Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: To examine the variables affecting outcomes for sequential bilateral cochlear implantation patients in the adolescent population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review at tertiary care center. METHODS: Main outcome measures were open set speech recognition tests at the word (Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant/Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten List Test [CNC/PBK]) and sentence levels in noise (Hearing in Noise Test-Noise [HINT-N]) in different test conditions with respect to the age at first and sequential implantation, as well as the interval between implants. RESULTS: Despite a mean age at sequential implantation of 13.5 years, sequential bilateral implanted adolescents revealed significant improvement in the sequential cochlear implant (CI2) ear. The mean time interval between implants was 8.2 years. A wide range of performance was noted, and age at implantation and interval between first cochlear implant (CI1) and CI2 did not predict outcome. Mean CNC/PBK score with CI1 alone was 83.0%, with the CI2 alone was 56.5%, and with bilateral implants was 86.8%. Sentence scores (HINT-N) were 89.5% for CI1, 74.2% for CI2, and 94.4% for bilateral CI condition. The clinical relevance of these enhanced perception abilities requires attention to individual device use, performance with the first implant, and subjective benefits reported by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral sequential cochlear implantation leads to improved speech perception in the adolescent population and should be considered in this population, even after a long period of deafness and despite a prolonged interval between implants. Numerous factors affect the ability to predict performance, but age at implantation and interimplant interval were not correlated with performance measures. Extensive preoperative counseling and individualized evaluation are critical to ensure that patients and families understand the range of possible outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 6. Laryngoscope, 2015.

Although the preponderance of cerebellopontine angle lesions are schwannomas, focused attention to patient clinical history, imaging studies, and tissue biopsies when indicated will aid in detection of less common lesions that might otherwise be misdiagnosed. This is most critical for pathologies that dictate different management paradigms be undertaken.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Trauma to intracochlear structures during cochlear implant insertion is associated with poorer hearing outcomes. One way surgeons can influence insertion trauma is by choosing the surgical approach. We seek to compare cochleostomy (CO), peri-round window (PRW), and round window (RW) approaches using a fresh frozen temporal bone model. STUDY DESIGN: Experiments using fresh frozen temporal bones. METHODS: Cochlear implant insertions using the three aforementioned approaches were performed on 15 fresh frozen human temporal bones using a Cochlear 422 electrode. Insertions were evaluated by examining fluoroscopic recordings of histologic sections. RESULTS: Five cochlear implant insertions were performed using each of the three aforementioned approaches. Fluoroscopic examination revealed that none of the CO or PRW insertions contacted the modiolus during insertion, whereas three of five RW insertions did. RW insertions were less linear during insertion when compared to CO and PRW insertions (P < .05). CO insertions had significantly larger angular depth of insertion (487 degrees ) when compared to PRW (413 degrees ) and RW (375 degrees ) (P < .05). Histologic examination revealed one RW insertion resulted in osseous spiral lamina fracture, whereas the remaining insertions had no evidence of trauma. In the damaged specimen, the inserted electrode was observed to rest in the scala vestibuli, whereas the remaining electrodes rested in the scala tympani. CONCLUSIONS: Due to variability in RW anatomy, a CO or PRW window surgical approach appears to minimize the risk for insertion trauma. However, with favorable anatomy, a Cochlear 422 electrode can be inserted with any of the three approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 125:966-971, 2015.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To provide insight into the demographics and vocal habits of current Broadway musical theater performers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, Questionnaire. METHODS: Adult musical theater performers in Broadway Productions as defined by the League of American Theater Producers and the Actors' Equity Association were asked to complete a survey collecting demographic information, vocal health and habits, alcohol, tobacco, and drug use and information regarding their level of vocal comfort and threshold to miss performances based on their voice. Data were subjected to descriptive and statistical analysis based on sex and role type (lead vs ensemble). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five performers completed the survey from seven actively running shows. Ensemble members were younger and had not been in the business as long as performers in lead roles. Over 25% of respondents had been diagnosed with a vocal injury, yet the number of days missed per year due to voice problems was relatively low (1.7-4.7). Across all respondents, only approximately 54.8% reported consistently warming up before a performance and 7.4% reported consistently cooling down afterward. Nearly 91% of respondents reported regular alcohol consumption and tobacco use was 10.4%; 23.0% reported illicit drug use. CONCLUSIONS: This study marks the first time that vocal health has been addressed in this elite group of vocal professionals. The performer's low self-reported numbers of missed days is interesting particularly given that they appear to participate in harmful vocal health activities at the same rate as the general public.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In pediatric patients with congenital malformations of the inner ear, anomalies within the anatomy may facilitate unintentional insertion of the cochlear implant electrode into the internal auditory canal. Revision procedures for removal and replacement of cochlear implant electrodes following internal auditory canal insertion are fraught with potential danger, including the theoretical risk of injury to vasculature within the internal auditory canal, repeat insertion within the internal auditory canal, and cerebrospinal fluid leak. The objective of this presentation is to describe a technique for revision cochlear implantation following internal auditory canal insertion to minimize the potential associated risks. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients at a tertiary care facility who underwent revision cochlear implantation for internal auditory canal insertion between January 1999 and July 2011. RESULTS: A total of four patients referred from outside institutions have undergone revision cochlear implantation for internal auditory canal insertion. The records from these patients were reviewed. Electrodes were safely removed in all cases without injury to the anterior inferior cerebellar artery or its branches (i.e., labyrinthine artery). Complete insertion was accomplished on reimplantation. Neural response telemetry was performed in all cases, and responses were noted. Fluoroscopy was utilized to visualize electrode progression during insertion. A detailed description of the operative technique is provided. CONCLUSIONS: This case series describes a technique for revision cochlear implantation that appears to be safe and effective in preventing potential associated complications. Laryngoscope, 2013.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of residual hearing on postoperative speech performance in traditional cochlear implant (CI) patients implanted with a conventional electrode. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 129 adults implanted by a single surgeon at a tertiary care facility between June 2005 and November 2010 with measurable preoperative pure tone thresholds at any frequency were included. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation with a conventional electrode via an anterior inferior cochleostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Speech perception using monosyllabic word scores in quiet and sentences in quiet and noise in the electric (CI-only) condition of the implanted ear. Preservation of hearing was defined as complete for postoperative thresholds within 10 dB of preimplant values and partial if greater than 11 dB. Pure tone audiometry and speech perception testing were performed preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively, with the 1-year evaluation being the final outcome period. RESULTS: Preservation at any frequency or level was not a factor in speech perception outcome, although preservation was more common in low frequencies. Hearing preservation was correlated with younger age at implantation, but was not related to length of hearing loss, cause of deafness, device type, sex, preoperative speech performance, or low-frequency pure-tone average. CONCLUSION: Hearing can be preserved in traditional CI patients implanted with a conventional electrode. Although preservation of hearing may have implications for future technology, it is not currently correlated with speech performance in the CI-only condition.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Life-support training emphasizes the primacy of airway management. Acquiring these skills requires practice and exposure to events. Otolaryngology residents lack standardized training in advanced airway skills. This project aimed to create such a program by using simulation-based methodology evaluated using specific educationally based tools. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: The program consisted of lectures and simulation-based training sessions designed to impart competency in a set of defined airway skills to otolaryngology residents. Only participating residents who completed the course (n = 12) were evaluated both before and after the course for their fund of knowledge through multiple-choice examinations and for clinical reasoning and technical skills as assessed by a panel of otolaryngologists in simulated difficult airway situations. Self-assessment tools were also incorporated. RESULTS: The average multiple choice score was 12 of 27 (44%) before the course and 15 of 27 (55%) after the completion of the course (P = .001). Faculty assessment yielded a cumulative score of 80% and 91% pre- and postcourse, respectively (P = .002). Although all residents reported prior experience in a critical emergency airway situation, only one reported prior training in advanced airway skills. A significant increase in participants' self-perceived ability to carry out critical airway-related skills was observed. All respondents felt the course was effective. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based airway training courses can be effectively incorporated into existing educational curricula for otolaryngology residents, and their success can be measured using educationally based tools. With such a course, residents can be expected to demonstrate measurable improvement in clinical knowledge base, technical skills, and self-perceived ability to handle difficult airway situations. Laryngoscope, 2013.