Faculty Bibliography

An 84-year-old man underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) for mixed rest-action tremors. One year later, he developed a keratoma where the DBS wire emerged from the insertion cap. It was suspected to be a foreign body reaction and removed by a dermatologist but returned and grew conically over the next 4 years, reaching a height of 4 cm (figure). The surrounding skin began to break down with protrusion of the adjacent extension wire. We recommended removal of the lead but due to continued efficacy and advanced age, he decided to continue with the stimulator in place under observation.

BACKGROUND: Abetalipoproteinemia is a rare disorder of fat absorption, characterized by vitamin deficiency, acanthocytosis, and neurologic symptoms including ataxia and tremor. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old male with abetalipoproteinemia is presented. He underwent staged bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of his tremors. After DBS, the patient achieved significant improvements in his tremors, ataxia, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Thalamic DBS proved to be both safe and efficacious in the management of ataxia and tremors in a patient with abetalipoproteinemia. This is the first report of DBS in abetalipoproteinemia in the literature.

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a debilitating neurological disorder with few treatment options. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the occipital nerves is a potentially promising therapy for CM patients. Methods: In this randomized, controlled multicenter study, patients diagnosed with CM were implanted with a neurostimulation device near the occipital nerves and randomized 2:1 to active (n = 105) or sham (n = 52) stimulation. The primary endpoint was a difference in the percentage of responders (defined as patients that achieved a >/=50% reduction in mean daily visual analog scale scores) in each group at 12 weeks. Results: There was not a significant difference in the percentage of responders in the Active compared with the Control group (95% lower confidence bound (LCB) of -0.06; p = 0.55). However, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients that achieved a 30% reduction (p = 0.01). Importantly, compared with sham-treated patients, there were also significant differences in reduction of number of headache days (Active Group = 6.1, baseline = 22.4; Control Group = 3.0, baseline = 20.1; p = 0.008), migraine-related disability (p = 0.001) and direct reports of pain relief (p = 0.001). The most common adverse event was persistent implant site pain. Conclusion: Although this study failed to meet its primary endpoint, this is the first large-scale study of PNS of the occipital nerves in CM patients that showed significant reductions in pain, headache days, and migraine-related disability. Additional controlled studies using endpoints that have recently been identified and accepted as clinically meaningful are warranted in this highly disabled patient population with a large unmet medical need. Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov (NCT00615342).

BACKGROUND: Chronic occipital and suboccipital headache is a common symptom in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). These headaches may persist despite appropriate surgical treatment of the underlying pathology via suboccipital decompression, duraplasty and cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of a variety of occipital headache/pain syndromes. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with ONS in patients with a primary diagnosis of Chiari malformation (CM) and a history of chronic occipital pain intractable to medical and surgical therapies. METHODS: We present a retrospective analysis of our series of 22 patients with CM and persistent occipital headaches who underwent occipital neurostimulator trials and, following successful trials, permanent stimulator placement. A trial was considered successful with greater than 50% pain relief using a standard visual analog score (VAS). Patients with a successful trial underwent permanent placement approximately one to two weeks later. Patients were assessed postoperatively for pain relief via VAS. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent (15/22) of patients had a successful stimulator trial and proceeded to permanent implant. Of those implanted, 13/15 (87%) reported continued pain relief at a mean follow-up of 18.9 months (6 - 51 months). Device-related complications requiring additional surgeries occurred in 40% of patients. CONCLUSION: Occipital stimulation may provide significant long-term pain relief in selected CMI patients with persistent occipital pain. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to further define appropriate patient selection criteria as well as to refine the surgical technique to minimize device-related complications.

The frequency with which patients with atypical parkinsonism and advanced motor symptoms undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures is unknown. However, the potential exposure of these patients to unnecessary surgical risks makes their identification critical. As many as 15% of patients enrolled in recent early Parkinson disease (PD) trials have been found to lack evidence of a dopaminergic deficit following PET or SPECT imaging. This suggests that a number of patients with parkinsonism who are referred for DBS may not have idiopathic PD. The authors report on 2 patients with probable psychogenic parkinsonism who presented for DBS surgery. They found that both patients had normal caudate and putamen [(18)F]-fluorodopa uptake on PET imaging, along with normal expression of specific disease-related metabolic networks for PD and multiple system atrophy, a common form of atypical neurodegenerative parkinsonism. The clinical and PET findings in these patients highlight the role of functional imaging in assisting clinical decision making when the diagnosis is uncertain.

BACKGROUND:: Placement of spinal cord stimulating paddle leads has traditionally been performed using local anesthesia with intravenous sedation to allow for intraoperative confirmation of appropriate placement. It may be difficult to maintain appropriate sedation in certain patients due to medical comorbidities. Furthermore, patients undergoing lead revision frequently have extensive epidural scarring, requiring multi-level laminectomies to place the electrode appropriately. OBJECTIVE:: We report our technique of neurophysiologic monitoring which allows these procedures to be performed under general anesthesia. METHODS:: Data from 78 patients who underwent electromyography (EMG) during laminectomy for paddle lead placement were retrospectively reviewed. 70 patients presented for first-time permanent system placement following a successful trial, and 8 were referred for revision or replacement of previously functioning systems. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia, with fluoroscopic guidance. EMG was used to help define the physiologic midline of the spinal cord and guide appropriate lead placement. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were used as an adjunct to minimize the possibility of neural injury. RESULTS:: Immediately postoperatively, 75 of 78 patients reported that the paresthesia coverage was as good (or better) as that of the SCS trial. At long-term follow-up, 1 system was removed for infection, and 6 systems were explanted for lack of efficacy. A total of 64 of the 78 implanted patients reported continued pain relief with stimulator use. Revision surgery was performed in 9 patients. CONCLUSION:: The use of intraoperative electrophysiology for the placement of SCS paddle leads under general anesthesia is a safe and efficacious alternative to awake surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Cluster headache is a headache syndrome characterized by periodic episodes of intense headache with spontaneous remission. There are recent reports utilizing occipital nerve stimulation for the successful management of medically refractory cases of cluster headache. METHODS: The case of an 18-year-old boy with chronic, refractory, recurrent cluster headaches is presented. He was treated surgically with combined occipital, supraorbital, and infraorbital nerve stimulation. RESULTS: Prior to operation, the patient suffered three to four episodes of cluster headache per day, for four years. After implantation of occipital, supraorbital, and infraorbital nerve stimulators, the patient averages at most three to four headaches per month, at 36-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Peripheral neurostimulation is safe and efficacious in the management of chronic, medically refractory cluster headache syndrome. The efficacy of treatment was found to be persistent after three years.

Chronic occipital and suboccipital headache is a common symptom in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). These headaches may persist despite appropriate surgical treatment of the underlying pathology via suboccipital decompression, duraplasty and related procedures. Occipital stimulation has been shown to be effective in the treatment of a variety of occipital headache/pain syndromes. We present our series of 18 patients with CMI and persistent occipital headaches who underwent occipital neurostimulator trials and, following successful trials, permanent stimulator placement. Seventy-two percent (13/18) of patients had a successful stimulator trial and proceeded to permanent implant. Of those implanted, 11/13 (85%) reported continued pain relief at a mean follow-up of 23 months. Device-related complications requiring additional surgeries occurred in 31% of patients. Occipital neuromodulation may provide significant long-term pain relief in selected CMI patients with persistent occipital pain. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to further define appropriate patient selection criteria as well as to refine the surgical technique to minimize device-related complications.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain states is a safe and efficacious technique, being used with increasing frequency. The incidence of hardware-related complications requiring revision remains high. OBJECTIVES: The authors describe a technique of distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision, which does not require the changing of generators or extension leads, and thus presumably will minimize further device-related complications. METHODS: The authors present a case series of 3 patients where the distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision technique was utilized. RESULTS: The technique was well tolerated in each instance and all patients reported >50% pain reduction at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The distal to proximal neurostimulator lead revision technique quickly and safely adjusts lead position, including both lead depth and lead tip location, without a need for replacement of components or revision of the entire system.