Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To evaluate granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as surgical adjuvant therapy in patients with malignant melanoma who are at high risk of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight assessable patients with stage III or IV melanoma were treated in a phase II trial with long-term, chronic, intermittent GM-CSF after surgical resection of disease. Patients with stage III disease were required to have more than four positive nodes or a more than 3-cm mass. All patients were rendered clinically disease-free by surgery before enrollment. The GM-CSF was administered subcutaneously in 28-day cycles, such that a dose of 125 microg/m(2) was delivered daily for 14 days followed by 14 days of rest. Treatment cycles continued for 1 year or until disease recurrence. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Overall and disease-free survival were significantly prolonged in patients who received GM-CSF compared with matched historical controls. The median survival duration was 37.5 months in the study patients versus 12.2 months in the matched controls (P <.001). GM-CSF was well tolerated; only one subject discontinued drug due to an adverse event (grade 2 injection site reaction). CONCLUSION: GM-CSF may provide an antitumor effect that prolongs survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage III and IV melanoma who are clinically disease-free. These results support institution of a prospective, randomized clinical trial to definitively determine the value of surgical adjuvant therapy with GM-CSF in such patients.

In order to explore non-cisplatin containing regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a randomized Phase-II study of two novel combinations, paclitaxel/ifosfamide and vinorelbine/ifosfamide. Both regimens were active with a 38% response rate (95% CI: 24%, 53%) and 31% (95% CI: 18%, 47%), respectively. Median survivals were 8.5 and 7.4 months. Toxicity, mostly neutropenia, was acceptable. These two combinations establish a 'proof of principle' that non-cisplatin containing regimens also have activity in this setting.

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine combined with monthly, fixed-dose docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 every 28 days. Gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 and underwent dose adjustment in cohorts of 3-6 patients. At the maximum tolerated dose, 11 additional patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 85 cycles of therapy. At the first dose level, the planned gemcitabine dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 was 800 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at this dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) requiring the reduction of gemcitabine to 600 mg/m(2) per dose and the administration of ciprofloxacin, 500 mg orally twice daily, on Days 8-18. At the second dose level the first 3 patients experienced no DLTs and the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 700 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at the 700 mg/m(2) dose level experienced DLTs. Eleven additional patients were enrolled at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, Grade 3/4 (according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5% and 2.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. Three of seven evaluable patients with pancreatic carcinoma had evidence of significant antineoplastic activity (three partial responses). In addition, two complete responses (one patient with gastric carcinoma and one patient with ovarian carcinoma) and one partial response (patient with hepatocellular carcinoma) were noted in patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen comprised of docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 8, and 15 with ciprofloxacin on Days 8-18 every 28 days is safe, well tolerated, and active.

BACKGROUND: In view of the successful use of serotherapy in many B-cell malignancies, we and others have sought to identify tumor selective antigens for the serotherapy of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD) including multiple myeloma (MM), and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). We recently identified Muc-1 core protein as a MM selective antigen. Though Muc-1 core protein is abundantly expressed on most MM plasma cells, expression of this antigen can be absent, or weak on some plasma cells which could potentially result in the selection of Muc-1 core protein negative clones following serotherapy of PCD. In addition to Muc-1 core protein, we have also been examining the use of CD20 directed serotherapy for PCD. DESIGN: As part of these efforts, we recently initiated a phase II clinical trial examining the use of Rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera) as a single agent in MM patients; as well several WM patients have been treated with Rituximab at our Institutions. RESULTS: In previous studies, we have shown that CD20 is abundantly expressed on the plasma cells of most WM patients; in contrast, CD20 is expressed on plasma cells from a minority of MM patients, and in these patients expression of CD20 can be weak or heterogeneous with both CD20+ and CD20- plasma cells present. As such, we have sought out clinically useful inducers of Muc-1 core protein, and of CD20 on malignant plasma cells. CONCLUSIONS: These efforts resulted in the identification of dexamethasone (Dex) as a potent inducer of Muc-1 core protein on MM plasma cells, and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) as a potent inducer of CD20 on MM plasma cells and B-cells. Importantly, these agents induced their respective antigens at pharmacologically achievable doses.

ASCO 2000 did not offer revolutionary new advances in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, reports at the meeting built incrementally on gains established over the past several years. The meeting continued to highlight advances in the targeted therapy of hematologic malignancies. Excitement abounds regarding the clinical development of STI 571, a rationally designed tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Studies further defined the role monoclonal antibody treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and more mature data were presented on both unconjugated antibody therapy and radioimmunoconjugates. In disease detection, important data were presented to clarify the role of positron emission tomography scans in the staging and follow-up of lymphoid malignancies. The following review summarizes key abstracts presented at the 2000 ASCO meeting and will elaborate on the implications of these findings for disease management.

The use of serotherapy to treat patients with plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) has been sought by us and others. Candidate antigens that have been targeted or proposed for targeting in PCDs include the immunoglobulin idiotype, CD19, CD38, CD54, CD126, HM1.24, and Muc-1 core protein. Unfortunately, many of these antigens are not ideal for use in serotherapy since they are not selectively expressed, are either shed or secreted, or have not been fully characterized. Serotherapy with an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody (B4) conjugated to a blocked ricin toxin had no significant activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Circulating CD20+ clonotypic B cells have been detected in the circulation of most MM and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) patients. Plasma cells from most WM patients express CD20, but most MM patient plasma cells either lack CD20 or express it weakly. In view of recent successes with anti-CD20-directed serotherapy in other B-cell malignancies, we initiated a phase II trial to study the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan; IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, and Genentech, Inc, San Francisco, CA) in patients with MM. We describe two PCD patients (one with WM and one with MM) who responded to therapy. By flow cytometric analysis, CD20+ plasma cells and B cells present in the bone marrow and peripheral blood of a patient with MM disappeared with response to rituximab therapy. However, residual CD20- tumor cells remained in the bone marrow following rituximab therapy, and after 6 months this patient progressed with CD20- myeloma cells. As a potential strategy to overcome this limitation, we demonstrated that interferon-gamma at pharmacologically achievable levels induced CD20 expression on these CD20- plasma cells, consistent with our recent findings that interferon-gamma is a potent inducer of CD20 expression on MM patient plasma cells and B cells. We also characterize a response to rituximab with a decrease in paraprotein and resolution of anemia in a patient with WM whose response to rituximab is ongoing after 19+ months. This preliminary experience supports the potential use of serotherapy targeting CD20 in PCDs. Our studies further suggest that interferon-gamma may enhance CD20 expression on MM plasma cells, thereby increasing their susceptibility to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies.

This Phase II trial was undertaken to determine the safety, toxicity, and potential efficacy of the B-cell restricted immunotoxin anti-B4-blocked ricin (Anti-B4-bR) when administered as adjuvant therapy to patients in complete remission (CR) after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Forty-nine patients with B-cell NHL in CR 46-202 days (median, 112 days) post-ABMT received Anti-B4-bR at a dose of 30 microg/kg lean body weight/day for 7 days by continuous i.v. infusion. Patients were eligible for up to two additional courses of therapy at 14-day intervals. A total of 83 courses of Anti-B4-bR were administered, with 31 patients receiving two or more courses of therapy. The mean serum level on day 7 of the first course was 0.77+/-0.41 nM. Reversible toxicities included hepatic transaminase elevations, thrombocytopenia, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, hypoalbuminemia, and dyspnea. Human antimouse antibody (HAMA) and/or human antiricin antibody (HARA) responses occurred in 23 patients at a median of 22 days from the initiation of Anti-B4-bR therapy (range, 11-100 days). The 4-year disease-free survival and overall survival are estimated at 56 and 72%, respectively. Twenty-six patients remain in CR after a median follow-up of 54.5 months. This study demonstrates that Anti-B4-bR can be administered safely to patients as adjuvant therapy early after ABMT for B-cell NHL. The toxicities are tolerable and reversible. Although the early estimate of disease-free survival was very encouraging in this single-armed trial, the 4-year follow-up data demonstrate continued relapse.

BACKGROUND: Although antibiotic therapy is emerging as effective initial treatment for patients with gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), there is a subset of patients for whom antibiotics are ineffective or inappropriate. Surgical resection can be curative, but total gastrectomy may be required for the eradication of all disease. To identify the optimal nonantibiotic therapy for early stage gastric MALT lymphoma, the authors retrospectively evaluated the Massachusetts General Hospital experience with gastric MALT lymphoma. METHODS: Disease patterns and treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed in data from 21 consecutive patients with gastric MALT lymphoma who were treated between 1978 and 1995 at the Massachusetts General Hospital. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were Stage IE, and 5 were in higher stages. Treatment consisted of resection with or without radiation or chemotherapy (14 patients), radiation alone (4 patients), or radiation plus chemotherapy (2 patients). Thirteen Stage IE patients received local therapy only. The 10-year actuarial relapse free survival rate for Stage IE patients was 93%, with 1 relapse among 15 treated patients. Because the patient who relapsed was treated successfully with chemotherapy, the 10-year cancer free survival was 100%. Overall survival for Stage IE patients was 93% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years, with no deaths from lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that a high probability of long term remission can be achieved with only local treatment of patients with Stage I gastric MALT lymphoma. Preliminary results suggest that radiation therapy is well tolerated and effective and may well be the optimal nonantibiotic treatment for patients with localized gastric MALT lymphoma