Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cognitive fatigue, defined as a decline in cognitive performance over a single testing session, could be identified in MS. METHODS: Forty-five individuals with MS and 14 healthy control participants completed a 4-hour session of cognitive testing that involved a baseline neuropsychological battery, a continuous effortful cognitive task (completing mental arithmetic problems administered on a computer), and a repeat neuropsychological battery. Self-report measures of fatigue and affect were completed before each step of the testing session. RESULTS: The pattern of change in cognitive performances over the testing session significantly differed between the MS and control participants. Individuals with MS showed declines on measures of verbal memory and conceptual planning, whereas the control participants showed improvement. Although there were no significant differences between the groups on any of the baseline cognitive measures, the MS participants performed worse than the control subjects on tests of visual memory, verbal memory, and verbal fluency that were repeated following the continuous effortful cognitive task. Both MS and control participants reported increased mental and physical fatigue across the testing session compared with their baseline values. CONCLUSION: Individuals with MS show declines in cognitive performance during a single testing session and fail to show the improvement exemplified by healthy control subjects.

The authors used data collected prospectively during a multicenter trial in 133 patients with secondary progressive MS to assess the relative sensitivity of quantitative functional tests and traditional measures, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Ambulation Index. Quantitative functional measures worsened in 69% of patients during an average of 6 months of observation, whereas the Clinical Global Impression of Change worsened in 33% and the EDSS worsened in 25% of patients. These changes should be interpreted in the context of the test-retest reliability for each measure.

The authors conducted an investigation in four tertiary-care centers to determine if psychiatric comorbidity and psychological variables were predictive of functional impairment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Seventy-three individuals were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, the Rand 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), and multiple self-report measures. The patients with FMS were found to have a high lifetime and current prevalence of major depression and panic disorder. The most common disorders were major depression (lifetime [L] = 68%, current [C] = 22%); dysthymia (10% [C only]); panic disorder (L = 16%, C = 7%); and simple phobia (L = 16%, C = 12%). The self-report scales revealed significant elevations in depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and hypochondriasis. Functional impairment on all measures of the SF-36 was severe (e.g., physical functioning = 45.5 and role limitations due to physical problems = 20.0). Stepwise multiple-regression analysis revealed that current anxiety was the only variable that predicted a significant proportion of the variance (29%) in SF-36 physical functioning. Thus, in this multicenter study, the persons with FMS exhibited marked functional impairment, high levels of some lifetime and current psychiatric disorders, and significant current psychological distress. Current anxiety level appears to be an important correlate of functional impairment in individuals with FMS.

We have obtained a current profile of multiple sclerosis York State through a centralized patient registry and standardized data collection instrument associated with the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium of 12 MS centers located throughout the state. Data from the first 3019 patients with clinically definite MS revealed a clear relationship between MS disease type, duration of disease, and severity of physical disability. Patients with relapsing disease had disease durations approximately half as long as those with progressive forms of the disease (means approximately 6 years versus 11 years). The majority of patients with relapsing disease had Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 4.0 or less (self-sustained, fully ambulatory), whereas the majority of patients with progressive disease types had EDSS scores of 6.0 or greater (at least unilateral assist for walking). These findings emphasize the importance of early intervention in patients with relapsing disease to slow or prevent the accumulation of physical disability associated with progressive types of disease. Progressive disease was associated with lack of full-time employment and being disabled before the age of 60 years. Patients with relapsing disease were more likely to be employed and have private forms of insurance, whereas patients with progressive types of disease were more likely to have government-supported insurance to cover medical expenses.