Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Autoantibody seroconversion has been extensively studied in the context of COVID-19 infection but data regarding post-vaccination autoantibody production is lacking. Here we aimed to determine the incidence of common autoantibody formation following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and in healthy controls. METHODS:Autoantibody seroconversion was measured by serum ELISA in a longitudinal cohort of IA participants and healthy controls before and after COVID-19 mRNA-based immunization. RESULTS:Overall, there was a significantly lower incidence of ANA seroconversion in participants who did not contract COVID-19 prior to vaccination compared with those who been previously infected (7.4% vs 24.1%, p= 0.014). Incidence of de novo anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (CCP) seroconversion in all participants was low at 4.9%. Autoantibody levels were typically of low titer, transient, and not associated with increase in IA flares. CONCLUSIONS:In both health and inflammatory arthritis, the risk of autoantibody seroconversion is lower following mRNA-based immunization than following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Importantly, seroconversion does not correlate with self-reported IA disease flare risk, further supporting the encouragement of mRNA-based COVID-19 immunization in the IA population.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is part of a group of closely related clinical phenotypes ('psoriatic disease') that is defined by shared molecular pathogenesis resulting in excessive, prolonged inflammation in the various tissues affected, such as the skin, the entheses or the joints. Psoriatic disease comprises a set of specific drivers that promote an aberrant immune response and the consequent development of chronic disease that necessitates therapeutic intervention. These drivers include genetic, biomechanical, metabolic and microbial factors that facilitate a robust and continuous mobilization, trafficking and homing of immune cells into the target tissues. The role of genetic variants involved in the immune response, the contribution of mechanical factors triggering an exaggerated inflammatory response (mechanoinflammation), the impact of adipose tissue and altered lipid metabolism and the influence of intestinal dysbiosis in the disease process are discussed. Furthermore, the role of key cytokines, such as IL-23, IL-17 and TNF, in orchestrating the various phases of the inflammatory disease process and as therapeutic targets in PsA is reviewed. Finally, the nature and the mechanisms of inflammatory tissue responses inherent to PsA are summarized.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg vs placebo in a US-only population of biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS:CHOICE was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial conducted in the United States. Biologic-naive patients with PsA and psoriasis were randomized 2:2:1 to secukinumab 300 mg (n = 103), secukinumab 150 mg (n = 103), or placebo (n = 52). The primary objective was to show superiority of secukinumab 300 mg vs placebo in ACR20 response at week 16. Additional objectives included the effect of secukinumab on dactylitis, enthesitis, psoriasis, and safety. RESULTS:= .0011). Secukinumab 300 mg also led to greater ACR50/70 responses and improvements in other variables vs placebo. Responses were generally sustained over time. Patients with inadequate response to secukinumab 150 mg at weeks 16, 28, or 40 who received dose escalation to 300 mg experienced improved clinical response after uptitration. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. No inflammatory bowel disease was reported or new safety signals observed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Secukinumab 300 mg led to rapid and significant improvements over placebo in symptoms of PsA in this heavier population of US-only biologic-naive patients. Findings were consistent with previous studies and suggest that secukinumab 300 mg is a safe and efficacious first-line biologic treatment for patients with PsA.

At the 2021 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)- Collaborative Research Network (CRN) annual meeting, the GRAPPA-CRN group presented a number of project updates, including a pilot investigator-initiated study to evaluate liquid and tissue biomarkers associated with axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The GRAPPA-CRN session updated progress made with 3 parallel international research initiatives based on 3 previously defined unmet needs in PsA. The Health Initiatives in Psoriasis and PsOriatic arthritis ConsoRTium European States (HIPPOCRATES) is a European research consortium formed to address unmet clinical needs in PsA. The Preventing Arthritis in a Multi-Center Psoriasis At-Risk Population (PAMPA) is a US-based organization that has defined consensus terminology for preclinical phases of PsA and is interested in the transition process from psoriasis to PsA. An overview of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases (AMP AIM) program 2.0, a consortium including GRAPPA-CRN members that addressed these 3 unmet needs in PsA, was also presented.

At the 2021 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) annual meeting, a summary of the research conducted by the recipients of the 2020 GRAPPA Research Awards was presented by the awardees. The summary of the 4 presentations is provided here.

The second basic science session at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) annual meeting focused on 2 recent publications that have increased our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Data from the first publication, presented by Prof. Erik Lubberts, showed that interleukin (IL)-17A is produced by CD4+ and not CD8+ T cells in PsA synovial fluid following T cell receptor activation. These findings contrast with previously published data, which had suggested that CD8+ T cells are a prominent source of IL-17A. In further experiments, they showed that when CD8+ T cells were stimulated with paramethoxyamphetamine/ionomycin, relatively high levels of IL-17A were detected. Prof. Jose Scher presented work on the role of the microbiome in PsA and more specifically, on pharmacomicrobiomics. He demonstrated the baseline collection of genomes and genes from the microbiota community (the metagenome) can be used as predictor for future treatment response in early rheumatoid arthritis and also likely in PsA.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the association of biologic therapy use for psoriasis with incident psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis. METHODS:A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database between 2006 and 2017 among patients with psoriasis between the ages of 16 and 90 initiating a therapy for psoriasis (oral, biologic or phototherapy). The incidence of PsA was calculated within each therapy group. Multivariable Cox models were used to calculate the HR for biologic versus oral or phototherapy using biologics as a time-varying exposure and next in a propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS:Among 1 93 709 patients with psoriasis without PsA, 14 569 biologic and 20 321 cumulative oral therapy and phototherapy initiations were identified. Mean age was lower among biologic initiators compared with oral/phototherapy initiators (45.9 vs 49.8). The incidence of PsA regardless of therapy exposure was 9.75 per 1000 person-years compared with 77.26 among biologic users, 61.99 among oral therapy users, 26.11 among phototherapy users and 5.85 among those without a prescription for one of the target therapies. Using a multivariable adjustment approach with time-varying exposure, adjusted HR (95% CI) for biologic users was 4.48 (4.23 to 4.75) compared with oral or phototherapy users. After propensity score matching, the HR (95% CI) was 2.14 (2.00 to 2.28). CONCLUSIONS:In this retrospective cohort study, biologic use was associated with the development of PsA among patients with psoriasis. This may be related to confounding by indication and protopathic bias. Prospective studies are needed to address this important question.