Faculty Bibliography
Searched for:
in-biosketch:true
person:egolk01
Total Results:
753
Open knee joint injuries--an evidence-based approach to management
Open knee joint injuries are potentially devastating injuries if not properly diagnosed and treated. Current diagnostic techniques, such as the saline load test (SLT), are based on outdated literature. Diagnosis of traumatic arthrotomies via the presence of intra-articular air on computed tomography (CT) scan has recently been shown to be 100% sensitive and specific to detect these injuries. Additionally, open knee joint injuries have a high rate of associated periarticular fractures (51%). The workhorse open surgical approach to the knee is the medial parapatellar approach; however, arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) should be considered in the setting of small puncture wounds (e.g., gunshot wounds). Antibiotic therapy following I&D of an open knee joint injury includes 24 to 48 hours of intravenous antibiotics. Oral antibiotic therapy can be administered afterwards for 3 to 5 days if the original injury was grossly contaminated. Ultimately, a unified management algorithm for open knee joint injuries based on current literature should be followed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment of this potentially devastating injury.
PMID: 25150328
ISSN: 2328-4633
CID: 1299532
Evolution of atypical femur fractures and the association with bisphosphonates
For almost 15 years bisphosphonates have been the mainstay of prevention and treatment of fragility fractures, particularly in post-menopausal women. As a result, there has been a decrease in fragility fractures, along with the health care costs associated with treating them. However, with all drugs, there are always concerns with side effects and potential complications. Atypical femur fractures have been observed in women taking bisphosphonates, a complication the drug was designed to prevent. There is no definitive link between bisphosphonates and atypical femur fractures and no proto- col to managing these fractures. This review discusses the evolution and development of bisphosphonates and offers the latest information regarding evidence surrounding the link to atypical femur fractures.
PMID: 25150333
ISSN: 2328-4633
CID: 1299542
Atypical Femur Fractures: A Review
Bisphosphonates are one of the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of osteoporosis. Their use has greatly decreased the number of osteoporosis-related vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Recently, however, a relationship between long-term bisphosphonate use and subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures has been elucidated. These low-energy fractures, termed atypical femur fractures, exhibit unique characteristics in their pathophysiology, presentation, and radiographic appearance compared with more traditional high-energy femur fractures. Here we provide a review based on the most recent literature of the pathophysiology, presentation, evaluation, and management of these fractures. Despite an abundance of literature, atypical femur fractures remain difficult to treat, and surgeons must be aware of the tricks and complications associated with their management.
PMID: 25287009
ISSN: 1544-1873
CID: 1299782
Can the use of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip maintain quality at a reduced cost?
In March 2012, an algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip was introduced in our academic department of Orthopaedic Surgery. It included the use of specified implants for particular patterns of fracture. In this cohort study, 102 consecutive patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture were followed prospectively (post-algorithm group). Another 117 consecutive patients who had been treated immediately prior to the implementation of the algorithm were identified retrospectively as a control group (pre-algorithm group). The total cost of the implants prior to implementation of the algorithm was $357 457 (mean: $3055 (1947 to 4133)); compared with $255 120 (mean: $2501 (1052 to 4133)) after its implementation. There was a trend toward fewer complications in patients who were treated using the algorithm (33% pre- versus 22.5% post-algorithm; p = 0.088). Application of the algorithm to the pre-algorithm group revealed a potential overall cost saving of $70 295. The implementation of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures reduced costs while maintaining quality of care with a lower rate of complications and re-admissions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1192-7.
PMID: 25183589
ISSN: 2049-4408
CID: 1173752
Painful hardware. What to do?
Pain emanating from an orthopaedic implant can be a difficult problem to identify. Hardware removal frequently is performed with successful results but may not always lead to resolution of all symptoms. A combination of patient history, physical examination, and diagnostic testing should guide management. Proper patient counseling on treatment options and outcomes is equally important to give patients reasonable expectations. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature and advise on the most appropriate means to evaluate and treat these patients.
SCOPUS:84900407518
ISSN: 1941-7551
CID: 1059832
Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Indications for Operative Management
Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture involving the upper extremity. Despite their frequency, there is a lack of consensus within the orthopedic community regarding indications for operative management of these injuries in the elderly population. An increase in the rate of operative fixation has been cited in the past decade, however, there is no definitive evidence in the literature to support such a trend. Although studies have reported successful functional outcomes with both operative and nonoperative management, the current evidence regarding indications for operative management remains inconclusive due to a lack of large-scale, prospective, randomized trials in the elderly population. Until evidence-based algorithms can be established, treatment decisions must be made based on clinical judgment and risk assessment, while taking into account the functional demands of each patient. 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
EMBASE:2014309281
ISSN: 2196-7865
CID: 1058142
No Advantage to rhBMP-2 in Addition to Autogenous Graft for Fracture Nonunion
Bone morphogenetic proteins are a necessary component of the fracture healing cascade. Few studies have delineated the efficacy of iliac crest bone graft and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2), especially, in comparison with the gold standard treatment of nonunion, which is autogenous bone graft alone. This study compared the outcome of patients with fracture nonunion treated with autogenous bone graft plus rhBMP-2 adjuvant vs patients treated with autogenous bone graft alone. A total of 118 consecutive patients who were to undergo long bone nonunion surgery with autogenous bone graft (50) or autogenous bone graft plus rhBMP-2 (68) were identified. Surgical intervention included either harvested iliac autogenous bone graft or autogenous bone graft plus 1.5 mg/mL of rhBMP-2 placed in and around the site of nonunion. No differences were found in the distribution of nonunion sites included within each group. Twelve-month follow-up was obtained on 100 of 118 patients (84.7%). Analyses of demographic characteristics (including tobacco), medical comorbidities, previous surgeries, and nonunion type (atrophic vs hypertrophic) did not differ. Postoperative complication rates did not differ. The percentage of patients who progressed to union did not differ. Mean time to union in the autogenous bone graft plus rhBMP-2 group was 6.6 months (+/-3.9) vs 5.4 (+/-2.7) months in the autogenous bone graft-only group (P=.06). Rates of revision (16.2% for rhBMP-2 plus autogenous bone graft vs 8% for autogenous bone graft) did not differ statistically (P=.19), nor did 12-month scores of pain and functional assessment. Although rhBMP-2 is a safe adjuvant, there was no benefit seen when rhBMP-2 was added to autogenous bone graft in the treatment of long bone nonunion. Given its high cost, rhBMP-2 should be reconsidered as an aid to autogenous bone graft in the treatment of nonunion.
PMID: 24972432
ISSN: 0147-7447
CID: 1051432
Feasibility of three-dimensional MRI of proximal femur microarchitecture at 3 tesla using 26 receive elements without and with parallel imaging
PURPOSE: High-resolution imaging of deeper anatomy such as the hip is challenging due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), necessitating long scan times. Multi-element coils can increase SNR and reduce scan time through parallel imaging (PI). We assessed the feasibility of using a 26-element receive coil setup to perform 3 Tesla (T) MRI of proximal femur microarchitecture without and with PI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval. We scanned 13 subjects on a 3T scanner using 26 receive-elements and a three-dimensional fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence without and with PI (acceleration factors [AF] 2, 3, 4). We assessed SNR, depiction of individual trabeculae, PI performance (1/g-factor), and image quality with PI (1 = nonvisualization to 5 = excellent). RESULTS: SNR maps demonstrate higher SNR for the 26-element setup compared with a 12-element setup for hip MRI. Without PI, individual proximal femur trabeculae were well-depicted, including microarchitectural deterioration in osteoporotic subjects. With PI, 1/g values for the 26-element/12-element receive-setup were 0.71/0.45, 0.56/0.25, and 0.44/0.08 at AF2, AF3, and AF4, respectively. Image quality was: AF1, excellent (4.8 +/- 0.4); AF2, good (4.2 +/- 1.0); AF3, average (3.3 +/- 1.0); AF4, nonvisualization (1.4 +/- 0.9). CONCLUSION: A 26-element receive-setup permits 3T MRI of proximal femur microarchitecture with good image quality up to PI AF2. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:229-238. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PMCID:4004721
PMID: 24711013
ISSN: 1053-1807
CID: 1042112
Hot topics in biomechanically directed fracture fixation
The evolution of locking plates and modern nail constructs provides the orthopaedic trauma surgeon with a myriad of options with regard to implant selection for common fractures. There is a significant amount of biomechanical literature comparing modern constructs with those conventionally used. A basic understanding of this literature is required to make informed decisions with regard to implant selection in the management of these injuries. This article reviews the most recent biomechanical literature regarding implant selection and application for a variety of commonly treated injuries, including fractures of the clavicle, proximal humerus, distal humerus, intertrochanteric hip region, distal femur, and bicondylar tibial plateau.
PMID: 24464098
ISSN: 1531-2291
CID: 991942
Scapula fractures: interobserver reliability of classification and treatment
OBJECTIVES: There is substantial variation in the classification and management of scapula fractures. The first purpose of this study was to analyze the interobserver reliability of the OTA/AO classification and the New International Classification for Scapula Fractures. The second purpose was to assess the proportion of agreement among orthopaedic surgeons on operative or nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: Web-based reliability study. SETTING: Independent orthopaedic surgeons from several countries were invited to classify scapular fractures in an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three orthopaedic surgeons evaluated 35 movies of three-dimensional computerized tomography reconstruction of selected scapular fractures, representing a full spectrum of fracture patterns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fleiss kappa (kappa) was used to assess the reliability of agreement between the surgeons. RESULTS: The overall agreement on the OTA/AO classification was moderate for the types (A, B, and C, kappa = 0.54) with a 71% proportion of rater agreement (PA) and for the 9 groups (A1 to C3, kappa = 0.47) with a 57% PA. For the New International Classification, the agreement about the intraarticular extension of the fracture (Fossa (F), kappa = 0.79) was substantial and the agreement about a fractured body (Body (B), kappa = 0.57) or process was moderate (Process (P), kappa = 0.53); however, PAs were more than 81%. The agreement on the treatment recommendation was moderate (kappa = 0.57) with a 73% PA. CONCLUSIONS: The New International Classification was more reliable. Body and process fractures generated more disagreement than intraarticular fractures and need further clear definitions.
PMID: 23629469
ISSN: 1531-2291
CID: 991952
