Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Over the last several decades, the opioid epidemic has become a national crisis, largely spurred by the spike in the use of prescription painkillers. With the epidemic came a concomitant rise in the incidence of opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD). Although OPIAD can significantly impact male sexual function and quality of life, it is an overlooked and poorly understood clinical entity that requires more attention from healthcare providers. AIM/OBJECTIVE:The objectives of the current review are to highlight the increasing incidence of OPIAD and the importance of an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to identify and treat patients with the condition. METHODS:This review presents the epidemiology surrounding the current opioid epidemic, with a focus on its origin, followed by a literature review surrounding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of OPIAD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/METHODS:Single-center studies were used to determine the safety and efficacy of various opioid and testosterone formulations on analgesia, sexual function, and quality of life. RESULTS:There should be a low threshold for obtaining laboratory studies (testosterone, luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]) on symptomatic patients who have a history of chronic opioid use. Treatment options include opioid cessation, short-acting opioids, and testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). The patient and physician should weigh the risks and benefits of TRT against more conservative approaches. Options such as clomiphene and anastrozole are available for patients who wish to preserve fertility. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Because OPIAD is an underappreciated and underdiagnosed consequence of chronic opioid abuse, healthcare providers should be particularly vigilant for signs of hypogonadism in this patient population. It is reasonable for pain specialists, urologists, and primary care physicians to closely monitor patients on prescription opioids and discuss available options for treatment of hypogonadism. Hsieh A, DiGiorgio L, Fakunle M, et al. Management strategies in opioid abuse and sexual dysfunction: A review of opioid-induced androgen deficiency. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:618-623.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A systematic review of the literature using the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (search dates 1/1/1965 to 7/29/17) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Evidence-based statements were based on body of evidence strength Grade A, B, or C and were designated as Strong, Moderate, and Conditional Recommendations with additional statements presented in the form of Clinical Principles or Expert Opinions. RESULTS:The American Urological Association has developed an evidence-based guideline on the management of erectile dysfunction. This document is designed to be used in conjunction with the associated treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS:Using the shared decision-making process as a cornerstone for care, all patients should be informed of all treatment modalities that are not contraindicated, regardless of invasiveness or irreversibility, as potential first-line treatments. For each treatment, the clinician should ensure that the man and his partner have a full understanding of the benefits and risk/burdens associated with that choice.

[This corrects the article on p. 423 in vol. 58.].

Xiaflex or collagenase Clostridium histolyticum intralesional injections are safe and effective as first-line treatment for Peyronie's disease.

PURPOSE:To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. RESULTS:A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified - 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8-10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8-10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening.

Prostate cancer most commonly metastasizes to bone, lung and liver. Omental metastasis of prostate cancer is extremely rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature, many of which have associated ascites. We present a case of non-ascitic omental metastasis of prostate cancer without any bone metastases. Furthermore, this patient has had two negative measurements of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood, suggesting a non-hematogenous route of metastasis to the omentum.

INTRODUCTION:There has been renewed interest in the use of subcutaneous testosterone pellets for the treatment of hypogonadism since the introduction of Testopel in 2008 by Slate Pharmaceuticals (Durham, NC, USA). Manufacturer guidelines recommend using two to six pellets; however, in the clinical setting, this is deemed insufficient. This has produced a wide variety of testosterone pellet usage that is not fully understood. AIM:To better understand subcutaneous testosterone pellet implantation practices among members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA). METHODS:A 19-item questionnaire was emailed to the 687 members of the SMSNA. Of the 19 questions, 17 were multiple choice and two required write-in responses. Usage patterns, satisfaction rates, and complication rates were investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Data regarding indications for initiating treatment with Testopel, initial dosage, follow-up of testosterone levels and dose titration, patient tolerance and satisfaction, technique of implantation, and procedural complications were collected. RESULTS:Eighty-seven survey responses were received (12.9%). At initiation of Testopel therapy, 80.5% of respondents would implant at least 10 pellets, whereas only 4.6% would place six to seven pellets and 3.4% would implant fewer than six pellets. Many respondents would determine the starting dose based on some combination of baseline testosterone level and weight, although 24.1% described using a standard starting dose for all patients. All respondents would check testosterone levels within 3 months of initiating therapy, with the vast majority (72.4%) doing so at 1 month. Subsequent dosing of Testopel was not changed in most patients, with 41.4% and 26.4% of respondents reporting that 60% to 80% and 80% to 100% of patients, respectively, remained on their initial dose. Most respondents would re-implant pellets at a 3-month (21.8%) or 4-month (43.7%) interval. High patient satisfaction was described by respondents, with 56.3% finding patients to be satisfied "most times" and 34.5% "almost always." CONCLUSION:This study provides insight into the usage of Testopel among members of the SMSNA. We found that the vast majority of specialists use at least 10 pellets at initial implantation, with limited need for subsequent dose adjustments, good durability of response, and high patient satisfaction and tolerability.