Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with optimal management remains unclear. We performed a review of the impact of trimodality approach on SNUC outcome. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of 18 patients, who were managed between 1997 and 2009. The median age at presentation was 52 years (28 to 82). Nine patients (50%) were female. Three patients had stage II disease and underwent surgery alone, 12 had stages III and IVa and underwent surgery combined with chemoradiation, and 3 had stage IVb and underwent definitive chemoradiation. Patients who underwent preoperative, postoperative, and definitive chemoradiation received 60, 66, and 70 Gy of radiation, respectively. In all patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation, cisplatin was used, at a dose of 100 mg/m every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy included docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) every 3 weeks for 2 to 3 cycles. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 26 months (16 to 120), a total of 8 patients (44%) have experienced the following: 1 persistent disease (5.5%), 4 local failure (22%), and 3 distant metastases (DM, 16.5%). Five of the 8 patients had preexisting cranial nerve deficits or gross cranial invasion. The 2-, 3-, and 4-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 78%, 72%, and 56%; 75%, 65%, and 52%; and 75%, 50%, and 48%, respectively. Trimodality approach provided 83% LC and 92% DM-free survival, whereas other modalities provided 50% LC and 33% DM-free survival. The causes of death for the entire cohort were DM and local invasion. Acute chemoradiotherapy toxicity was 100% grades 1 and 2 dermatitis, mucositis, and fatigue, 55% developed grades 1 and 2 dysphagia, and 6% had grade 3 mucositis. Long-term toxicity was 28% grade 1 xerostomia, 11% retinopathy and optic neuropathy, and 6% orbital exenteration and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: SNUC is an aggressive neoplasm that frequently presents at an advanced stage. Our data show that trimodality approach in the form of surgery combined with chemoradiation seems to offer better LC and lower DM compared with other modalities.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although cervical spine reconstruction with osteocutaneous fibular flap microvascular grafting has been described, simultaneous reconstruction of the cervical vertebral column and laryngectomy have not been described. PURPOSE: To present a unique case of combined cervical spine and laryngectomy reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: We modified a previously reported procedure reconstituting the cervical spine and pharynx with a single fibular flap in a case of posterior pharyngeal ulceration and osteomyelitis/osteoradionecrosis without spinal deformity. RESULTS: We present a case of simultaneous cervical stabilization and pharynx reconstruction with a fibular graft in a life-saving treatment of osteoradionecrosis complicated by acute cervical kyphosis and spinal cord compression in a 55-year-old patient with extensive head and neck cancer history and recent recurrence of hypopharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid anterior plate fixation and subsequent posterior fixation were required after corpectomy and total laryngectomy in our patient with extensive surgical scarring and radiation history because of severe spinal deformity secondary to osteoradionecrosis. We achieved successful preservation of neurologic function and resolution of pain.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection of oral cancer can result in altered speech, swallowing, and quality of life (QOL). To date, the oral outcome variables of tongue strength, tongue and jaw range of motion, and saliva production have not been extensively assessed. This pilot study was done to assess tongue strength along with other oral outcomes and their relationship to performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL after partial glossectomy. Our aim was to create a norm for what should be considered a normal tongue strength value in this population. We hypothesized that patients with tongue strength of 30 kPa or greater would perform better on the performance status scale and various QOL measures than do patients with tongue strength of less than 30 kPa. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design in this study. The postoperative assessment included 1) Performance Status Scale and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; 2) oral outcome variables of tongue strength, jaw range of motion. and saliva production; and 3) patient-rated QOL ratings via Eating Assessment Tool, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, EORTC-H&N35, and Speech Handicap Index. RESULTS: Patients with tongue strength of at least 30 kPa performed better on the performance status scales and various QOL measures. The cutoff score of 30 kPa for tongue strength measures revealed a trend in predicting performance on the scales and QOL measures. CONCLUSIONS: The oral outcome variables correlated with performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL. We propose a norm for tongue strength in this population, based on the trend seen in this group of patients, as none previously existed. Future studies are under way that incorporate a larger sample size to further validate this norm. Future studies will also examine oral functional outcome measures in a larger population by inclu'ding other oral and oropharyngeal sites to help predict speech and swallow performance status and QOL.

IMPORTANCE: Free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction has evolved since the mid-1950s. A variety of different recipient arteries and veins have been described for use in head and neck reconstruction. In our experience, the internal mammary artery (IMA) and internal mammary vein (IMV) have become increasingly important for achieving successful microvascular reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the efficacy of the IMA and IMV recipient vessels in head and neck reconstruction, highlighting the different techniques used to harvest these vessels and outline decision making when approaching a neck where commonly used vessels are unavailable. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Outpatient clinic setting. PARTICIPANTS: All free-tissue transfers performed between 2005 and 2011. All patients in whom the IMA or IMV recipient vessels were used were included. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve cases were performed with IMA and IMV harvest. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Donor site, flap used, recipient artery and vein, success of transfer, flap survival, and presence of donor site complications. RESULTS: The IMA and IMV were harvested in 12 patients, with 11 successful free-tissue transfers. In 1 patient, the vessels were unusable, and a regional tissue transfer was performed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The IMA and IMV are excellent recipient vessels for use in head and neck reconstruction and should be considered for use in challenging reconstructive cases.