Faculty Bibliography

AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between presenting heart rate (HR) and in-hospital events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 139 194 patients with NSTE-ACS in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. The presenting HR was summarized as 10 beat increments. Patients with systolic BP < 90 mm Hg (4030 patients) were excluded to avoid the confounding effect of cardiogenic shock. An adjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated using a reference OR = 1 for HR of 60-69 b.p.m. after controlling for baseline variables. Primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital events all-cause mortality, non-fatal re-infarction, and stroke. Secondary outcomes were each of these considered separately. From the cohort of 135 164 patients, 8819 (6.52%) patients had a primary outcome (death/re-infarction or stroke) of which 5271 (3.90%) patients died, 3578 (2.65%) patients had re-infarction, and 1038 (0.77%) patients had a stroke during hospitalization. The relationship between presenting HR and primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and stroke followed a 'J-shaped' curve with an increased event rate at very low and high HR even after controlling for baseline variables. However, there was no relationship between presenting HR and risk of re-infarction. CONCLUSION: In contrast to patients with stable CAD, in the acute setting, the relationship between presenting HR and in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes has a 'J-shaped' curve (higher event rates at very low and high HRs). These associations should be considered in ACS prognostic models

Bioabsorbable stents are an important advancement in stent technology providing a temporary scaffold and may be augmented with drugs to suppress neointimal hyperplasia.Though changes are being made to the design of the stents, to ensure similar rates of acute recoil, residual stenosis postintervention remains higher when compared to contemporary durable stents. In order to achieve similar clinical restenosis outcomes, bioabsorbable stents must first show similar MLD or percent diameter stenosis at follow-up to drug-eluting stents.While variable different acute gain and post-procedure MLD for bioabsorbable stents make late lumen loss a poor marker for restenosis probability by itself, late loss can be an informative metric for neointimal hyperplasia over time in these stents.Metrics which are independent of acute gain such as minimal luminal diameter and percentage diameter stenosis may make better surrogates for restenosis (Table 1). Moreover, remodelling over time requires measurement of the vessel and lumen diameters in later follow-up. Since the natural history of the vascular response to bioabsorbable stents is in its infancy of investigation, follow-up of these stents at least beyond the duration of polymer is prudent. Finally, given a disappearing frame of reference, both careful angiographic and intravascular ultrasound assessments are helpful to delineate the varying contributions of recoil, remodelling, and neointima formation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are effective in reducing the time to ambulation for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures and in reducing the risk of vascular complications in selected patient cohorts. However, the frequency and consequence of failure of VCDs is not well defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a prospective registry of consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at our center, 9823 patients who received either a collagen plug-based (Angio-Seal) or a suture-based (Perclose) VCD were selected for the study. VCD failure was defined as unsuccessful deployment or failure to achieve hemostasis. Major vascular complication was defined as any retroperitoneal hemorrhage, limb ischemia, or any surgical repair. Minor vascular complication was defined as any groin bleeding, hematoma (> or = 5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistula. Any vascular complication was defined as either a major or minor vascular complication. Among the 9823 patients in the study, VCD failed in 268 patients (2.7%; 2.3% diagnostic versus 3.0% percutaneous coronary intervention; P=0.029). Patients with VCD failure had significantly increased risk of any (6.7% versus 1.4%; P<0.0001), major (1.9% versus 0.6%; P=0.006), or minor (6.0% versus 1.1%; P<0.0001) vascular complication compared with the group with successful deployment of VCD. The increased risk of vascular complication was unchanged in a propensity score-matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice, VCD failure is rare, but when it does fail, it is associated with a significant increase in the risk of vascular complications. Patients with VCD failure should be closely monitored