Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES:Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinomas (PUC) of the bladder are rare variants known for diffuse and infiltrative spread, however their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are not well established. We aimed to evaluate MRI features of PUC of the bladder and their association with survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS:This retrospective single-center study included 41 patients with pathologically-proven bladder PUC of the bladder that underwent pre-treatment MRI between January 2000 and March 2020. Two radiologists reviewed MRIs independently followed by consensus with a third radiologist. On MRI, tumor extent, size, Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scores (≥4, muscle-invasive; 5, extravesical extension [EVE]), pelvic peritoneal spread (PPS), hydronephrosis, pelvic adenopathy and clinicopathological factors of age, gender, pathological stage, and treatment type were extracted. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate association with survival. RESULTS:Thirty-two men and 9 women (median age 70 years, IQR 64-76) were included. Most were muscle-invasive (n = 30 [73.2%]). On MRI, most tumors were diffuse (n = 28 [68.3%]), >5 cm (n = 30 [73.2%]), VI-RADS 4 to 5 (n = 36 [87.8%]) with features of EVE and (n = 31 [75.6%]) and PPS (n = 25 [61.0%]). Variables associated with survival were: Larger tumors (>5 cm; hazard ratio [HR] = 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-15.5; P < 0.01), diffuse extent (HR = 4.0; 95% CI 1.4-11.2; P = 0.01), EVE (HR = 4.5; 95% CI 1.5-13.6; P < 0.01), PPS (HR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.4; P = 0.01), hydronephrosis (HR = 13.7; 95% CI 3.1-60.9; P < 0.01), pathologic stage (≥pT3 vs. pT1; HR = 5.6; 95% CI 1.3-22.0; P = 0.02), and margin positivity (HR = 4.4 [95% CI 1.2-16.4], P = 0.03). CONCLUSION:PUCs of the bladder are commonly large, diffuse VI-RADS score 4 to 5 tumors with MRI features of EVE and PPS. These features and pathological stage were associated with survival.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS:were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS:Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. CONCLUSION:. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine risk factors for hypervascularization in hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointense nodules without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to May 7, 2020. Studies which evaluated radiologic and clinical risk factors for hypervascularization in HBP hypointense nodules without APHE were included. Hazard ratios were meta-analytically pooled using random-effects model. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS:Sixteen studies with 934 patients were included. HBP hypointense nodules without APHE with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity, and restricted diffusion showed risk for hypervascularization with pooled HRs of 2.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-4.20), 4.21 (95% CI, 1.15-15.40), 5.83 (95% CI, 1.42-23.95), respectively. Previous HCC history contributed to hypervascularization of the nodules with hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.23-3.44). T1 hyperintensity, intralesional fat, Child-Pugh Class B, sex, alfa-fetoprotein, hepatitis B or C infection were not significant risk factors for hypervascularization (p ≥0.05). Study quality was generally moderate. CONCLUSION:HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with baseline size greater than 10 mm, T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion and previous hepatocellular carcinoma history pose higher risk for hypervascularization. Proper patient management in patients with HBP hypointense nodules without APHE on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may need to be tailored according to these risk factors.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) based on Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) has been increasingly used as a meaningful imaging-based intermediate endpoint (IBIE) for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In randomized phase III trials, rPFS showed good correlation with OS at the individual trial level. We aimed to assess the correlation between the hazard ratios (HR) of IBIE and OS among PCWG2-based randomized trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS:PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for randomized trials evaluating systemic treatments on mCRPC using PCWG2 up to April 15, 2020. Hazard ratios for OS and IBIEs were extracted and their correlation was assessed using weighted linear regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to various clinical settings: prior chemotherapy, drug category, type of IBIE (rPFS vs. composite IBIE, latter defined as progression by imaging and one or a combination of PSA, pain, skeletal-related events, and performance status), and publication year. RESULTS: = 0.32-0.91). CONCLUSION:IBIEs in the era of PCWG2 correlate well with OS in randomized trials for systemic drugs in patients with mCRPC. PCWG2-based rPFS should be used instead of a composite IBIE that includes PSA and other clinical variables.

BACKGROUND:Intradiverticular bladder tumors (IDBT) are rare but clinically important, as they are difficult to assess endoscopically due to limited anatomic access and risk of perforation. MRI may be helpful in assessing IDBT and providing relevant staging and prognostic information. PURPOSE:To assess MRI findings of IDBT and their relationship with overall survival. METHODS:This retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients with IDBT undergoing MRI from 2008 to 2018 identified through electronic medical records and PACS database search. Two radiologists independently assessed the following MRI features: size (>3 vs ≤3 cm), diverticular neck involvement, Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score (>3 vs ≤3), perivesical fat infiltration, additional tumors and suspicious pelvic lymph nodes. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis; and the relationship with clinicopathological and MRI features was determined using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Cohen's kappa (K). RESULTS:Median follow-up was 1044 days (interquartile range, 474-1952 days). Twenty-six (83.9%) patients underwent surgical treatment with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On MRI, greater tumor size (>3 cm), diverticular neck involvement, perivesical extension, and suspicious lymph nodes were associated with lower overall survival (HR = 3.6-8.1 and 4.3-6.3 for the 2 radiologists, p ≤ 0.03). Other clinicopathological or MRI findings were not associated with survival (p = 0.27-0.65). Inter-reader agreement was excellent for tumor size (ICC = 0.991; 95% CI 0.982-0.996), fair for VI-RADS (K = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.22-0.82), and moderate for others (K = 0.61-0.79). CONCLUSION:In patients with IDBT, several MRI features were significantly associated with overall survival. Utilizing all available clinicopathological and imaging information may improve estimation of prognosis.

BACKGROUND:F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET or PET/CT has shown the capacity to better identify the primary tumour site and detect additional sites of metastasis. However, its clinical impact is not well established. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies to assess the impact of FDG-PET or PET/CT on the management of patients with CUP. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to 4th February 2021. Studies that reported the proportion of patients with CUP who experienced a management change after FDG-PET or PET/ computed tomography (CT) were included and the proportions were pooled using the random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: = 82%). The specific reason for management change was more commonly detection of the primary site (22% [95% CI 18-28%]) than detection of additional metastatic sites (14% [95% CI 10-19%]). The pooled proportions of patients with management changes were similar among numerous subgroups (range, 32.8%-38.2%). CONCLUSION:FDG-PET or PET/CT had a meaningful impact on the management of patients with CUP. Approximately, a third of patients had their management changed because of FDG-PET or PET/CT results, and this finding was consistent across numerous subgroups.

MRI features are presented in a multicenter retrospective series of five patients with a unilateral masslike lesion seen in the genitourinary diaphragm at MRI performed for known or suspected prostate cancer. In all cases, the lesion appeared as an encapsulated 1.3 to 3.0 cm mass of heterogeneous low or intermediate T2 signal intensity in the genitourinary diaphragm, and targeted biopsy demonstrated benign Cowper's gland tissue. This entity is a potential imaging pitfall that could result in a diagnosis of an exophytic nodule of benign prostatic hyperplasia or local spread of prostate cancer. We present these cases to facilitate correct identification of Cowper's gland hyperplasia as an occasional finding at MRI of the prostate.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:Prostate gland volume (PGV) should be routinely included in MRI reports of the prostate. The recently updated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 includes a change in the recommended measurement method for PGV compared to version 2.0. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement of MRI-based PGV calculations with the volumetric manual slice-by-slice prostate segmentation as a reference standard using the linear measurements per PI-RADS versions 2.0 and 2.1. Furthermore, to assess inter-reader agreement for the different measurement approaches, determine the influence of an enlarged transition zone on measurement accuracy and to assess the value of the bullet formula for PGV calculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Ninety-five consecutive treatment-naive patients undergoing prostate MRI were retrospectively analyzed. Prostates were manually contoured and segmented on axial T2-weighted images. Four different radiologists independently measured the prostate in three dimensions according to PI-RADS v2.0 and v2.1, respectively. MRI-based PGV was calculated using the ellipsoid and bullet formulas. Calculated volumes were compared to the reference manual segmentations using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS:Inter-reader agreement was excellent for the ellipsoid and bullet formulas using PI-RADS v2.0 (ICC 0.985 and 0.987) and v2.1 (ICC 0.990 and 0.994), respectively. The median difference from the reference standard using the ellipsoid formula derived PGV was 0.4 mL (interquartile range, -3.9 to 5.1 mL) for PI-RADS v2.0 (p = 0.393) and 2.6 mL (interquartile range, -1.6 to 7.3 mL) for v2.1 (p < 0.001) with a median difference of 2.2 mL. The bullet formula overestimated PGV by a median of 13.3 mL using PI-RADS v2.0 (p < 0.001) and 16.0 mL using v2.1 (p < 0.001). In the presence of an enlarged transition zone the PGV tended to be higher than the reference standard for PI-RADS v2.0 (median difference of 4.7 mL; p = 0.018) and for v2.1 (median difference of 5.7 mL, p < 0.001) using the ellipsoid formula. CONCLUSION:Inter-reader agreement was excellent for the calculated PGV for both methods. PI-RADS v2.0 measurements with the ellipsoid formula yielded the most accurate volume estimates. The differences between PI-RADS v2.0 and v2.1 were statistically significant although small in absolute numbers but may be of relevance in specific clinical scenarios like prostate-specific antigen density calculation. These findings validate the use of the ellipsoid formula and highlight that the bullet formula should not be used for prostate volume estimation due to systematic overestimation.

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is one of the most challenging gynecologic oncologic surgeries and is an overriding term for different procedures that entail radical en bloc resection of the female reproductive organs and removal of additional adjacent affected pelvic organs (bladder, rectum, anus, etc.) with concomitant surgical reconstruction to restore bodily functions. Multimodality cross-sectional imaging with MRI, PET/CT, and CT plays an integral part in treatment decision-making, not only for the appropriate patient selection but also for surveillance after surgery. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief background on pelvic exenteration in gynecologic cancers and to familiarize the reader with the critical radiological aspects in the evaluation of patients for this complex procedure. The focus of this review will be on how imaging can aid in treatment planning and guide management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Uterine sarcomas are rare and are often challenging to differentiate on imaging from benign mimics, such as leiomyoma. As functional MRI techniques have improved and new adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, are now being investigated, it is helpful to be aware of the current literature on imaging features that may sometimes allow for preoperative distinction. RECENT FINDINGS:MRI, with both conventional and functional imaging, is the modality of choice for evaluating uterine mesenchymal tumors, especially in differentiating uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma through validated diagnostic algorithms. MRI is sometimes helpful in differentiating high-grade stromal sarcoma from low-grade stromal sarcoma or differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma from endometrial carcinoma. However, imaging remains nonspecific for evaluating rarer neoplasms, such as uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor or perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, primarily because of the small number and power of relevant studies. SUMMARY:Through advances in MRI techniques and novel investigational imaging adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, imaging differentiation of malignant from benign uterine mesenchymal tumors has improved and could help reduce morbidity relating to misdiagnosis or diagnostic delays.