Faculty Bibliography

Therapeutic advances for glioblastoma have been minimal over the past 2 decades. In light of the multitude of recent phase III trials that have failed to meet their primary endpoints following promising preclinical and early-phase programs, a Society for Neuro-Oncology Think Tank was held in November 2020 to prioritize areas for improvement in the conduct of glioblastoma clinical trials. Here, we review the literature, identify challenges related to clinical trial eligibility criteria and trial design in glioblastoma, and provide recommendations from the Think Tank. In addition, we provide a data-driven context with which to frame this discussion by analyzing key study design features of adult glioblastoma clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as "recruiting" or "not yet recruiting" as of February 2021.

Radiation therapy has long been a critical modality of treatment of patients with central nervous system tumors, including primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and meningiomas. Advances in radiation technology and delivery have allowed for more precise treatment to optimize patient outcomes and minimize toxicities. Improved understanding of the molecular underpinnings of brain tumors and normal brain tissue response to radiation will allow for continued refinement of radiation treatment approaches to improve clinical outcomes for brain tumor patients. With continued advances in precision and delivery, radiation therapy will continue to be an important modality to achieve optimal outcomes of brain tumor patients.

Background/UNASSIGNED:This secondary image analysis of a randomized trial of proton radiotherapy (PT) versus photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compares tumor progression based on clinical radiological assessment versus Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO). Methods/UNASSIGNED:Eligible patients were enrolled in the randomized trial and had MR imaging at baseline and follow-up beyond 12 weeks from completion of radiotherapy. "Clinical progression" was based on a clinical radiology report of progression and/or change in treatment for progression. Results/UNASSIGNED:= .04) groups. There were 31 (46.3%) discrepant cases of which 17 had RANO progression more than a month prior to clinical progression, and 14 had progression by RANO but not clinical criteria. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Based on this secondary analysis of a trial of PT versus IMRT for glioblastoma, while no difference in PFS was noted relative to treatment technique, RANO criteria identified progression more often and earlier than clinical assessment. This highlights the disconnect between measures of tumor response in clinical trials versus clinical practice. With growing efforts to utilize real-world data and personalized treatment with timely adaptation, there is a growing need to improve the consistency of determining tumor progression within clinical trials and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse gliomas are highly aggressive brain tumors that invariably relapse despite treatment with chemo-and radiotherapy. Treatment with alkylating chemotherapy can drive tumors to develop a hypermutator phenotype. In contrast, the genomic effects of radiation therapy (RT) remain largely unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the mutational spectra following treatment with RT in whole genome or exome sequencing data from 190 paired primary-recurrent gliomas from the Glioma Longitudinal Analysis (GLASS) dataset and 3693 post-treatment metastatic tumors from the Hartwig Medical Foundation (HMF).
RESULT(S): We identified a significant increase in the burden of small deletions following radiation therapy that was independent of other factors (P = 3e-03, multivariable log-linear regression). These novel deletions demonstrated distinct characteristics when compared to pre-existing deletions present prior to RT-treatment and deletions in RT-untreated tumors. Radiation therapy-acquired deletions were characterized by a larger deletion size (GLASS and HMF, P = 1.5e-04 and P = 6e-16, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test), an increased distance to repetitive DNA elements (P < 2.2e-16, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and a lack of microhomology at breakpoints (P = 6.6e-05, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Furthermore, mutational signature analysis confirmed the distinct genomic characteristics of RT-associated deletions when compared to deletions arising via homologous recombination deficiency or microsatellite instability. These observations suggested that canonical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ) was the preferred pathway for DNA double strand break repair of RT-induced DNA damage. Furthermore, RT resulted in frequent chromosomal deletions and significantly increased frequencies of CDKN2A homozygous deletions in IDHmut glioma (P= 1.9e-05, Fisher's exact test). Finally, a high burden of RT-associated deletions was associated with worse clinical outcomes (GLASS and HMF, P = 3.4e-02 and P < 1e-04, respectively; log-rank test).
CONCLUSION(S): Our results collectively suggest that effective repair of RT-induced DNA damage is detrimental to patient survival and that inhibiting c-NHEJ may be a viable strategy for improving the cancer-killing effect of radiotherapy. Furthermore, CDKN2A homozygous deletion at recurrence may be leveraged as a promising clinical biomarker of RT-resistance in IDHmut glioma. Taken together, the identified genomic scars as a result of RT reflect a more aggressive tumor with increased levels of resistance to follow up treatments

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS:ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS:Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

OBJECTIVE:Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain are living longer. The risk of new brain metastases when these patients stop systemic therapy is unknown. The authors hypothesized that the risk of new brain metastases remains constant for as long as patients are off systemic therapy. METHODS:A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing radiosurgery for brain metastases was analyzed. Of 606 patients with NSCLC, 63 met the inclusion criteria of discontinuing systemic therapy for at least 90 days and undergoing active surveillance. The risk factors for the development of new tumors were determined using Cox proportional hazards and recurrent events models. RESULTS:The median duration to new brain metastases off systemic therapy was 16.0 months. The probability of developing an additional new tumor at 6, 12, and 18 months was 26%, 40%, and 53%, respectively. There were no additional new tumors 22 months after stopping therapy. Patients who discontinued therapy due to intolerance or progression of the disease and those with mutations in RAS or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways (e.g., KRAS, EGFR) were more likely to develop new tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.81, p = 2.5 × 10-3; HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.45-4.34, p = 9.8 × 10-4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:The rate of new brain metastases from NSCLC in patients off systemic therapy decreases over time and is uncommon 2 years after cessation of cancer therapy. Patients who stop therapy due to toxicity or who have RAS or RTK pathway mutations have a higher rate of new metastases and should be followed more closely.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Healthcare data often exist in silos and in unstructured formats that limit interoperability and require tedious manual extraction. Our institution has adopted a flexible and scalable big data platform built on Hadoop that integrates data from Epic/Clarity as well as Aria and allows users to leverage modern data science tools to facilitate access. We hypothesize that a data analytics and visualization dashboard can be built using open-source tools that will (1) allow non-technical users to explore de-identified clinical data within our institutional big data platform and (2) connect with repositories of molecular data to demonstrate potential methods of integrating clinical and basic science data. MATERIALS/METHODS: De-identified patient-level radiation oncology data from the institutional big data platform (Hadoop) were extracted with the python packages pyodbc and pandas. For the purposes of this dashboard, radiation oncology specific clinical data elements were queried including the date of first radiation treatment, treatment location, treatment modality (SBRT, external beam, SRS, TBI, LDR/HDR brachytherapy), ICD10 codes, anatomic treatment site, number of fractions, treatment prescription, and dose per fraction. A python client connection with the publicly accessible instance of cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics was established using the Bravado library. Data transformation and cleaning was performed in python using panda's data frames. A web-based dashboard to facilitate user-defined visualizations was implemented using the Dash python library and interactive visualizations of subsets of extracted data were generated in real-time using the plotly plotting library.
RESULT(S): We developed a web-based dashboard that gives users without extensive programming expertise the ability to explore de-identified clinical data extracted from Hadoop. As proof of principle, the dashboard was used to visualize the clinical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiation oncology patient volumes, revealing a significant decline in new radiation treatments in April and May of 2020 (-54% and -36% compared to 2019) during the initial COVID-19 surge. Furthermore, the dashboard allows users to interact with the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics repository, which currently houses clinical and molecular data from 301 publicly available studies spanning 869 different cancer types. This interface with cBioPortal illustrates the potential for future integration of clinically meaningful sequencing results with clinical outcomes data.
CONCLUSION(S): We built an interactive web-based dashboard to enable general users' easy access to de-identified clinical data stored within the institutional big data platform. Additional data sources, including external molecular data can be connected to the dashboard allowing for future integration.
Copyright

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Despite maximal surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and re-treatment at re-occurrence, median overall survival time of glioblastoma (WHO grade IV, IDH wild-type) is estimated to be ~16 months. In glioma, DNA methylation states are the most predictive marker of overall survival and response to therapy. Our understanding of how epigenetic states, such as DNA methylation, are "mis-repaired" after DNA damage repair is scant, hampering our ability to understand how treatment associated DNA methylation alterations may drive tumor resistance and growth. MATERIALS/METHODS: Three different patient derived glioma stem cell (GSC) lines, in duplicates, were treated with 20 Gy in 10 fractions and allowed to recover prior to DNA methylation analysis with 850K methylation arrays. To analyze the methylation array data, we used RnBeads (version 2.4.0) and R (version 3.6.1) packages. We further focused our analysis to various genomic regions, including CpG islands, promoters, gene bodies and CTCF motifs to understand how methylation alterations may differ between these and other genomic contexts.
RESULT(S): We found differential methylation (pre-treatment vs. radiation treatment) changes among the genomic regions examined. Interestingly, we found differential methylation changes at CTCF motifs, which play important DNA-methylation dependent roles in gene expression and chromatin architecture regulation. Hierarchical clustering, PCA and MDS analysis amongst CpG islands, promoters, gene bodies and CTCF domains did not reveal strong inter-sample differences that segregated the samples on the basis of treatment status, suggesting radiation associated methylation alterations are context dependent.
CONCLUSION(S): Radiation treatment is associated with wide-spread alterations of DNA methylation states in this patient derived glioblastoma model. Such alterations may drive gene expression changes, or genomic architecture alterations, that lead to treatment resistance in the recurrent setting. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE: A.S. Modrek: None. R. Ezhilarasan: None. M. Snuderl: None. E.P. Sulman: None.
Copyright

Interferon (IFN) signaling contributes to stemness, cell proliferation, cell death, and cytokine signaling in cancer and immune cells; however, the role of IFN signaling in glioblastoma (GBM) and GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) is unclear. Here, we investigated the role of cancer-cell-intrinsic IFN signaling in tumorigenesis in GBM. We report here that GSCs and GBM tumors exhibited differential cell-intrinsic type I and type II IFN signaling, and high IFN/STAT1 signaling was associated with mesenchymal phenotype and poor survival outcomes. In addition, chronic inhibition of IFN/STAT1 signaling decreased cell proliferation and mesenchymal signatures in GSCs with intrinsically high IFN/STAT1 signaling. IFN-β exposure induced apoptosis in GSCs with intrinsically high IFN/STAT1 signaling, and this effect was abolished by the pharmacological inhibitor ruxolitinib and STAT1 knockdown. We provide evidence for targeting IFN signaling in a specific sub-group of GBM patients. IFN-β may be a promising candidate for adjuvant GBM therapy.