Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Although preoperative risk assessment tools have been effective in predicting discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), studies reporting on discharge planning in extended length of stay (ELOS), >3 days, patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to describe the predictive utility of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) for discharge disposition in ELOS patients. METHODS:Our study included 260 patients with LOS >3 days who underwent primary TJA between 2014 and 2016. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, based on their RAPT score: low risk (9-12), medium risk (6-9), and high risk for discharge to a facility (1-6). Scores were compared among cohorts and correlated with discharge disposition for patients who stayed beyond 3 days. RESULTS:In ELOS, RAPT had a higher utility in predicting discharge disposition in the low-risk (76.5% to home) and high-risk (62.9% to facility) patient cohorts, while medium-risk patients (56.5% to home) were the least accurate. Responses that significantly correlated with discharge home included male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; P < .05), ambulation without walking aids (OR, 2.94; P < .01) or a single-point cane (OR, 2.95; P < .0001), <1 community support visit per week preoperatively (OR, 1.86; P < .05), and having support from someone at home (OR, 3.43; P < .0001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The RAPT score in ELOS patients is better correlated with the low-risk and high-risk cohorts than in medium-risk patients. Conversely, medium-risk ELOS patients constituted 56.8% of our sample size, but only predicted 56.5% of discharge dispositions correctly. Future discharge disposition risk assessment tools are needed to stratify medium-risk patients.

BACKGROUND:Advancements in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) now permit HIV-positive patients to have longer life spans, increasing their cumulative risk of developing an advanced degenerative joint disease, necessitating total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to provide an extended follow-up on a previously published study on a cohort of HIV-positive THA recipients in an effort to confirm the safety and longevity of THA in this population. METHODS:This study is a follow-up on a previous study comprised of 41 hips in 31 HIV-positive THA recipients. At this follow-up, 5 patients from the original cohort required contralateral THA. Postoperative complications were recorded up to the patient's last follow-up date. A survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with revision THA as the end point. RESULTS:Since the last report, 2 additional hips were revised (one for aseptic loosening and one for a periprosthetic fracture), and 5 patients underwent contralateral THA. This resulted in a total of 5 (13.8%) hips requiring revision THA at the latest follow-up. The mean follow-up interval for the original cohort and for the contralateral 5 hips was 78.9 ± 50.2 months and 54.6 ± 45.3 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with revision THA for any reason as the end point demonstrated survivorship of 93% (2 years), 90% (5 years), and 81% (10 and 14 years) after primary THA, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggests that it is possible to achieve a low incidence of postoperative infection in HIV-positive THA recipients. In addition, our study demonstrates that non-hemophiliac HIV-positive patients have comparable revision rates to previously published reports on HIV-negative patients of similar age, underscoring the clinical efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Despite the development of newer preventative measures, the rate of infection continues to be approximately 1% for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The extent of the infection can range from a mild superficial infection to a more serious periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJIs not only play a significant role in the clinical well-being of the TJA patient population, but also have substantial economic implications on the health care system. Several approaches are currently being used to mitigate the risk of PJI after TJA. The variety of prophylactic measures to prevent infection after TJA must be thoroughly discussed and evaluated.

BACKGROUND:Patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) have had extremely high complication rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to compare perioperative complication rates between untreated and treated HCV in THA patients and to compare these rates between patients treated with 2 different therapies (interferon vs direct antiviral agents). METHODS:A multicenter retrospective database query was used to identify patients diagnosed with HCV who underwent THA between 2006 and 2016. All patients (n = 105) identified were included and divided into 2 groups: untreated (n = 63) and treated (n = 42) HCV; treated patients were further subdivided into those receiving interferon (n = 16) or direct antiviral agent therapies (n = 26). Comparisons between the treated and untreated groups were made with respect to demographic data, comorbidities, preoperative viral load, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and all surgical and medical complications; a subgroup analysis of the treated patients was also performed. Separate independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted for continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test of independence. RESULTS:A greater number of untreated patients were human immunodeficiency virus infected (P = .01), while a reduced number of treated patients were either former or current smokers (P = .004). The untreated group had greater surgical complication rates (25.4% vs 4.8%; P = .007), with a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (14.3% vs 0%, P = .01). For treated patients, no differences were observed between treatment types for postsurgical complications. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Treatment for HCV prior to THA appears to be associated to fewer postoperative complications, primarily periprosthetic joint infection. Although further investigation is warranted, strong consideration should be given to treating patients for HCV prior to elective THA.

Proper ligament tension in knee flexion within cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty has long been associated with clinical success; however, traditional balancing principles have assumed that the distal femoral joint line (DFJL) affects only extension. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect DFJL may have on ligament strains and tibiofemoral kinematics of CR knee designs in flexion. A computational analysis was performed using a musculoskeletal modeling system for two different knee implants, the high-flex CR (HFCR) and guided-motion CR (GMCR). Tibiofemoral kinematics and ligament strain were measured at 90-degree knee flexion while the implants' DFJL was incrementally shifted proximally. Femoral implant position and kinematics were used to determine the femur's anteroposterior position relative to the tibia. The change in the femoral medial condyle position relative to the tibia was 0.33 mm and 0.53 mm more anterior per each 1-mm elevation of the DFJL for HFCR and GMCR, respectively. The change in the lateral condyle position was 0.20 mm more anterior and 0.06 mm more posterior for HFCR and GMCR, respectively. The strain in the lateral and medial collateral ligaments changed minimally with elevation of the DFJL. In both implants, strain increased in the anterior lateral and posterior medial bundles of the posterior collateral ligament with elevation of the DFJL, whereas strain decreased in the iliotibial band and iliotibial patellar band. Our findings suggest that DFJL affects ligament tension at 90-degree knee flexion and therefore flexion balance for CR implants. Elevating the DFJL to address tight extension space in a CR knee while flexion space is well balanced could result in increased flexion tension especially when the flexion-extension mismatch is large. To achieve balanced flexion and extension, the amount of DFJL elevation may need to be reduced.

Despite the overall successful outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the concept that a well-balanced TKA yields a more successful result, concerns still remain in the reported literature regarding the patellofemoral joint. Diminished outcomes have been associated with poorly balanced or placed patella implants. The effect of different techniques to achieve flexion-extension balance and the use of posterior stabilized (PS) versus cruciate retaining (CR) implant designs on patellofemoral balancing has not been previously studied. The purpose of this study is to utilize a validated computational analysis software to simulate the effects of varying implant positions and sizes of femoral components. The patellofemoral retinaculum (PFR) load was significantly affected by some conditions, while others did not reach significance. The proximal-distal implant position with knee flexion angle (p < 0.001), the implant size (p < 0.001), and the implant bearing type (CR/PS) (p < 0.05) were significant. For the proximal-distal implant position and knee flexion angle, a more proximal implant position (elevating the joint line) increased the PFR load from 15 to 30°, and a more proximal implant position reduced retinaculum load from 60 to 135°. However, at 45°, implant position does not affect retinaculum load. Achieving the appropriate balance between the dynamic nature of both the tibiofemoral and the patellofemoral interaction in TKA has proven to be complex and challenging to manage. Balancing of a TKA is essential to the proper functioning and overall longevity of the implant. These results demonstrate that patellofemoral balance is affected by implant size and position during flexion-extension gap balancing.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess changes in the patterns of T2 and T1rho values within grade 1 cartilage lesions of osteoarthritis (OA) patients compared to healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Twenty healthy knees and 25 OA knees were examined on a 3 T scanner. Areas of signal heterogeneity within the cartilage of the distal femur were identified using fat suppressed proton density-weighted imagines. T2 and T1rho values in each OA patient with grade 1 lesions were compared to average T2 and T1rho values of the corresponding areas in healthy subjects. RESULTS:A total of 28 areas including grade 1 lesion were identified. Compared to normal cartilage, the majority of grade 1 cartilage lesions demonstrated either no significant change or a statistically significant increase in both T2 values (18/28, 64%) and T1rho values (23/28, 82%). Compared to T2, T1rho demonstrated a greater proportion of statistically significantly higher values in OA patients than those from the normal controls. However, T2 and T1rho values in grade 1 lesions can be decreased, or demonstrate mixed patterns compared to those in healthy cartilage. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that early degenerative cartilage lesions can demonstrate various patterns of T2 and T1rho changes.

Poor outcomes associated with increased perioperative opioid use have led investigators to seek alternative pain management modalities after total joint arthroplasty. Nonpharmacological approaches, such as electroceuticals, have shown promise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of "havening," a specific form of psychosensory therapy, on postoperative pain scores and narcotic consumption. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, the authors compared 19 patients who underwent psychosensory therapy with 22 patients who served as the control group. Visual analog scale scores were collected preoperatively, every day during the hospitalization, and at approximately 1-month follow-up. Narcotic consumption during hospitalization was converted into daily morphine milligram equivalents and compared between the cohorts. In addition, postoperative complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions were compared between the cohorts. No difference in visual analog scale pain scores was reported between cohorts on postoperative day 1 (P=.229), at discharge (P=.434), or at 1-month follow-up (P=.256). Furthermore, there was no significant variance in mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (P=.221), length of stay (P=.313), postoperative complications (P=.255), 90-day readmissions (P=.915), and emergency department visits (P=.46) between the cohorts. This study showed that psychosensory therapy was not effective in reducing pain or narcotic consumption following total joint arthroplasty. Nonetheless, future studies assessing the role of psychosensory therapeutic interventions among patients after total joint arthroplasty are warranted to better understand the clinical implications of innovative therapies aimed at alleviating pain. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e848-e853.].

Increasingly the relationship between the hip and spine has become recognized as a risk factor for postoperative instability following total hip arthroplasty. Thorough understanding of the relationship between the spine and pelvis, spinopelvic parameters, and normal and pathologic spinopelvic motion is critical to surgical planning and prevention of instability after total hip arthroplasty. This review details spinopelvic motion and postural changes that predispose patients to instability, guides readers through a preoperative risk assessment tool and our stepwise protocol to classify spinopelvic motion and prevent instability.
Copyright