Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Radiation-induced meningiomas of the brain are typically managed with surgical resection. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an important primary or adjuvant management for patients with intracranial meningiomas, but the value of this approach for radiation-induced tumors is unclear. METHODS: This series consisted of 19 patients (mean age, 40 years) with 24 tumors. The patients met criteria for a radiation-induced meningioma and underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Seven patients had undergone a previous resection. The World Health Organization tumor grades for those with prior histology were Grade I (n = 5) and Grade II (n = 2). The median tumor volume was 4.4 cm3. Radiosurgery was performed using a median margin dose of 13 Gy. RESULTS: Serial imaging was evaluated in all patients at a median follow-up of 44 months. The control rate was 75% after primary radiosurgery. Delayed resection after radiosurgery was performed in 5 patients (26%) at an average of 39 months. The median latency between radiation therapy for original disease and SRS for radiation-induced meningiomas was 29.7 years (range, 7.3-59.0 years). The overall survival after SRS was 94.1% and 80.7% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. No patient developed a subsequent radiation-induced tumor. The overall morbidity rate was 5.3% (1 optic neuropathy). Asymptomatic peritumoral imaging changes compatible with an adverse radiation effect developed in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: SRS provides satisfactory control rates either after resection or as an alternative to resection. Its role is most valuable for patients whose tumors affect critical neurological regions and who are poor candidates for resection.

OBJECTIVE: To develop outcome predictors after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with intracranial ependymomas who had received previous fractionated radiation therapy, we compared tumor control, survival, and complications with tumor grade, volume, age of patients, and imaging characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 39 consecutive ependymoma patients who underwent SRS for 56 tumors. The median patient age was 22.8 years (range, 2.9-71.1 years). All patients had previous surgical resection of their ependymomas followed by radiotherapy, and 14 patients underwent previous chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients had low-grade ependymomas (34 tumors), and 14 patients had anaplastic ependymomas (22 tumors). The median radiosurgery target volume was 3.6 cm (range, 0.1-36.8 cm), and the median margin dose was 15.0 Gy (range, 10-22 Gy). RESULTS: At a median of 23.5 months after SRS (range, 6.1-155.2 months), 25 patients died as a result of metastases (12 patients) or disease progression (13 patients). The overall survival rates after SRS were 60.1, 36.1, and 32.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The progression-free survival rates after SRS at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.6, 45.8, and 45.8%, respectively, for all grades of ependymomas. Lower histological tumor grade was not significantly associated with better progression-free survival (P = 0.725). Factors associated with an improved progression-free survival included smaller tumor volume and homogeneous tumor contrast enhancement in low-grade ependymomas. CONCLUSION: SRS provides another management option for patients with residual or recurrent ependymomas that have failed surgery and radiation therapy. Predictors of response include smaller volume and homogeneous contrast enhancement.

OBJECTIVE: The safety, efficacy, and morbidity of radiosurgery (RS) must be established before it can be offered as an alternative to open surgery for unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. We report the 3-year outcomes of a multicenter, prospective pilot study of RS. METHODS: RS was randomized to 20 or 24Gy targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus. Seizure diaries evaluated the final seizure remission between months 24 and 36. Verbal memory was evaluated at baseline and 24m with the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) and California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Patients were classified as having "significant improvement," "no change," and "significant impairment" based on relative change indices. RESULTS: Thirteen high-dose and 17 low-dose patients were treated. Both groups showed significant reductions in seizures by 1 year after treatment. At the 36-month follow-up evaluation, 67% of patients were free of seizures for the prior 12 months (high dose: 10/13, 76.9%; low dose: 10/17, 58.8%). Use of steroids, headaches, and visual field defects did not differ by dose or seizure remission. The prevalence of verbal memory impairment was 15% (4/26 patients); none declined on more than one measure. The prevalence of significant verbal memory improvements was 12% (3/26). INTERPRETATION: RS for unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy offers seizure remission rates comparable with those reported previously for open surgery. There were no major safety concerns with high-dose RS compared with low-dose RS. Additional research is required to determine whether RS may be a treatment option for some patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

This paper proposes an efficient method to acquire sources of tremor in patients with movement disorders based on blind source separation of convolutive mixtures. The extracted sources indicated neural activities that might be generated in the central nervous system. Four patients with essential tremor were tested in a set of movement tasks. Subjects wore a data glove that measured finger movements of the hand. The experimental data were then fed to a convolutive-mixture model, which revealed sources that imbibed in them the tremor frequency components of 2--8 Hz. Time--frequency analysis of these sources might be of potential help to clinicians to devise tasks that can manifest visible tremor from patients.