Faculty Bibliography

Following the pivotal manuscript that outlined unique disease features half a century ago, investigators in the field of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have extrapolated clinical trial data and molecular insights from the more expansive experience in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As a result, many of the diagnostic approaches, imaging modalities, therapeutics and outcome measures paralleled (and at times became identical to) those developed for RA.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by systemic immune dysregulation. Over the past several years, advances in genetics, microbiology, immunology, and mouse models have revealed the complex interplay between the heritable and microenvironmental factors that drive the development of psoriatic inflammation. In the first of this two-part review series, the authors will discuss the newest insights into the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease and highlight how the evolution of these scientific fields has paved the way for a more personalized approach to psoriatic disease treatment.

Background/Purpose: Obesity is associated with poor response to treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), however, available data are mostly focused on tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) initiators with only a few studies that have examined this association with initiators of other therapies. There are even fewer studies with patient reported outcome (PRO) measures as the outcomes of interest in PsA treatment. The clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) is a composite measure of disease activity in PsA and the, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) are PROs used in PsA. We examined the association of obesity with change in cDAPSA, RAPID3, PsAID among patients with PsA initiating TNFi, interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL17i) and oral small molecules (OSM).
Method(s): Patients with PsA were enrolled in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium longitudinal cohort study in the US between 2016-2020, initiated therapy with either TNFi, IL17i or OSM and completed at least one follow up visit. Treatment response was assessed by change in cDAPSA, RAPID3, or PsAID. Patients were stratified based on body mass index category (normal weight = BMI 19 to < 25 kg/m², overweight = BMI 25 to < 30 kg/m², obese = BMI >= 30 kg/m²). Baseline characteristics were reported descriptively. BMI category and its association with change in the outcomes of interest was examined in univariable and age-and-sex adjusted linear regression models.
Result(s): A total of 310 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 52 and 56% were female. At baseline, the mean cDAPSA was 17.3 (SD 12.7), the mean PsAID was 3.6 (SD 2.2), the mean RAPID3 was 10.9 (SD 5.8). Baseline scores were overall similar when stratified by BMI category (Table 1). The mean change in cDAPSA was lowest among obese patients (-2.91 (SD 9.56) in normal BMI, -2.29 (SD 11.48) in overweight BMI, and -1.42 (SD 12.33) in obese BMI). The mean change in RAPID3 was lowest among obese patients (-1.53 (SD 4.50) in normal BMI, -1.69 (SD 4.47) in overweight BMI, and -0.26 (SD 5.46) in obese BMI). The mean change in PsAID was lowest among obese patients (-0.58 (SD 1.48) in normal weight BMI, -0.72 (SD 1.47) in overweight BMI, and -0.17 (SD 1.98) in obese BMI) (Figure 1). These differences were not statistically significant, potentially due to sample size. In unadjusted and age-and-sex adjusted analyses (Table 2), compared to the normal BMI category, obese patients had less improvement in cDAPSA, RAPID3 and PsAID. Similar numerical reduction in improvement was also found in the TNFi initiators although there was not a stepwise decrease in improvement with increasing BMI in IL17i nor OSM initiators.
Conclusion(s): The mean change in the selected outcome measures (cDAPSA, RAPID3, PsAID) was lowest among obese patients compared to the other BMI categories. Interestingly, this pattern was observed primarily among TNFi initiators as opposed to OSM or IL17i initiators (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: Patients with immune mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) have an inherently heightened susceptibility to infection and may be considered high risk for developing COVID-19. While data regarding the COVID-19 vaccine's immunogenicity in an immunocompetent adult population is rapidly emerging, the ability of IMID patients to adequately respond to these vaccines is not known. Here, we investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs on immunomodulatory treatment Methods: Patients with immune mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) have an inherently heightened susceptibility to infection and may be considered high risk for developing COVID-19. While data regarding the COVID-19 vaccine's immunogenicity in an immunocompetent adult population is rapidly emerging, the ability of IMID patients to adequately respond to these vaccines is not known. Here, we investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs on immunomodulatory treatment.
Result(s): The NY cohort baseline characteristics are found in Table 1. The Erlangen cohort consisted of 182 healthy subjects, 11 subjects with IMID receiving TNFi monotherapy, and 20 subjects with IMID on MTX monotherapy. In both cohorts, healthy individuals and those with IMID not on MTX were similar in age, while those IMID patients receiving MTX were generally older. In the NY cohort, of the healthy participants, 96.3% demonstrated adequate humoral immune response. Patients with IMID not on MTX achieved a similar rate of high antibody response rate (91.8%), while those on MTX had a lower rate of adequate humoral response (75.0%) (Figure 1A). This remains true even after the exclusion of patients who had evidence of prior COVID-19 infection (P= 0.014). Of note, 3 out of the 4 IMID patients receiving rituximab did not produce an adequate response. Similarly, in the Erlangen validation cohort, 98.3% of healthy controls, 90.9% of patients with IMID receiving TNFi monotherapy, and 50.0% receiving MTX monotherapy achieved adequate immunogenicity (Figure 1B). These differences remain significant when combining the cohorts, using a stricter definition of adequate response, and in a subgroup analysis by age. Cellular response was also analyzed in a subgroup of the NY cohort before and after second vaccination. Activated CD8+ T cells (CD8+ T cells expressing Ki67 and CD38) and the granzyme B-producing subset of these activated CD8+ T cells, were induced in immunocompetent adults and those with IMID not on MTX, but not induced in patients receiving MTX (Figure 2).
Conclusion(s): In two independent cohorts of IMID patients, MTX, a widely used immunomodulator for the treatment of several IMIDs, adversely affected humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Although precise cut offs for immunogenicity that correlate with vaccine efficacy are yet to be established, our findings suggest that different strategies may need to be explored in patients with IMID taking MTX to increase the chances of immunization efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, as has been demonstrated for other viral vaccines

Background/Purpose: Psoriasis (PsO) is an inflammatory, immune-mediated skin disorder affecting ~3% of the population worldwide. It is associated with multiple comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which occurs in up to a third of patients. While genes contribute to the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease, twin studies demonstrate substantial discordance in PsO and PsA, suggesting that epigenetics and environmental factors play a significant role. In fact, there is increasing evidence that the microbiome has an impact on psoriatic disease pathogenesis. However, prior investigations were performed in populations of unrelated individuals and could not discern environmental from genetic influences. To characterize the host-microbiome relationship, we studied the gut and skin microbiome of monozygotic (MZ) twins discordant for psoriatic disease in order to determine disease-specific microbial perturbations that are independent of host-genes.
Method(s): Stool and skin swabs were collected from subjects with psoriatic disease and their unaffected MZ twin siblings (pairs=9, n=18). Non-lesional (NL) or healthy skin was swabbed at three separate sites: bicep, scalp, and elbow/forearm. Fecal samples underwent shotgun metagenomic sequencing to deeply characterize the gut microbiome taxonomy and functional pathways at high resolution. Sequences were processed with the HUMAnN and MetaPhlAn2 pipelines. Skin swab samples underwent 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the cutaneous bacterial microbiome. Forward sequences were processed with the QIIME2 pipeline and SILVA reference database. Downstream computational analysis was performed using several libraries in R, including DESeq2.
Result(s): In gut samples, the relative abundance of Ruminococcus bromii species was significantly reduced and two pathways related to tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis were upregulated in psoriatic twins compared to their corresponding unaffected siblings (Fig 1; p< 0.05, Mann-Whitney). In NL skin samples from psoriatic twins, there was a significant reduction in alpha diversity and beta diversity differences in microbial communities of the scalp, but not the bicep or elbow/forearm, compared to healthy samples from unaffected twins (Fig 2A-B; p< 0.05, Mann-Whitney and Permanova). Differential analysis of taxa in the scalp identified a higher abundance of the Bacillales order and related taxa, as well as a lower abundance of the Deinococcus genus and related taxa in psoriatic twins compared to their unaffected siblings (Fig 2C; p< 0.05 with FDR correction).
Conclusion(s): This is the first study exploring microbial differences in MZ twins discordant for psoriatic disease. In agreement with our previous results, we found that Ruminococcus is reduced or virtually absent in the gut of psoriatic patients, and may therefore be associated with psoriatic disease. Additionally, we discovered that even healthyappearing NL skin of psoriatic subjects, particularly in the scalp, exhibited microbial perturbations and decreased diversity compared to unaffected twins. A further understanding of these changes and their downstream effects should shed light into the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease beyond genetic susceptibility

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex inflammatory disease with heterogeneous clinical features, which complicates psoriasis in 30% of patients. There are no diagnostic criteria or tests available. Diagnosis is most commonly made by identifying inflammatory musculoskeletal features in joints, entheses or the spine in the presence of skin and/or nail psoriasis and in the usual absence of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide. The evolution of psoriasis to PsA may occur in stages, although the mechanisms are unclear. In many patients, there may be little or no relationship between severity of musculoskeletal inflammation and severity of skin or nail psoriasis. The reason for this disease heterogeneity may be explained by differences in genotype, especially in the HLA region. New targeted therapies for PsA have been approved with additional therapies in development. These developments have substantially improved both short-term and long-term outcomes including a reduction in musculoskeletal and skin manifestations and in radiographic damage. With efforts underway aimed at improving our understanding of the molecular basis for the heterogeneity of PsA, a personalized approach to treating PsA may become possible.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of developing COVID-19 due to underlying immune abnormalities and regular use of immunosuppressant medications. We aimed to evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in patients with SLE with or without previous COVID-19-related symptoms or RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods/UNASSIGNED:For this analysis, we included patients with SLE from two cohorts based in New York City: the Web-based Assessment of Autoimmune, Immune-Mediated and Rheumatic Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (WARCOV) study; and the NYU Lupus Cohort (a prospective registry of patients at NYU Langone Health and NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue). Patients in both cohorts were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies via commercially available immunoassays, processed through hospital or outpatient laboratories. Patients recruited from the NYU Lupus Cohort, referred from affiliated providers, or admitted to hospital with COVID-19 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies as part of routine surveillance during follow-up clinical visits. Findings/UNASSIGNED:67 [24%] of 278). Other demographic variables, SLE-specific factors, and immunosuppressant use were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Of the 29 patients with COVID-19 previously confirmed by RT-PCR, 18 (62%) were on immunosuppressants; 24 (83%) of 29 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Of 17 patients who had symptoms of COVID-19 but negative concurrent RT-PCR testing, one (6%) developed an antibody response. Of 26 patients who had COVID-19-related symptoms but did not undergo RT-PCR testing, six (23%) developed an antibody response. Of 83 patients who had no symptoms of COVID-19 and no RT-PCR testing, four (5%) developed an antibody response. Among 36 patients who were initially SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, the majority maintained reactivity serially (88% up to 10 weeks, 83% up to 20 weeks, and 80% up to 30 weeks). Seven (70%) of ten patients with confirmed COVID-19 had antibody positivity beyond 30 weeks from disease onset. Interpretation/UNASSIGNED:Most patients with SLE and confirmed COVID-19 were able to produce and maintain a serological response despite the use of a variety of immunosuppressants, providing reassurance about the efficacy and durability of humoral immunity and possible protection against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Funding/UNASSIGNED:National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Bloomberg Philanthropies COVID-19 Response Initiative Grant.