Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The impact of morbid obesity (MO) on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when performed by high-volume (HV) surgeons has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess complication rates and implant survivorship in MO patients operated on by HV surgeons. METHODS:Patients undergoing primary, elective TKA between June 2011 and May 2022 with a HV surgeon (top 25% surgeons by the number of primary TKAs per year) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) into 3 groups: BMI ≥40 (MO), 30≤ BMI <40 (non-morbidly obese), and BMI <30 (nonobese) and 1:1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. Of the 12,132 patients evaluated, 1,158 were included in final matched analyses (386 per group). The HV surgeons performed a median of 104 TKAs annually (range, 90-173). RESULTS:The MO patients had significantly longer surgery duration (P = .006) and hospital lengths of stay (P < .001). The 90-day postoperative complications (P = .38) and readmission rates (P = .39) were comparable between groups. Rates of all-cause, septic and aseptic revision were similar between groups at two-year (P = .30, P = .15, and P = .26, respectively) and the latest follow-up (P = .36, P = .52, and P = .38, respectively). Improvement in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) scores at 6 months (P = .049) and one year (P = .015) was significantly higher in MO patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinical outcomes and complication rates following TKA by HV surgeons are comparable regardless of obesity status. The MO patients may benefit from referral to experienced surgeons to minimize procedural risks and improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

The process of giving and receiving feedback in orthopaedic surgery training programs is distinctly unique from any other job. Trainees are required to meet certain milestones, and faculty are responsible for the caliber of surgical skills of their graduating trainees, yet there are rarely standardized practices and guidance for providing real-time feedback. Furthermore, institutional educational programs for faculty on giving meaningful feedback are lacking. The purpose of this article was to understand how feedback is defined, how to appropriately involve the learner in the process to foster active engagement rather than destructive thinking, and to characterize important principles that can elevate one's learning and self-reflection to the fullest potential.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:To improve revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) prognosis and postoperative management, a better understanding of how non-elective and elective indications influence clinical outcomes is needed. We sought to compare ambulatory status, complication rates, and implant survival rates in patients who underwent aseptic rTHA for periprosthetic fracture or elective indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This retrospective study examined all aseptic rTHA patients with a minimum follow-up of two years at a single tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into two groups: fracture rTHA (F-rTHA) if the patient had a periprosthetic femoral or acetabular fracture, and elective rTHA (E-rTHA) if the patient underwent rTHA for other aseptic indications. Multivariate regression was performed for clinical outcomes to adjust for baseline characteristics, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess implant survival. RESULTS:A total of 324 patients (F-rTHA: 67, E-rTHA: 257) were included. In the F-rTHA cohort, 57 (85.0%) and 10 (15.0%) had femoral and acetabular periprosthetic fractures, respectively. F-rTHA patients were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing (40.3% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.049) and acute rehabilitation facilities (19.4% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.004). F-rTHA patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (26.9% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.033). Ambulatory status at three months postoperatively significantly differed (p = 0.004); F-rTHA patients were more likely to use a walker (44.6% vs. 18.8%) and less likely to ambulate independently (19.6% vs. 28.6%) or with a cane (28.6% vs. 41.1%). These differences did not persist at one and two years postoperatively. Freedom from all-cause re-revision (77.6% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.912) and re-revision due to PJI (88.1% vs. 91.9%, p = 0.206) were similar at five-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to rTHA performed for elective aseptic indications, fracture rTHA patients had poorer early functional outcomes, with greater need for ambulatory aids and non-home discharge. However, these differences did not persist long term and did not portend increased infection or re-revision rates.

BACKGROUND:The lower morbidity and mortality rate associated with increased surgeon and hospital volume may also correlate with improved patient-reported outcome measures. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using American Joint Replacement Registry data. METHODS:Using American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to 2020, 8,193 primary, elective TKAs with both preoperative and 1-year postoperative The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) scores were analyzed. This study was powered to detect the minimally clinical important difference (MCID). The main exposure variables were median annual surgeon and hospital volume. Tertiles were formed based on the median annual number of TKAs performed: low-volume surgeons (1 to 52), medium-volume (53 to 114), and high-volume (≥115); low-volume hospitals (1 to 283), medium-volume (284 to 602), and high-volume (≥603). The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of surgeon and hospital volume and demographics on achieving the MCID for KOOS-JR. RESULTS:The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR score for low-volume surgeons was 47.78 ± 13.50 and 77.75 ± 16.65, respectively, and 47.32 ± 13.73 and 76.86 ± 16.38 for low-volume hospitals. The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR score for medium-volume surgeons was 47.20 ± 13.46 and 76.70 ± 16.98, and 48.93 ± 12.50 and 77.15 ± 16.36 for medium-volume hospitals. The mean preoperative and 1-year postoperative KOOS-JR scores for high-volume surgeons were 49.08 ± 13.04 and 78.23 ± 16.72, and 48.11 ± 13.47 and 78.23 ± 17.22 for high-volume hospitals. No notable difference was observed in reaching MCID for KOOS-JR after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:An increased number of TKA cases performed by a given surgeon or at a given hospital did not have an effect on achieving MCID for KOOS-JR outcomes.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures are expected to grow exponentially in the upcoming years, highlighting the importance of identifying preoperative risk factors that predispose patients to poor outcomes. The present study sought to determine if preoperative healthcare events (PHEs) influenced outcomes following TKA. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent TKA at a single institution from June 2011 to April 2022. Patients who had a PHE within 90 days of surgery, defined as an emergency department visit or hospital admission, were compared to patients with no history of PHE. Patients who underwent revision, nonelective, and/or bilateral TKA were excluded. Chi-squared analysis and independent sample t-tests were used to determine significant differences between demographic variables. All significant covariates were included in binary logistic regressions used to predict discharge disposition, 90-day readmission, and 1-year revision. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .004) compared to patients without a PHE. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our results demonstrate that PHEs put patients at significantly greater risk of facility discharge, 90-day readmission, and 1-year revision. Moving forward, consideration of elective surgery scheduling in the context of a recent PHE may lead to improved postoperative outcomes. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Operating room air quality can be affected by several factors including temperature, humidity, and airborne particle burden. Our study examines the role of operating room (OR) size on air quality and airborne particle (ABP) count in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We analyzed all primary, elective TKAs performed within two ORs measuring 278 sq ft. (small) and 501 sq ft. (large) at a single academic institution in the United States from April 2019 to June 2020. Intraoperative measurements of temperature, humidity, and ABP count were recorded. p values were calculated using t test for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical values. RESULTS:91 primary TKA cases were included in the study, with 21 (23.1%) in the small OR and 70 (76.9%) in the large OR. Between-groups comparisons revealed significant differences in relative humidity (small OR 38.5% ± 7.24% vs. large OR 44.4% ± 8.01%, p = 0.002). Significant percent decreases in ABP rates for particles measuring 2.5 μm (- 43.9%, p = 0.007) and 5.0 μm (- 69.0%, p = 0.0024) were found in the large OR. Total time spent in the OR was not significantly different between the two groups (small OR 153.09 ± 22.3 vs. large OR 173 ± 44.6, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Although total time spent in the room did not differ between the large and small OR, there were significant differences in humidity and ABP rates for particles measuring 2.5 μm and 5.0 μm, suggesting the filtration system encounters less particle burden in larger rooms. Larger studies are required to determine the impact this may have on OR sterility and infection rates.

Reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important perioperative consideration. Though commonly used, the combined influence of tourniquets and adductor canal blocks (ACBs) on pain and opioid consumption is unknown. This study evaluated inpatient opioid consumption and pain between patients with TKA based on tourniquet and/or ACB use. Pain and opioid consumption were highest when a tourniquet, but no ACB was used, and lowest when an ACB, but no tourniquet was used - though absolute differences in pain scores were not clinically significant. Tourniquet and ACB use should be considered as part of TKA opioid-sparing protocols.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Surgeons with high volume (HV) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have seen better outcomes than low volume (LV) surgeons. However, literature regarding surgeon volume and outcomes in morbidly obese THA patients is scarce. This study examines the association between surgeon volume with THA in morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥40) and their clinical outcomes. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We retrospectively reviewed all morbidly obese patients who underwent primary THA at our institution between March 2012 and July 2020 with 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were compared between the HV (HVa, top quartile of surgeons with the highest overall yearly THA volume) and LV (LVa) surgeons. Similar analysis was run comparing HV of morbidly obese THA (HVo, top quartile of surgeons with the highest yearly morbidly obese THA volume) and LV of morbidly obese THA (LVo) surgeons. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Six hundred and forty-three patients and 33 surgeons were included. HVa surgeons had significantly shorter length of stay and increased home discharge. HVa and HVo surgeons had significantly shorter operative times. There were no significant differences in overall 90-day major and minor complications or clinical differences in patient-reported outcomes. Revision rates and freedom from revisions did not differ between groups at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:HVa surgeons had significantly lower length of stay and operative times and increased discharge to home. There was no significant decrease in complications or revisions in either comparison model. Complications, revision rates, and patient satisfaction in morbidly obese patients who undergo THA may be independent of surgeon volume.

BACKGROUND:Few studies have assessed how socioeconomic status (SES) influences patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the impact of patient median ZIP code income levels on PROMs after TKA. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients at our institution undergoing primary, unilateral TKA from 2017 to 2020. Patients who did not have one-year postoperative PROMs were excluded. Patients were stratified based on the quartile of their home ZIP code median income from United States Census Bureau data. There were 1,267 patients included: 98 in quartile 1 (median income ≤ $46,308) (7.7%); 126 in quartile 2 (median income $46,309-$57,848) (10.0%); 194 in quartile 3 (median income $57,849-$74,011) (15.7%); and 849 in quartile 4 (median income ≥ $74,012) (66.4%). We collected baseline demographic data, 2-year outcomes, and PROMs preoperatively, as well as at 12 weeks and one year, postoperatively. RESULTS:The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement was significantly higher in quartile 4 preoperatively (P < .001), 12 weeks postoperatively (P < .001), and one year postoperatively (P < .001). There were no significant differences in delta improvements of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement from preoperative to 12 weeks or one year postoperatively. There were no significant differences in lengths of stay, discharge dispositions, readmissions, or revisions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients from lower income areas have slightly worse knee function preoperatively and worse outcomes following TKA. However, improvements in PROMs throughout the first year postoperatively are similar across income quartiles, suggesting that patients from lower income quartiles achieve comparable therapeutic benefits from TKA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE/METHODS:Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND:Many studies have demonstrated that in patients whose primary language is not English, outcomes after orthopaedic surgery are worse compared to primary English speakers. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who prefer English as their first language versus those who prefer a different language. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary TKA from May 2012 to July 2021. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether English was their preferred primary language (PPL). Of the 13,447 patients who underwent primary TKA, 11,290 reported English as their PPL and 2,157 preferred a language other than English. Patients whose PPL was not English were further stratified based on whether they requested interpreter services. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the significance of perioperative outcomes while controlling for demographic differences. RESULTS:Our analysis found that non-English PPL patients had significantly lower rates of readmission (p=0.040), overall revision (p=0.028), and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA; p=0.025) within 90 days postoperatively. Sub analyses of the non-English PPL group showed that those who requested interpreter services had significantly lower one year revision (p<0.001) and overall MUA (p=0.049) rates. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results demonstrate that TKA patients who communicated in English without an interpreter were significantly more likely to undergo revision, readmission, and MUA. These findings may suggest that language barriers may make it more difficult to identify postoperative problems or concerns in non-English speakers, which may limit appropriate postoperative care.