Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: In patients with atrial fibrillation, 90% of embolic strokes originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Successful exclusion of the LAA is associated with a lower stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation. Surgical oversewing of the LAA is often incomplete when evaluated with transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). External closure techniques of suturing and stapling have also demonstrated high failure rates with persistent flow and large stumps. We hypothesized that the precise visualization of a robotic LAA closure (RLAAC) would result in superior closure rates. METHODS: Before robotic mitral repair, patients underwent RLAAC; the base of the LAA was oversewn using a running 4-0 polytetrafluoroethylene suture in two layers. Postoperatively, the LAA was interrogated in multiple TEE views. Incomplete closure was defined as any flow across the LAA suture line or a residual stump of greater than 1 cm. RESULTS: Seventy-nine consecutive patients underwent RLAAC; no injuries occurred. On postrepair TEE, 73 of 79 patients had LAAs visualized well enough to thoroughly evaluate. Successful ligation was confirmed in 64 (87.7%) of 73 patients. Seven patients (9.6%) had small jet flow into the LAA; no residual stumps were noted. Two patients (2.7%) had undetermined flow. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated excellent success with RLAAC; we postulate that this may be due to improved intracardiac visualization. Robotic LAA closure was more successful (87.7%) than previously reported results from the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study for suture exclusion (45.5%) and staple closure (72.7%). With success rates equivalent to transcatheter device closures, RLAAC should be considered for robotic mitral valve surgical patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is increasingly performed as a minimally invasive treatment option for aortic valve disease. The typical anesthetic management for this procedure was traditionally similar to surgical aortic valve replacement and involved general anesthesia and transesophageal echocardiography. In this review, we discuss the technological advances in transcatheter valve systems that have improved outcomes and allow for use of sedation instead of general anesthesia. We describe an anesthetic protocol that avoids general anesthesia and utilizes transthoracic echocardiography for procedural guidance.

We describe the use of the Sapien XT, placed in the mitral position using a totally endoscopic robotic approach in a 76-year-old man with extensive circumferential mitral calcifications and severe stenosis. The patient was at high risk for traditional open surgery and a large mitral valve annulus prevented safe transcatheter deployment due to size mismatch. Our novel approach offered a minimally invasive technique for native mitral valve replacement in a high-risk patient with anatomical constraints prohibitive to conventional approaches. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12737 (J Card Surg 2016;31:303-305).

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is an association between left atrial appendage velocity and the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). DESIGN: Single institution retrospective study performed between January 2013 and December 2013. SETTING: Single-institution, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred sixty-two adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions for the purpose of this study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Left atrial appendage velocity, measured by transesophageal echocardiogram, ranged from 8 cm/sec to 126 cm/sec. The development of POAF within the first 3 days after cardiac surgery was 38.3%. The authors found that patients with a lower left atrial appendage velocity had a higher risk of developing POAF. In the adjusted logistic regression model, there was an 11% decrease in the odds of POAF for each 10-unit (cm/sec) increase in the left atrial appendage velocity (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing left atrial appendage velocity is an independent predictor of risk for the development of POAF following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the addition of paravertebral blockade to general anesthesia in patients undergoing robotic mitral valve repair. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective trial. SETTING: A single tertiary referral academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 60 patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 4-level paravertebral blockade with 0.5% bupivicaine before induction of general anesthesia. All patients were given a fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia upon arrival to the intensive care unit, and visual analog scale pain scores were queried for 24 hours. On postoperative day 2, patients were given an anesthesia satisfaction survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, surgical and anesthetic data were recorded perioperatively and compared between groups. Compared to general anesthesia alone, patients receiving paravertebral blockade and general anesthesia reported significantly less postoperative pain and required fewer narcotics intraoperatively and postoperatively. Patients receiving paravertebral blockade also reported significantly higher satisfaction with anesthesia. Successful extubation in the operating room at the conclusion of surgery was 90% and similar in both groups. Hospital length of stay also was similar. No adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of paravertebral blockade to general anesthesia appears safe and can reduce postoperative pain and narcotic usage in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery. These findings were similar to previous studies of patients undergoing thoracic procedures. Paravertebral blockade alone likely does not reduce hospital length of stay. This may be more closely related to early extubation, which is possible with or without paravertebral blockade.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheal extubation in under 6 hours following cardiac surgery (also known as fast track extubation) is associated with decreased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay and the potential for improved recovery and decreased resource utilization1. This involves a collaborative effort from anesthesiologists, intensivists, critical care nursing and respiratory therapists. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reported that postoperative ventilation time was less than 6 hours in 34.3% of cases, which was not being achieved at our institution2. There has been increased interest in the use of checklists for perioperative procedures, which have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality3. As a result, a multidisciplinary team was formed to create a fast track extubation checklist using clinical assessment, ventilator data and laboratory values (Figure 1). Our goal was to meet the STS benchmark. In this study we review the results of this protocol. METHODS: After IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,028 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a single institution between January 1 2013 and August 31st, 2014. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery before initiation of the extubation protocol on November 1st, 2013 were compared to those who received surgery after implementation. Descriptive statistics for categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared using t-sample t tests. RESULTS: A total of 529 patients underwent surgery before and 499 patients after implementation of the extubation protocol. Preoperative data, intraoperative data and procedure type were similar in both groups (Table 1). After implementation, patients were significantly more likely to be extubated in under 6 hours (25.9% vs. 60.1%, p=.001, Table 2). Hospital length of stay was numerically less but not significantly less (9.4 days vs. 8.8 days, p=0.160) however post procedural length of stay was significantly less(8.0 days vs. 7.2 days, p=0.036) after protocol implementation. Reintubation rates remained unchanged (3.9% vs. 2.6%, p=0.295). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the multidisciplinary extubation checklist appears safe and may expedite discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and decrease length of stay after cardiac surgery. These have been previously reported to decrease morbidity and financial expense. The extubation rate under 6 hours at our institution now exceeds the STS benchmark. This suggests that our collaborative approach to extubation involving a well-defined checklist may be beneficial at other cardiac centers. (Figure Presented)

OBJECTIVE: Immediate extubation of select patients in the operating room after cardiac surgery has been shown to be safe and may result in improved hemodynamics and decreased cost perioperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of paravertebral blockade (PVB) to general anesthesia facilitates extubation in the operating room in patients undergoing totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair (TERMR). METHODS: A review of 65 consecutive patients who underwent TERMR between January 2012 and June 2013 at a single institution was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups, one group that received PVB and general anesthesia and a second group that received general anesthesia alone. The data analyzed included quantities of anesthetic administered during surgery and the location of extubation after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients received PVB and general anesthesia, whereas 31 received general anesthesia alone. The two groups had similar demographic and surgical data. Patients in the PVB and general anesthesia group were more likely to be extubated in the operating room (67.6%, n = 23 vs 41.9%, n = 13, P = 0.048) and required less intraoperative fentanyl (3.41 mug/kg vs 4.90 mug/kg, P = 0.006). There were no adverse perioperative events in either group related to PVB or extubation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PVB to general anesthesia for perioperative pain control facilitated extubation in the operating room in patients undergoing TERMR. Paravertebral blockade allowed for lower intraoperative fentanyl dosing, which may account for the increased incidence of immediate extubation. A detailed prospective study is warranted.

BACKGROUND Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF TAVR) can be performed under general anesthesia (GA) or moderate sedation (MS). Despite observational studies suggesting a shorter length of stay (LOS), shorter procedural time and a similar mortality rate with MS, only 5% of patients undergoing TF TAVR in the United States are done with this type of anesthesia. We reviewed the implementation of a MS for TF TAVR protocol at a single institution with no previous experience with this technique. METHODS Patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), likely difficult intubation, inability to tolerate supine position due to musculoskeletal disease, or barriers to communication including altered mental status were performed under GA with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. All others received MS with an ilioinguinal nerve block and intraoperative transthoracic echocardiography. The MS for TF TAVR protocol was implemented on October 9th, 2014. The records of patients undergoing TF TAVR 6 months before and after protocol implementation were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS In the pre protocol group 33 patients underwent TF TAVR under GA and no patients received MS. In the post protocol group, 97 underwent TF TAVR, 81 (83.5%) of which received MS. OSA was the most common reason for GA (N=10, 62.5%). Conversion from MS to GA occurred in 2 cases (2.5%) due to procedural complications, of which 1 resulted in death. All other cases involving MS were tolerated well and there were no anesthesia related complications. Post procedural LOS (3.2 days vs. 5.0 days, p=0.002) and procedure time (144.0 minutes vs. 96.1 minutes, p<0.001) were both significantly shorter in post protocol group. The post protocol group was also significantly less likely to require a skilled nursing facility upon discharge (24.2% vs. 8.2%, p=0.027). In hospital mortality was similar between groups (N=2 6.1% vs. N=3, 3.1%, p=0.601). (Table Presented) CONCLUSIONS The MS for TF TAVR protocol appears safe and can be rapidly implemented at institutions with no previous MS experience. This technique is feasible in the majority of patient undergoing TF TAVR. Post procedural LOS and procedural time are multifactorial, but this data further suggests MS may be beneficial in select patients