Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Cystadenofibromas are benign ovarian neoplasms. Their most typical features on sonography (US) are unilocular cysts with small, shadowing hyperechoic, solid papillae without internal vascularity. In the past, they were virtually always surgically removed to exclude malignancy. This study was undertaken to review the sonographic appearances of benign cystadenomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the transvaginal US studies of 32 cases of pathologically proven ovarian cystadenofibromas. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the tumors presented as unilocular cystic structures with one or more solid, hyperechoic, shadowing, mural nodules with no discernible blood flow projecting from the inner cyst wall. Ten lesions were multiloculated with multiple small solid areas, with scant or no blood vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Cystadenofibromas do not always have a classic appearance on transvaginal US and color Doppler imaging. In our series, however, the majority (69%) presented as unilocular cysts with one or more small solid, avascular projections from the inner cyst wall. These features had 100% reliability for a diagnosis of benign cystadenofibroma in this small series. Further study is necessary to confirm the reliability of this finding for benign cystadenofibroma, thus possibly avoiding or minimizing any surgical exploration. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2014.

Abstract Objective Assessment of 12-month safety of ospemifene 60 mg/day for treatment of postmenopausal women with vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). Methods In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, women 40-80 years with VVA and an intact uterus were randomized 6 : 1 to ospemifene 60 mg/day or placebo. The primary objective was 12-month safety, particularly endometrial; 12-week efficacy was assessed. Safety assessments included endometrial histology and thickness, and breast and gynecological examinations. Efficacy evaluations included changes from baseline to week 12 in percentage of superficial and parabasal cells and vaginal pH. Results Of 426 randomized subjects, 81.9% (n = 349) completed the study with adverse events the most common reason for discontinuation (ospemifene 9.5%; placebo 3.9%). Most (88%) treatment-emergent adverse events with ospemifene were considered mild or moderate. Three cases (1.0%) of active proliferation were observed in the ospemifene group. For one, active proliferation was seen at end of study week 52, and diagnosed as simple hyperplasia without atypia on follow-up biopsy 3 months after the last dose. This subsequently resolved with progestogen treatment and dilatation and curettage. In six subjects (five ospemifene (1.4%), one placebo (1.6%)) endometrial polyps were found (histopathology); however, only one (ospemifene) was confirmed as a true polyp during additional expert review. Endometrial histology showed no evidence of carcinoma. Statistically significant improvements were seen for all primary and secondary efficacy measures and were sustained through week 52 with ospemifene vs. placebo. Conclusions The findings of this 52-week study confirm the tolerance and efficacy of oral ospemifene previously reported in short- and long-term studies.

Prevention of osteoporosis should begin in childhood and continue throughout adulthood. Although genetic determinants of muscle and bone mass may offer other therapeutic options in the future, currently, counseling should primarily focus on lifestyle modification including healthy dietary practices and regular exercise. Vitamin supplementation, particularly vitamin D, should be considered to enhance diet based on patient's need. Attention to estrogen status is also important. In addition, patients should be counseled regularly about cigarette cessation and avoiding moderate alcohol intake.