Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is frequently recommended prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for morbidly obese patients with end-stage arthropathy. Current published data on the efficacy of bariatric surgery for preoperative medical optimization has yielded mixed results, and the effect of time from bariatric surgery to TJA on the preoperative risk profile is not well defined. Our study evaluated the effect of time from bariatric surgery to TJA on 90-day complication and readmission rates. METHODS: We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) California State Inpatient Database (SID) to identify patients who underwent TJA following bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2011. Primary endpoints were 90-day complication rates and all-cause 90-day readmission rates following TJA. RESULTS: We identified 330 cases of bariatric surgery followed by total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 1017 cases followed by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were no significant demographic differences among patients who underwent TJA greater than or less than 6 months after bariatric surgery. Patients undergoing THA more than 6 months after bariatric surgery were significantly less likely to be readmitted within 90 days for any cause. There was no association between time from bariatric surgery to THA or TKA and 90-day complications. DISCUSSION: Delaying THA at least 6 months after bariatric surgery may help reduce the rate of 90-day readmissions in this high-risk patient population. Arthroplasty surgeons recommending bariatric surgery as preoperative risk modification should consider the patient's overall nutritional status, medical comorbidities, and overall response to surgery prior to booking for TJA.

CASE/METHODS:We review the case of a 44-year-old man with Camurati-Engelmann disease, who presented with chronic right hip pain that did not improve following intra-articular hip injections. He was functionally debilitated because of the worsening pain. Routine radiographs demonstrated severe right hip osteoarthritis and severe diaphyseal sclerosis of the femur. To address the narrowed medullary cavity, appropriate reaming of the diaphysis and broaching to fill the metaphysis were performed. The patient underwent an uncemented total hip arthroplasty that resulted in an excellent recovery with no complications. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Uncemented total hip arthroplasty serves as a good option for patients with hip osteoarthritis secondary to Camurati-Engelmann disease. Anticipation of potential operative challenges is the key to avoiding complications and achieving an optimal, durable outcome.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of respiratory synchronized compression devices (RSCDs) versus nonsynchronized intermittent pneumatic compression devices (NSIPCDs) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty. A systematic literature review was conducted. Data regarding surgical procedure, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and adverse events were abstracted. Compared with control groups, the risk ratio of deep vein thrombosis development was 0.51 with NSIPCDs and 0.47 with RSCDs. This review demonstrates that RSCDs may be marginally more effective at preventing VTE events than NSIPCDs. Furthermore, the addition of mechanical prophylaxis to any chemoprophylactic regimen increases VTE prevention.

Adverse local tissue reaction, osteolysis, and subsequent increased incidence of failure have been associated with metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis who has undergone left THA with a MoM bearing. Seven years postoperatively, she presented with 6 weeks of severe left hip pain. Sequential radiographs and advanced imaging demonstrated a rapid onset of extensive acetabular osteolysis with pelvic discontinuity and pseudotumor formation. She underwent revision THA using a cup-cage construct with a satisfactory outcome. In this article, we review current evidence-based management options for pelvic discontinuity, as well as other complications related to MoM THA.

BACKGROUND: High body mass index (BMI) is associated with significant complications in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Many studies have evaluated this trend, but few have looked at the rates of complications based on BMI as a continuous variable. The purpose of this study was to stratify obese patients into 3 BMI categories and evaluate their rates of complications and gauge whether transitioning from higher to lower BMI category lowers complication. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2008-2015 and arranged into 3 groups based on BMI: O1 (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2), O2 (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m2), and O3 (BMI >40 kg/m2). Thirty-day complications were recorded and evaluated utilizing univariate and multivariate analyses stratified by BMI. RESULTS: A total of 268,663 patients were identified. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 had more infectious and medical complications compared with nonobese patients. Furthermore, there were increased complications as the BMI categories increased. Patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 (O3) had longer operating times, length of stay, higher rates of readmissions, reoperations, deep venous thrombosis, renal insufficiency, superficial infections, deep infections, and wound dehiscence. These trends were present when comparing the O2 with O1 category as well. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated increased rates of medical and surgical complications in obese patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated a stepwise increase in complication rates when transitioning to higher BMI groups. Based on our data, we believe that preoperative counseling and interventions to decrease BMI should be explored before offering elective surgery to obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Irrigation and debridement with modular component and liner exchange (IDLE) is a low morbidity procedure for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with reported failure rates exceeding 50%. Dilute povidone-iodine lavage has been shown to be safe and effective in decreasing acute PJI in primary total joint arthroplasty. Vancomycin powder has also shown to be effective in preventing infection in spine surgery. We hypothesize that a vancomycin povidone-iodine protocol (VIP) used in conjunction with IDLE can increase infection-free survivorship after acute PJI. METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective review of all PJIs treated with IDLE and VIP since March 2014. A consecutive matched control group of patients treated with IDLE for PJI for 2 years prior to March 2014 was also included for analysis. Primary outcome was failure, defined as return to operating room for an infection-related problem. Secondary outcome was chronic suppression with antibiotics at final follow-up. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients in the VIP group and 38 patients in control group were identified. In the VIP group, 16.7% (6/36) failed at final follow-up compared to 37% failure rate (14/38) in the control group (P < .05). Three patients in the VIP group were on chronic antibiotic suppression at final follow-up. There were no medical complications secondary to the VIP. CONCLUSIONS: The VIP group demonstrated a significant reduction in reinfection and failure rate following IDLE. The authors believe that a VIP is an effective adjunct for treating PJI with irrigation and debridement.

BACKGROUND:The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative was developed to reduce costs associated with total joint arthroplasty through a single payment for all patient care from index admission through a 90-day post-discharge period, including care at skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The aim of this study is to investigate whether forming partnerships between hospitals and SNFs could lower the post-discharge costs. We hypothesize that institutionally aligned SNFs have lower post-discharge costs than non-aligned SNFs. METHODS:A cohort of 615 elective, primary total hip and knee arthroplasty subjects discharged to an SNF under the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement from 2014 to 2016 were included in our analysis. Patients were grouped into one of the 3 categories of SNF alignment: group 1: non-partners; group 2: agreement-based partners; group 3: institution-owned partners. Demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS) at SNF, and associated costs during the 90-day post-operative period were compared between the 3 groups. RESULTS:Mean index hospital LOS was statistically shortest in group 3 (mean 2.7 days vs 3.5 for groups 1 and 2, P = .001). SNF LOS was also shortest in group 3 (mean 11 days vs 19 and 21 days in groups 2 and 1 respectively, P < .001). Total SNF costs and total 90-day costs were both significantly lower in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2 (P < .001 for all), even after controlling for medical comorbidities. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Institution-owned partner SNFs demonstrated the shortest patient LOS, and the lowest SNF and total 90-day costs, without increased risk of readmissions, compared with other SNFs.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The use of perioperative surgical wound dressings is an important factor in the mitigation of infection following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Few studies have been published comparing wound dressings and infection rates after TJA. Methods/UNASSIGNED:MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 2006 and 2016 reporting infection rates in patients using various wound dressings after undergoing TJA. All studies comparing Hydrofibre dressings to Standard dressings or Absorbent dressings were included in this meta-analysis. Studies looking at TJA secondary to trauma were excluded. Two individuals independently extracted data, and study results were divided based on type of treatment. The primary outcome was to compare the infection rate of Hydrofibre dressings to that of both Standard Dressings and Absorbent dressings. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of a total of 3721 participants, 1483 were treated with Standard dressings (non-impregnated gauze), 1911 with Hydrofibre dressings, and 327 with Absorbent dressings. The risk ratio for infection comparing Standard with Hydrofibre was 4.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.71-10.16) as compared to 2.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-10.27) when comparing Absorbent with Hydrofibre dressings. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our analysis suggests that Hydrofibre dressings may be significantly better than Standard and Absorbent dressings with respect to reducing infection. However, given the observed heterogeneity and small number of studies included, more comparative studies are needed to definitively recommend superiority among dressings following TJA. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:Level 1.

Background/UNASSIGNED:We sought to develop an objective implant selection guideline based on the ratio of patient body mass index (BMI) to age in order to select implants preoperatively and reduce cost while maintaining quality. The BMI-to-age ratio can be used to distinguish patient demand and select those patients who may benefit from newer technology and higher cost implants and those who would do well with standard-demand implants. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective analysis investigated the types of implants received by patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty from January 2012 to August 2014. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio >0.60 were categorized as high demand and were eligible for either a high-demand implant or a standard-demand implant. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio ≤0.60 were recognized as standard demand and would be eligible for only standard-demand implants. The actual implant received was identified and compared with the implant as predicted by the BMI-to-age ratio and potential cost savings were identified. Results/UNASSIGNED:A total of 1507 operative knees were identified. The high-demand implant carries a 31% greater cost than that of a standard-demand implant. Thirty-eight of 1084 high-demand implants were placed in standard-demand knees. An additional 1.1% cost was realized with 38 standard-demand knees receiving high-demand implants and 28.6% if high-demand knees had been used in all standard-demand patients. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Limiting the use of high-demand implants to high-functional-demand patients based on the BMI-to-age ratio may guide the surgeon's choice in optimizing implant selection while providing value-based purchasing criteria to the selection of total knee arthroplasty implants.