Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: A small fraction of patients with 1-2 brain metastases will not be suitable candidates to either surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) due to either their location or their size. The objective of this study was to determine the local control, survival, patterns of relapse and the incidence of brain injury following a course of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy while avoiding upfront whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in this subgroup of patients. METHODS: A Gill-Thomas removable head frame system was used for immobilization. Brain LAB software with dynamic multileaf collimator hardware was used to design and deliver an intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plan. A dose of 600 cGy was prescribed to the 100% isodose line that would encompass the lesion with a 3-mm margin. A total dose of 3,000 cGy was delivered in 5 fractions using 2 fractions per week. The patients were followed with neurological examination and serial MRI images done every 3 months following the procedure. RESULTS: Twenty patients have been treated using this fractionation schedule since April 2004. The 1-year local control at the site of original disease is 70%. The complete response, partial response and stable disease at the last follow-up were 15, 30 and 45%, respectively. Two patients had local recurrence at the site of original disease, while 5 had evidence of leptomeningeal disease. Two additional patients developed new brain metastases, resulting in a 1-year brain relapse-free survival of 36% following this approach. The median overall survival was 8.5 months. Three patients (15%) developed steroid dependency lasting 3 months or longer following the procedure. Four patients (20%) needed WBRT as salvage following this approach. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of hypofractionated SRS are comparable to both surgery and SRS data for solitary brain metastases in terms of local control and overall survival with acceptable morbidity in this cohort of unfavorable patients

Response of a solid tumor to radiation treatment depends, in part, on the intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumor cells, the proliferation rate of tumor cells between radiation treatments and the hypoxic state of the tumor cells. A successful radiosensitizing agent would target S-phase cells and hypoxia. Recently, we demonstrated the anti-tumor effects of flavopiridol in the GL261 murine glioma model might involve 1) recruitment of tumor cells to S-phase (Newcomb et al Cell Cycle 2004; 3:230-234) and 2) an anti-angiogenic effect on the tumor vasculature by downregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor -1alpha (HIF-1alpha) (Newcomb et al Neuro-Oncology 2005; 7:225-235). Given that flavopiridol has demonstrated radiosensitizing activity in several murine tumor models, we tested whether it would enhance the response of GL261 tumors to radiation. In the present study, we evaluated the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of the GL261 glioma model using the tumor control/cure dose of radiation assay (TCD(50)). We found that a single dose of 65 Gy (CI 57.1-73.1) was required to cure 50% of the tumors locally. Using the tumor growth delay assay, fractionated radiation (5 fractions of 5 Gy over 10 days) combined with flavopiridol (5 mg/kg) given three times weekly for 3 cycles produced a significant growth delay. Our results indicate that the GL261 murine glioma model mimics the radioresistance encountered in human gliomas, and thus should prove useful in identifying promising new investigational radiosensitizers for use in the treatment of glioma patients

PURPOSE: To analyze the dose/fractionation schedules currently used in ongoing clinical trials of partial breast irradiation (PBI) by comparing their biologically effective dose (BED) values to those of three standard whole breast protocols commonly used after segmental mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The BED equation derived from the linear-quadratic model for radiation-induced cell killing was used to calculate the BEDs for three commonly used whole breast radiotherapy regimens, in addition to a variety of external beam radiotherapy, as well as high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy, PBI protocols. RESULTS: The BED values of most PBI protocols resulted in tumor control BEDs roughly equivalent to a 50-Gy standard treatment, but consistently lower than the BEDs for regimens in which the tumor bed receives a total dose of either 60 Gy or 66 Gy. The BED values calculated for the acute radiation responses of erythema and desquamation were nearly all lower for the PBI schedules, and the late-response BEDs for most PBI regimens were in a similar range to the BEDs for the standard treatments. CONCLUSION: Biologically effective dose modeling raises the concern that inadequate doses might be delivered by PBI to ensure optimal in-field tumor control