Faculty Bibliography

One-stage and two-stage revision strategies are the two main options for treating established chronic peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip; however, there is uncertainty regarding which is the best treatment option. We aimed to compare the risk of re-infection between the two revision strategies using pooled individual participant data (IPD). Observational cohort studies with PJI of the hip treated exclusively by one- or two-stage revision and reporting re-infection outcomes were retrieved by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; as well as email contact with investigators. We analysed IPD of 1856 participants with PJI of the hip from 44 cohorts across four continents. The primary outcome was re-infection (recurrence of infection by the same organism(s) and/or re-infection with a new organism(s)). Hazard ratios (HRs) for re-infection were calculated using Cox proportional frailty hazards models. After a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 222 re-infections were recorded. Re-infection rates per 1000 person-years of follow-up were 16.8 (95% CI 13.6-20.7) and 32.3 (95% CI 27.3-38.3) for one-stage and two-stage strategies respectively. The age- and sex-adjusted HR of re-infection for two-stage revision was 1.70 (0.58-5.00) when compared with one-stage revision. The association remained consistently absent after further adjustment for potential confounders. The HRs did not vary importantly in clinically relevant subgroups. Analysis of pooled individual patient data suggest that a one-stage revision strategy may be as effective as a two-stage revision strategy in treating PJI of the hip.

BACKGROUND:At our institution, all postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates have received home health services (HHS), consisting of visiting nurses, physical and occupational therapists. However, with a more technologically inclined patient population, electronic patient rehabilitation applications (EPRAs) can be used to deliver perioperative care at the comfort of the patient's home. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical utility and economic burden associated with digital rehabilitation applications in primary THA recipients. METHODS:We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of patients operated between November 2016 and November 2017. Before surgery, and at the discretion of the surgeon, patients were assigned to EPRA with HHS or EPRA alone. Patient baseline demographics, EPRA engagement, and validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were (Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12] and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior) at baseline and 12 weeks. These PRO scores were correlated with cohort assignments to assess noninferiority of EPRA alone. RESULTS:In total, 268 patients received either EPRA-HHS (n = 169) or EPRA (n = 99) alone. Patients receiving EPRA only were on average younger (60.8 vs 65.8; P < .0001), but otherwise similar to patients in the EPRA-HHS cohort. EPRA-only patients demonstrated no differences in VR-12 (P > .05) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (P > .05) when compared with EPRA-HHS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The integration of electronic rehabilitation tools is gaining acceptance within the orthopedic community. Our study demonstrated that EPRA alone was clinically noninferior while substantially less costly than EPRA-HHS.

Background/UNASSIGNED:The use of perioperative surgical wound dressings is an important factor in the mitigation of infection following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Few studies have been published comparing wound dressings and infection rates after TJA. Methods/UNASSIGNED:MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 2006 and 2016 reporting infection rates in patients using various wound dressings after undergoing TJA. All studies comparing Hydrofibre dressings to Standard dressings or Absorbent dressings were included in this meta-analysis. Studies looking at TJA secondary to trauma were excluded. Two individuals independently extracted data, and study results were divided based on type of treatment. The primary outcome was to compare the infection rate of Hydrofibre dressings to that of both Standard Dressings and Absorbent dressings. Results/UNASSIGNED:Of a total of 3721 participants, 1483 were treated with Standard dressings (non-impregnated gauze), 1911 with Hydrofibre dressings, and 327 with Absorbent dressings. The risk ratio for infection comparing Standard with Hydrofibre was 4.16 (95% confidence interval, 1.71-10.16) as compared to 2.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-10.27) when comparing Absorbent with Hydrofibre dressings. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our analysis suggests that Hydrofibre dressings may be significantly better than Standard and Absorbent dressings with respect to reducing infection. However, given the observed heterogeneity and small number of studies included, more comparative studies are needed to definitively recommend superiority among dressings following TJA. Level of Evidence/UNASSIGNED:Level 1.

Background/UNASSIGNED:We sought to develop an objective implant selection guideline based on the ratio of patient body mass index (BMI) to age in order to select implants preoperatively and reduce cost while maintaining quality. The BMI-to-age ratio can be used to distinguish patient demand and select those patients who may benefit from newer technology and higher cost implants and those who would do well with standard-demand implants. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective analysis investigated the types of implants received by patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty from January 2012 to August 2014. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio >0.60 were categorized as high demand and were eligible for either a high-demand implant or a standard-demand implant. Patients with a BMI-to-age ratio ≤0.60 were recognized as standard demand and would be eligible for only standard-demand implants. The actual implant received was identified and compared with the implant as predicted by the BMI-to-age ratio and potential cost savings were identified. Results/UNASSIGNED:A total of 1507 operative knees were identified. The high-demand implant carries a 31% greater cost than that of a standard-demand implant. Thirty-eight of 1084 high-demand implants were placed in standard-demand knees. An additional 1.1% cost was realized with 38 standard-demand knees receiving high-demand implants and 28.6% if high-demand knees had been used in all standard-demand patients. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Limiting the use of high-demand implants to high-functional-demand patients based on the BMI-to-age ratio may guide the surgeon's choice in optimizing implant selection while providing value-based purchasing criteria to the selection of total knee arthroplasty implants.

BACKGROUND:Periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a serious complication often related to obesity which leads to poor patient outcomes and increased resource utilization. A periarticular soft tissue index (PASTI) may help predict postoperative wound complications than BMI alone. METHODS:Three hundred seventy-six TKA patients with a preoperative, lateral knee X-ray radiograph and 1 year of follow up were analyzed. We used 2 pairs of soft tissue and bony measurements, one referencing the femur and the other the tibia. A high PASTI was defined as a ratio >3.0. Minor complications involved clinical interventions related to the surgical wound. Major complications involved return to the operating room. RESULTS:More minor complications occurred in high PASTI for both tibial (20.9% vs 6.4%; odds ratio 3.89, 95% confidence interval 1.94-7.79, P < .001) and femoral measurements (15.3% vs 7.2%; odds ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval 1.06-4.15, P = .013). Major complications were also more frequent in high PASTI, though not statistically significant. The proportion of obesity (BMI > 30) in both minor (12.4% vs 7.7%, P = .140) and major complications (2.8% vs 3.3%, P = .788) was not statistically different. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:More wound complications occurred in patients with high PASTI, while no difference was seen using BMI. BMI has traditionally approximated patient size, but does not describe variations in body habitus. PASTI is a more reliable and direct way to assess the periarticular soft tissue envelope size, which is associated with postoperative wound complications in the knee.

BACKGROUND:Individuals coinfected with both hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV represent a unique and growing population of patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. Data regarding complications for HCV monoinfection or HIV monoinfection are robust, but there are no data available, to our knowledge, on patients who have both HCV and HIV infections. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES/OBJECTIVE:We sought to determine whether patients with coinfection differed in terms of baseline demographics and comorbidity burden as compared with patients without coinfection and whether these potential differences were translated into varying levels of postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital readmission risk. Specifically, we asked: (1) Are there demonstrable differences in baseline demographic variables between patients infected with HCV and HIV and those who do not have those infections (age, sex, race, and insurance status)? (2) Do patients with HCV and HIV infection differ from patients without those infections in terms of other medical comorbidities? (3) Do patients with HCV/HIV coinfection have a higher incidence of early postoperative complications and mortality than patients without coinfection? (4) Is the frequency of readmission greater for patients with HCV/HIV coinfection than those without? METHODS:The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2014. The SPARCS database is particularly useful because it captures 100% of all New York State inpatient admissions while providing detailed demographic and comorbidity data for a large, heterogeneous patient population with long-term followup. Patients were stratified into four groups based on HCV/HIV status: control patients without disease, HCV monoinfection, HIV monoinfection, and coinfection. We sought to determine whether patients coinfected with HCV and HIV would differ in terms of demographics from patients without those infections and whether patients with HCV and HIV would have a greater risk of complications, longer length of stay, and hospital readmission. A total of 80,722 patients underwent THA between 2010 and 2014. A total of 98.55% (79,554 of 80,722) of patients did not have either HCV or HIV, 0.66% (530 of 80,722) had HCV monoinfection, 0.66% (534 of 80,722) HIV monoinfection, and 0.13% (104 of 80,722) were coinfected with both HCV and HIV. Multivariate analysis was performed controlling for age, sex, insurance, residency status, diagnosis, and comorbidities to allow for an equal comparison between groups. RESULTS:Patients with coinfection were more likely to be younger, male (odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-3.13; p < 0.001), insured by Medicaid (OR, 6.43; 4.41-7.55; p < 0.001), have a history of avascular necrosis (OR, 8.76; 7.20-9.53; p < 0.001), and to be homeless (OR, 6.95; 5.31-7.28; p < 0.001) as compared with patients without HIV or HCV. Additionally, patients with coinfection had the highest proportion of alcohol abuse, drug abuse, and tobacco use along with a high proportion of psychiatric disorders, including depression. HCV and HIV coinfection were independent risk factors for increased length of stay (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.29-3.01; p < 0.001), having two or more in-hospital complications (OR, 1.64; 1.01-2.67; p < 0.001), and 90-day readmission rates (OR, 2.97; 1.86-4.77; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:As the prevalence of HCV and HIV coinfectivity continues to increase, orthopaedic surgeons will encounter a greater number of these patients. Awareness of the demographic and socioeconomic factors leading to increased complications after THA will allow physicians to consider interventions such as in-hospital psychiatric counseling, advanced discharge planning, and coordination with social work and collaboration with HCV/HIV infectious disease specialists to improve patient health status to improve outcomes and reduce costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, therapeutic study.

BACKGROUND:Irrigation and debridement (I&D) is performed for early management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Symptom reporting is a subjective measure and may miss direct management of PJI. Utilizing an objective time interval from index procedure to I&D may better inform treatment decisions. METHODS:From 2009 to 2017, retrospective review was performed of 55 knee PJI cases at our institution. All patients underwent polyethylene liner exchange and I&D for PJI. Patients were stratified by time from index procedure to I&D (≤2 weeks, >2 weeks). Success was defined as eradication of infection and resolution of presenting symptoms. Failed cases required subsequent procedures due to infection. RESULTS:Average follow-up time after index TKA was 2.5 years. Among patients with I&D within 2 weeks of index TXA, 14 patients (82%) were successfully treated while 3 (18%) had infection recurrence. These outcomes were significantly improved compared to patients with I&D after 2 weeks: 19 (50%) successes and 19 (50%) failures (P = .024). Staphylococcal species were the most frequent pathogen in patients treated before and after 2 weeks of index TKA (39% and 50%, respectively). Outcomes were pathogen-independent in PJIs treated before or after 2 weeks of index TKA (P = .206 and .594, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results demonstrate that patients with early PJI managed with I&D and liner exchange within 2 weeks of index TKA had higher rates of treatment success when compared to those with I&D beyond 2 weeks. These findings suggest that time from index TKA to I&D is an objective and reliable indicator of treatment success when considering I&D in acute onset knee PJI.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of respiratory synchronized compression devices (RSCDs) versus nonsynchronized intermittent pneumatic compression devices (NSIPCDs) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty. A systematic literature review was conducted. Data regarding surgical procedure, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and adverse events were abstracted. Compared with control groups, the risk ratio of deep vein thrombosis development was 0.51 with NSIPCDs and 0.47 with RSCDs. This review demonstrates that RSCDs may be marginally more effective at preventing VTE events than NSIPCDs. Furthermore, the addition of mechanical prophylaxis to any chemoprophylactic regimen increases VTE prevention.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) patients utilize pelvic tilt (PT) and their lower extremities in order to compensate for malalignment. This study examines the effect of hip osteoarthritis (OA) on compensatory mechanisms in SSD patients. METHODS:Patients ≥ 18 years with SSD were included for analysis. Spinopelvic, lower extremity, and cervical alignment were assessed on standing full-body stereoradiographs. Hip OA severity was graded by Kellgren-Lawrence scale (0-4). Patients were categorized as limited osteoarthritis (LOA: grade 0-2) and severe osteoarthritis (SOA: grade 3-4). Patients were matched for age and T1-pelvic angle (TPA). Spinopelvic [sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-pelvic angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi)] and lower extremity parameters [sacrofemoral angle, knee angle, ankle angle, posterior pelvic shift (P. Shift), global sagittal axis (GSA)] were compared between groups using independent sample t test. RESULTS:136 patients (LOA = 68, SOA = 68) were included in the study. SOA had less pelvic tilt (p = 0.011), thoracic kyphosis (p = 0.007), and higher SVA and T1Spi (p < 0.001) than LOA. SOA had lower sacrofemoral angle (p < 0.001) and ankle angle (p = 0.043), increased P. Shift (p < 0.001) and increased GSA (p < 0.001) compared to LOA. There were no differences in PI-LL, LL, knee angle, or cervical alignment (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with coexisting spinal malalignment and SOA compensate by pelvic shift and thoracic hypokyphosis rather than PT, likely as a result of limited hip extension secondary to SOA. As a result, SOA had worse global sagittal alignment than their LOA counterparts. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly performed inpatient surgical procedure within the USA and is estimated to reach 3.48 million procedures annually by 2030. As value-based care initiatives continue to focus on hospital readmission rates and patient satisfaction, it has become essential for health care providers to develop and implement a multidisciplinary approach to enhance TKA outcomes while minimizing unnecessary expenditures. Through this necessity, clinical care pathways have been developed to standardize, organize, and improve the quality and efficiency of patient care while simultaneously encouraging the collaboration among various medical care providers. Here, we review several systems based programs and specialty care practices that can be adopted into the standard orthopedic practice.