Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence of bleeding complications from central venous access procedures performed by a critical care service in patients with disorders of hemostasis. DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive sample, collection of clinical data. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with disorders of hemostasis who required central venous access for clinical management between October 1992 and October 1993. MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, clinical diagnosis, most recent platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were recorded from the medical record of patients with known coagulation or platelet abnormalities. The site of central venous catheter placement, the number of needle passes necessary to complete the procedure, and the occurrence of complications were reported by the critical care attending physician performing or supervising the procedure. RESULTS: One hundred four central venous access procedures were performed on 76 patients with disorders of hemostasis. Seventy-three percent of catheters were placed in patients with platelet counts less than 100,000/mL and 40% of catheters were placed in patients with abnormalities of PT, aPTT, or both. Thirteen percent of patients had abnormalities of both platelets and coagulation profile. There were no serious complications. Bleeding complicated 7 (6.5% of the procedures; 5 patients had bleeding from the skin (from the suture sites in four), and 2 patients developed small periosteal hematomas. All patients with bleeding complications had thrombocytopenia with mean platelet counts of 22,000/mL and a range of 6,000 to 37,000/mL. Most patients with platelet counts in this range did not have clinically evident bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Central venous access procedures can be done safely in patients with disorders of hemostasis by skilled physicians who frequently perform these procedures. Patients most likely to experience bleeding from these procedures are patients with severe thrombocytopenia. In this series, only a single patient, with a platelet count of 6,000/mL, required therapeutic blood product administration

A group of 16 patients with advanced malignancy were entered on a phase I trial of escalating doses of doxorubicin with ICRF-187 for cardioprotection and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) for bone marrow protection. Patients received intravenous ICRF-187 (dose ratio 20:1 ICRF-187:doxorubicin) 30 min prior to doxorubicin. GMCSF at a dose of 15 micrograms kg-1 day-1 was self-administered subcutaneously on days 3-14 of the cycle. Doxorubicin was administered every 21 days. Substantial hematological and non-hematological toxicity was seen. Fever, malaise, and pulmonary symptoms, thought to be due to GMCSF, were not eliminated by reduction in the GMCSF dose to 10 or 5 micrograms kg-1 day-1. Severe hematological toxicity was seen despite GMCSF administration and it was not possible to escalate the doxorubicin dose above 72 mg/m2 with this combination. Dose escalation of doxorubicin may be more feasible with the use of other growth factors or growth factor combinations

Acute renal failure is rarely the presenting manifestation of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Of the reported cases of renal insufficiency secondary to diffuse renal infiltration with lymphoma, few have presented with acute renal failure. We present a patient with acute renal failure secondary to diffuse bilateral renal infiltration by a B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The findings of an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), lymphopenia, and homogenous bilateral renal enlargement on computed tomographic (CT) imaging were important in suggesting the diagnosis of primary renal lymphoma. Renal biopsy with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis was instrumental in confirming this diagnosis

Iproplatin (CHIP) is a second generation cisplatin analogue which has completed its Phase I trials. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of CHIP in 36 previously untreated patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas (GE junction, cardia, antrum and body of the stomach). The starting dose was 275 mg/m2; course were repeated on an every four week schedule. Thirty-five patients were evaluable for response. Three partial remissions (8.5%) [95% confidence limits 2.5-15%] were seen. Toxicity was tolerable and included mild myelosuppression and mild nausea and vomiting. Although well tolerated, in patients with gastric and GE junction adenocarcinomas, CHIP chemotherapy was not more and probably slightly less, effective than the parent analogue cisplatin.