Faculty Bibliography

A consensus panel was formed to review the rapidly emerging literature on the vascular-specific inflammatory marker lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) and to update recommendations for the appropriate use of this novel biomarker in clinical practice. The recommendations of the panel build on guidelines of the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) and the American Heart Association/Centers for Disease Control (AHA/CDC) for cardiovascular risk assessment. Consistent with the ATP III guideline recommendations for the use of inflammatory markers, Lp-PLA(2) is recommended as an adjunct to traditional risk assessment in patients at moderate and high 10-year risk. A simplified framework for traditional Framingham risk factor assessment is proposed. As a highly specific biomarker for vascular inflammation, elevated Lp-PLA(2) levels should prompt consideration of increasing the cardiovascular risk category from moderate to high or high to very high risk, respectively. Because intensification of lifestyle changes and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering is beneficial in high-risk patients, regardless of baseline LDL cholesterol levels, consideration should be given to lowering the LDL cholesterol target by 30 mg/dL (1 mg/dL = 0.02586 mmol/L) in patients with high levels of Lp-PLA(2). Lp-PLA(2) is recommended as a diagnostic test for vascular inflammation to better identify patients at high or very high risk who will benefit from intensification of lipid-modifying therapies. However, at this time Lp-PLA(2) cannot be recommended as a target of therapy

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and the obesity epidemic combined with aging of the population seems destined to increase the burden of this disease. Traditional cardiovascular risk assessment accounts for <50% of the variability in risk in the United States. Therefore, better and more effective identification of persons at high cardiovascular risk is needed. Our understanding of atherosclerosis has shifted from a focal disease whose hallmark is symptoms caused by a severe stenosis to a systemic disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction (ED) and plaque inflammation, with the potential for rupture and thrombosis mainly in those with subcritical stenosis. Under the new paradigm, clinicians require updated strategies to better assess the quality of arterial plaque. Effective tools for primary and secondary prevention of heart attack and stroke include intensive lifestyle modification, blood pressure reduction, and lipid-modifying therapies. These interventions are now understood to decrease plaque inflammation and thereby promote plaque stability. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) appears to be a specific marker of plaque inflammation that may play a direct role in the formation of rupture-prone plaque. In contrast, traditional risk factors, lipid measurement, and most vascular imaging modalities do not directly assess the acute ischemic potential in the arterial wall. Measuring Lp-PLA(2) levels in human serum or plasma is noninvasive and relatively inexpensive. Lp-PLA(2) may provide additional clinically relevant information that shows which patients have a high level of atherosclerotic disease activity as manifested by vascular inflammation, ED, and increased risk for progression toward rupture-prone plaque

Fibrates are a class of lipid-lowering medication primarily used as second-line agents behind statins. Acting via the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-alpha, their main lipoprotein effects are to lower serum triglyceride levels and to raise high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, with modest effects on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. However, many clinical trials indicate that fibrates may have benefits beyond simply altering one's lipid profile. Several angiographic studies show retardation in the progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary vessels. Although clinical trials have failed to show a reduction in mortality with fibrates, several post hoc analyses indicate that there may be a mortality benefit in patients with features of the metabolic syndrome. Given that fibrates are often used as second-line agents, it is essential they are safe to be given in combination with other agents, particularly statins and ezetimibe. Although the side-effect profile of fibrates includes gastrointestinal symptoms, increased liver function tests, a reversible rise in creatinine and myositis, in general, fibrates seem to be safe to use in combination with other lipid lowering medications. Thus far, fibrates have not shown a mortality benefit in randomized clinical trials; as a result, they cannot be considered first-line medication for the primary or secondary prevention of coronary artery disease

During the past 25 years, the role of traditional 'risk factors' in the genesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease has been convincingly validated. The impact of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension, type II diabetes, and metabolic syndrome are now well accepted. However, until recently, there was guilt by association without a clear understanding of the manner in which the crime was committed. It is now acknowledged that the presence of multiple risk factors can increase the likelihood of an ischemic event. This has become a great concern, given the very high prevalence of patients who fall into this category. In light of this information, the mandate for appropriate guideline-driven therapy has become even stronger, and we must consider the use of multiple medications to effectively neutralize this risk

Background: Despite improvements in care, the prognosis for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) remains poor. Fifty percent of patients with CHF suffer from arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. This may be attributable in part to the use of medications that contribute to electrolyte imbalance. Objective: This article presents a case report of a woman with CHF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Results: The case report involved a 52-year-old white woman with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atypical chest pain, and dyslipidemia. Her medical treatment had included the use of furosemide (a loop diuretic), digoxin, and sotalol; she subsequently developed torsades de pointes (TdP). An electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm; the QT(c) interval was 530 msec. Levels of digoxin, K+, and Mg2+ were 1.8 ng/mL, 3.5 mEq/L, and 1.5 mEq/L, respectively. Results of a Holter monitor recording suggested that the hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia, interacting with the digoxin and sotalol, potentiated the development of a prolonged QT interval. To ensure the TdP did not recur, an IV bolus of Mg2+ was administered and oral triamterene therapy was added to the patient's current medications. These additions appeared to correct the electrolyte imbalance. Conclusion: This case exemplifies the importance of recognizing and managing electrolyte imbalance in the treatment of patients with CHF