Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:wysocj01

Total Results:

88


Prostate Cancer Academy 2016: Presentation summaries

Crawford, E David; Albala, David M; Wysocki, James S; Lepor, Herbert; Ross, Ashley E; Finkelstein, Steven E; Keane, Thomas; Freedland, Stephen; Harris, Richard; Shore, Neal D; Ryan, Charles J
PMCID:5260950
PMID: 28127262
ISSN: 1523-6161
CID: 3086492

Multiparametric MRI and targeted prostate biopsy: Improvements in cancer detection, localization, and risk assessment

Bjurlin, Marc A; Mendhiratta, Neil; Wysock, James S; Taneja, Samir S
INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) is an evolving noninvasive imaging modality that increases the accurate localization of prostate cancer at the time of MRI targeted biopsy, thereby enhancing clinical risk assessment, and improving the ability to appropriately counsel patients regarding therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used MEDLINE/PubMed to conduct a comprehensive search of the English medical literature. Articles were reviewed, data was extracted, analyzed, and summarized. In this review, we discuss the mp-MRI prostate exam, its role in targeted prostate biopsy, along with clinical applications and outcomes of MRI targeted biopsies. RESULTS: Mp-MRI, consisting of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and possibly MR spectroscopy, has demonstrated improved specificity in prostate cancer detection as compared to conventional T2-weighted images alone. An MRI suspicion score has been developed and is depicted using an institutional Likert or, more recently, a standardized reporting scale (PI-RADS). Techniques of MRI-targeted biopsy include in-gantry MRI guided biopsy, TRUS-guided visual estimation biopsy, and software co-registered MRI-US guided biopsy (MRI-US fusion). Among men with no previous biopsy, MRI-US fusion biopsy demonstrates up to a 20% increase in detection of clinically significant cancers compared to systematic biopsy while avoiding a significant portion of low risk disease. These data suggest a potential role in reducing over-detection and, ultimately, over-treatment. Among men with previous negative biopsy, 72-87% of cancers detected by MRI targeted biopsy are clinically significant. Among men with known low risk cancer, repeat biopsy by MR-targeting improves risk stratification in selecting men appropriate for active surveillance secondarily reducing the need for repetitive biopsy during surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of mp-MRI for targeting prostate biopsies has the potential to reduce the sampling error associated with conventional biopsy by providing better disease localization and sampling. MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy may improve the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer while limiting detection of indolent disease, ultimately facilitating more accurate risk stratification. Literature supports the clinical applications of MRI-targeted biopsy in men who have never been biopsied before, those with a prior negative biopsy, and those with low risk disease considering active surveillance.
PMCID:4846729
PMID: 27123316
ISSN: 2080-4806
CID: 2092142

AUTHOR'S REPLY

Bjurlin, Marc A; Mendhiratta, Neil; Wysock, James S; Taneja, Samir S
PMCID:4846738
PMID: 27123319
ISSN: 2080-4806
CID: 2092152

Primary penile cancer organ sparing treatment

Sosnowski, Roman; Kuligowski, Marcin; Kuczkiewicz, Olga; Moskal, Katarzyna; Wolski, Jan Karol; Bjurlin, Marc A; Wysock, James S; Peczkowski, Piotr; Protzel, Chris; Demkow, Tomasz
INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of penile cancer is usually associated with mutilation; alterations in self-esteem and body image; affecting sexual and urinary functions; and declined health-related quality of life. Recently, organ sparing treatment has appeared and led to limiting these complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An extensive review of the literature concerning penile-preserving strategies was conducted. The focus was put on indications, general principles of management, surgical options and reconstructive techniques, the most common complications, as well as functional and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Analyzed methods, e.g.: topical chemotherapy, laser ablation therapy, radiotherapy, Moh's microscopic surgery, circumcision, wide local excision, glans resurfacing and glansectomy are indicated in low-stage tumors (Tis, Ta-T2). After glansectomy, reconstruction is also possible. CONCLUSIONS: Organ sparing techniques may achieve good anatomical, functional, and psychological outcomes without compromising local cancer control, which depends on early diagnosis and treatment. Penile sparing strategies are acceptable treatment approaches in selected patients with low-stage penile cancer after establishing disease-risk and should be considered in this population.
PMCID:5260461
PMID: 28127454
ISSN: 2080-4806
CID: 2418762

MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over-Detection through Improved Risk Stratification

Mendhiratta, Neil; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Meng, Xiaosong; Wysock, James S; Fenstermaker, Michael; Huang, Richard; Deng, Fang Ming; Melamed, Jonathan; Zhou, Ming; Huang, William C; Lepor, Herbert; Taneja, Samir S
BACKGROUND: MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy (MRF-TB) may improve detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men presenting for prostate biopsy. We report clinical outcomes of 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) and MRF-TB in men presenting for primary biopsy and further describe pathological characteristics of cancers detected by SB and not by MRF-TB. MATERIALS & METHODS: Clinical outcomes of 435 consecutive men who underwent pre-biopsy mpMRI followed by MRF-TB and SB at our institution between June 2012 and March 2015 were captured in an IRB-approved database Clinical characteristics, biopsy results and MRI suspicion scores (mSS) were queried from the database. RESULTS: Among 370 men (mean age 64+/-8.5 years; mean PSA 6.8, SEM 0.3 ng/mL) who met inclusion criteria, PCa was detected in 200 (54.1%) cases. Cancer detection rates for SB and MRF-TB were 47.3% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.104). MRF-TB detected more Gleason score >/=7 cancers than SB (114/128 (89.1%) vs 95/128 (74.2%), respectively, p = 0.008). Of 39 cancers detected by SB, but not by MRF-TB, 32/39 (82.1%) demonstrated Gleason 6 disease, and 24/39 (61.5%) and 32/39 (82.1%) were clinically insignificant by Epstein and UCSF CAPRA (score
PMID: 26100327
ISSN: 1527-3792
CID: 1640862

Pre-Biopsy MRI and MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men with Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies

Mendhiratta, Neil; Meng, Xiaosong; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Wysock, James S; Fenstermaker, Michael; Huang, Richard; Deng, Fang Ming; Melamed, Jonathan; Zhou, Ming; Huang, William C; Lepor, Herbert; Taneja, Samir S
OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of MRI-ultrasound fusion (MRF-TB) and 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) over a 26-month period in men with prior negative prostate biopsy. METHODS: Between 6/12 and 8/14, 210 men presenting to our institution for prostate biopsy with >/=1 prior negative biopsy underwent multiparametric MRI followed by MRF-TB and SB and were entered into a prospective database. Clinical characteristics, MRI suspicion scores (mSS), and biopsy results were queried from the database and the detection rates of Gleason >/=7 prostate cancer (PCa) and overall PCa were compared between biopsy techniques using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Fifty-three (31%) of 172 men meeting inclusion criteria (mean age 65+/-8 years; mean PSA 8.9+/-8.9) were found to have PCa. MRF-TB and SB had overall cancer detection rates (CDR) of 23.8% and 18.0% (p=0.12), respectively, and CDR for Gleason score (GS)>/=7 disease of 16.3% and 9.3% (p=0.01), respectively. Of 31 men with GS>/=7 disease, MRF-TB detected 28 (90.3%) while SB detected 16 (51.6%) (p<0.001). Using UCSF-CAPRA criteria, only one man was re-stratified from low-risk to higher risk based on SB results compared to MRF-TB alone. Among men with mSS<4, 80% of detected cancers were low-risk by UCSF-CAPRA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In men with previous negative biopsies and persistent suspicion for PCa, SB contributes little to the detection of GS>/=7 disease by MRF-TB, and avoidance of SB bears consideration. Based on the low likelihood of detecting GS>/=7 cancer and overall low-risk features of PCa in men with mSS<4, limiting biopsy to men with mSS>/=4 warrants further investigation.
PMCID:4726647
PMID: 26335497
ISSN: 1527-9995
CID: 1761932

PREDICTION OF OVERALL AND CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER RISK ON MRI-TARGETED AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY USING PREBIOPSY NOMOGRAMS [Meeting Abstract]

Bjurlin, Marc; Wysock, James; Sakar, Saradwata; Venkataraman, Rajesh; Meng, Xiaosong; Fenstermaker, Michael; Mendhiratta, Neil; Fernandez, Gregory; Rosenkrantz, Andrew; Taneja, Samir
ISI:000362826600554
ISSN: 1527-3792
CID: 1871662

COMPARISON OF MRI-US FUSION TARGETED BIOPSY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY: SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE IN 604 PATIENTS. [Meeting Abstract]

Meng, Xiaosong; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Mendhiratta, Neil; Fenstermaker, Michael; Huang, Richard; Wysock, James; Bjurlin, Marc; Marshall, Susan; Deng, Fang-Ming; Melamed, Jonathan; Zhou, Ming; Huang, William C; Lepor, Herbert; Taneja, Samir S
ISI:000362826500362
ISSN: 1527-3792
CID: 1871612

OUTCOMES OF MRI-US FUSION TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN MEN WITH HISTORY OF PREVIOUS NEGATIVE BIOPSY: IMPROVED CANCER DETECTION AND RISK STRATIFICATION. [Meeting Abstract]

Mendhiratta, Neil; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Meng, Xiaosong; Fenstermaker, Michael; Huang, Richard; Wysock, James S; Deng, Fang-Ming; Melamed, Jonathan; Zhou, Ming; Huang, William C; Lepor, Herbert; Taneja, Samir S
ISI:000362826500364
ISSN: 1527-3792
CID: 1871622

OUTCOMES OF MRI-US FUSION TARGETED BIOPSY IN THE RISK STRATIFICATION OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE CANDIDATES [Meeting Abstract]

Meng, Xiaosong; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Mendhiratta, Neil; Fenstermaker, Michael; Huang, Richard; Wysock, James; Deng, Fang-Ming; Melamed, Jonathan; Zhou, Ming; Huang, William C; Lepor, Herbert; Taneja, Samir S
ISI:000362826500482
ISSN: 1527-3792
CID: 1871632