Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Pediatric mandibular fractures remain a therapeutic challenge due to the presence of tooth buds, the need to preserve the growth centers of the jaw, and the high risk to ankylosis in patients with trauma to the condyles. More specifically, condylar fracture with lateral dislocation out of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can pose significant challenges due to the difficulty with application of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) as well as rigid plate fixation. Furthermore, open reduction of the condyle poses long term risk to dysfunction. Herein, we present a novel transfacial pinning surgical technique for the management of pediatric bilateral condylar fractures with lateral dislocation and concomitant symphyseal fracture in a patient less than 5 years of age. Methods/Description: A healthy 3-year-old male patient, who sustained a complex facial fracture in a golf cart accident in which he was unrestrained. Physical exam was remarkable for panfacial edema with no soft tissue injuries and limited oral excursion. Craniofacial computed tomography (CT) revealed a tripartite mandibular fracture, including bilateral condylar fractures with lateral dislocation of the left condyle and a symphyseal fracture. There were no other facial fractures and the patient's cervical spine was cleared both clinically and radiographically. The deciduous teeth precluded the use of traditional MMF and the presence of tooth buds within the entirely of the mandibular body and symphysis made the use of rigid fixation not feasible. The operative plan entailed a staged lower jaw reconstruction with: closed reduction of the laterally dislocated condyle; transfacial pinning with a 2.8 mm threaded Steinman pin between the mandibular angles to secure the medial location mandibular ramus and angle; application of MMF using circummandibular wiring and intermaxillary fixation screws. Two weeks later, MMF was released and the patient started a soft diet and oral excursion exercises with the transfacial pin in place. Two months after the first surgery, the transfacial pin was removed.
Result(s): The patient tolerated all procedures well. Immediate postoperative CT taken after placement of the transfacial pin (first surgery) revealed appropriate reduction of the laterally displaced condyle. At the time of transfacial pin removal (8 weeks after the initial repair), the patient demonstrated full and pain free oral excursion and stable class I occlusion. Follow-up CT analysis after removal of the transfacial pin demonstrates a stable reduction of the dislocated condyle and bony union of all three fractures.
Conclusion(s): Transfacial pinning technique can be a safe and effective technique for treatment of pediatric mandible fractures with lateral dislocation of the condyle

Background/Purpose: After LeFort I advancement surgery, soft tissue changes are unpredictable, especially in patients with orofacial clefts, as scar tissue from primary repair can alter soft tissue responses. Therefore, this study aimed to measure and evaluate soft tissue response following LeFort I advancement in skeletally matured patients with complete cleft lip and palate (CLP). Methods/Description: The cohort of 26 patients with non-syndromic CLP who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy between 2013 and 2019 and met the inclusion criteria. Patients were included if they had lateral cephalograms or CBCT at pre-operative (T1), immediately post-operative (T2), and one-year follow-up (T3). Patients who underwent nose/lip revision surgery before T3 were excluded. Four skeletal and dental hard-tissue (ANS, point A; A-point, upper incisor most labial; U1-most, upper incisor edge; U1-tip) and 5 softtissue (tip of nose or pronasale; Prn, subnasale; Sn, superior labial sulcus; SLS, upper lip anterior or labrale superius; LS, and stomion superius; SIMS) landmarks were digitized and measured. For the outcome analyses, 5 ratios of soft- to hard-tissue changes (Prn/ANS, Sn/A-point, SLS/A-point, LS/U1-most, and SIMS/ U1-tip) were calculated for each group, and associations between hard-and-soft tissue counterparts were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
Result(s): Sixteen patients had UCLP, and 10 patients had BCLP. At one-year follow-up (T1-T3), the mean advancement in UCLP and BCLP groups at ANS were 4.4+/-3 and 4.7+/-3.9 mm, from point A were 6.6+/-2.5, 8.8+/- 2.6 mm, respectively. The mean horizontal changes of the corresponding soft tissue anatomy, Prn, were 2.7 +/-1.7, 4.6+/-3.5 mm, from Sn, were 3.9+/-1.9, 6.2+/-2.4. mm, and from SLS were 5.2+/-2.5, 7.4+/-2.8 mm. The mean advancement in at upper incisor most labial were 7.2+/-2.7 and 8.4+/-2.4 mm, and from the upper incisal edge were 7.5+/-2.9 and 8.4+/-2.7. mm. The mean horizontal changes of the soft tissue counterpart, LS, were 5.6+/-2.9, 7.9+/- 3.7 mm, and SIMS were 6.0+/-3.2, 7.3+/- 2.7 mm. All skeletal, dental, and soft tissue advancements from T1-T3 were significant (P< 0.01) except for Sn and LS in both groups and SIMS in UCLP group. For ratio and correlation analyses in UCLP and BCLP groups, Prn/AND were 0.48 (r=0.40) and (r=0.00), Sn/A-point were 0.58 (r=0.79) and 0.70 (r=0.77), SLS/A-point were 0.79 (r=0.82) and 0.85 (r=0.80), LS/U1-most were 0.74 (r=0.92) and 0.96 (r=0.74), and SIMS/U1-tip were 0.78 (r=0.75) and 0.82(r=0.67), respectively. All associations except for Prn/ANS were statistically significant (P< 0.01).
Conclusion(s): This study demonstrated a linear relationship between soft- and hard-tissue changes in the maxillary landmarks following LeFort I advancement in patients with complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP and BCLP)

Background/Purpose: Gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) is a procedure performed at the time of primary cleft lip or palate repair in which the alveolus is repaired without the need for bone graft. Although the success of GPP is reported up to 70%, the associated disparities with regards to access or receipt of GPP has not been studied. This study reports on patient access to GPP reconstruction. Methods/Description: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (ACS NSQIP Peds) was queried from 2014 to 2019. Patients were selected using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes (Table 1). Patient race, gender, age at time of surgery, 30 day readmission, comorbidities and complications were recorded. Postoperative complications included surgical site infections (SSI), dehiscence and transfusion. Receipt of GPP was analyzed using binary logistic regression to control for variables that could potentially affect access to/ receipt of GPP. For multivariable analysis, Bonferroni correction was used.
Result(s): 23408 patients with a cleft were included in our analysis. 12590 were White, 1732 were Black/African American, 3914 were Hispanic, 2267 were Asian/other Pacific Islander, and 2905 did not have a reported Race. Amongst this cohort, 709 patients underwent GPP (2.25%). Patients who did not report/of unknown Race were less likely to undergo GPP (p = 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference amongst access to GPP for Black/African American, Hispanic, or Asian/ other Pacific Islander patients. The average age of all patients was 2411 days. White patients had primary cleft repair at a younger age (p = 0.000) than non-White patients. There was no difference in gender or co-morbidities (cardiac risk factors and congenital/chronic lung disease, respectively) amongst all Races (p = 0.291, p = 0.276, p = 0.547). There was no statistically significant difference in unplanned 30-day readmission and 30-day postoperative complication (p = 0.326, 0.934, respectively). Patients with ASA class 3 or 4 and minor or major cardiac risk factors had a statistically significant higher chance of 30-day readmission (p = 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion(s): Amongst reported Races there was no statistically significant difference with regards to access/receipt of GPP, but patients without a reported Race were less likely to undergo GPP. Undergoing GPP did not appear to increase the likelihood of 30-day readmission or postoperative complication. We did find that White patients received cleft lip/palate repair at a statistically significant younger age and Hispanic patients at a later age, which is similar to previous studies. Although there was no difference in access to GPP amongst Races, further studies to evaluate disparities in outcomes for children undergoing GPP needs to be elucidated

Background/Purpose: Traditional palatoplasty techniques rely on repositioning of soft palate muscle and mucosa to restore velopharyngeal closure. In the case of the wide cleft palate (10 mm or greater), we hypothesize that soft palate nasal mucosa closure can result in vertical shortening of the palate. Furthermore, horizontal release of the reconstructed soft palate nasal mucosa from the hard palate will result in significant lengthening of the soft palate, identifying a potential loss of domain of palatal length in patients with a wide cleft palate. This study characterizes this potential loss of vertical length of the nasal soft palate mucosa in patients with a wide cleft. Methods/Description: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent a primary cleft palate repair with a buccal flap prior to 18 months of age by a single plastic surgeon over a 2-year period. Inclusion criteria was defined as patients with cleft palate at least 10 mm in length at the area of the posterior nasal spine. All patients who met inclusion criteria underwent primary cleft palate repair with horizontal transection of the nasal mucosa during palatoplasty. This transection was performed after nasal mucosa repair, but prior to muscular reconstruction. The resulting mucosal defect was measured and reconstructed with a buccal flap. Patient demographics, intra-operative palatal measurements, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed.
Result(s): Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 10.68+/-1.04 months, mean gestational age at birth was 38.14+/-1.75 weeks, and mean weight at surgery was 8.75+/-1.22 kg. Three (13.6%) had a history of Pierre Robin sequence and 5 (22.7%) had an associated syndrome. Notably, 13 (59.1%) had a history of nasoalveolar molding, and 15 (68.2%) had previously had a cleft lip repair. No patients had a Veau I cleft, 7 (31.8%) had a Veau II, 12 (54.5%) had a Veau III, and 3 (13.6%) had a Veau IV cleft. Regarding palate repair techniques employed, 12 (54.5%) had a Bardach, 7 (31.8%) had a Von Langenbeck, 3 (13.6%) had an Oxford, and all had a concomitant radical intravelar veloplasty. All 22 (100%) patients had a right buccal flap during primary palatoplasty. The mean cleft width or horizontal separation of the palate at the posterior nasal spine was 10.6+/-2.82 mm, and the mean lengthening of the palate was measured as 10.5+/-2.23 mm. For complications, there were 2 (9.1%) fistulas, 1 (4.5%) wound dehiscence, 1 (4.5%) 30-day readmission (for RSV bronchiolitis), and no bleeding complications.
Conclusion(s): Patients with a wide cleft palate have a potential loss of vertical length of approximately 1 cm. Considering that patients with a wide palatal cleft are predisposed to developing VPI, these data provide supportive evidence that acute palatal lengthening during palatoplasty should be considered for this patient population. The buccal flap can mitigate the loss of domain in palatal length, and potentially improve palatal excursion

Background/Purpose: The relative value unit (RVU) is a metric established by Medicare to quantify physician time and intensity required to furnish a surgical service, and is broadly used for the purposes of billing and physician compensation. Despite widespread use since the 1990s, the accuracy of RVU assignments has not been scientifically evaluated for cleft and craniofacial surgery. We hypothesize that unbalanced RVU allocation creates inappropriate disparities in value amongst procedures performed by cleft and craniofacial surgeons. Methods/Description: The American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried to identify all cleft and craniofacial surgery cases performed by plastic surgeons from 2012-2019 based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. Microsurgical cases and CPT codes with a case count of fewer than 10 were excluded. Total RVUs per case were calculated based on the sum of work RVUs for the principal procedure, and any other procedure that was performed during the case. Efficiency was defined as total RVUs divided by total operative time (i.e. RVUs/hour), based on previously published methodology. Mean efficiency per CPT code was ranked and compared by quartile using Student's t-tests.
Result(s): The sample consisted of 69 CPT codes with a total of 50,450 cases. The most common procedure was cleft palate repair of the soft and/or hard palate (CPT 42200). The mean efficiency for the top quartile of CPT codes was 15.65+/-4.22 (range 12.05-26.56) RVUs/hour, compared to 7.39+/-0.98 (range 5.57-8.69) RVUs/hour for the bottom quartile (p<0.001). The mean operative time for the top quartile of CPT codes was 167.14+/-90.29 minutes, compared to 107.79 +/-55.17 minutes for the lowest quartile (p=0.029). In the top quartile, the majority of CPT codes were craniofacial procedures including frontofacial procedures (23.53%) and craniectomies for craniosynostosis or bony lesions (35.29%). The lowest quartile was comprised mainly of CPT codes for cleft procedures including surgeries for velopharyngeal insufficiency (17.65%), cleft palate repair (23.53%), and cleft septoplasty (5.88%). It was 2.5 times more efficient for a cleft and craniofacial surgeon to perform a local skin flap (15.18 RVUs/ hour, CPT 14040) than a secondary palatal lengthening for cleft palate (6.09 RVUs/hour, CPT 42200).
Conclusion(s): The current RVU allocation to cleft and craniofacial procedures creates arbitrary disparities in physician efficiency, with cleft procedures disproportionately negatively affected despite being among the most common procedures. RVU assignments should be reevaluated to avoid disincentivizing cleft surgical care

Background/Purpose: Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in combination with primary gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) may obviate the need for a secondary alveolar bone graft. While the long-term facial growth following GPP has been well documented, no study has evaluated the transverse growth of the cleft-maxilla following NAM and GPP. Here we report the effects of NAM and GPP on the maxillary transverse dimension in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Methods/Description: A retrospective single-institution review of nonsyndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate born between 2005 and 2010 was completed. Patients were divided into four groups based on their interventions: 1) NAM-GPP with adequate bone formation 2) NAM-GPP without adequate bone formation (requiring ABG) 3) NAM-no GPP (requiring ABG), and 4) No NAM-no GPP control (patients who received primary surgeries outside of our institution). Cone-beam computed tomographic scans (CBCTs) taken at the early-mixed dentition stage, prior to orthodontic intervention, were used to assess the anterior and posterior maxillary transverse dimensions. The transverse discrepancy at the affected and non-affected sides was measured at the level of the primary canines (anterior dimension) and the permanent first molars (posterior dimension) to the maxillary midline. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the transverse dimension of the affected versus non-affected sides within each group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare each NAM group with the no NAM-no GPP control group.
Result(s): A total of 85 patients were included in this study (mean age = 8.7). Male patients (50.6%) and the left side (64.7%) were most affected. Of the 85 patients, 26 (30.6%) underwent NAM-GPP with adequate bone formation, 22 (25.9%) underwent NAM-GPP but required ABG, 16 (18.8%) underwent NAM without GPP, and 21 (24.7%) underwent no NAM-no GPP. Median values were significantly different in the anterior maxilla between the affected and nonaffected sides across all four groups (p = 0.001). The transverse dimension at the affected side also revealed a significant difference in both the NAM-GPP (with adequate bone formation) and the NAM-GPP (requiring ABG) groups compared to the no NAM-no GPP group (p= 0.022 and p= 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the NAM-no GPP group compared to the control (p = 0.059). Distances to the molars of the affected and nonaffected sides were not statistically significant within or across any of the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion(s): In patients with UCLP, the maxillary primary canine transverse dimension on the affected side is significantly reduced in patients undergoing NAM and GPP compared to the control. However, the position of the maxillary first molars appear to be unaffected by NAM and GPP

BACKGROUND:β-Tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is one of the most common synthetic bone grafting materials utilized in craniofacial reconstruction; however, it is limited by a slow degradation rate. The aim of this study was to leverage 3-dimensional (3D) printing in an effort to accelerate the degradation kinetics of β-TCP. METHODS:Twenty-two 1-month-old New Zealand white rabbits underwent creation of calvarial and alveolar defects, repaired with 3D-printed β-TCP scaffolds coated with 1000 μM of osteogenic agent dipyridamole. Rabbits were euthanized after 2, 6, and 18 months after surgical intervention. Bone regeneration, scaffold degradation, and bone mechanical properties were quantified. RESULTS:Histological analysis confirmed the generation of vascularized and organized bone. Microcomputed tomography analysis from 2 to 18 months demonstrated decreased scaffold volume within calvarial (23.6% ± 2.5%, 5.1% ± 2.2%; P < 0.001) and alveolar (21.5% ± 2.2%, 0.2% ± 1.9%; P < 0.001) defects, with degradation rates of 54.6%/year and 90.5%/year, respectively. Scaffold-inducted bone generation within the defect was volumetrically similar to native bone in the calvarium (55.7% ± 6.9% vs 46.7% ± 6.8%; P = 0.064) and alveolus (31.4% ± 7.1% vs 33.8% ± 3.7%; P = 0.337). Mechanical properties between regenerated and native bone were similar. CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates an improved degradation profile and replacement of absorbed β-TCP with vascularized, organized bone through 3D printing and addition of an osteogenic agent. This novel additive manufacturing and tissue engineering protocol has implications to the future of craniofacial skeletal reconstruction as a safe and efficacious bone tissue engineering method.

The double Frost suture is a useful supplement to the reconstruction of ipsilateral upper and lower eyelid defects with full-thickness skin grafts. This technique involves silk traction sutures that overlap the upper and lower eyelids to place them on maximal stretch after placement of 2 full-thickness skin grafts. It has the added benefit of protecting the cornea and compressing both grafts under 1 bolster. The authors illustrate this technique in 2 pediatric cases-a congenital melanocytic kissing eyelid nevus and a periocular burn. Each case resulted in large upper and lower anterior lamellar defects, which were reconstructed with supraclavicular and retroauricular free skin grafts. The double Frost sutures counter vertical cicatricial forces during graft healing, obviating the need for staged procedures. Both described cases resulted in excellent graft survival with minimal contracture.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) can be treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), tongue-lip adhesion, or tracheostomy; however, there is an active debate regarding the indications of MDO in this patient population. Published algorithms identify tracheomalacia, bronchomalacia, laryngomalacia, hypotonic syndromes, and central sleep apnea as contraindications for MDO and indications for tracheostomy, but these comorbidities may exist along a spectrum of severity. The authors propose that appropriately selected neonates with PRS who concurrently express 1 or more of these traditional contraindications may be successfully treated with MDO. METHODS:The authors performed a 5-year retrospective chart review of all neonates who underwent MDO for treatment of severe PRS. All patients expressed a comorbidity previously identified as an indication for tracheostomy. Pre- and postoperative characteristics were recorded. Apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) before and after MDO were compared using 2-tailed repeated measures t-test. RESULTS:The authors identified 12 patients with severe PRS and conditions associated with contraindications to MDO: 9 (75.0%) patients had laryngomalacia, 6 (50.0%) patients had tracheomalacia, 2 (16.6%) patients had bronchomalacia, 1 (8.3%) patient had central sleep apnea, and 3 (25.0%) patients had hypotonia. Five (41.7%) patients underwent concurrent gastrostomy tube placement due to feeding insufficiency. Average birthweight was 3.0 kg. Average pre-op AHI was 34.8. Average post-op AHI was 7.3. All patients successfully underwent MDO with avoidance of tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS:By employing an interdisciplinary evaluation of patient candidacy, MDO can safely and effectively treat upper airway obstruction and avoid tracheostomy in higher-risk neonatal patients with traditional indications for tracheostomy.