Faculty Bibliography

Major depressive disorder (MDD) contributes to a significant worldwide disease burden, expected to be second only to heart disease by 2050. However, accurate diagnosis has been a historical weakness in clinical psychiatry. As a result, there is a demand for diagnostic modalities with greater objectivity that could improve on current psychiatric practice that relies mainly on self-reporting of symptoms and clinical interviews. Over the past two decades, literature on a growing number of putative biomarkers for MDD increasingly suggests that MDD patients have significantly different biological profiles compared to healthy controls. However, difficulty in elucidating their exact relationships within depression pathology renders individual markers inconsistent diagnostic tools. Consequently, further biomarker research could potentially improve our understanding of MDD pathophysiology as well as aid in interpreting response to treatment, narrow differential diagnoses, and help refine current MDD criteria. Representative of this, multiplex assays using multiple sources of biomarkers are reported to be more accurate options in comparison to individual markers that exhibit lower specificity and sensitivity, and are more prone to confounding factors. In the future, more sophisticated multiplex assays may hold promise for use in screening and diagnosing depression and determining clinical severity as an advance over relying solely on current subjective diagnostic criteria. A pervasive limitation in existing research is heterogeneity inherent in MDD studies, which impacts the validity of biomarker data. Additionally, small sample sizes of most studies limit statistical power. Yet, as the RDoC project evolves to decrease these limitations, and stronger studies with more generalizable data are developed, significant advances in the next decade are expected to yield important information in the development of MDD biomarkers for use in clinical settings.

Background: Numerous studies have suggested that the APOE e4 allele, an established risk factor for AD, may act synergistically with depression to increase the risk for progressive cognitive decline and conversion to MCI/AD. However, these findings remain controversial and have been reported inconsistently. A possible reason for these conflicting results is differences in methodologies across studies, including differences in the definition of depression, failure to properly diagnose depression or AD, short duration of follow up, differences in age, and possible inclusion of individuals with preexisting cognitive decline or MCI. These considerations prompted us to conduct a 3-year longitudinal prospective study in cognitively intact elderly individuals, who either had a diagnosis of MDD or were healthy controls, to determine if e4 and depression interacted with respect to progressive cognitive decline. We focused primarily on neurobehavioral tests sensitive to early AD and also examined the CSF total tau/Ab42 ratio, which has been linked to incident MCI/AD-related decline. Methods: 91 participants were included in this study, 60 older and with an MMSE score of at least 28 at the beginning of the 3-year longitudinal investigation. 45 participants had a diagnosis of MDD. APOE status and CSF AD biomarkers were determined at baseline and participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that included the Buschke Selective Reminding Test and the Boston Naming Task. Regression models examining change scores from baseline to follow-up were employed to test our hypotheses. Results: Adjusting for age and MMSE score, elderly participants with depression and carrying APOE e4 showed greater decline on average in the Boston Naming Task (p < 0.01) and a trend with high imagery performance (p = 0.05). A higher CSF total tau/Ab42 ratio was associated with decline in memory performance among depressed subjects (r =-0.45, p = 0.03, n = 23), regardless of APOE status, but not in controls. Conclusions: Our results indicate that cognitively intact depressive e4 carriers have greater decline in selective cognitive tests especially in a confrontation naming task even during a relatively short three year longitudinal period compared to controls. Additionally, increased brain AD pathology as reflected by the CSF tau/Ab42 ratio appeared to be associated with greater decline in memory performance in all depressives, regardless of APOE e4 status

Background: A common method of evaluating memory involves list learning in which the items to be remembered are presented in a temporal sequence. Studies of serial position have highlighted the importance of the order of presentation, but little attention has been paid so far to the order of recall. Following from the work of Kahana and colleagues (e.g., Kahana, 1996; Howard & Kahana, 1999), we have developed two memory indices for neuropsychological tests of memory to examine order of recall and use of temporal context. These are output order (i.e., the first item recalled) and output order variability (i.e., the temporal distance between the first four recalled items). We tested two hypotheses in separate cohorts: 1) whether these indices were correlated with generalized cognitive ability, and 2) whether they were associated with gray matter hippocampal volumes. Methods: To test hypothesis 1, we conducted ordinal and linear regression analyses on data from the Memory Evaluation Research Initiative (MERI), which comprised 680 participants, aged 60 or above. Memory performance was measured with the Rey's AVLT and we included only participants who recalled at least one item; generalized cognitive ability was measured with the MMSE. To test hypothesis 2, we analysed data from a sample of 81 cognitively intact individuals aged 60 or over. Memory was measured with the BSRT and hippocampal volume was extracted from MRI images using an automated volumetric approach. Results: Output order and variability correlated with MMSE scores only in the delayed trial, but not in the immediate trial: higher MMSE scores were associated with starting recall nearer the primacy position, and with less variability. Similarly, variability in the delayed trial correlated (negatively) with hippocampal size. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the hippocampus may be involved in coding the temporal context of the learning episode, and that measuring the ability to employ temporal information can be useful to predict future cognitive performance

Background: Volumetric analyses of MRI data have been employed to predict conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD), and individuals with preclinical AD tend to show atrophy in the right medial temporal lobe, which includes the hippocampus. In this study, we set out to compare a volumetric measurement of the hippocampus to a newly developed measure of hippocampal integrity in their respective potential for prediction of generalized cognitive performance (MMSE) over time. Methods: Ninety participants, who were cognitively intact at baseline and aged 60 or older, were recruited for a study on major depressive disorder (MDD) and tested twice, over three years. Linear regression models were applied to the data with the change in MMSE score as outcome, and hippocampal integrity (HI), hippocampal volume (HV), age and MDD status among the predictors. HI was measured for the left and right hippocampi as the ratio of the parenchymal voxels to the total number of voxels in an automatically determined hippocampus ROI. The ROI was determined by local affine registration of 65 previously delineated hippocampus atlases to the test subject. HVs were extracted from MRI images using an automated volumetric approach. Results: Change in MMSE performance was significantly predicted by both integrity and volume: greater HI and HV values were associated with less decline. However, when comparing predictors' contributions to the models, HI was slightly better than HV for the right side, and explained more of the variance in MMSE performance; HI and HV contributions were largely comparable for the left side. Conclusions: More research is needed to evaluate whether hippocampal integrity or hippocampal volume is a more accurate predictor of cognitive decline, but tentative results from this study appear to suggest that right side HI measures have the potential to be sensitive to future changes in general cognitive ability

Background: The APOE e4 allele, an established risk factor for AD, may act synergistically with depression to increase the risk for progressive cognitive decline and conversion to MCI/AD. However, these findings have been reported inconsistently. Methodological differences across studies, including in the definition of depression, failure to properly diagnose depression or AD, short duration of follow up, and possible inclusion of individuals with preexisting cognitive decline or MCI. These considerations prompted us to conduct a 3-year longitudinal prospective study in cognitively intact elderly individuals, who either had a diagnosis of MDD or were healthy controls, to determine if e4 and depression interacted with respect to progressive cognitive decline. We focused primarily on neurobehavioral tests sensitive to early AD and also examined the CSF total tau/Abeta42 ratio, which has been linked to incident MCI/AD-related decline. Methods: 91 participants were included in this study, age 60 and older, with an MMSE 28 at the beginning of the 3- year longitudinal investigation. 45 participants had a diagnosis of MDD. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that included the Buschke Selective Reminding Test and Boston Naming Task at baseline and annually thereafter. APOE status on all and CSFAD biomarkers on a subset of subjects were determined at baseline. Regression analyses examining neuropsych change scores (baseline to follow-up) as functions of baseline characteristics. Results: Adjusting for age and MMSE score, participants with depression and carrying. Conclusions: Our results indicate that cognitively intact depressive e4 carriers have greater decline in selective cognitive tests especially in a confrontation naming task even during a relatively short three year longitudinal period compared to controls. Additionally, increased brain AD pathology as reflected by the CSF tau/Abeta42 ratio appeared to be associated with greater decline in memory performance in all depressives, regardless of APOE e4 status

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Volumes of hippocampus and cholinergic basal forebrain are associated with delayed recall performance and may modulate the effect of a muscarinic receptor antagonist on delayed recall in healthy volunteers. METHODS:We studied 15 older adults before and after the oral administration of a single dose of 1 or 2 mg of the preferential M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist trihexyphenidyl (Artane™) or placebo in a double-blind randomized cross-over design. Hippocampus and basal forebrain volumes were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS:We found a significant interaction between treatment and hippocampus volume and a trend level effect between treatment and anterior basal forebrain volume on task performance, with an attenuation of the association between volume size and performance with trihexyphenidyl. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest a reduction of delayed recall performance with increasing doses of the muscarinic antagonist that is related to an uncoupling of the association of task performance with cholinergic basal forebrain and hippocampus volumes.

BACKGROUND: Primacy performance in recall has been shown to predict cognitive decline in cognitively intact elderly, and conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Delayed primacy performance, but not delayed non-primacy performance, has been shown to be associated with hippocampal volume in cognitively intact older individuals. Since presence of neurofibrillary tangles is an early sign of AD-related pathology, we set out to test whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau had an effect on delayed primacy performance, while controlling for hippocampal volume and CSF Abeta 1-42 levels. METHODS: Forty-seven individuals, 60 or older and cognitively intact, underwent a multi-session study including lumbar puncture, an MRI scan of the head and memory testing. RESULTS: Our regression analyses show that CSF levels of hyperphosphorylated (P) tau are only associated with reduced delayed primacy performance when hippocampal volumes are smaller. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that hippocampal size may play a protective role against the negative effects of P tau on memory.

Delayed recall at the primacy position (first few items on a list) has been shown to predict cognitive decline in cognitively intact elderly participants, with poorer delayed primacy performance associated with more pronounced generalized cognitive decline during follow-up. We have previously suggested that this association is due to delayed primacy performance indexing memory consolidation, which in turn is thought to depend upon hippocampal function. Here, we test the hypothesis that hippocampal size is associated with delayed primacy performance in cognitively intact elderly individuals. Data were analyzed from a group (N=81) of cognitively intact participants, aged 60 or above. Serial position performance was measured with the Buschke selective reminding test (BSRT). Hippocampal size was automatically measured via MRI, and unbiased voxel-based analyses were also conducted to explore further regional specificity of memory performance. We conducted regression analyses of hippocampus volumes on serial position performance; other predictors included age, family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD), APOE epsilon4 status, education, and total intracranial volume. Our results collectively suggest that there is a preferential association between hippocampal volume and delayed primacy performance. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that delayed primacy consolidation is associated with hippocampal size, and shed light on the relationship between delayed primacy performance and generalized cognitive decline in cognitively intact individuals, suggesting that delayed primacy consolidation may serve as a sensitive marker of hippocampal health in these individuals.

BACKGROUND: The benzodiazepine lorazepam is widely utilized in the treatment of elderly individuals with anxiety disorders and related conditions. Negative effects of acute lorazepam administration on cognitive performance, especially memory, have been reported in both previously untreated elderly and in individuals who have received short term (up to three weeks) treatment with therapeutic doses. However, it remains unclear if these adverse cognitive effects also persist after long-term use, which is frequently found in clinical practice. METHODS: Cognitively intact elderly individuals (n=37) on long-term (at least three months) daily treatment with lorazepam were studied using a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study design. Subjects were administered their highest daily unit dose of lorazepam (0.25 - 3.00mg) or placebo on different days, approximately 1week apart in a random order, and were assessed on memory, psychomotor speed, and subjective mood states. RESULTS: Subjects had significantly poorer recall and slowed psychomotor performance following acute lorazepam administration. There were no significant effects on self-ratings of mood, sedation, or anxiety in the whole group, but secondary analyses suggested a differential response in subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced recall and psychomotor slowing that we observed, along with an absence of significant therapeutic benefits, following acute lorazepam administration in elderly long-term users reinforces the importance of cognitive toxicity as a clinical factor in benzodiazepine use, especially in this population.