Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE:To review the incidence of complications following primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. METHODS:A literature search was conducted by querying PubMed and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines using the terms "Medial Patellofemoral Ligament," "MPFL," "reconstruction," "patellar," and "instability." Inclusion criteria included studies reporting complications following primary MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Exclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on patients undergoing concurrent osteotomy procedures, revision reconstruction, and biomechanical or anatomic studies. The incidence of specific complications was aggregated from the included studies. RESULTS:Twenty-eight studies, consisting of 1,478 patients (n = 1521 knees), with a mean age of 23.3 years (mean range, 19-34.3 years) were identified. The overall incidence of complications ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures occurred in 0% to 8.3% of knees, primarily in patients treated with full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques. All patellar fractures occurred in patients with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 to 6.0 mm in diameter. The incidence of postoperative knee stiffness/range of motion deficit ranged from 0% to 20%. Persistent anterior knee pain, ranged from 0% to 32.3%. CONCLUSIONS:Complications following primary MPFL reconstruction ranged from 0% to 32.3% of knees, primarily consisting of residual anterior knee pain. Failure ranged from 0% to 10.7% of knees, whereas patellar fractures were reported in 0% to 8.3% of knees. Fractures primarily occurred with a full-length transverse tunnel or 2-tunnel techniques, whereas all fractures occurred with patellar tunnels ranging from 4.5 mm to 6.0 mm in diameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IV; Systematic Review of Level I-IV studies.

PURPOSE:To compare clinical and radiologic outcomes following superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft versus tensor fascia lata (TFL) autograft for massive rotator cuff tears with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS:A literature search was performed by querying Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed computerized databases from database inception through September 2022 in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies evaluating clinical and radiologic outcomes, as well as complications following SCR for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears were included. Study quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment. The mean change from preoperative to postoperative values (delta) was calculated for each outcome. RESULTS:Seventeen studies, consisting of 519 patients were identified. Mean duration of follow-up ranged from 24 to 60 months. Mean reduction in visual analog scale pain score ranged from 2.9 to 5.9 points following use of dermal allograft, and 3.4 to 7.0 points following TFL autograft reconstruction. Mean improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were similar between groups (dermal allograft: 28.0-61.6; TFL autograft: 24.7-59.3). The mean increase in forward flexion ranged from 31° to 38° with dermal allograft, versus 19° to 69° with TFL autograft. Average improvement in active external rotation with dermal allograft ranged from -0.4° to 11° and from 2° to 22.4° using TFL autograft. A similar change in acromiohumeral distance following SCR (dermal allograft: 0.9-3.2 mm; TFL autograft: 0.3-3.6 mm) was appreciated. The rate of complications within the dermal allograft group ranged from 4.5% to 38.2% versus 13.3% to 86.4% following TFL autograft. Failure rate ranged from 4.5 to 38.2% following dermal allograft versus 4.5 to 86.4% with TFL autograft. CONCLUSIONS:Acellular dermal allograft versus TFL autograft for SCR both demonstrate improved VAS and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, with increased values in flexion and external rotation, and increased visual analog scale, although with high variability. Both grafts demonstrate high rates of complications and failures at minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IV; systematic review of level II-IV studies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:This review provides a historical perspective on the approach to radial tears and collates the currently available evidence on repair techniques, rehabilitation, and outcomes following the treatment of meniscus radial tears. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Recent literature shows that the repair of meniscus radial tears reports improved patient-reported outcome scores with high return to function and activity. However, no single technique nor construct was proven better than the other. Various methods of repairing radial tears can be employed, with biomechanical research supporting all-inside double vertical sutures, the addition of vertical "rip-stop" mattress sutures, and transtibial pullout augmentation. To ensure proper healing before undergoing physical therapy, it is crucial to abstain from weight-bearing and deep knee flexion for the first 6 weeks after surgery. Despite considerable heterogeneity in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols found in the current literature, studies reporting on radial repairs report positive results, with high healing rates and improved patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND Stress fractures of the patella are rare, may result from overuse, and can be difficult to detect on imaging. Furthermore, the differential diagnosis of the anterior knee pain associated with most patellar stress fractures is broad, making it difficult to quickly reach the diagnosis. This report is of an 18-year-old female athlete presenting with knee pain after playing basketball and diagnosed with bilateral patellar stress fractures. CASE REPORT An 18-year-old female athlete with a history of bilateral anterior knee pain presented with left knee pain and swelling following a basketball game. X-ray images and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a displaced inferior pole fracture of the left patella. The patient underwent surgical fixation of the patella. Approximately 4 months following surgical fixation of the left patella, right anterior knee pain persisted, and imaging demonstrated a stress reaction in the inferior pole of the right patella. The patient was ultimately treated with surgical fixation of the right patella as well. CONCLUSIONS This report demonstrates that, although stress fractures of the patella are rare, and bilateral stress fractures of the patella are even more rare, this condition may present with pain and usually with a history of high-impact exercise. Challenges remain in identifying patellar stress fractures early in their progression and determining the best course of treatment.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the primary restraint to tibial internal rotation and is supported by secondary stabilizers, including the iliotibial band (ITB), anterolateral ligament (ALL), anterolateral capsule, and lateral meniscus, which provide additional rotational control. Combined injury to primary and secondary rotational stabilizers can lead to anterolateral rotatory instability. This can best be demonstrated in patients with large pivot-shifts. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alone does not restore native kinematics in the setting of a combined injury. Concomitant anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques have been evaluated as a possible solution. Both the LET and ALLR may help restore rotational control, with the LET being slightly more powerful due to its more horizontal force vector based on biomechanical studies. However, there may be a slight risk of overconstraint with both techniques, more pronounced with the LET. Clinical studies evaluating the techniques for both primary and revision ACLR have generally found both to be safe and effective, leading to decreased rates of re-rupture and improved outcome scores. Either technique is a reasonable addition to ACLR when additional rotational control is indicated, though the LET may be more reproducible.

PURPOSE:To systematically evaluate reported clinical outcomes, return-to-sport (RTS) rates, and complications following biceps tenodesis in patients aged 35 years and younger and compare outcomes between overhead and nonoverhead athletes. METHODS:A literature search was performed by querying Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed computerized databases from database inception through August 2022 in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies that evaluated clinical outcomes following biceps tenodesis in patients aged 35 years or younger were included. Study quality was assessed via the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Clinical outcomes, RTS rates, and complications were aggregated. RESULTS:Nine studies from 2011 to 2022 comprising 161 patients (mean age, 25 years; range, 19.7-28.9 years) were included. At an average follow-up of 59 months, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score ranged from 81.6 to 96 and the mean visual analog scale score ranged from 0 to 2.1. Mean overall RTS rate ranged from 35% to 100% for the entire patient cohort 35% to 86% among overhead athletes, and 46% to 100% among nonoverhead athletes. Among the overhead athletes, 24 were baseball pitchers. 17% to 100% able to return to sport at any level. Complications were reported in 0% to 19% of patients. 0 to 18% of patients underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Biceps tenodesis in patients 35 years of age and younger yields a wide variability in reported RTS rates, excellent clinical outcome scores, and low but variable reported rates of complications, reoperations, and failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IV; Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.

Patellofemoral joint chondral lesions can be challenging to treat with osteochondral allograft plugs because of the complex morphology and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint Shell allografts replace the entirety of the damaged articular surface with a single osteochondral allograft piece (e.g., the entire trochlea or patella articular surface). Although technically demanding, shell grafts would allow for the treatment of bigger defects, correction of dysplasia, and for the treatment of uncontained lesions. However, shell allografts have historically shown inferior results than focal cylindrical grafts (bone plugs), with failure rates up to 38% based in the published literature. Although evidence exists demonstrating the efficacy of shell grafts in select cases, additional studies from multiple sources are required to support their continued use as well as determine the optimal graft-preservation techniques.

BACKGROUND:Recent interest has surged in the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and complex (ALC) of the knee. Its existence and role in rotary stability of the knee, particularly in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, remains a contentious and controversial topic. UNDERSTANDING THE ALC/UNASSIGNED:We must review our history and recognize the pioneers who pushed our understanding of the ALL forward before it was popularly recognized as a discrete structure. Additionally, given that many eponyms remain in common use related to the ALC, we must standardize our nomenclature to prevent misuse or misunderstanding of terms in the literature. In this review, modern understanding of the anterolateral ligament complex (ALC) is traced to 1829 by exploring eponymous terms first in anatomy and then in surgical technique. Understanding our history and terminology will allow us to better understand the ALC itself. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This review aims to provide historical context, define terminology, and provide insight into the clinical relevance of the ALC.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the variation in tibial tubercle sagittal alignment in patients with and without patellofemoral (PF) cartilage wear. METHODS:This was a single-centre, retrospective review of patients that underwent a cartilage restoration procedure for isolated PF cartilage wear from 2014 to 2020. Patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, sex and BMI to partial meniscectomy patients as controls. The sagittal TT-TG (sTT-TG) distance was measured on preoperative axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and was defined as the distance between a point at the nadir of the trochlear cartilage and the most anterior point of the tibial tubercle. RESULTS:One hundred and forty patients (47 cartilage restoration, 94 meniscectomy) were included. Mean age, BMI, and height for the total cohort were 34.01 ± 8.7, 26.6 ± 6.4, and 173.0 ± 17.7 respectively, with 78 males (55%) and 63 females (45%). There were no significant differences between groups for age, BMI or sex (n.s). The cartilage restoration group (- 2.5 mm ± 5.9) was found to have a significantly more posterior (negative) sTT-TG compared to the meniscectomy group (1.72 mm ± 6.7) (p < 0.001). Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.931, p < 0.001). Patients with less than - 3.4 mm sTT-TG were 2.74 times more likely to have a cartilage restoration procedure compared to those with greater than - 3.4 mm (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.85). Patients with < - 10 mm posterior translation were 13.7× (CI 1.6-111.1) more likely to have a cartilage restoration procedure. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients that underwent isolated cartilage restoration procedures had a significantly more posterior tibial tubercle than partial meniscectomy controls based on the sagittal TT-TG. The more posterior the tubercle, the more likely the patient had a cartilage restoration procedure. Surgeons should consider the sTT-TG measurement in patients presenting with anterior knee pain, particularly patellofemoral lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to determine and establish the MCID for the NAHS at 2 years in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS:Patients that underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed for eligibility. Data were collected from a single surgeon's hip arthroscopy database. MCID was calculated for the NAHS utilizing a distribution-based method. RESULTS:. At baseline, the cohort's average NAHS score was 48.7 ± 13.6 and demonstrated an improvement of 36.5 ± 17.0 for NAHS at follow-up. This resulted in MCID values of + 8.5 for NAHS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study to report the MCID (+ 8.5) for NAHS following primary hip arthroscopy, and as such, is a valuable contribution to future hip arthroscopy research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV.