Faculty Bibliography

Background: Unlike other solid tumors, the impact of primary HS on melanoma survival and response to systemic therapy is not well studied. Nodular melanoma (NM) has a worse prognosis than superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), which is usually attributed to thicker primary tumors. Herein, we examine the hypothesis that HS might have an impact on MSS independent of thickness and that NM and SSM exhibit different mutational landscapes that associate with response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IT) and BRAF targeted therapy (TT) in the metastatic setting. Methods: Primary NM and SSM patients prospectively enrolled at NYU (2002 - 2016) were compared to the most recent SEER cohort (1973 - 2012) and analyzed with respect to MSS. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) was performed on a subset of matched tumor-germline pairs, allowing a comparison of the mutational landscape between NM and SSM. In the metastatic setting, survival analyses were used to compare outcomes and responses to treatment across HS. Results: The NYU cohort of 1,621 patients with either NM (n = 510) or SSM (n = 1,111) was representative of the analogous SEER cohort (21,339 NM, 97,169 SSM), with NM presenting as thicker, more ulcerated, and later stage (all p < 0.001). Among the NYU cohort, NM was found to have lower rates of TIL (p = 0.047), higher mitotic index (p < 0.001), and higher rates of NRAS mutation (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox models, NM was a significant predictor of worse MSS, independent of thickness and stage (p = 0.01). NM had a significantly lower mutational burden across the exome (p < 0.001). Some of the most under-mutated genes noted in NM were NOTCH4, BCL2L12 and RPS6KA6 (all p < 0.01). Among patients treated with TT (n = 56), NM remained a significant predictor of worse MSS (p = 0.004). However, there was no difference in response to IT. Conclusions: NM and SSM show divergent mutational patterns which may contribute to their different clinical behaviors and responses to BRAF targeted therapy. More studies are needed to better understand the key molecular and cellular processes driving such differences. Integration of HS data into prospective clinical trial reporting is needed to better assess its impact on response to treatment

Background: Efforts to identify targeted therapies that can improve treatment outcome in metastatic ALM have been unsuccessful. In a previous genomic screening, we identified copy number amplification of the histone methyltransferase EZH2 in 47% of ALM cases, a higher frequency than previously reported in cutaneous melanomas (CM) (5%). Here, we tested the hypothesis that increased EZH2 expression contributes to ALM progression and may confer selective sensitivity to EZH2 inhibition. Methods: EZH2 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 51 primary (21 stage I, 13 Stage II and 17 Stage III) and 23 metastatic (11 in transit, 8 nodal and 4 visceral) ALM cases with extensive clinicopathological data and protocol-driven follow up. Colony formation and cell proliferation was assessed following treatment of ALM and CM cell lines with three EZH2 inhibitors, including GSK126, currently in clinical trials. The effect of GSK126 on H3K27me3 and downstream EZH2 targets was analyzed by western blotting. Results: EZH2 is commonly overexpressed in both primary (30/51; 65%) and metastatic (20/23; 87%) ALM cases, with a significant increase in mean IHC score between primary and metastatic tumors (1.9 vs. 2.7, respectively, p = 0.047). EZH2 expression increased in 6/10 metastatic ALM tumors compared to their matched primary tumors. ALM tumors with EZH2 gene amplification showed increased EZH2 protein expression; however more cases showed overexpression with no amplification suggesting a potential epigenetic component of EZH2 regulation. GSK126 significantly suppressed ALM colony formation at lower doses compared to CM (1 muM vs. 5 muM, respectively). EZH2 inhibition also increased expression of the downstream tumor suppressor E-cadherin in ALM but not in CM cell lines. Finally, ALM cell lines had significantly lower basal H3K27me3 levels than CM cell lines, suggesting an additional, histone methyltransferase-independent function of EZH2 in ALM. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate thatEZH2 upregulation is common in ALM, and suggest that it may play a role in ALM's metastatic progression that requires further investigation. Selective sensitivity of ALM cell lines to EZH2 inhibitors supports the therapeutic potential of EZH2-targeted therapy in ALM

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the surgical Apgar score (SAS) may enhance the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) risk assessment for prediction of early postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated demographics, medical history, procedure, SAS, VASQIP assessment, and postoperative data for patients undergoing major/extensive intra-abdominal surgery at the Manhattan Veterans Affairs between October 2006 and September 2011. End points were overall morbidity and 30-, 60- , and 90-day mortality. Pearson's chi-square, ANOVA, and multivariate regression modeling were employed. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-nine patients were included. Apgar groups did not differ in age, sex, and race. Low SASs were associated with worse functional status, increased postoperative morbidity, and 30-, 60- , and 90-day mortality rates. SAS did not significantly enhance VASQIP prediction of postoperative outcomes, although a trend was detected. Multivariate analysis confirmed SAS as an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SAS effectively identifies veterans at high risk for poor postoperative outcome. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate the role of SAS in enhancing VASQIP risk prediction.

BACKGROUND: The Liaison Committee on Medical Education requires midclerkship formative (low stakes) feedback to students regarding their clinical skills. Student self-assessment is not commonly incorporated into this evaluation. We sought to determine the feasibility of collecting and comparing student self-assessment with that of their preceptors using an iPad application. These student self-ratings and preceptor ratings are jointly created and reviewed as part of a face-to-face midclerkship feedback session. METHODS: Using our iPad application for Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills ("PRIMES"), students answer 6 questions based on their self-assessment of performance at midclerkship. Each skill is rated on a 3-point scale (beginning, competent, and strong) with specific behavioral anchors. The faculty preceptors then complete the same PRIMES form during the face-to-face meeting. The application displays a comparison of the 2 sets of ratings, facilitating a discussion to determine individualized learning objectives for the second half of the clerkship. RESULTS: A total of 209 student-preceptor pairs completed PRIMES ratings. On average, student-preceptor ratings were in agreement for 38% of the time. Agreement between students and preceptors was highest for Professionalism (70%) and lowest for Procedural Skills (22%). On average, 60% of student-preceptor ratings did not agree. Students rated themselves lower than preceptors 52% of the time, while only 8% of students rated themselves higher than their preceptors' ratings (this difference is significant at the P value <.05 level). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of using the PRIMES framework to incorporate surgery clerkship students' self-assessment into formative face-to-face midclerkship feedback sessions with their preceptors with the goal to improve performance during the second half of the clerkship.

Patients with thick (>4 mm) primary melanomas have highly variable outcomes. Current staging criteria for these patients are based primarily on the presence of nodal disease, which often serves as the basis for adjuvant trial eligibility. Identification of novel biomarkers could help identify patients who may benefit from promising, new adjuvant therapies or, alternatively, spare patients with good prognoses the cost and potential toxicity of these drugs. We examined patients with thick primary melanoma to determine whether proliferation markers (mitotic index and Ki- 67) and other clinicopatholgical features were associated with survival. We studied 171 patients with thick primary melanomas; median thickness was 6.0 mm (median follow-up, 3.0 years). In clinically node-negative patients, Ki-67 expression was an independent predictor of worse RFS (HR 2.19, P = 0.024) and OS (HR 2.49, P = 0.028). In a separate model, moderate (>1 to <5 per mm²) and many (>5 per mm²) mitoses were each significantly associated with RFS (HR = 9.97, P = 0.035 and HR = 11.93, P = 0.025, respectively); and OS (HR = 12.79, P = 0.033 and HR = 18.68, P = 0.017, respectively). In the same model, natural log-transformed tumor thickness was also significantly associated with worse OS (HR 2.37, P = 0.009). In sum, we identified cell proliferation markers Ki-67 and mitotic index as independent predictors of survival in clinically nodenegative patients with thick primary melanoma. Greater tumor thickness was also an independent predictor of survival in this cohort. With further investigation, these measures may improve risk-stratification for patients with thick primary melanoma

BACKGROUND: Metastatic melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is uncommon, biologically ill defined, and clinically understudied. MUP outcomes are seldom reported in clinical trials. In this study, we analyze responses of MUP patients treated with systemic therapy in an attempt to inform treatment guidelines for this unique population. METHODS: New York University (NYU)'s prospective melanoma database was searched for MUP patients treated with systemic therapy. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for MUP patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy reported in the literature, and their response and survival data were compared to the MUP patient data from NYU. Both groups' response data were compared to those reported for melanoma of known primary (MKP). RESULTS: The MUP patients treated at NYU had better outcomes on immunotherapy but worse on targeted therapy than the MUP patients in the literature. The NYU MUP patients and those in the literature had worse outcomes than the majority-MKP populations in 10 clinical trial reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that MUP patients might have poorer outcomes on systemic therapy as compared to MKP patients. Our cohort was small and limited data were available, highlighting the need for increased reporting of MUP outcomes and multi-institutional efforts to understand the mechanism behind the observed differences.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2011, metastatic melanoma treatment has evolved with commercial approval of BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy and CTLA-4- and PD-1-blocking antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICI). While novel therapies have demonstrated improved prognosis in clinical trials, few studies have examined the evolution of prognosis and toxicity of these drugs among an unselected population. We assess whether survival and toxicity reported in trials, which typically exclude most patients with brain metastases and poor performance status, are recapitulated within a commercial access population. METHODS: 182 patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma from July 2006 to December 2013 and treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy or ICI were prospectively studied. Outcomes and clinicopathologic differences between trial and commercial cohorts were assessed. RESULTS: Patients receiving commercial therapy (vs. on trial) had poorer prognostic features (i.e., brain metastases) and lower median overall survival (mOS) when assessed across all treatments (9.2 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.0027). While toxicity within trial and commercial cohorts did not differ, patients who experienced toxicity had increased mOS (p < 0.001), irrespective of stratification by trial status or therapy. CONCLUSION: Metastatic melanoma patients receiving commercial treatment may represent a different clinical population with poor prognostic features compared to trial patients. Toxicity may prognosticate treatment benefit.