Faculty Bibliography

Importance/UNASSIGNED:There is tremendous interest in using immunotherapy to treat breast cancer, as evidenced by the more than 290 clinical trials ongoing at the time of this narrative review. The objective of this review is to describe the current status of immunotherapy in breast cancer, highlighting its potential in both early-stage and metastatic disease. Observations/UNASSIGNED:After searching ClinicalTrials.gov on April 24, 2018, and PubMed up to June 30, 2018, to identify breast cancer immunotherapy trials, we found that immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is the most investigated form of immunotherapy in breast cancer. Use of ICB as monotherapy has achieved objective responses in patients with breast cancer, with higher rates seen when administered in earlier lines of therapy. For responding patients, those responses are durable. More recent data suggest clinical efficacy when ICB is given in combination with chemotherapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating combination strategies pairing ICB with additional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapy, vaccines, and local ablative therapies to enhance response. To date, robust predictive biomarkers for response to ICB have not been established. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:It is anticipated that combination therapy strategies will be the way forward for immunotherapy in breast cancer, with an improved understanding of tumor, microenvironment, and host factors informing treatment combination decisions. Thoughtful study design incorporating appropriate end points and correlative studies will be critical in identifying optimal strategies for enhancing the immune response against breast tumors.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:The humanized monoclonal antibody atezolizumab targets programmed death-ligand 1 and has demonstrated durable single-agent activity in a subset of metastatic triple-negative breast cancers. To extend the observed activity, combinatorial approaches are being tested with standard cytotoxic chemotherapies known to induce immunogenic tumor cell death. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To examine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary clinical activity of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants/UNASSIGNED:This phase 1b multicohort study enrolled 33 women with stage IV or locally recurrent triple-negative breast cancers and 0 to 2 lines of prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting from December 8, 2014, to April 30, 2017, at 11 sites in the United States. The median follow-up was 24.4 months (95% CI, 22.1-28.8 months). Interventions/UNASSIGNED:Patients received concurrent intravenous atezolizumab and intravenous nab-paclitaxel (minimum 4 cycles). Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included best overall response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1; objective response rate; duration of response; disease control rate; progression-free survival; overall survival; and biomarker analyses. Results/UNASSIGNED:The 33 women had a median age of 55 years (range, 32-84 years) and received 1 or more doses of atezolizumab. All patients (100%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related adverse event, 24 patients (73%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, and 7 patients (21%) had grade 3/4 adverse events of special interest. No deaths were related to study treatment. The objective response rate was 39.4% (95% CI, 22.9%-57.9%), and the median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI, 2.0-20.9 months). The disease control rate was 51.5% (95% CI, 33.5%-69.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-7.7 months) and 14.7 months (95% CI, 10.1-not estimable), respectively. Concurrent nab-paclitaxel neither significantly changed biomarkers of the tumor immune microenvironment (programmed death-ligand 1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8) nor impaired atezolizumab systemic immune activation (expansion of proliferating CD8+ T cells, increase of CXCL10 chemokine). Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:In this phase 1b trial for metastatic triple-negative breast cancers, the combination of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel had a manageable safety profile. Antitumor responses were observed, including in patients previously treated with a taxane. Trial Registration/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01633970.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Standard first-line treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is chemotherapy. However, outcomes are poor, and new treatment options are needed. In cohort B of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-086 study, we evaluated pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC. Patients and methods/UNASSIGNED:Eligible patients had centrally confirmed mTNBC, no prior systemic anticancer therapy for metastatic disease, measurable disease at baseline per RECIST v1.1 by central review, no radiographic evidence of central nervous system metastases, and a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score ≥1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR; percentage of patients with complete or partial response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results/UNASSIGNED:All 84 patients enrolled were women, and 73 (86.9%) received prior (neo)adjuvant therapy. Fifty-three (63.1%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (AEs), including 8 patients (9.5%) with grade 3 severity; no patients experienced grade 4 AEs or died because of treatment-related AEs. Four patients had a complete response and 14 had a partial response, for an ORR of 21.4% (95% CI, 13.9-31.4). Of the 13 patients with stable disease, 2 had stable disease lasting ≥24 weeks, for a DCR of 23.8% (95% CI, 15.9-34.0). At data cutoff, 8 of 18 (44.4%) responses were ongoing, and median duration of response was 10.4 months (range, 4.2-19.2+). Median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.2) and median OS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 12.9-23.0). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Pembrolizumab monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and showed durable antitumor activity as first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC. Clinical trial registration/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02447003.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Treatment options for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are limited. In cohort A of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-086 study, we evaluated pembrolizumab as second or later line of treatment for patients with mTNBC. Patients and methods/UNASSIGNED:Eligible patients had centrally confirmed mTNBC, ≥1 systemic therapy for metastatic disease, prior treatment with anthracycline and taxane in any disease setting, and progression on or after the most recent therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in the total and PD-L1-positive populations, and safety. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR; percentage of patients with complete or partial response or stable disease for ≥24 weeks), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results/UNASSIGNED:All enrolled patients (N=170) were women, 61.8% had PD-L1-positive tumors, and 43.5% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy for metastatic disease. ORR (95% CI) was 5.3% (2.7-9.9) in the total and 5.7% (2.4-12.2) in the PD-L1-positive populations. DCR (95% CI) was 7.6% (4.4-12.7) and 9.5% (5.1-16.8), respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in the total (range, 1.2+-21.5+) and in the PD-L1-positive (range, 6.3-21.5+) populations. Median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-2.0), and the 6-month rate was 14.9%. Median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.7-11.2), and the 6-month rate was 69.1%. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 103 (60.6%) patients, including 22 (12.9%) with grade 3 or 4 AEs. There were no deaths due to AEs. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated durable antitumor activity in a subset of patients with previously treated mTNBC and had a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial registration/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02447003.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of the current study was to conduct a pooled analysis of studies that have investigated the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS:Participating studies had evaluated the percentage infiltration of stromally located TILs (sTILs) that were quantified in the same manner in patient diagnostic samples of early-stage TNBC treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without taxanes. Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by trial were used for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; primary end point), distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and overall survival (OS), fitting sTILs as a continuous variable adjusted for clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS:, 48.5 OS; P < .001). Each 10% increment in sTILs corresponded to an iDFS hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.91) for iDFS, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for D-DFS, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.89) for OS. In node-negative patients with sTILs ≥ 30%, 3-year iDFS was 92% (95% CI, 89% to 98%), D-DFS was 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%), and OS was 99% (95% CI, 97% to 100%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This pooled data analysis confirms the strong prognostic role of sTILs in early-stage TNBC and excellent survival of patients with high sTILs after adjuvant chemotherapy and supports the integration of sTILs in a clinicopathologic prognostic model for patients with TNBC. This model can be found at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org .

Metaplastic breast cancer (MPBC) is a rare subtype that accounts for <1% of all breast cancers. Although these are typically "triple negative," they are relatively chemotherapy-refractory compared to conventional triple negative invasive breast cancers with more aggressive features and an overall poor prognosis. MPBC is a heterogeneous group of tumors that are enriched for TP53 and PIK3CA mutations, and have been found to have high PD-L1 expression though the mechanisms underlying its immunogenicity remain unclear. We perform comprehensive genomic profiling in the largest MPBC dataset (n = 192) to date and assess for other potential biomarkers of immune response.

BACKGROUND:Unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative (hormone-receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-negative) breast cancer is an aggressive disease with poor outcomes. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel may enhance the anticancer activity of atezolizumab. METHODS:In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) patients with untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to receive atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or placebo plus nab-paclitaxel; patients continued the intervention until disease progression or an unacceptable level of toxic effects occurred. Stratification factors were the receipt or nonreceipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane therapy, the presence or absence of liver metastases at baseline, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression at baseline (positive vs. negative). The two primary end points were progression-free survival (in the intention-to-treat population and PD-L1-positive subgroup) and overall survival (tested in the intention-to-treat population; if the finding was significant, then it would be tested in the PD-L1-positive subgroup). RESULTS:Each group included 451 patients (median follow-up, 12.9 months). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel, as compared with 5.5 months with placebo plus nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.92; P=0.002); among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, the median progression-free survival was 7.5 months and 5.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.78; P<0.001). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median overall survival was 21.3 months with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and 17.6 months with placebo plus nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02; P=0.08); among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, the median overall survival was 25.0 months and 15.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86). No new adverse effects were identified. Adverse events that led to the discontinuation of any agent occurred in 15.9% of the patients who received atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and in 8.2% of those who received placebo plus nab-paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS:Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel prolonged progression-free survival among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in both the intention-to-treat population and the PD-L1-positive subgroup. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of each agent. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpassion130 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02425891 .).

Immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB), in particular PD-1 inhibition, has rapidly changed the treatment landscape and altered therapeutic paradigms across many tumor types, with unprecedented rates of durable clinical responses in a number of cancers. Despite this success, only a subset of patients responds to ICB and, as a result, predictive biomarkers would be useful to guide the selection of patients for these therapies. This article highlights currently used biomarkers, as well as several promising novel candidates, and also discusses the challenges involved in establishing their analytic validity and clinical utility. Progress is being evaluated in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, for which PD-1 ± CTLA-4 inhibitors have become standard therapy, to other malignancies for which PD-L1 inhibitors remain investigational. Although single biomarkers have substantial limitations, a combination of biomarkers that reflect the interaction of host and tumor will likely be needed to provide a reproducible surrogate for the benefit of checkpoint modulation. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(10); 1122-8. ©2018 AACR.

The immune system encompasses a broad array of defense mechanisms against foreign threats, including invading pathogens and transformed neoplastic cells. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are critically involved in innate immunity, serving as pattern recognition receptors whose stimulation leads to additional innate and adaptive immune responses. Malignant cells exploit the natural immunomodulatory functions of TLRs, expressed mainly by infiltrating immune cells but also aberrantly by tumor cells, to foster their survival, invasion, and evasion of anti-tumor immune responses. An extensive body of research has demonstrated context-specific roles for TLR activation in different malignancies, promoting disease progression in certain instances while limiting cancer growth in others. Despite these conflicting roles, TLR agonists have established therapeutic benefits as anti-cancer agents that activate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and facilitate the expression of cytokines that allow for infiltration of anti-tumor lymphocytes and the suppression of oncogenic signaling pathways. This review focuses on the clinical application of TLR agonists for cancer treatment. We also highlight agents that are undergoing development in clinical trials, including investigations of TLR agonists in combination with other immunotherapies.