Faculty Bibliography

A 61-year-old woman presented with a five-month history of an intermittent eruption of papules and nodules on her face and neck. Past medical history included systemic lupus erythematosus. Histopathologic examination was consistent with secondary follicular mucinosis in association with systemic lupus erythematosus. This rare entity has been described in one prior report as a precursor to the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. Follicular mucinosis occurs as either a primary idiopathic form or a secondary form associated with either benign inflammatory processes or malignant conditions, such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Numerous treatments for primary follicular mucinosis have been described, which include isotretinoin and glucocorticoids, whereas treatment of the underlying disease is necessary in the secondary form. The association with lymphoma mandates long-term clinical monitoring of patients with particularly recalcitrant, widespread, or chronic follicular mucinosis

A 62-year-old woman with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis presented for evaluation and treatment of a one-week history of pruritic, pink spots on her trunk and extremities. Several weeks prior, therapy with certolizumab pegol and methotrexate was started for her psoriatic arthritis. A biopsy specimen was consistent with the diagnosis of porokeratosis. Owing to the setting of immunosuppression and presence of symmetric pruritic lesions on non-sun exposed areas, the diagnosis of disseminated superficial porokeratosis was made

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is commonly used for a variety of diseases in the United States. Limited population-based data exist on CAM use among patients with dermatologic conditions OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the extent and the nature of CAM use in the United States among people with skin problems. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the 2002 National Health Interview Survey and the Alternative Health Supplement. RESULTS: Among those reporting skin problems in the past year, 49.4% (95% confidence interval 47.2-51.6) had used CAM. Only 6.0% of this group (95% confidence interval 4.2-7.7) used CAM specifically for skin disease. Those reporting skin problems were more likely to use CAM than those who did not report skin problems (odds ratio 1.7, P < or = .001, 95% confidence interval 1.6-1.8). The most commonly used CAM modality was nonvitamin, nonmineral, natural products (ie, herbals). LIMITATIONS: Because of the nature of a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to know whether the skin problem or the CAM use came first (except in situations where they used CAM specifically for skin problems). Because this is not a dermatology-focused database, the definition of skin disease is vague. CONCLUSION: CAM use among adults with skin problems in the Unites States is common. Dermatologists should have candid discussions with their patients regarding CAM use.

The field of nonsurgical laser resurfacing for aesthetic enhancement continues to improve with new research and technological advances. Since its beginnings in the 1980s, the laser-resurfacing industry has produced a multitude of devices employing ablative, nonablative, and fractional ablative technologies. The three approaches largely differ in their method of thermal damage, weighing degrees of efficacy, downtime, and side effect profiles against each other. Nonablative technologies generate some interest, although only for those patient populations seeking mild improvements. Fractional technologies, however, have gained dramatic ground on fully ablative resurfacing. Fractional laser resurfacing, while exhibiting results that fall just short of the ideal outcomes of fully ablative treatments, is an increasingly attractive alternative because of its far more favorable side effect profile, reduced recovery time, and significant clinical outcome.

A 78-year-old man presented with an eight-month history of folliculocentric, pink, hyperkeratotic papules and plaques with thick white scale that involved the entire body, with confluence on the buttocks and genitalia. A biopsy specimen demonstrated superficial and focal, mild perivascular and perifollicular, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate and eosinophils. There were lymphocytes extending to the dermo-epidermal junction with vacuolar changes. A diagnosis of lichenoid drug eruption secondary to a proton-pump inhibitor was made. To the best of our knowledge, only one other case of lichenoid drug eruption secondary to a proton-pump inhibitor has been reported

BACKGROUND: The characteristics and prevalence of dermatologists reading dermatopathology slides are not well understood. METHODS: We surveyed 1406 members of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), including all 497 who were also members of the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) along with a random sample of the remaining AAD members who were not ASDP members. Seven hundred and thirty of 1406 (51.9%) responded with a usable survey. Logistic regression was used to analyze responses by ASDP member dermatologists, non-ASDP member dermatologists and in a weighted analysis for dermatologists as a whole. RESULTS: A total of 32.7% of dermatologists as a whole generated at least one final microscopic diagnosis in the preceding year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that men were significantly more likely to read dermatopathology slides (odds ratio (OR) = 1.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.12; p = 0.01). Additionally, there was significant variation by region (p < 0.001); compared with dermatologists in the Midwest, dermatologists in the Southeast (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.80) were significantly less likely to read slides, while those in the Mountain (OR = 3.09; 95% CI 1.10-8.72) and West (OR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.04-3.90) regions were significantly more likely. There were no significant associations found between reading slides and the year of residency completion, the number of patients seen per week or being primarily in academics. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of dermatologists reading dermatopathology slides is relatively common, with significant regional and sex differences.