Faculty Bibliography

Aims: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has gained popularity as a safe, reversible surgical treatment for morbid obesity. However, there are few studies and no consensus on revisional bariatric surgery for those patients in whom banding has failed. We analyzed results of conversion from LAGB to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion in one high-volume center. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was conducted on patients who had undergone conversion of LGB to a revisional bypass procedure during the time period January 2003 through November 2011. Data on patient demographics, surgical technique, pre- and post-operative complications, and weight loss (body mass index [BMI] and percent excess weight loss [%EWL]) were collected and analyzed. Results: We identified 76 patients at our institution who underwent conversion from LAGB to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; n = 62), biliopancreatic diversion (BPD; n = 12), or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS; n = 2). 69 of the 76 conversions (90.8%) were completed laparoscopically. 29/76 (38.2%) had required additional surgery prior to conversion for band-related complications including slippage, erosion, port migration, hiatal hernia, bowel obstruction, or leakage; all occurred at >;30 days. After conversion, the rate of complications requiring hospitalization was 27.6% (21/76); 14.5% (11/76) occurred at<30 days. There was one mortality. Mean time from band placement to conversion was 1439 +/- 661.4 days (range 245-3140). At time of conversion, mean BMI was 44.4 +/- 6.6 kg/ m², and mean %EWL was 12.21 +/- 20.7 (range 67-75). Following conversion, mean BMI and %EWL at 12 months, respectively, were 31.6 +/- 4.2 kg/m² and 55.2 +/- 24.7, at 24 months 33.6 +/- 5.6 kg/m² and 45.3 +/- 20.1, and at 36 months 33.0 +/- 7.5 kg/m² and 46.0 +/- 18.2. Conclusions: There is an increasing need for proven corrective solutions to failed LAGB. Our results show that con!

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is safe and effective. This less invasive option involving fewer incisions and umbilical approaches is coined as single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). Over the last 3 years, we performed 46 % of our LAGBs as SILS with excellent results. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 1,644 LAGBs performed between 2008 and 2010. A total of 756 were performed as SILS bands (46 %) and 888 as standard (non-SILS) (54 %). Data points compared include operative time, percent of excess weight loss at 1 and 2 years, complication, and re-operation rates. RESULTS: Groups were matched by age, initial BMI, and gender: 584 non-SILS and 710 SILS patients. The average operating time was 44.3 +/- 19.6 min for SILS and 51.1 +/- 19.4 min for non-SILS (p < 0.001). The 12-month percent excess weight loss (%EWL) for SILS was 45.0 +/- 19.1; it was 40.7 +/- 17.5 for non-SILS (p = 0.003). The 24 month %EWL for SILS was 54.4 +/- 16.3; it was 46.4 +/- 16.1 for non-SILS (p = 0.10). Complication rates were 5.6 % (40 of 710) for SILS and 4.5 % (26 of 584) for non-SILS (p = 0.34). The 30-day readmission/re-operation rates are 1 % (seven of 710) for SILS and 1.5 % (nine of 584) for non-SILS (p = 0.37). There was one death in the SILS group. CONCLUSIONS: We have been performing more SILS bands over time. Our operative times and weight loss figures show that it is an efficient and effective means of weight loss. Furthermore, the data also show that the SILS approach is safe and does not increase operative time. In conclusion, SILS laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective means of attaining weight loss in selected patients.

BACKGROUND: The need for revision after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) surgery has been reduced over the past 10 years with the introduction of the pars flaccida technique, delicate band tightening, and concurrent hiatal hernia repairs. However, band revision still occurs for as many as 5% of patients. Placement of a lesser-curvature gastrogastric suture distal to the band is one newer technique suggested to lower band slippage. To evaluate the worth of this technique, the authors have investigated two groups of patients in their practice: one group with the plication stitch and one group without it. METHODS: This retrospective review examined data for 1,365 LAGB patients collected prospectively by an institutional review board-approved database between July 2007 and May 2010. One surgeon did not perform the plication stitch (n = 776) and one did (n = 589). The surgical techniques were very similar. The majority of the patients had crural repair at the primary operation. Band revision rates were assessed. RESULTS: For 1,365 patients, LAGB was performed safely. The mean follow-up period was 22 months. The two groups were similar. The no-stitch group consisted of 776 patients (496 women, 64%) with a mean age of 42 years, a mean weight of 278 lb, and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.6 kg/m(2). The stitch group consisted of 589 patients (426 woman, 72%) with a mean age of 40 years, a mean weight of 278 lb, and a mean BMI of 44.8 kg/m(2). The no-stitch group had an estimated weight loss (EWL) of 44% at 12 months and 50% EWL at 2 years. The stitch group had 37% EWL at 12 months and 45% EWL at 2 years. Both groups had very low revision rates. The no-stitch group had 4 revisions in 776 patients (0.26%), and the stitch group had 9 revisions in 589 patients (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Adding gastrogastric plication sutures offers no benefit of reducing the rate of revision after LAGB surgery