Faculty Bibliography

The authors reviewed a 2-year experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair to determine if patients who were excluded from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) because of anatomic criteria (Group III) represented a higher risk for subsequent open aneurysm repair than either patients undergoing EVAR (Group II) or those patients who preferentially underwent open repair (Group I). Between January 2001 and December 2003, 107 patients underwent AAA repair. Open repair was recommended in patients <70 years of age and without significant comorbidities (Group I). There were 35 patients in Group I; 72 patients were evaluated for EVAR; 29 patients underwent EVAR (Group II), and 43 were excluded and underwent open repair (Group III). Exclusion criteria were those recommended by the graft manufacturers. Patients in Group I were significantly younger than those in Groups II and III (p < 0.0001). Gender, incidence of diabetes, and hypertension were similar in all groups. Patients in Group III had a greater incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) than those in Groups I and II, trending toward statistical significance (p = 0.06). Aneurysm size in Group II was statistically smaller than in Group I or III. Group III had significantly more complications (25.6% vs 5.7% and 6.9%) than either Group I or II (p < 0.015). Cardiac complications were similar in all groups. Three patients in Group III required prolonged intubation and 3 in Group III developed renal insufficiency. A history of CAD was predictive of complications (21.8% vs 5.8%, p < 0.024), as was inclusion in Group III. There were 2 deaths in this series, both in Group III. Length of stay was significantly less in Group II (4.17 +/-2.36 days) than in Group I (6.57 +/-1.84 days) or Group III (12.30 +/-9.82 days) (p = 0.0001). Open aneurysm repair can be safely performed in younger good-risk patients (Group I) with results equivalent to EVAR (Group II) but with slightly longer length of stay (LOS). In older patients with suitable anatomy EVAR can be performed with minimal morbidity and short LOS. Older patients not suitable for EVAR (Group III) constitute a higher risk group of patients because of increased incidence of CAD and the need for more complex repairs. However, the mortality rate in this group was only 4.6%.

Cerebral oximetry is a simple method of measuring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO(2)). One promising application is its use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to help minimize the risk of perioperative stroke. The authors used the INVOS-4100 cerebral oximeter at several steps during CEA to measure the effect of carotid clamping and shunting on rSO(2). The authors prospectively evaluated 42 consecutive CEAs in 40 patients. All had CEA under general anesthesia with the routine use of a Javid shunt. The INVOS-4100 oximeter was used to measure rSO(2) before clamping (t1), after clamping but before shunting (t2), 5 minutes after shunt insertion (t3), and after patch closure with reestablished flow (t4). The Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests were used for analysis. Clamping of the internal carotid artery (t1 vs t2) resulted in a drop of ipsilateral rSO(2) by -12.3% (p < 0.001). Shunt insertion (t2 vs t3) increased rSO(2) by 10.9% (p < 0.001). Contralateral rSO(2) for the same time periods was insignificant. Patients with preoperative neurologic symptoms had a greater decrease in rSO(2) after clamping (-18.4%) compared with a decrease of -10.4% in asymptomatic patients (p = 0.037). Cerebral oximetry monitoring is simple and inexpensive. The study showed statistically significant changes in rSO(2) as a result of clamping and shunting of the carotid artery. Symptomatic patients had a greater drop in rSO(2).

The concept of a "high-risk" carotid endarterectomy patient has been suggested in an effort to justify the application of carotid angioplasty and stenting outside of clinical trials. Contemporary results of carotid endarterectomy in this subgroup of patients would argue against the existence of a high-risk patient. Until randomized prospective trials establish the role of carotid angioplasty and stenting in carotid bifurcation disease, this new technology should be restricted to recurrent and radiation-induced disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current management of acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to thrombotic or embolic occlusion of visceral vessels in a community teaching hospital. Between October 1997 and July 2000, a review of all hospital discharges revealed 83 patients with a discharge diagnosis of "acute vascular insufficiency-intestine." Among these 83 patients, 22 cases of acute mesenteric ischemia were confirmed. Management of these 22 patients was divided into 2 groups for analysis. In Group A, 14 patients were aggressively treated with visceral angiography (n=10), visceral artery bypass (n=8), visceral embolectomy (n=4), and bowel resection (n=7). In 8 of 14 of these patients, surgical intervention occurred in less than 24 hours from presentation. In Group B, 8 patients were managed with supportive care because of advanced age (mean age = 86 +/- 7 years), comorbid conditions, or patient and family preference. Postoperative morbidity in Group A consisted of cardiac events (n=3), pulmonary insufficiency (n=5), and prolonged gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (n=3). Twelve of 14 patients in Group A survived and were discharged, whereas only 2 of 8 patients in Group B survived and were discharged from the hospital. Although the literature suggests that there can be a significant delay in the diagnosis and treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia, the early recognition and aggressive treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia resulted in a good survival rate. Supportive management of very elderly and debilitated patients needs to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Although the outlook for such patients is dismal, survivors are possible as demonstrated by this series.

OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that patients whose conditions do not meet North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial inclusion criteria or have anatomic risk factors constitute a "high-risk" group for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and might be candidates for primary carotid angioplasty stenting. Our objective was to review a consecutive series of isolated CEAs, identify the number of such patients at high risk, and determine whether their operations were associated with increased complication rate. METHODS: Consecutive isolated CEAs performed between June 1996 and June 2001 were reviewed. High-risk comorbidities included: age 80 years or more (n = 80), New York Heart Association class III/IV angina (n = 16), Canadian class III/IV heart failure (n = 4), myocardial infarct 6 months or less (n = 11), steroid-dependent or oxygen-dependent pulmonary disease (n = 4), and creatinine level of 3 or more (n = 13). Anatomic high risk was defined by: contralateral occlusion (n = 66), lesion above C(2) or requirement of digastric division (n = 53), reoperation (n = 29), and neck radiation (n = 3). Statistical analysis was with chi(2) analysis. RESULTS: Of 788 patients reviewed, 228 (29%) were classified as high risk by one or more of the previous criteria (63% comorbidity, 28% anatomy, 9% both). Presence of preoperative neurologic symptoms and postoperative results were similar across all patient groups. The total stroke and death rate was 1.1% for all the patients. Six patients had postoperative strokes (0.8%), and three patients died of myocardial infarcts (0.4%). The stroke and death rate was 1.3% in the high-risk group as compared with 1.1% in the normal-risk group (P =.51). CONCLUSION: The concept of the high-risk CEA must be critically reexamined. Although 29% of patients for CEA were high risk as defined by others, we found no evidence that this influenced the results after CEA. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, contralateral carotid occlusion, and high carotid lesions can undergo operation without increased complications. If a high-risk group exists, it is small and restricted to reoperation or radiated neck (4% in this series). With this possible exception, carotid angioplasty stenting should be restricted to randomized clinical trials.

Neurofibromatosis is characterized by its cutaneous manifestations. It also is manifested by arterial lesions commonly found in arterioles and small arteries but rarely in large arteries. We present a patient with type I neurofibromatosis with spontaneous rupture of his abdominal aorta. He was found at the time of emergency laparotomy to have direct compression of his aorta by retroperitoneal neurofibromas and abnormal aortic structural wall integrity.

BACKGROUND:A coil in the internal carotid artery (ICA), defined as a circular configuration or exaggerated S shape of the ICA, is occasionally encountered during endarterectomy for carotid bifurcation lesions. The significance of coils as an etiology for symptoms is difficult to determine. It is thought, however, that the failure to correct coils and kinks during routine carotid endarterectomy (CE) may lead to turbulence and failure of the CE. Various techniques have been discussed to repair coils. METHODS:Our technique consisted of complete dissection of the coil, routine use of a Javid shunt, standard endarterectomy, resection of the redundant ICA, re-approximation of the posterior wall of the ICA and patch angioplasty of the anterior wall. Three hundred and fifteen patients underwent CE between August, 1998 and February, 2000. Fifteen patients (4.7%) had a carotid coil that was repaired. There were ten men and five women. Mean age was 72.6+/-6.1 years. Ten patients had an asymptomatic stenosis. Four patients had lateralizing symptoms and one patient had dizziness. Fifteen patients underwent preoperative duplex scanning and 14 of these patients had MRA scans performed. All patients had a preoperative stenosis of 80-99% by duplex on the operated side. The right carotid artery was repaired in 12 patients. The left in three patients. The length of resected artery varied from 1.2-2.8 cm (1.93+/-0.49 cm). RESULTS:All patients survived surgery. One patient developed a cerebellar stroke on the third postoperative day. A postoperative carotid duplex scan demonstrated a widely patent repair. There were no cranial nerve injuries in this series. One patient died seven months after surgery from cardiac events with no follow-up duplex exam. There have been no long term strokes or anastomotic complications. Follow-up duplex scans demonstrated widely patent repairs (1-15% stenosis) in seven patients and low end 15-49% stenosis in five patients. CONCLUSIONS:Resection of redundant ICA with re-anastomosis of the posterior wall and patch reconstruction of the anterior wall gives acceptable perioperative and long term results.

Renal artery stenosis has long been recognized as a cause of systemic hypertension, and has more recently been identified as a cause of progressive renal insufficiency. The diagnosis of renal artery stenosis often has been overlooked because of the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis. Until recently, surgical intervention has been the only therapeutic modality available. This article will review some recent advances in imaging modalities, particularly duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography, which have allowed easier visibility of the renal vessels. Second, the introduction of renal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with and without stent placement, has made operative intervention more attractive. The early and short-term results of this procedure are discussed and compared with surgical experience. Finally, the implications for using these newer interventional techniques for minimally symptomatic renal artery stenosis are reviewed.

BACKGROUND:The value of carotid patching in carotid endarterectomy in achieving low perioperative morbidity and long-term freedom from restenosis is controversial. We hypothesized that if large internal carotid arteries were closed primarily and smaller arteries selectively patched, there would be no difference in early or long-term results between the two groups. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 133 carotid endarterectomies performed by one surgeon in a community teaching hospital was performed to evaluate a selective approach to patching vs primary closure. Primary closure was performed if the arteriotomy could be closed without tension over a Javid shunt. Seventy-seven arteries underwent primary closure and 56 underwent patching (Vein-14, PTFE-17, Dacron-25). Postoperative (>6 month) duplex scans were available on 46/77 (60%) patients undergoing primary closure, and 33/56 (59%) of patients with patch repair. RESULTS:There were 2 perioperative neurologic deficits, both in the patch group. Restenosis of equal or greater than 50% at 11 months occurred in 5/46 (10.8%) of patients with primary closure and 2/34 patients (5.9%) with patch closure (p=ns). No patient in either group had a late neurologic event or required a redo operation. CONCLUSIONS:Selective primary closure is not associated with increased risk of perioperative neurologic events or statistically significant evidence of late postoperative stenosis if primary closure is performed in large internal carotid arteries.