Faculty Bibliography

Among the current agents in the class of direct thrombin inhibitors, bivalirudin (Angiomax(®), The Medicines Company, NJ, USA) has seen increased use in cardiovascular medicine over the past decade through its primary indication as an anticoagulant used during percutaneous coronary interventions. Bivalirudin has been further investigated and used as the anticoagulation strategy in the setting of cardiac and endovascular surgical procedures and is frequently utilized in the management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In comparison with heparin, bivalirudin exhibits a low immunogenic profile and provides similar or reduced major bleeding rates as well as a predictable degree of anticoagulation that is dose related. Bivalirudin primarily undergoes dual elimination via proteolytic cleavage and renal elimination, and requires dose adjustment in the setting of severe renal dysfunction. Given the body of supportive data, bivalirudin is likely to continue to figure prominently as a reliable and efficient anticoagulation strategy. Additional agents in the class of direct thrombin inhibitors are under investigation and may find increasing clinical use.

BACKGROUND:There is uncertainty regarding the optimal adjunctive unfractionated heparin (UFH) regimen for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) treated with fondaparinux. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of 2 dose regimens of adjunctive intravenous UFH during PCI in high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS initially treated with fondaparinux and referred for early coronary angiography. DESIGN/METHODS:This is an international prospective cohort study of approximately 4,000 high-risk patients presenting to hospital with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, treated with fondaparinux as initial medical therapy, and referred for early coronary angiography with a view to revascularization. Within this cohort, 2,000 patients undergoing PCI will be eligible for enrollment into a double-blind international randomized parallel-group trial evaluating standard activated clotting time (ACT)-guided doses of intravenous UFH versus a non-ACT-guided weight-adjusted low dose. The standard regimen uses an 85-U/kg bolus of UFH if there is no platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb-IIIa) inhibitor or 60 U/kg if GpIIb-IIIa inhibitor use is planned, with additional bolus guided by blinded ACT measurements. The low-dose regimen uses a 50 U/kg UFH bolus, irrespective of planned GpIIb-IIIa use. The primary outcome is the composite of peri-PCI major bleeding, minor bleeding, or major vascular access site complications. The assessment of net clinical benefit is a key secondary outcome: it addresses the composite of peri-PCI major bleeding with death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at day 30. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:FUTURA/OASIS 8 will help define the optimal UFH regimen as adjunct to PCI in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients treated with fondaparinux.

BACKGROUND:Major bleeding during an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with increased late ischemic events. Patients with bleeding are often discharged without antiplatelet therapy (AT). The association between discharge AT use and late ischemic outcomes among ACS patients with bleeding is uncertain. METHODS:We examined discharge AT use among 8,582 ACS patients with in-hospital bleeding from a total of 26,451 patients enrolled in 4 randomized trials. After adjusting for the propensity to receive AT, we compared 6-month postdischarge outcomes between patients discharged with and those discharged without AT. RESULTS:Almost 1 in 10 patients with bleeding was discharged without AT (n=826). Compared with those receiving discharge AT, those not receiving discharge AT had a higher risk of 6-month death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (14.3% vs 7.8%, propensity-adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.36, 95% confidence interval=1.01-1.85). Nonuse of AT at discharge was associated with worse outcomes among patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with those treated without it (adjusted HR=4.22 vs 1.13, interaction P=.0003). Discharge monotherapy was associated with worse outcomes than dual AT among patients receiving stents (adjusted HR=1.78, 95% CI=1.04-3.03). CONCLUSIONS:Bleeding occurred commonly among patients with ACS. AT was often not used in these patients at discharge, and lack of discharge AT was associated with an increased risk of 6-month ischemic events. These data raise the possibility that lack of AT use among patients with in-hospital bleeding may contribute to their excess risk of long-term ischemic outcomes.