Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for moderate to severe ulcer-ative colitis (UC). Prospective real-world data on tofacitinib in UC patients are limited. Using an electronic system to evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) in real time, we measured clinical response and PROs during the induction phase of tofacitinib.
METHOD(S): An initial 65 patients initiating tofacitinib were recruited from 13 academic and community gastroenterology practices. Demographic information, disease and medication histories were obtained. Patients completed PRO surveys on days 1-14, and at week 6, 10 and 14. Outcome data included the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), and PRO measurement information system (PROMIS) measures of depression, anxiety and social satisfaction. A score of < 4 with a decrease by >1.5 points is considered response. PROMIS measures are calibrated using a T score (mean of the US population equal to 50, standard deviation (SD) of 10). A higher PROMIS score equates to more of the measure (higher scores worse for depression, anxiety and better for social satisfaction).
RESULT(S): A total of 62/65 (95%) completed electronic PRO data through week 6. Mean age was 38.4 (SD 14.9), 61.5% were male, mean disease duration was 9.6 years and 58.5% were on concomitant steroids at baseline. Mean disease activity at baseline (n = 65) was active (SCCAI of 5.6 (SD 3.2)), with reductions in mean disease activity to SCCAI 3.1 on day 14, 2.7 on week 14 (Figure 1). At the time of first in-person clinical visit (week 2-6), only 18.2% remained on steroids. Among patients initiating tofacitinib without concomitant corticosteroid use (n = 27), early reductions in SCCAI were seen (mean SCCAI 5.4 at baseline, reduced to SCCAI 3.8 by day 4). Improvements in all PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, social satisfaction) were seen through week 14 (Figure 2). A total of 54.2% met criteria for response at day 14, with 52.2% at week 6.
CONCLUSION(S): Real time electronic PRO data capture provided the ability to assess cessation of steroids and time to response to tofacitinib via important PRO outcomes. Tofacitinib was associated with a rapid response in this ongoing prospective multi-center real-world cohort, independent of steroid use. Continued enrollment and long-term data, planned through week 30, will enhance our understanding of UC

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend testing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients hospitalized with flare for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), though little is known about whether a delay in testing for CDI is related to adverse outcomes. We examined the relationship between time to C. difficile PCR test order, collection, and result with adverse IBD outcomes.
METHOD(S): We performed a retrospective cohort study of IBD patients hospitalized with flare through the emergency department (ED) between 2013 and January 2020 at an urban academic medical center. The time from ED presentation to CDI test order (time-to-order), sample collection (time-to-collection), and test result (time-to-result) were collected. Time-to-result was stratified by within+/-hours, 6-24 hours, and 24 hours or longer. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were inpatient anti-TNF administration and surgery. Separately, we used initial hemodynamic and laboratory values to create an IBD hospitalization severity score for evaluation against LOS and time-dependent variables.
RESULT(S): We identified 122 IBD patients hospitalized with flare. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among time-to-result groups. There was no difference in time-toorder between the+/-hours and 6-24 hours groups (Table 1). Despite a shorter time-to-result, the average LOS in the+/-hours group was 7.3 days, longer compared to the 6-24 hours group (4.3 days, P=0.018) and the 24 hours group (4.2 days, P=0.035Table 1). There were no differences in inpatient anti-TNF administration (P=0.10) or surgery (P=0.08) among time-to-result groups. Markers of disease severity correlated with longer LOS and earlier time-to-result (Table 2). A composite of these markers was used to stratify patients by disease severity. Those with more severe disease had earlier times-to-result (12.8 hours vs. 32.2 hours, P=0.014) and had a longer LOS (7.9 vs. 3.4 days, P=0.007) with no difference in time-to-order compared to patients with less severe disease (P=0.09Table 3).
CONCLUSION(S): Earlier time-to-result for CDI is associated with longer LOS in IBD patients hospitalized with flare. This inverse relationship is confounded by disease severity at presentation. Patients with more severe disease have a shorter time-to-result and a longer LOS without any difference in time-to-order. Delay in testing was not associated with higher rates of inpatient anti- TNF administration or surgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:For more than half of Crohn's disease patients, strictures will cause bowel obstructions that require surgery within 10 years of their initial diagnosis. This study utilizes computed tomography imaging and clinical data obtained at the initial emergency room visit to create a prediction model for progression to surgery in Crohn's disease patients with acute small bowel obstructions. METHODS:A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who presented to the emergency room with an ICD-10 diagnosis for Crohn's disease and visit diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Two expert abdominal radiologists evaluated the CT scans for bowel wall thickness, maximal and minimal luminal diameters, length of diseased segment, passage of oral contrast, evidence of penetrating disease, bowel wall hyperenhancement or stratification, presence of a comb sign, fat hypertrophy, and small bowel feces sign. The primary outcome was progression to surgery within 6 months of presentation. The secondary outcome was time to readmission. RESULTS:Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, with 78% receiving medical treatment alone and 22% undergoing surgery within 6 months of presentation to the emergency room. Multivariable analysis produced a model with an AUC of 92% (95% CI 0.82-1.00), 78% sensitivity, and 97% specificity, using gender, body mass index, and the radiographic features of segment length, penetrating disease, and bowel wall hyperenhancement. CONCLUSIONS:The model demonstrates that routine clinical and radiographic data from an emergency room visit can predict progression to surgery, and has the potential to risk stratify patients, guide management in the acute setting, and predict readmission.

BACKGROUND:Hyperbaric oxygen has been reported to improve disease activity in hospitalised ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. AIM/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate dosing strategies with hyperbaric oxygen for hospitalised UC patients. METHODS:We enrolled UC patients hospitalised for acute flares (Mayo score 6-12). Initially, all patients received 3 days of hyperbaric oxygen at 2.4 atmospheres (90 minutes with two air breaks) in addition to intravenous steroids. Day 3 responders (reduction of partial Mayo score ≥ 2 points and rectal bleeding score ≥ 1 point) were randomised to receive a total of 5 days vs 3 days of hyperbaric oxygen. RESULTS:We treated 20 patients with hyperbaric oxygen (75% prior biologic failure). Day 3 response was achieved in 55% (n = 11/20), with significant reductions in stool frequency, rectal bleeding and CRP (P < 0.01). A more significant reduction in disease activity was observed with 5 days vs 3 days of hyperbaric oxygen (P = 0.03). Infliximab or colectomy was required in only three patients (15%) despite a predicted probability of 80% for second-line therapy. Day 3 hyperbaric oxygen responders were less likely to require re-hospitalisation or colectomy by 3 months vs non-responders (0% vs 66%, P = 0.002). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hyperbaric oxygen appears to be effective for optimising response to intravenous steroids in UC patients hospitalised for acute flares, with low rates of re-hospitalisation or colectomy at 3 months. An optimal clinical response is achieved with 5 days of hyperbaric oxygen. Larger phase 3 trials are needed to confirm efficacy and obtain labelled approval.

A goal in precision medicine is to use patient-derived material to predict disease course and intervention outcomes. Here, we use mechanistic observations in a preclinical animal model to design an ex vivo platform that recreates genetic susceptibility to T cell-mediated damage. Intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We found that intestinal GVHD in mice deficient in Atg16L1, an autophagy gene that is polymorphic in humans, is reversed by inhibiting necroptosis. We further show that co-cultured allogeneic T cells kill Atg16L1 mutant intestinal organoids from mice, which was associated with an aberrant epithelial interferon signature. Using this information, we demonstrate that pharmacologically inhibiting necroptosis or interferon signaling protects human organoids derived from individuals harboring a common ATG16L1 variant from allogeneic T cell attack. Our study provides a roadmap for applying findings in animal models to individualized therapy that targets affected tissues.

First detected in Wuhan, China, the novel 2019 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped RNA beta-coronavirus responsible for an unprecedented, worldwide pandemic caused by COVID-19. Optimal management of immunosuppression in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with COVID-19 infection currently is based on expert opinion, given the novelty of the infection and the corresponding lack of high-level evidence in patients with immune-mediated conditions. There are limited data regarding IBD patients with COVID-19 and no data regarding early pregnancy in the era of COVID-19. This article describes a patient with acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) during her first trimester of pregnancy who also has COVID-19. The case presentation is followed by a review of the literature to date on COVID-19 in regard to inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy, respectively.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Exposure to hormone contraception has been associated with an increased risk of relapse of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Little is known about the effects of cancer therapies, specifically hormone therapies, on the course of IBD. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study, collecting data from 5 medical centers on patients with IBD who received a subsequent diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer from 1997 through 2018. For patients with quiescent IBD at their cancer diagnosis, the primary outcome was relapse of IBD. For patients with active IBD at their cancer diagnosis, the primary outcome was IBD remission. RESULTS:Our analysis included 447 patients with IBD (44% with Crohn's disease, 53% with ulcerative colitis, and 3% with IBD-unclassified) who had either breast (78%) or prostate (22%) cancer. At their cancer diagnosis, 400 patients (90%) had inactive IBD, and 47 (10%) had active IBD. Among patients with inactive IBD, 112 (28%) developed active IBD. Previous exposure to steroids, immunomodulators, or biologics was associated with IBD relapse following a cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] for steroids, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.71; HR for immunomodulators, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.38-3.55; HR for biologics, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.01-5.36). Hormone monotherapy (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.21-3.29) and combination cytotoxic and hormone therapy (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.01-3.43) was associated with IBD relapse. Among 34 patients who received only cytotoxic chemotherapy, 75% remained in remission from IBD at 250 months compared with 42% of those who received hormone monotherapy (log rank=0.02). Among patients with active IBD at their cancer diagnosis, 14 (30%) entered remission from IBD, but there were no significant factors of achieving IBD remission. CONCLUSIONS:In a multicenter retrospective study, we found that patients with IBD and breast or prostate cancer who receive hormone therapy have an increased risk for relapse of IBD and related adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Postoperative ileus (POI) is a temporary delay of coordinated intestinal peristalsis. Alvimopan, an oral peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist approved for accelerating gastrointestinal recovery, has never been studied specifically in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIM/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the efficacy of alvimopan in preventing POI among IBD patients. METHODS:A retrospective chart review was conducted on 246 IBD patients undergoing bowel surgery between 2012 and 2017. Data collected included demographics, IBD subtype, length of stay (LOS), postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, and administration of alvimopan. The primary outcome was POI; secondary gastrointestinal recovery outcomes were: time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, time to tolerating a liquid diet, time to tolerating solid food, and LOS. RESULTS:When compared with the control group, patients in the alvimopan group had shorter times to tolerating liquids and solids, first flatus, and first bowel movements (p < 0.01). LOS was shorter in the alvimopan group when compared with controls (p < 0.01). The overall incidence of POI was higher in controls than in the alvimopan group (p = 0.07). For laparoscopic surgeries, the incidence of POI was also higher in controls than in the alvimopan group (p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, alvimopan significantly decreased time to all gastrointestinal recovery endpoints when compared to controls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Alvimopan is effective in accelerating time to gastrointestinal recovery and reducing POI in IBD patients. While the benefits of alvimopan have been demonstrated previously, this is the first study of the efficacy of alvimopan in IBD patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Treating moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease has become increasingly complex as the array of available biologics increases. Moreover, tofacitinib, the first small molecule approved for IBD, is available for use in ulcerative colitis. Choosing the right biologic, for the right patient, at the right time, can be a confusing and daunting task for clinicians. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:In this review, we summarize the evidence for first-line use of the available biologics by disease state. Special circumstances for consideration including rapidity of action, safety, comparative effectiveness, postoperative Crohn's disease, fertility and pregnancy, and extraintestinal manifestations are discussed. In the moderate-to-severe UC patient, vedolizumab and infliximab are preferred first-line options. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with a penetrating phenotype or with multiple EIMs, infliximab or adalimumab are the preferred first-line agents. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with an inflammatory phenotype, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab are all reasonable options.