Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:IPMN consensus guidelines make implicit judgments on what cancer risk level should prompt surgery. We used decision modeling to estimate this cancer risk threshold (CRT) for BD-IPMN patients. METHODS:We created a decision model to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) following surgery or surveillance for BD-IPMNs. We simulated treatment decisions for hypothetical patients, varying age, comorbidities and lesion location (pancreatic head/tail). The base case was a 60-year-old patient with mild comorbidities and pancreatic head IPMN. Probabilities, life expectancies, and utilities were incorporated from literature/public datasets. CRT was defined as the level of cancer risk at which the expected value of QALYs for surgery first exceeded that of surveillance. RESULTS:In the base case, surgery was preferred over surveillance, yielding 21.90 vs. 21.88 QALYs. The optimal CRT for a BD-IPMN patient depended on age, comorbidities, and location. CRT in the base case was 20 % and 3 % for an IPMN in the head and tail of the pancreas, respectively. Other drivers of preferred treatment were age and likelihood of postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:For BD-IPMNs, the optimal CRT varies depending on patient age and risk of surgical complications. Personalized risk threshold values could guide treatment decisions and inform future treatment consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate whether tangential versus segmental portomesenteric venous resection (PVR) impacts surgical and oncological outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with portomesenteric vein (PMV) involvement. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Current comparative studies on tangential versus segmental PVR as part of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer include all degrees of PMV involvement, including cases where tangential PVR may not be a feasible approach, limiting the clinical applicability. METHODS:International retrospective study in 10 centers from 5 countries, including all consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement on cross-sectional imaging at diagnosis (2014-2020). Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of tangential versus segmental PVR with overall survival (OS) from surgery, recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence, and in-hospital/30-day major morbidity, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS:Overall, 357 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with PVR were included (42% tangential PVR, 58% segmental PVR). The adjusted risk for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 23% (95%CI, 17-32) after tangential and 23% (95%CI, 17-30) after segmental PVR (P=0.98). After adjusting for confounders, PVR type was not associated with OS (HR=0.94 [95%CI, 0.69-1.30]), RFS (HR=0.94 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28), and locoregional recurrence (OR=0.76 [95%CI, 0.40-1.46]). CONCLUSIONS:In patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer with ≤180° PMV involvement, the type of PVR (i.e., tangential vs. segmental) was not associated with differences in surgical and oncological outcome. This suggest that if both procedures are technically feasible, surgeons can choose the type of PVR based on their preference.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to investigate prognostic factors in context of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and develop tools that can allow for accurate and personalized patient prognostication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:NAT might impact the prognostic ability of well-established clinicopathological factors in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS:Patients after resection for PDAC were identified from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group Recurrence Database and institutional databases at NYU Langone Health and the Johns Hopkins Hospital (2014-2019). Patients were stratified into NAT and chemo-naïve groups. Overall survival (OS), calculated from the time of resection, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using log-rank tests. Prognostic factors associated with OS were assessed in both groups using univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses and presented using hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Predictive models were developed and an interactive tool was created to predict survival independently in both groups. RESULTS:Of 2,760 patients with resected PDAC, 778 patients (28%) received NAT. Independent predictors for worse OS in chemo-naïve patients included age ≥65 years, markedly elevated CA19-9 (≥500 U/mL) at diagnosis, higher AJCC-T stage (T3/4 vs T1/2), worsening AJCC N-stage (N2 vs. N1 vs. N0), poor tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and microscopically positive resection margin (R1 vs. R0). Contrastingly, predictors for worse OS in NAT patients included non-normalization of CA19-9 after NAT (<37 U/mL), presence of nodal disease (N1/2 vs. N0 given no statistical difference between N1 and N2 disease), and grade of treatment response (moderate/poor vs. complete/near complete). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected PDAC differ between chemo-naïve and NAT patients. Personalized prediction tools for OS in resected PDAC based on these specific factors are available online (www.pancpals.com/tools).

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:En-bloc celiac axis resection (CAR) was first proposed by Lyon H. Appleby in 1952 for gastric cancer and later modified for pancreatic resections with gastric preservation by Nimura et al. in 1976. CAR remains uncommon, performed in fewer than 0.2 cases annually. Advancements in preoperative imaging and anatomy understanding, ischemic complication management, and centralization of care have improved outcomes. This report presents a robotic distal pancreatectomy (DP) with CAR and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) divestment. CASE REPORT/METHODS:A 65-year-old woman presented with back pain. Imaging revealed biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body, encasing the celiac, splenic, and common hepatic arteries with SMA abutment. Following four cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, follow-up imaging demonstrated stable disease without metastasis. The need for hepatic artery reconstruction was assessed intraoperatively, with alternative strategies detailed in the accompanying video. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE/METHODS:The patient underwent a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with class Ia CAR. Surgery was conducted in a caudal approach, lasted 420 minutes with minimal blood loss (100 ml). Laparoscopic ultrasound (lapUS) and indocyanine green (ICG) perfusion were used to assess resectability, vascular perfusion, and targeted blood vessels. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for a Grade B chyle leak managed conservatively. No liver or gastric ischemia occurred. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated two months postoperatively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Enhanced visualization, improved dexterity, and adjuncts including lapUS and ICG are potential benefits that are available to surgeons with the robotic platform when performing arterial divestment and CAR via a caudal approach.