Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conservation surgery (BCS) is considered to be an indicator of quality of care for the majority of women with breast cancer, but many women do not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. We investigated the association of surgeon-related factors with receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy after BCS. METHODS: We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify women aged 65 years or older with stage I/II breast cancer who were diagnosed between 1991 and 2002 and underwent BCS. We collected demographic and clinical data from SEER and treatment information from Medicare claims data. The American Medical Association Masterfile was used to obtain information on surgeons' characteristics, including sex, medical school location (United States or elsewhere), and type of degree (MD or Doctorate in Osteopathic Medicine [DO]). The associations of patient (age, race, rural vs urban residence, comorbidities, marital status), tumor (hormone receptor status, grade, stage), and surgeon-related factors with receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations to control for clustering. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Of 29,760 women in our sample, 22,207 (75%) received radiotherapy. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to be white, married, from an urban area, and diagnosed in a later year compared with those who did not. They were also more likely to have a surgeon who was female (79% vs 73%), had an MD degree (75% vs 68%), or was US trained (75% vs 70%). The multivariable analysis confirmed the association of radiotherapy with having a surgeon who was female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.27), had an MD degree (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.24 to 1.91), was US trained (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.25), or had more than 15 patients (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon characteristics were associated with patients' receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy after BCS after controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, although the individual effect sizes were small for surgeon sex, location of training, and type of medical degree. More research is warranted to confirm the associations to determine whether they reflect surgeon behavior, patient response, or physician-patient interactions

BACKGROUND: Although black women develop invasive breast cancer at a lower incidence than white women, the cancers they develop tend to be of a higher grade and are more likely estrogen receptor negative. There is very little information with regard to black women and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In addition, although various reasons have been proposed for the delay to screening for black women, a delay after diagnosis has also been recognized. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate disparities in time to treatment between black women and white women once DCIS has been diagnosed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 37 black women and 37 matched white women treated for DCIS was performed. Matches were made based on the date of birth, date of diagnosis, date and type of surgery, and age at diagnosis. The time from the date of diagnosis to the date of surgery was ascertained. RESULTS: Black women were 64% more likely to undergo a delay to surgery (>50 days) compared with white women (21% versus 13%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Black women are more likely not to reach surgery within 50 days of diagnosis, which is concerning, and further studies to investigate the cause of these delays are warranted

BACKGROUND: Malignant phyllodes tumors are an extremely rare breast tumor. Prognostic features and overall survival data have not been consistent across studies. METHODS: Retrospectively, we examined the clinicopathologic features of 27 breast cancer patients treated for malignant phyllodes tumors from 1995 to 2004 and analyzed their recurrence and survival outcomes using contingency tables, a logistic regression model, or a proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 12% (n = 3) of the cohort and 75% of the group with distant metastases. The median follow-up period was 51 months (range, 12-192 mo). A mitotic index greater than 10 per high-powered field, the presence of stromal overgrowth, mastectomy at initial surgery, and larger tumor size were associated with an increased incidence of distant metastases. Larger tumor size also was associated with an increased incidence of death. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with malignant phyllodes tumors will enjoy significant long-term survival if treated appropriately with local excision with clear margins

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the strongest predictors of breast cancer in a high-risk population and to increase our understanding of the possible interactions between risk factors. METHODS: The Women At Risk High-Risk Registry provided the study population. The variables of interest included age at enrollment, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia, family history of breast cancer, body mass index, and Gail scores (5-year high-risk > or =1.7%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with the Cox proportional hazards regression model and years of follow-up evaluation as the time scale. RESULTS: Out of 1553 high-risk women, 79 (5%) developed breast cancer during a median follow-up period of 5 years. Results from the multivariate Cox model demonstrated that FHBC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.97), ADH (HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.13), LCIS (HR = 1.71; 95% CI, .99-2.95), and a body mass index > or =30 (HR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.14-4.35) were statistically significant predictors of breast cancer within this high-risk population. CONCLUSIONS: These results support current literature showing the synergistic increase in risk for patients with ADH, LCIS, and a positive family history of breast cancer. Obesity was also a strong predictor of breast cancer risk, which suggests that there may be a potentiating effect of obesity on other risk factors. Obesity may represent a modifiable risk factor, providing women with an opportunity to reduce their risk with lifestyle modification. Women with a strong family history of breast cancer or a diagnosis of ADH or LCIS may benefit most from risk-reduction strategies, chemoprevention, and surveillance

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of breast-imaging studies in identifying cancer and high-risk lesions among patients with spontaneous, single-duct, nipple discharge (SSND). METHODS: The medical records of 168 cases with SSND treated with duct excision between June 1998 and May 2004 were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of mammogram, ultrasound, and ductogram in predicting high-risk lesions and cancer were calculated. RESULTS: The sensitivity of mammography was 10%, the specificity 94%, the NPV 88%, and the PPV 18%. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 68%, PPV of 14%, and NPV of 89%. Ductography had a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 49%, and NPV and PPV of 93% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional imaging studies do not accurately identify cancer or high-risk lesions in patients with SSND.All patients with SSND should be offered duct excision

BACKGROUND: Gross cystic disease (GCD) is a common benign breast condition. Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the relationship of GCD and subsequent risk of developing breast cancer. This cohort study was conducted to investigate the association of GCD and breast cancer among women at high risk for breast cancer. METHODS: The Women At Risk Registry provided the study population. The variables of interest included age at enrollment, age at breast cancer diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), and Gail scores. Statistical significance was determined by calculating multivariable-adjusted rate ratios using Cox proportional hazards regression model with years of follow-up as the time scale. RESULTS: The study population included 1317 high-risk women, including 363 (28%) with GCD. The mean follow-up was 5.9 years for the GCD cohort, and 5.1 years for the non-GCD cohort (P < .001). The GCD and non-GCD groups differed by Gail score (P < .001), BMI (P < .01), presence of atypical hyperplasia (P < .001), presence of LCIS (P < .001), and family history of breast cancer (P < .001). Within the total population of 1317 women, 79 (6%) developed breast cancer; 28 (35%) out of the 79 had a prior history of GCD. Results from the Cox proportional hazards regression model showed a nonstatistically significant association of GCD and breast cancer (hazard ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval 0.88-2.51). The Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimate between the exposed and unexposed groups indicate that there are no differences in overall survival between the 2 groups (P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the contention that gross cystic disease is a significant risk factor for breast cancer