Faculty Bibliography

Background: Potassium citrate is a mainstay of treatment to prevent recurrent calcium-containing kidney stones. However, it can increase urine pH and calcium phosphate (CaP) supersaturation (SS). HCA, extracted from Garcinia cambogia, is a potent inhibitor of calcium oxalate crystal growth in vitro and should not provide "potential base", as citrate does. Urine excretion of HCA has not been well-studied.
Method(s): We enrolled 2 groups: calcium stone formers (SF; n = 9) and non-stone forming (NSF, n = 9) controls (after excluding 2 SF and 2 NSF whose urine creatinine excretion on the 2 collections differed by more than 20%). Mean age 49.3 years. Thiazides and citrate were held for 2 weeks prior to study. Participants recorded a self-selected diet for 2 days and performed 24-hour urine collection on day 2. HCA was purchased online from Amazon.com (Super CitriMax Garcinia Cambogia); 2 caps = 900 mg of HCA. Participants took 900 mg 3 times daily orally for 7 days. Diet from days 1 and 2 was replicated on day 6 and 7 of the HCA arm of the study. 24-hour urine was collected on day 7. Urine was sent to Litholink, Inc. (Chicago, IL) for analysis. Urinary excretion of hydroxycitrate and citrate were measured using LC/MS.
Result(s): According to label, 6 pills would provide 2700 mg (13.2 mmol) of HCA per day; we measured content as 3198 mg (15.6 mmol). Citrate content is supposed to be 0, but we found 126 mg (0.66 mmol) per day. Both NSF and SF had appearance of HCA in the urine: 1.86 +/- 0.80 and 2.07 +/- 0.67 mmol/day (p = 0.56). Urine chemistry seen in Table 1. In NSF, pH and citrate did not change. In SF, pH increased, citrate did not. K went up in both groups.
Conclusion(s): Administration of HCA, a potential inhibitor of Ca stone formation, leads to significant urinary HCA excretion. Citrate excretion was not affected. Urine pH increased, suggesting some alkalinizing effect. The difference in NSF and SF may be due to the lower starting pH in SF. The effect of HCA on stone formation remains to be determined. (Figure Presented)

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic strained hospital resources in New York City, including those for providing dialysis. New York University Medical Center and affiliations, including New York City Health and Hospitals/Bellevue, developed a plan to offset the increased needs for KRT. We established acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) capability, as usual dialysis modalities were overwhelmed by COVID-19 AKI. Methods:Observational study of patients requiring KRT admitted to Bellevue Hospital during the COVID surge. Bellevue Hospital is one of the largest public hospitals in the United States, providing medical care to an underserved population. There were substantial staff, supplies, and equipment shortages. Adult patients admitted with AKI who required KRT were considered for PD. We rapidly established an acute PD program. A surgery team placed catheters at the bedside in the intensive care unit; a nephrology team delivered treatment. We provided an alternative to hemodialysis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration for treating patients in the intensive-care unit, demonstrating efficacy with outcomes comparable to standard care. Results:From April 8, 2020 to May 8, 2020, 39 catheters were placed into ten women and 29 men. By June 10, 39% of the patients started on PD recovered kidney function (average ages 56 years for men and 59.5 years for women); men and women who expired were an average 71.8 and 66.2 years old. No episodes of peritonitis were observed; there were nine incidents of minor leaking. Some patients were treated while ventilated in the prone position. Conclusions:Demand compelled us to utilize acute PD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience is one of the largest recently reported in the United States of which we are aware. Acute PD provided lifesaving care to acutely ill patients when expanding current resources was impossible. Our experience may help other programs to avoid rationing dialysis treatments in health crises.