Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:To assess patterns of care and outcomes with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive radiation in local-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective database analysis. METHODS:We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with T3-4N2 or T1-4N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, propensity-score matching, and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for demographic and disease-specific prognostic factors. RESULTS:P = .001). At a median follow-up of 36.6 months, patients had 3-year OS of 66% in the neoadjuvant group compared with 70% in those who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log rank P = .29). On subgroup analysis by histology, T stage, and N stage, there remained no differences in OS between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant survival difference associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.25, P = .54). In a propensity score-matched population of 1,008 patients (504 with neoadjuvant therapy and 504 without), there was no significant survival difference associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (H: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93-1.38, P = .22). CONCLUSIONS:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used in over 25% of patients, and its use is increasing. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with any differences in survival compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4 Laryngoscope, 2018.

BACKGROUND:Delays in postoperative head and neck (HN) radiotherapy have been associated with decreased overall survival; however, the impact of delays in postoperative HN chemoradiotherapy remains undefined. METHODS:All patients with nonmetastatic HN cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx) who underwent curative intent surgery and received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were identified from the National Cancer Database (2005-2012). Overall treatment time (OTT) was defined as the time from surgery to the end of radiation therapy. Statistical methods included Cox proportional hazards modeling, which adjusted for clinicopathologic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified the optimal threshold of OTT via conditional inference trees to estimate the greatest differences in overall survival (OS) on the basis of randomly selected training and validation sets. RESULTS:A total of 16,733 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 37 months. Median OS for OTT in a predefined threshold of ≤ 13 weeks was 10.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8 years; not reached) compared with 8.7 years (95% CI, 8.2-9.2 years) in > 13 weeks. On multivariate analysis, OTT of > 13 weeks versus ≤ 13 weeks independently increased mortality risk (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17; P = < 0.001). RPA identified an optimal OTT threshold of 97 days (interquartile range: 96-98 days). The OTT threshold of 97 days was confirmed in a full Cox regression model estimating the risk of death according to overall treatment time as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this large hospital-based national data, an OTT of greater than approximately 14 weeks most consistently increased the risk of death. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4. Laryngoscope, 2018.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) published consensus guidelines on the management of Hodgkin disease (HD) and nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which became the most downloaded articles from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, and Physics. E-contouring workshops allow for interactive didactic sessions, allowing participants to see case-based contouring in real time. A pilot 1-hour curriculum was developed with the objective of reviewing ILROG guidelines for HD and NHL management with incorporation of e-contouring tools. This represents the first international education intervention in Spanish using e-contouring with a pre- and postintervention questionnaire. METHODS:A 1-hour presentation was prepared in Spanish reviewing the ILROG recommendations for HD and NHL. The review was followed by the author's demonstration of contour creation using patients with HD and NHL prepared for the American Society for Radiation Oncology's 2015 e-contouring lymphoma session. A five- question evaluation was prepared and administered before and after intervention. A two-tailed paired t test was performed to evaluate any significant change in test value before and after intervention. RESULTS:A total of nine quizzes were collected before and after the intervention. The average test score before the intervention was 75.6%, and the average test score after the intervention was 86.7% ( P = .051). Four students scored 100% on both the pre- and postintervention evaluations, and no student had a decrease in score from pre- to postintervention evaluation. The topic with the lowest score tested dose consideration. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A substantial but nonsignificant improvement in test evaluation was seen with this pilot curriculum. This pilot intervention identified obstacles for truly interactive didactic sessions that, when addressed, can lead to fully developed interactive didactic sessions.

Introduction Photobiomodulation (PBM Therapy) formerly known as Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) is an effective treatment for reducing the incidence and severity of oral mucositis (OM) after high dose chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. However, reported PBM irradiation parameters, dose per point, number of treatment points or treatment intervals vary widely Objectives To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs), summarise the PBM parameters and detain the most effective treatment regimen. Methods Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing efficacy of PBM verses controls for prevention or treatment cancer therapy induced OM. Papers were scored for quality and effect size for the primary outcome, irradiation parameters and dose were compared with outcomes. Results There was lots of mistakes and missing treatment data (i.e. laser wavelength ranges, power, beam sizes, energy applied and treatment duration) on the reported data, however the majority of the randomized clinical trials reported positive effects: PBM reduced pain, onset of OM, and improved overall quality of life of the patients that received PBM. Conclusions Although no precise conclusion can be drawn due to a large variation on the reported data, PBM used for OM confidently recommend an optimal treatment guideline for this condition

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:To develop a clinically relevant model of oropharyngeal concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in order to quantify the effects of CCRT on tongue function and structure. CCRT for advanced oropharyngeal cancer commonly leads to tongue base dysfunction and dysphagia. However, no preclinical models currently exist to study the pathophysiology of CCRT-related morbidity, thereby inhibiting the development of targeted therapeutics. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Animal model. METHODS:Twenty-one male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups: 2 week (2W), 5 month (5M), and control (C). The 2W and 5M animals received cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and five fractions of 7 Gy to the tongue base; the C animals received no intervention. In vivo tongue strength and displacement, as well as hyoglossus muscle collagen content, were assessed. Analyses were conducted 2 weeks or 5 months following completion of CCRT in the 2W and 5M groups, respectively. RESULTS:Peak tetanic and twitch tongue forces were significantly reduced in both 2W and 5M animals compared to controls (tetanic: P = .0041, P = .0089, respectively; twitch: P = .0201, P = .0020, respectively). Twitch half-decay time was prolonged in 2W animals compared to controls (P = .0247). Tongue displacement was significantly reduced across all testing parameters in 5M animals compared to both the C and 2W groups. No differences in collagen content were observed between experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS:The current study is the first to describe a preclinical model of CCRT to the head and neck with an emphasis on clinical relevance. Tongue strength decreased at 2 weeks and 5 months post-CCRT. Tongue displacement increased only at 5 months post-CCRT. Fibrosis was not detected, implicating alternative causative factors for these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:NA Laryngoscope, 2017.

BACKGROUND:Postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard of care in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer with positive margins and/or extracapsular extension (ECE). METHODS:The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with stages III to IVB disease or with positive margins and/or ECE diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 receiving postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Using univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression, we assessed for predictors of CRT use and covariables impacting overall survival (OS), including in a propensity-matched subset. RESULTS:Of 12 224 patients, 67.1% with positive margins and/or ECE received CRT as well as 54.0% without positive margins and/or ECE. The 5-year OS was 61.6% for RT alone versus 67.4% for CRT. In the propensity-matched cohort, OS benefit persisted with CRT, including in a subset with positive margins and/or ECE but not without. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative CRT seems underutilized with positive margins and/or ECE and overutilized without positive margins and/or ECE. The CRT was associated with improved OS but the benefit persisted only in the subset with positive margins and/or ECE.