Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI uses a 5-point scale to establish malignancy risk in sonographically-indeterminate adnexal masses. The management of O-RADS MRI score 4 lesions is challenging, as the prevalence of malignancy is widely variable (5-90%). We assessed imaging features that may sub-stratify O-RADS MRI 4 lesions into malignant and benign subgroups. METHOD/METHODS:Retrospective single-institution study of women with O-RADS MRI score of 4 adnexal masses between April 2021-August 2022. Imaging findings were assessed independently by 2 radiologists according to the O-RADS lexicon white paper. MRI and clinical findingswere compared between malignant and benign adnexal masses, and inter-reader agreement was calculated. RESULTS:Seventy-four women (median age 52 years, IQR 36-61) were included. On pathology, 41 (55.4%) adnexal masses were malignant. Patients with malignant masses were younger (p = 0.02) with higher CA-125 levels (p = 0.03). Size of solid tissue was greater in malignant masses (p = 0.01-0.04). Papillary projections and larger solid portion were more common in malignant lesions; irregular septations and predominantly solid composition were more frequent in benign lesions (p < 0.01). Solid tissue of malignant lesions was more often hyperintense on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging (p ≤ 0.03). Other imaging findings were not significantly different (p = 0.09-0.77). Inter-reader agreement was excellent-good for most features (ICC = 0. 662-0.950; k = 0. 650-0.860). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Various MRI and clinical features differed between malignant and benign O-RADS MRI score 4 adnexal masses. O-RADS MRI 4 lesions may be sub-stratified (high vs low risk) based on solid tissue characteristics and CA-125 levels.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare the interreader agreement of a novel quality score, called the Radiological Image Quality Score (RI-QUAL), to a slighly modified version of the existing Prostate Imaging Quality (mPI-QUAL) score for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate. METHODS:A total of 43 consecutive scans were evaluated by two subspecialized radiologists who assigned scores using both the RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL methods. The interreader agreement was analyzed using three statistical methods: concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's kappa. Time needed to arrive at a quality judgment was measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS:The interreader agreement for RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL scores was comparable, as evidenced by the high CCC (0.76 vs. 0.77, p = 0.93), ICC (0.86 vs. 0.87, p = 0.93), and moderate Cohen's kappa (0.61 vs. 0.64, p = 0.85) values. Moreover, RI-QUAL assessment was faster than mPI-QUAL (19 vs. 40 s, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:RI-QUAL is a new quality score that has comparable interreader agreement to the mPI-QUAL score, but with the potential to be applied to different MRI protocols and even different modalities. Like PI-QUAL, RI-QUAL may also facilitate communication about quality to referring physicians, as it provides a standardized and easily interpretable score. Further studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of RI-QUAL in larger patient cohorts and for other imaging modalities.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aims of this study were to determine whether ComBat harmonization improves multiclass radiomics-based tissue classification in technically heterogeneous MRI data sets and to compare the performances of 2 ComBat variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:One hundred patients who had undergone T1-weighted 3D gradient echo Dixon MRI (2 scanners/vendors; 50 patients each) were retrospectively included. Volumes of interest (2.5 cm3) were placed in 3 disease-free tissues with visually similar appearance on T1 Dixon water images: liver, spleen, and paraspinal muscle. Gray-level histogram (GLH), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM), and gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM) radiomic features were extracted. Tissue classification was performed on pooled data from the 2 centers (1) without harmonization, (2) after ComBat harmonization with empirical Bayes estimation (ComBat-B), and (3) after ComBat harmonization without empirical Bayes estimation (ComBat-NB). Linear discriminant analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation was used to distinguish among the 3 tissue types, using all available radiomic features as input. In addition, a multilayer perceptron neural network with a random 70%:30% split into training and test data sets was used for the same task, but separately for each radiomic feature category. RESULTS:Linear discriminant analysis-based mean tissue classification accuracies were 52.3% for unharmonized, 66.3% for ComBat-B harmonized, and 92.7% for ComBat-NB harmonized data. For multilayer perceptron neural network, mean classification accuracies for unharmonized, ComBat-B-harmonized, and ComBat-NB-harmonized test data were as follows: 46.8%, 55.1%, and 57.5% for GLH; 42.0%, 65.3%, and 71.0% for GLCM; 45.3%, 78.3%, and 78.0% for GLRLM; and 48.1%, 81.1%, and 89.4% for GLSZM. Accuracies were significantly higher for both ComBat-B- and ComBat-NB-harmonized data than for unharmonized data for all feature categories (at P = 0.005, respectively). For GLCM (P = 0.001) and GLSZM (P = 0.005), ComBat-NB harmonization provided slightly higher accuracies than ComBat-B harmonization. CONCLUSIONS:ComBat harmonization may be useful for multicenter MRI radiomics studies with nonbinary classification tasks. The degree of improvement by ComBat may vary among radiomic feature categories, among classifiers, and among ComBat variants.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate MRI features of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and their association with survival. METHODS:This retrospective single-center study included 59 patients with sarcomatoid RCC who underwent MRI before nephrectomy during July 2003-December 2019. Three radiologists reviewed MRI findings of tumor size, non-enhancing areas, lymphadenopathy, and volume (and percentage) of T2 low signal intensity areas (T2LIA). Clinicopathological factors of age, gender, ethnicity, baseline metastatic status, pathological details (subtype and extent of sarcomatoid differentiation), treatment type, and follow-up were extracted. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS:Forty-one males and eighteen females (median age 62 years; interquartile range 51-68) were included. T2LIAs were present in 43 (72.9%) patients. At univariate analysis, clinicopathological factors associated with shorter survival were: greater tumor size (> 10 cm; HR [hazard ratio] = 2.44, 95% CI 1.15-5.21; p = 0.02), metastatic lymph nodes (present; HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.01-4.37; p = 0.04), extent of sarcomatoid differentiation (non-focal; HR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.55-7.01; p < 0.01), subtypes other than clear cell, papillary, or chromophobe (HR = 3.25, 95% CI 1.28-8.20; p = 0.01), and metastasis at baseline (HR = 5.04, 95% CI 2.40-10.59; p < 0.01). MRI features associated with shorter survival were: lymphadenopathy (HR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.16-4.71; p = 0.01) and volume of T2LIA (> 3.2 mL, HR = 4.22, 95% CI 1.92-9.29); p < 0.01). At multivariate analysis, metastatic disease (HR = 6.89, 95% CI 2.79-16.97; p < 0.01), other subtypes (HR = 9.50, 95% CI 2.81-32.13; p < 0.01), and greater volume of T2LIA (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.04-6.05; p = 0.04) remained independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:T2LIAs were present in approximately two thirds of sarcomatoid RCCs. Volume of T2LIA along with clinicopathological factors were associated with survival.

PURPOSE:To explore ways to improve O-RADS MRI scoring for fat-containing adnexal masses, by investigating methods for quantifying solid tissue volume and fat distribution and evaluating their associations with malignancy. METHODS:), and fat distribution. Wilcoxon test, Fisher-exact test, and ROC curve analysis were performed. Reference standard was pathology or follow-up > 24 months. RESULTS:(R1, ≥ 1.2 cm; R2, ≥ 1.0 cm) yielded sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.93 (R1) and 0.76 and 0.95 (R2). Among immature teratomas, 85.7% displayed scattered fat. CONCLUSION:Overall size, size of (any or non-Rokitansky-nodule) solid tissue, and fat distribution differed between benign and malignant fat-containing adnexal masses. Incorporating these would constitute simple and practical approaches to refining O-RADS MRI scoring.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Prophet forecasting procedure, part of the Facebook open-source Artificial Intelligence portfolio, for forecasting variations in radiological examination volumes. Daily CT and MRI examination volumes from our institution were extracted from the radiology information system (RIS) database. Data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, was used for training the Prophet algorithm, and data from January 2020 was used for validation. Algorithm performance was then evaluated prospectively in February and August 2020. Total error and mean error per day were evaluated, and computational time was logged using different Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples. Data from 610,570 examinations were used for training; the majority were CTs (82.3%). During retrospective testing, prediction error was reduced from 19 to < 1 per day in CT (total 589 to 17) and from 5 to < 1 per day (total 144 to 27) in MRI by fine-tuning the Prophet procedure. Prospective prediction error in February was 11 per day in CT (9934 predicted, 9667 actual) and 1 per day in MRI (2484 predicted, 2457 actual) and was significantly better than manual weekly predictions (p = 0.001). Inference with MCMC added no substantial improvements while vastly increasing computational time. Prophet accurately models weekly, seasonal, and overall trends paving the way for optimal resource allocation for radiology exam acquisition and interpretation.

There has been an increasing role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of prostate cancer. MRI already plays an essential role in the detection and staging, with the introduction of functional MRI sequences. Recent advancements in radiomics and artificial intelligence are being tested to potentially improve detection, assessment of aggressiveness, and provide usefulness as a prognostic marker. MRI can improve pretreatment risk stratification and therefore selection of and follow-up of patients for active surveillance. MRI can also assist in guiding targeted biopsy, treatment planning and follow-up after treatment to assess local recurrence. MRI has gained importance in the evaluation of metastatic disease with emerging technology including whole-body MRI and integrated positron emission tomography/MRI, allowing for not only better detection but also quantification. The main goal of this article is to review the most recent advances on MRI in prostate cancer and provide insights into its potential clinical roles from the radiologist's perspective. In each of the sections, specific roles of MRI tailored to each clinical setting are discussed along with its strengths and weakness including already established material related to MRI and the introduction of recent advancements on MRI.

Prostate MRI is an integral part of the clinical work-up in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer, and its use has been increasing steadily over the last years. To further its general availability and the number of men benefitting from it and to reduce the costs associated with MR, several approaches have been developed to shorten examination times, e.g., by focusing on sequences that provide the most useful information, employing new technological achievements, or improving the workflow in the MR suite. This review highlights these approaches; discusses their implications, advantages, and disadvantages; and serves as a starting point whenever an abbreviated prostate MRI protocol is being considered for implementation in clinical routine.

OBJECTIVES:Urachal carcinomas (UrC) are rare non-urothelial bladder neoplasms, however the potential role for MR imaging in UrC has not been well established. Our objective was to assess the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in primary and recurrent UrC. METHODS AND MATERIALS:This retrospective single-center study included all patients with UrC that underwent MRI between January 2005 and May 2020. Two radiologists reviewed MRIs independently followed by consensus with a third radiologist. For primary UrC, tumor location, size, morphology, invasion of peritoneum and/or local structures other than bladder and concordance between Mayo stage on MRI and pathology were assessed. MRI performed for recurrent UrC evaluated the pattern of recurrence. The reference standard was histopathological analysis. RESULTS:Ninety-six patients with UrC were identified of which 17 were included (9 men and 8 women, median age 50 years [IQR 42-62]). At initial MR staging (n = 10), all primary UrC were located at the bladder dome with median longest axis dimension of 6.0 cm. Most (70%) were mixed solid-and-cystic. Invasion of the peritoneum and/or local structures other than bladder was identified in 30%. Concordance between consensus MRI Mayo stage and final pathologic Mayo stage was 90%. At MR restaging (n = 7), UrC recurrence was most commonly seen at the bladder dome (71%). Overall, MRI showed a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 50% for detecting recurrent tumor. CONCLUSION:MRI demonstrates value in evaluation of disease extent in primary and recurrent UrC, with high concordance between Mayo stage at MRI and pathology, and in the detection of local recurrences.