Faculty Bibliography

We describe a 21-year-old woman who presented with chest pain and dyspnea on exertion and who was found to have a large pericardial mass. Multimodality imaging was instrumental in narrowing the differential diagnosis and planning surgical treatment, which included coronary artery bypass and right-sided heart reconstruction. The final pathologic diagnosis was lymphohemangioma; to our knowledge, this was the largest cardiac/pericardial vascular tumor ever to be reported in the literature.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare operative strategies and patient outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repairs before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary aortic surgery program. Methods: Between May, 2005, and July, 2014, 101 patients underwent ATAAD repair at our institution. A dedicated multidisciplinary aortic surgery team (experienced aortic surgeon, perfusionists, cardiac anesthesiologists, nurses, radiologists) was formed in 2010. We retrospectively compared ATAAD repair outcomes in patients before (2005-2009, n=39) and after (2010-2014, n=62) the implementation of our program. Expected operative mortality was calculated using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) preoperative prediction model. Results: This study demonstrated a significant reduction in operative mortality after implementation of the aortic surgery program (30.8% vs. 9.7%; P=0.014). There was also an increase in the complexity of surgical technique and perfusion strategies with fewer postoperative complications related to respiratory (P<0.0001) and renal failure (P=0.034). No statistical difference in baseline demographics and IRAD-predictive variables were noted between groups (Table SA17-1). However, there was a 3.5-fold reduction in the observed to- expected (O/E) operative mortality ratio (1.52-0.44) (Fig. SA17-1). The success of the aortic program resulted in a 50%increase in volume with a significant number of patients being admitted directly to our aortic center for ATAAD repair, thus avoiding delays related to transfer from a secondary hospital. Conclusions: Patient outcomes can be improved if the surgical treatment of ATAAD were restricted to institutions with a high-volume multidisciplinary aortic surgery program. (Figure Presented)

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of blood conservation strategies on patient outcomes after aortic surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospective data. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive high-risk patients (mean EuroSCORE 10.4%) underwent thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection repair from January 2010 to September 2011. A blood conservation strategy (BCS) focused on limitation of hemodilution and tolerance of perioperative anemia was used in 57 patients (43.2%); the remaining 75 (56.8%) patients were managed by traditional methods. Mortality, major complications, and red blood cell transfusion requirements were assessed. Independent risk factors for clinical outcomes were determined by multivariate analyses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 9.8% (13 of 132). Lower preoperative hemoglobin was an independent predictor of mortality (p<0.01, odds ratio [OR] 1.7). Major complications were associated with perioperative transfusion: 0% complication rate in patients receiving<2 units of packed red blood cells versus 32.3% (20 of 62) in patients receiving>/=2 units. The blood conservation strategy had no significant impact on mortality (p = 0.4) or major complications (p = 0.9) despite the blood conservation patients having a higher incidence of aortic dissection and urgent/emergent procedures and lower preoperative and discharge hemoglobin. In patients with aortic aneurysms, BCS patients received 1.5 fewer units of red blood cells (58% reduction) than non-BCS patients (p = 0.01). Independent risk factors for transfusion were lower preoperative hemoglobin (p<0.01, OR 1.5) and lack of BCS (p = 0.02, OR 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines for blood conservation should be considered for high-risk complex aortic surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: Systolic anterior motion (SAM) can occur after mitral valve repair (MVr), most frequently in patients with degenerative valve disease. Our initial observations (1981-1990) revealed that most patients with SAM can be successfully treated medically. Here the authors review the last 16 years of their experience with SAM after MVr. METHODS: Between January 1996 and October 2011, 1918 patients with degenerative mitral valve disease underwent MVr at our institution. We performed a retrospective analysis of SAM in this patient population. RESULTS: The incidence of SAM was 4.6% (89 of 1918) overall, 4.0% (77 of 1906) in patients who did not have SAM preoperatively (de novo). Compared with our previously published report, the incidence of SAM decreased from 6.4% to 4.0% (P = .03). Hospital mortality was 2.0% (38 of 1918) overall, 1.3% (14 of 1078) for isolated MVr. One patient with de novo SAM (1 of 77; 1.3%) died after emergency MVr. All patients with de novo SAM were successfully managed conservatively with intravenous fluids, alpha agonists, and/or beta blockers. A higher incidence of SAM was associated with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 60% (P = .01), posterior leaflet resection (P = .048), and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (P < .01). The incidence of SAM was lower in patients who underwent device mitral annuloplasty with a semirigid posterior band compared with a complete ring (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In the more recent era, SAM occurs one-third less frequently after repair of degenerative mitral valve disease. Use of an incomplete annuloplasty band rather than a complete ring is associated with a lower incidence of SAM. The mainstay treatment of SAM continues to be medical management.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Optimal repair of the mitral valve involves the implantation of an annuloplasty device to geometrically reshape and/or stabilize the annulus and improve long-term durability. It has been reported previously that trigone-to-trigone semi-rigid posterior band (PB) annuloplasty is associated with excellent short-term outcomes, physiologic motion of the anterior mitral annulus and leaflet, and lower postoperative transvalvular gradients compared to complete ring (CR) annuloplasty. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term effectiveness of PB and CR annuloplasty in patients with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Between 1993 and 2010, a total of 1,612 patients with degenerative MR underwent mitral valve repair (MVr) with either PB (n = 1,101) or CR (n = 511). Initially, CR was the annuloplasty device of choice, but after 2001 PB was preferred. A retrospective review of clinical and echocardiographic follow up was performed on these patients. The eight-year cumulative freedom from adverse events were determined by life-table analysis. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 1.9% overall (n = 30/1612), but 1.3% (12/939) for isolated MVr, and 2.7% (18/673) for MVr with concomitant procedures (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality was similar for both PB (1.9%; 21/1101) and CR (1.8%; 9/511) (p = 0.8). The mean MR grade was reduced from 3.9 +/- 0.3 preoperatively to 0.6 +/- 0.9 at follow up using PB (p < 0.01), and from 3.9 +/- 0.4 to 0.9 +/- 0.9 using CR (p < 0.01). PB was associated with a similar long-term freedom from death (77 +/- 0.03% versus 83 +/- 0.02%; p = 0.4), reoperation (95 +/- 0.01% versus 92 +/- 0.01%; p = 0.06), and reoperation or recurrent severe MR (91 +/- 0.02% versus 92 +/- 0.01%; p = 0.7), and slightly greater freedom from valve-related complications compared to CR (91 +/- 0.02% versus 87 +/- 0.02%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of mitral valve annuloplasty with PB was comparable to that with CR for degenerative disease. Anterior annuloplasty was found to be unnecessary in this patient population.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data in the literature concerning the effect of a blood conservation strategy (BCS) on aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 778 patients underwent AVR at a single institution. During this period, a multidisciplinary BCS was initiated with emphasis on limiting intraoperative hemodilution, tolerance of perioperative anemia, and blood management education for the cardiac surgery care providers. RESULTS: Mortality was 3.0% (23 of 778) overall and 1.7% (9 of 522) for isolated first-time AVR. There was no difference in rates of mortality (p = 0.5) or major complications (p = 0.4) between the pre-BCS and post-BCS groups; however, the BCS was associated with a lower risk of major complications (odds ratio, 1.7; p = 0.046) by multivariable analysis. The incidence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion decreased from 82.9% (324 of 391) to 68.0% (263 of 387; p < 0.01). Of those patients who did not receive any day-of-operation RBC transfusions, 64.5% (191 of 296) did not receive any postoperative RBC transfusions. Lower risk of RBC transfusion was associated with isolated AVR (p < 0.01), a minimally invasive approach (p < 0.01), and BCS (p < 0.01), whereas a greater risk of RBC transfusion was associated with older age (p < 0.01), prior cardiac operation (p = 0.01), female sex (p < 0.01), and smaller body surface area (p < 0.01). Day-of-operation RBC transfusion of 2 units or more was associated with increased deaths (p = 0.01), prolonged intubation (p < 0.01), postoperative renal failure (p = 0.01), and increased incidence of any complication (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative BCS reduced RBC transfusion in AVR patients without an increase in mortality or morbidity. Guidelines for BCS in routine cardiac operations should be extended to AVR patients.

OBJECTIVE: Recent Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (STS/SCA) guidelines highlight the safety of blood conservation strategies in routine cardiac surgery. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of such a program in complex aortic surgery. METHODS: Between March 2010 and October 2011, 63 consecutive aortic replacement procedures were performed: aortic root (n = 17; 27%), ascending aorta (n = 15; 23.8%), aortic arch (n = 19; 30.2%), descending aorta (n = 8; 12.7%), and thoracoabdominal aorta (n = 4; 6.3%). Aortic dissections were present in 32 patients. A multidisciplinary approach to blood conservation included minimal perioperative crystalloid, small priming circuits, hemoconcentration, meticulous hemostasis, and tolerance of postoperative anemia (hemoglobin of >/= 7mg/dL). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 11.1%. Multivariate predictors of mortality were low preoperative hematocrit (HCT, P = 0.05) and endocarditis (P = 0.021). Seventy-four percent of patients required no intraoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion. For nondissection patients, 80.6% required /= 2 U (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that a perioperative blood conservation management strategy can be extended to complex aortic surgery and is associated with better clinical outcomes.

In the 1990s, the success of 'minimally invasive' laparoscopic operations in other surgical subspecialties sparked an interest in minimally-invasive approaches for cardiac surgery, specifically for mitral valve repair. In 1996 at New York University (NYU) we began our experience with minimally invasive mitral valve repair performed through a small right anterior mini-thoracotomy incision using the Port-Access system in a phase I clinical trial. This was the beginning of our extensive right mini-thoracotomy experience for mitral valve repair at NYU. Currently at our institution the preferred approach for the right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve surgery is through the 3rd or 4th interspace mini-thoracotomy incision. Perfusion is accomplished with direct aortic or femoral cannulation, long femoral venous cannula drainage, and a retrograde cardioplegia catheter placed trans-atrialy in the coronary sinus under TEE guidance. An antegrade cardioplegia and venting needle is placed in the ascending aorta and direct external aortic clamping is achieved with one of several specialized crossclamps. With over four decades of experience, more than 4,000 patients have undergone mitral valve repair at NYU including 1,922 performed through a right mini-thoracotomy. We have reported an overall operative mortality of 1.3%, 8-year freedom from reoperation of 95%, freedom from reoperation or severe recurrent mitral regurgitation of 93%, and freedom from all valve-related complications of 90% for our initial series of 1,071 right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Based on our extensive experience we believe that mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy provides a durable and safe alternative to a traditional sternotomy with the benefits of improved cosmesis, reduced post-operative pain, less blood loss with fewer blood transfusions, fewer infections, shorter length of stay, and faster return to activity. It is our standard of care approach for mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a standard technique to perform mitral valve surgery in many cardiac centers. However, there remains a question regarding when MIMVS should not be performed due to an increased surgical risk. Consequently, expert surgeons were surveyed regarding their opinions on patient factors, mitral valve pathology and surgical skills in MIMVS. METHODS: Surgeons experienced in MIMVS were identified through an electronic search of the literature. A link to an online survey platform was sent to all surgeons, as well as two follow-up reminders. Survey responses were then submitted to a central database and analyzed. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 20 surgeons. Overall results were not uniform with regard to contraindications to performing MIMVS. Some respondents do not consider left atrial enlargement (95% of surgeons), complexity of surgery (75%), age (70%), aortic calcification (70%), EuroSCORE (60%), left ventricular ejection fraction (55%), or obesity (50%) to be contraindication to surgery. Ninety percent of respondents believe more than 20 cases are required to gain familiarity with the procedure, while 85% believe at least one MIMVS case needs to be performed per week to maintain proficiency. Eighty percent recommend establishment of multi-institutional databases and standardized surgical mentoring courses, while 75% believe MIMVS should be incorporated into current training programs for trainees. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MIMVS has been accepted as a treatment option for patients with mitral valve pathologies according the expert panel. Initial training and continuing practice is recommended to maintain proficiency, as well as further research and formalization of training programs.