Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Pediatric mandibular fractures remain a therapeutic challenge due to the presence of tooth buds, the need to preserve the growth centers of the jaw, and the high risk to ankylosis in patients with trauma to the condyles. More specifically, condylar fracture with lateral dislocation out of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can pose significant challenges due to the difficulty with application of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) as well as rigid plate fixation. Furthermore, open reduction of the condyle poses long term risk to dysfunction. Herein, we present a novel transfacial pinning surgical technique for the management of pediatric bilateral condylar fractures with lateral dislocation and concomitant symphyseal fracture in a patient less than 5 years of age. Methods/Description: A healthy 3-year-old male patient, who sustained a complex facial fracture in a golf cart accident in which he was unrestrained. Physical exam was remarkable for panfacial edema with no soft tissue injuries and limited oral excursion. Craniofacial computed tomography (CT) revealed a tripartite mandibular fracture, including bilateral condylar fractures with lateral dislocation of the left condyle and a symphyseal fracture. There were no other facial fractures and the patient's cervical spine was cleared both clinically and radiographically. The deciduous teeth precluded the use of traditional MMF and the presence of tooth buds within the entirely of the mandibular body and symphysis made the use of rigid fixation not feasible. The operative plan entailed a staged lower jaw reconstruction with: closed reduction of the laterally dislocated condyle; transfacial pinning with a 2.8 mm threaded Steinman pin between the mandibular angles to secure the medial location mandibular ramus and angle; application of MMF using circummandibular wiring and intermaxillary fixation screws. Two weeks later, MMF was released and the patient started a soft diet and oral excursion exercises with the transfacial pin in place. Two months after the first surgery, the transfacial pin was removed.
Result(s): The patient tolerated all procedures well. Immediate postoperative CT taken after placement of the transfacial pin (first surgery) revealed appropriate reduction of the laterally displaced condyle. At the time of transfacial pin removal (8 weeks after the initial repair), the patient demonstrated full and pain free oral excursion and stable class I occlusion. Follow-up CT analysis after removal of the transfacial pin demonstrates a stable reduction of the dislocated condyle and bony union of all three fractures.
Conclusion(s): Transfacial pinning technique can be a safe and effective technique for treatment of pediatric mandible fractures with lateral dislocation of the condyle

Background/Purpose: After LeFort I advancement surgery, soft tissue changes are unpredictable, especially in patients with orofacial clefts, as scar tissue from primary repair can alter soft tissue responses. Therefore, this study aimed to measure and evaluate soft tissue response following LeFort I advancement in skeletally matured patients with complete cleft lip and palate (CLP). Methods/Description: The cohort of 26 patients with non-syndromic CLP who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy between 2013 and 2019 and met the inclusion criteria. Patients were included if they had lateral cephalograms or CBCT at pre-operative (T1), immediately post-operative (T2), and one-year follow-up (T3). Patients who underwent nose/lip revision surgery before T3 were excluded. Four skeletal and dental hard-tissue (ANS, point A; A-point, upper incisor most labial; U1-most, upper incisor edge; U1-tip) and 5 softtissue (tip of nose or pronasale; Prn, subnasale; Sn, superior labial sulcus; SLS, upper lip anterior or labrale superius; LS, and stomion superius; SIMS) landmarks were digitized and measured. For the outcome analyses, 5 ratios of soft- to hard-tissue changes (Prn/ANS, Sn/A-point, SLS/A-point, LS/U1-most, and SIMS/ U1-tip) were calculated for each group, and associations between hard-and-soft tissue counterparts were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
Result(s): Sixteen patients had UCLP, and 10 patients had BCLP. At one-year follow-up (T1-T3), the mean advancement in UCLP and BCLP groups at ANS were 4.4+/-3 and 4.7+/-3.9 mm, from point A were 6.6+/-2.5, 8.8+/- 2.6 mm, respectively. The mean horizontal changes of the corresponding soft tissue anatomy, Prn, were 2.7 +/-1.7, 4.6+/-3.5 mm, from Sn, were 3.9+/-1.9, 6.2+/-2.4. mm, and from SLS were 5.2+/-2.5, 7.4+/-2.8 mm. The mean advancement in at upper incisor most labial were 7.2+/-2.7 and 8.4+/-2.4 mm, and from the upper incisal edge were 7.5+/-2.9 and 8.4+/-2.7. mm. The mean horizontal changes of the soft tissue counterpart, LS, were 5.6+/-2.9, 7.9+/- 3.7 mm, and SIMS were 6.0+/-3.2, 7.3+/- 2.7 mm. All skeletal, dental, and soft tissue advancements from T1-T3 were significant (P< 0.01) except for Sn and LS in both groups and SIMS in UCLP group. For ratio and correlation analyses in UCLP and BCLP groups, Prn/AND were 0.48 (r=0.40) and (r=0.00), Sn/A-point were 0.58 (r=0.79) and 0.70 (r=0.77), SLS/A-point were 0.79 (r=0.82) and 0.85 (r=0.80), LS/U1-most were 0.74 (r=0.92) and 0.96 (r=0.74), and SIMS/U1-tip were 0.78 (r=0.75) and 0.82(r=0.67), respectively. All associations except for Prn/ANS were statistically significant (P< 0.01).
Conclusion(s): This study demonstrated a linear relationship between soft- and hard-tissue changes in the maxillary landmarks following LeFort I advancement in patients with complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP and BCLP)

Background/Purpose: Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in combination with primary gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) may obviate the need for a secondary alveolar bone graft. While the long-term facial growth following GPP has been well documented, no study has evaluated the transverse growth of the cleft-maxilla following NAM and GPP. Here we report the effects of NAM and GPP on the maxillary transverse dimension in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Methods/Description: A retrospective single-institution review of nonsyndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate born between 2005 and 2010 was completed. Patients were divided into four groups based on their interventions: 1) NAM-GPP with adequate bone formation 2) NAM-GPP without adequate bone formation (requiring ABG) 3) NAM-no GPP (requiring ABG), and 4) No NAM-no GPP control (patients who received primary surgeries outside of our institution). Cone-beam computed tomographic scans (CBCTs) taken at the early-mixed dentition stage, prior to orthodontic intervention, were used to assess the anterior and posterior maxillary transverse dimensions. The transverse discrepancy at the affected and non-affected sides was measured at the level of the primary canines (anterior dimension) and the permanent first molars (posterior dimension) to the maxillary midline. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the transverse dimension of the affected versus non-affected sides within each group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare each NAM group with the no NAM-no GPP control group.
Result(s): A total of 85 patients were included in this study (mean age = 8.7). Male patients (50.6%) and the left side (64.7%) were most affected. Of the 85 patients, 26 (30.6%) underwent NAM-GPP with adequate bone formation, 22 (25.9%) underwent NAM-GPP but required ABG, 16 (18.8%) underwent NAM without GPP, and 21 (24.7%) underwent no NAM-no GPP. Median values were significantly different in the anterior maxilla between the affected and nonaffected sides across all four groups (p = 0.001). The transverse dimension at the affected side also revealed a significant difference in both the NAM-GPP (with adequate bone formation) and the NAM-GPP (requiring ABG) groups compared to the no NAM-no GPP group (p= 0.022 and p= 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the NAM-no GPP group compared to the control (p = 0.059). Distances to the molars of the affected and nonaffected sides were not statistically significant within or across any of the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion(s): In patients with UCLP, the maxillary primary canine transverse dimension on the affected side is significantly reduced in patients undergoing NAM and GPP compared to the control. However, the position of the maxillary first molars appear to be unaffected by NAM and GPP

BACKGROUND:β-Tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is one of the most common synthetic bone grafting materials utilized in craniofacial reconstruction; however, it is limited by a slow degradation rate. The aim of this study was to leverage 3-dimensional (3D) printing in an effort to accelerate the degradation kinetics of β-TCP. METHODS:Twenty-two 1-month-old New Zealand white rabbits underwent creation of calvarial and alveolar defects, repaired with 3D-printed β-TCP scaffolds coated with 1000 μM of osteogenic agent dipyridamole. Rabbits were euthanized after 2, 6, and 18 months after surgical intervention. Bone regeneration, scaffold degradation, and bone mechanical properties were quantified. RESULTS:Histological analysis confirmed the generation of vascularized and organized bone. Microcomputed tomography analysis from 2 to 18 months demonstrated decreased scaffold volume within calvarial (23.6% ± 2.5%, 5.1% ± 2.2%; P < 0.001) and alveolar (21.5% ± 2.2%, 0.2% ± 1.9%; P < 0.001) defects, with degradation rates of 54.6%/year and 90.5%/year, respectively. Scaffold-inducted bone generation within the defect was volumetrically similar to native bone in the calvarium (55.7% ± 6.9% vs 46.7% ± 6.8%; P = 0.064) and alveolus (31.4% ± 7.1% vs 33.8% ± 3.7%; P = 0.337). Mechanical properties between regenerated and native bone were similar. CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates an improved degradation profile and replacement of absorbed β-TCP with vascularized, organized bone through 3D printing and addition of an osteogenic agent. This novel additive manufacturing and tissue engineering protocol has implications to the future of craniofacial skeletal reconstruction as a safe and efficacious bone tissue engineering method.

The double Frost suture is a useful supplement to the reconstruction of ipsilateral upper and lower eyelid defects with full-thickness skin grafts. This technique involves silk traction sutures that overlap the upper and lower eyelids to place them on maximal stretch after placement of 2 full-thickness skin grafts. It has the added benefit of protecting the cornea and compressing both grafts under 1 bolster. The authors illustrate this technique in 2 pediatric cases-a congenital melanocytic kissing eyelid nevus and a periocular burn. Each case resulted in large upper and lower anterior lamellar defects, which were reconstructed with supraclavicular and retroauricular free skin grafts. The double Frost sutures counter vertical cicatricial forces during graft healing, obviating the need for staged procedures. Both described cases resulted in excellent graft survival with minimal contracture.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) can be treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), tongue-lip adhesion, or tracheostomy; however, there is an active debate regarding the indications of MDO in this patient population. Published algorithms identify tracheomalacia, bronchomalacia, laryngomalacia, hypotonic syndromes, and central sleep apnea as contraindications for MDO and indications for tracheostomy, but these comorbidities may exist along a spectrum of severity. The authors propose that appropriately selected neonates with PRS who concurrently express 1 or more of these traditional contraindications may be successfully treated with MDO. METHODS:The authors performed a 5-year retrospective chart review of all neonates who underwent MDO for treatment of severe PRS. All patients expressed a comorbidity previously identified as an indication for tracheostomy. Pre- and postoperative characteristics were recorded. Apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) before and after MDO were compared using 2-tailed repeated measures t-test. RESULTS:The authors identified 12 patients with severe PRS and conditions associated with contraindications to MDO: 9 (75.0%) patients had laryngomalacia, 6 (50.0%) patients had tracheomalacia, 2 (16.6%) patients had bronchomalacia, 1 (8.3%) patient had central sleep apnea, and 3 (25.0%) patients had hypotonia. Five (41.7%) patients underwent concurrent gastrostomy tube placement due to feeding insufficiency. Average birthweight was 3.0 kg. Average pre-op AHI was 34.8. Average post-op AHI was 7.3. All patients successfully underwent MDO with avoidance of tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS:By employing an interdisciplinary evaluation of patient candidacy, MDO can safely and effectively treat upper airway obstruction and avoid tracheostomy in higher-risk neonatal patients with traditional indications for tracheostomy.

Robin sequence (RS) is diagnosed in infants born with micrognathia, glossoptosis and varying degrees of upper airway obstruction (UAO). Due to the variable levels of hypoxia, severe breathing and feeding problems can occur. Treatment is determined by clinical severity, ranging from conservative interventions for mild cases to surgical interventions for severe cases. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a surgical technique that gradually lengthens the mandible after an osteotomy by using an internal or external distraction device, directly correcting the micrognathia. This review will focus on advantages and disadvantages of mandibular distraction in infants with RS.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to measure the association between the magnitude of advancement and dental and skeletal relapse in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). METHODS:A single-institution retrospective cohort study of skeletally matured patients with CLP who underwent isolated Le Fort I advancement surgery between 2013 and 2019 was studied. Patients were included if they had lateral cephalograms or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3). Lateral cephalometric landmarks were digitized and measured. The sample was divided on the basis of the magnitude of skeletal advancement: minor (<5 mm), moderate (≥5 but <10 mm), and major (≥10 mm) advancement groups. The mean advancement and relapse were compared between groups using 1-way ANOVA. Correlation between the amount of surgical advancement and relapse was evaluated. RESULTS:Forty-nine patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla met inclusion criteria and the sample consisted of 36 males and 13 females with the mean age of 19.5 years. In the minor, moderate, and major advancement groups, the mean advancement at point A was +4.1 ± 0.4, + 7.5 ± 1.4, and +11.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, the mean relapse at point A was -1.3 ± 1.2, -1.1 ± 1.2, and -1.7 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the relapse amount between all surgical groups. No correlation between the magnitude of advancement and relapse was found. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference in skeletal stability between a minor (<5 mm), moderate (≥5 but <10 mm), and major (≥10 mm) Le Fort I advancement groups in patients with clefts. Regardless of the degree of advancement, mild skeletal relapse was observed in all 3 groups.

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Identifying optimal treatment for infants with Robin sequence (RS) is challenging due to substantial variability in the presentation of upper airway obstruction (UAO) in this population. Objective assessments of UAO and treatments are not standardized. A systematic review of objective measures of UAO was conducted as step towards evidence based clinical decision making for RS. METHODS:A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Embase databases (1990-2020) following PRISMA-guidelines. Articles reporting on RS and UAO-treatment were included if the following objective measures were studied: oximetry, polysomnography and blood gas. Quality was appraised by methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS, range:0-24). RESULTS:A total of 91 articles met inclusion criteria. Mean MINORS-score was 7.1 (range:3-14). Polysomnography was most frequently used (76%) followed by oximetry (20%) and blood gas (11%). Sleep position of the infant was reported in 35% of studies, with supine position most frequently, and monitoring time in 42%, including overnight recordings in more than half. Of 71 studies that evaluated UAO-interventions, the majority used polysomnography (90%), of which 61% did not specify the polysomnography technique. Reported polysomnography metrics included oxygen saturation (61%), apnea-hypopnea index (52%), carbon dioxide levels (31%), obstructive-apnea-hypopnea index (27%), and oxygen-desaturation-index (16%). Only 42 studies reported indications for UAO-intervention, with oximetry and polysomnography thresholds used equally (both 40%). In total, 34 distinct indications for treatment were identified. CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review demonstrates a lack of standardization, interpretation and reporting of assessment and treatment indications for UAO in RS. An international, multidisciplinary consensus protocol is needed to guide clinicians on optimal UAO assessment in RS.

INTRODUCTION:We analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. METHODS:Data were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. RESULTS:The total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS:Our study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.