Faculty Bibliography

Response of a solid tumor to radiation treatment depends, in part, on the intrinsic radiosensitivity of tumor cells, the proliferation rate of tumor cells between radiation treatments and the hypoxic state of the tumor cells. A successful radiosensitizing agent would target S-phase cells and hypoxia. Recently, we demonstrated the anti-tumor effects of flavopiridol in the GL261 murine glioma model might involve 1) recruitment of tumor cells to S-phase (Newcomb et al Cell Cycle 2004; 3:230-234) and 2) an anti-angiogenic effect on the tumor vasculature by downregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor -1alpha (HIF-1alpha) (Newcomb et al Neuro-Oncology 2005; 7:225-235). Given that flavopiridol has demonstrated radiosensitizing activity in several murine tumor models, we tested whether it would enhance the response of GL261 tumors to radiation. In the present study, we evaluated the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of the GL261 glioma model using the tumor control/cure dose of radiation assay (TCD(50)). We found that a single dose of 65 Gy (CI 57.1-73.1) was required to cure 50% of the tumors locally. Using the tumor growth delay assay, fractionated radiation (5 fractions of 5 Gy over 10 days) combined with flavopiridol (5 mg/kg) given three times weekly for 3 cycles produced a significant growth delay. Our results indicate that the GL261 murine glioma model mimics the radioresistance encountered in human gliomas, and thus should prove useful in identifying promising new investigational radiosensitizers for use in the treatment of glioma patients

PURPOSE: To analyze the dose/fractionation schedules currently used in ongoing clinical trials of partial breast irradiation (PBI) by comparing their biologically effective dose (BED) values to those of three standard whole breast protocols commonly used after segmental mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The BED equation derived from the linear-quadratic model for radiation-induced cell killing was used to calculate the BEDs for three commonly used whole breast radiotherapy regimens, in addition to a variety of external beam radiotherapy, as well as high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy, PBI protocols. RESULTS: The BED values of most PBI protocols resulted in tumor control BEDs roughly equivalent to a 50-Gy standard treatment, but consistently lower than the BEDs for regimens in which the tumor bed receives a total dose of either 60 Gy or 66 Gy. The BED values calculated for the acute radiation responses of erythema and desquamation were nearly all lower for the PBI schedules, and the late-response BEDs for most PBI regimens were in a similar range to the BEDs for the standard treatments. CONCLUSION: Biologically effective dose modeling raises the concern that inadequate doses might be delivered by PBI to ensure optimal in-field tumor control