisted in the multivariate analysis (OR =2.03; 95% CI, 1.13-3.65; P=0.017). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Although numerous techniques can be utilized in the treatment approach to various lumbar pathologies, anterior approaches have an increased risk of developing a perioperative DVT and early mortality. Transfusion risk is more strongly associated with elevated American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, increased age, preoperative anemia, and patients with bleeding disorders.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Case series. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the safety and feasibility of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement under robotic guidance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Similar to standard iliac fixation, S2AI screws aid in achieving fixation across the sacropelvic junction and decreasing S1 screw strain. Fortunately, the S2AI technique minimizes prominent instrumentation and the need for offset connectors to the fusion construct. Herein, we present an analysis of the largest series of robotic-guided S2AI screws in the literature without any significant author conflicts of interest with the robotics industry. METHODS:Twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent spinopelvic fixation with 46 S2AI screws under robotic guidance were analyzed from 2015 to 2016. Screws were placed by two senior spine surgeons, along with various fellow or resident surgical assistants, using a proprietary robotic guidance system (Renaissance; Mazor Robotics Ltd., Caesara, Israel). Screw position and accuracy was assessed on intraoperative CT O-arm scans and analyzed using three-dimensional interactive viewing and manipulation of the images. RESULTS:The average caudal angle in the sagittal plane was 31.0° ± 10.0°. The average horizontal angle in the axial plane using the posterior superior iliac spine as a reference was 42.8° ± 6.6°. The average S1 screw to S2AI screw angle was 11.3° ± 9.9°. Two violations of the iliac cortex were noted, with an average breach distance of 7.9 ± 4.8 mm. One breach was posterior (2.2%) and one was anterior (2.2%). The overall robotic S2AI screw accuracy rate was 95.7%. There were no intraoperative neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications related to the placement of the S2AI screws. CONCLUSIONS:Spinopelvic fixation achieved using a bone-mounted miniature robotic-guided S2AI screw insertion technique is safe and reliable. Despite two breaches, no complications related to the placement of the S2AI screws occurred in this series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV, therapeutic.