Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Patients with immune mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) have an inherently heightened susceptibility to infection and may be considered high risk for developing COVID-19. While data regarding the COVID-19 vaccine's immunogenicity in an immunocompetent adult population is rapidly emerging, the ability of IMID patients to adequately respond to these vaccines is not known. Here, we investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs on immunomodulatory treatment Methods: Patients with immune mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) have an inherently heightened susceptibility to infection and may be considered high risk for developing COVID-19. While data regarding the COVID-19 vaccine's immunogenicity in an immunocompetent adult population is rapidly emerging, the ability of IMID patients to adequately respond to these vaccines is not known. Here, we investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IMIDs on immunomodulatory treatment.
Result(s): The NY cohort baseline characteristics are found in Table 1. The Erlangen cohort consisted of 182 healthy subjects, 11 subjects with IMID receiving TNFi monotherapy, and 20 subjects with IMID on MTX monotherapy. In both cohorts, healthy individuals and those with IMID not on MTX were similar in age, while those IMID patients receiving MTX were generally older. In the NY cohort, of the healthy participants, 96.3% demonstrated adequate humoral immune response. Patients with IMID not on MTX achieved a similar rate of high antibody response rate (91.8%), while those on MTX had a lower rate of adequate humoral response (75.0%) (Figure 1A). This remains true even after the exclusion of patients who had evidence of prior COVID-19 infection (P= 0.014). Of note, 3 out of the 4 IMID patients receiving rituximab did not produce an adequate response. Similarly, in the Erlangen validation cohort, 98.3% of healthy controls, 90.9% of patients with IMID receiving TNFi monotherapy, and 50.0% receiving MTX monotherapy achieved adequate immunogenicity (Figure 1B). These differences remain significant when combining the cohorts, using a stricter definition of adequate response, and in a subgroup analysis by age. Cellular response was also analyzed in a subgroup of the NY cohort before and after second vaccination. Activated CD8+ T cells (CD8+ T cells expressing Ki67 and CD38) and the granzyme B-producing subset of these activated CD8+ T cells, were induced in immunocompetent adults and those with IMID not on MTX, but not induced in patients receiving MTX (Figure 2).
Conclusion(s): In two independent cohorts of IMID patients, MTX, a widely used immunomodulator for the treatment of several IMIDs, adversely affected humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Although precise cut offs for immunogenicity that correlate with vaccine efficacy are yet to be established, our findings suggest that different strategies may need to be explored in patients with IMID taking MTX to increase the chances of immunization efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, as has been demonstrated for other viral vaccines

Background/Purpose: The Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP) is a multi-racial/ ethnic population-based registry with the primary goal to determine the prevalence and incidence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we compare the three most commonly used classification criteria for SLE (1997 revised ACR, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the recent EULAR/ACR classification criteria) to identify cases that fulfilled only one of the classification criteria and explore each criteria set's unique cases. In addition, we used the EULAR/ACR criteria to determine the incidence and prevalence of SLE in Manhattan.
Method(s): MLSP cases were identified from Manhattan-based hospitals and rheumatologists, and state population databases. For this analysis, SLE cases were defined as fulfilling 1) the 1997 ACR classification criteria, 2) the SLICC criteria or 3) EULAR/ACR classification criteria. We quantified the number of cases that uniquely associated with each classification criteria and the number that fulfilled all three classifications. Prevalence (2007) and incidence rates (2007-2009) using the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using denominators obtained from the US Census data (revised 2000-2009 intercensal population files) for Manhattan.
Result(s): Overall 1,568 cases fulfilled at least one of the three classification criteria. Of those, 1008 (64.3%) cases fulfilled all three classification criteria, 166 (10.5%) fulfilled only the SLICC criteria, 50 (3.2%) fulfilled only the 1997 ACR criteria and 36 (2.3%) fulfilled the EULAR/ACR criteria with the remaining cases fulfilling a combination of two classification criteria. Cases that only met one of the classification criteria, and the reasons why they did not meet the other two classification criteria with example cases, are detailed in Tables 1-3. Based on the EULAR/ACR classification criteria, the age-adjusted overall prevalence and incidence rates of SLE in Manhattan were 59.8 (n=1,029, 95%CI:56.1-63.6) and 4.9 (n=245, 95%CI 4.3-5.5) per 100,000 population. Prevalence was 9 times higher and incidence was 6.9 times higher among females compared to males. The age-adjusted prevalence per 100,000 was highest among non-Hispanic Black females (198.9), followed by Hispanic females (133.1), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander females (97.7) and non-Hispanic White females (59.8). Age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 were highest in non-Hispanic Black females (15.8), followed by Hispanic females (7.5), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander females (7.3) and non-Hispanic White females (6.3). Prevalence and incidence rates for males followed a similar pattern.
Conclusion(s): Applying the three commonly used classification systems to a multi-racial/ ethnic population-based registry allowed for identifying unique cases of SLE who only fulfilled one classification system. The EULAR/ACR classification criteria revealed similar prevalence and incidence estimates and gender and racial/ethnic disparities to the previously published results from the MLSP using the 1997 revised ACR and SLICC classification criteria

Background/Purpose: The Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) Lupus Network was established with the goal of applying novel technologies to the interrogation of blood and tissue samples from patients with lupus nephritis (LN). In contrast to global LN clinical trials, the AMP LN cohort affords an opportunity to generate outcome data representative of a US multicenter multi-ethnic real-world experience. In this analysis, the AMP clinical dataset was investigated to determine the percentages of patients who attained prespecified definitions of partial or complete responses at 52 weeks. In addition, incorporation of response rates at weeks 12 and 26 to the analysis provided longitudinal patterns of response to standard of care.
Method(s): Patients with LN who were undergoing kidney biopsies as part of standard of care were eligible to enroll in the AMP LN study. Response definitions were only applied to cases whose baseline spot urine protein/creatinine (UPCR) ratios were > 1.0. Complete response (CR) required: 1) UPCR < 0.5; and 2) normal creatinine (< 1.3 mg/dL) or, if abnormal at baseline, < 125% of baseline; and 3) prednisone < 10 mg/day at the time of the study visit. Partial response required: 1) >50% reduction in UPCR without meeting UPCR criterion for CR; and 2) normal creatinine (< 1.3 mg/dL) or, if abnormal, < 125% of baseline; and 3) prednisone dose < 15 mg/day at the time of the study visit. Patients who did not achieve a CR or PR at the specific timepoints were considered non-responders (NR). Only patients with renal biopsies that demonstrated ISN/RPS classes III, IV, V or combined III or IV with V and data available at all four timepoints (baseline, weeks 12, 26 and 52) were included in this analysis. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of responses were performed, and heat maps were generated to graphically display response patterns.
Result(s): Data on 121 patients with LN enrolled in AMP were included in this analysis. Cross-sectional response rates at 52 weeks were: CR: 28.1%; PR: 23.1%; NR: 48.8% (Table 1). Response rates at weeks 12 and 26 are additionally displayed in Table 1, and Figure 1 is a heat map demonstrating longitudinal responses of our patients. All patients were considered NR at baseline. Only 7.4% of patients had week 12 CR responses sustained through week 52, whereas 19% had attained PR or CR at all 3 visits. An additional 14.9% achieved a PR or CR at 26 weeks which was sustained at 52 weeks. Overall, 36.4% of patients were NR at all time points.
Conclusion(s): Clinical data from the AMP Lupus Network revealed rates of 52-week CR and PR that were consistent with placebo response data from recently conducted LN trials. Low sustained CR rates not only underscore the need for more efficacious therapies but highlight how critically important it is to understand the molecular pathways that are associated with response and non-response. (Figure Presented)

Background/Purpose: Anti-Ro autoantibody production often precedes the development of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Sjogren's syndrome (SS) by years. For anti-Ro+ mothers enrolled in the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus (RRNL), progression to SS or SLE occurs in about a quarter, while most remain asymptomatic or develop only minor rheumatic symptoms (Asym/UAS). Thus, RRNL mothers uniquely offer a promise to identify genotype-phenotype relationships that are important to preclinical autoimmunity. Since multiple SLE risk alleles from Class II HLA genes are present in anti-Ro+ mothers, we examined interactions of specific microbiome taxa with Class II HLA by independent analytic paths with the goal to identify HLA-related microbiome associations in Anti-Ro+ Mothers of Children with Neonatal Lupus.
Method(s): Subjects included 125 RRNL mothers and 23 healthy controls. Stool microbiomes of anti-Ro+ women in RRNL (Asym/UAS, SS/SLE), and healthy controls (HC) were processed using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Sera/ plasma were evaluated for cytokines and autoantibody levels. Alleles from HLA Class II genes were genotyped using NextGen sequencing of HLA region or imputed (HIBAG) from GWAS data. Independent analytic paths sought to explore associations of specific taxa and class II HLA included: 1) use of a cumulative logit model to test interactions between FDR significant genera and HLA alleles and 2) assignment of SLE, SS, UAS patients and HC to molecular phenotype clusters by Random Forest (RF), an unsupervised machine learning tool using Z-score transformed cytokine soluble mediators and autoantibody values with settings and the gap statistic that were used to estimate the optimal number of patients and HC within clusters. The overlapping distribution of SS/SLE, HLA alleles and taxa at clusters were then examined.
Result(s): Findings related to DRB1*15:01 and an interaction with genera of the Ruminococcaceae family were tested. Oscillibacter, with FDR-adjusted significance was shown to exhibit evidence of an interaction (P=0.033 (OR=0.60 (0.37-0.96)). In order to authenticate that SLE HLA risk alleles modify the strength of the association, we examined the molecular phenotype clusters from RF clustering. Radar plots were used to visualize the distribution HLA alleles and the enrichment of microbiome taxa within these clinically relevant phenotypic clusters (Figure 1). DRB1*1501 shows enrichment at cluster 4. Interestingly, the distribution of Oscillibacter, but not Coprococcus 3 was nearly superimposable with the Class II HLA allele with enrichment at cluster 4. However, the distribution of DRB1*1501 was not enriched at cluster profiles representing evaluations of DRB1*0301 and SS/SLE disease classification (Figure 2) demonstrating a limitation of DRB1*1501 to predict risk for transition from benign to pathologic autoimmunity in anti-Ro+ mothers of children with neonatal lupus.
Conclusion(s): These data support the use of molecular phenotypes that are linked to genetic-environmental interactions to identify HLA-related microbiome associations

OBJECTIVE:To estimate the annual incidence rate of SLE in the USA. METHODS:A meta-analysis used sex/race/ethnicity-specific data spanning 2002-2009 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention network of four population-based state registries to estimate the incidence rates. SLE was defined as fulfilling the 1997 revised American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Given heterogeneity across sites, a random effects model was employed. Applying sex/race/ethnicity-stratified rates, including data from the Indian Health Service registry, to the 2018 US Census population generated estimates of newly diagnosed SLE cases. RESULTS:The pooled incidence rate per 100 000 person-years was 5.1 (95% CI 4.6 to 5.6), higher in females than in males (8.7 vs 1.2), and highest among black females (15.9), followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (7.6), Hispanic (6.8) and white (5.7) females. Male incidence was highest in black males (2.4), followed by Hispanic (0.9), white (0.8) and Asian/Pacific Islander (0.4) males. The American Indian/Alaska Native population had the second highest race-specific SLE estimates for females (10.4 per 100 000) and highest for males (3.8 per 100 000). In 2018, an estimated 14 263 persons (95% CI 11 563 to 17 735) were newly diagnosed with SLE in the USA. CONCLUSIONS:A network of population-based SLE registries provided estimates of SLE incidence rates and numbers diagnosed in the USA.

High levels of autoimmune antibodies are observed in COVID-19 patients but their specific contribution to disease severity and clinical manifestations remains poorly understood. We performed a retrospective study of 115 COVID-19 hospitalized patients with different degrees of severity to analyze the generation of autoimmune antibodies to common antigens: a lysate of erythrocytes, the lipid phosphatidylserine (PS) and DNA. High levels of IgG autoantibodies against erythrocyte lysates were observed in a large percentage (up to 36%) of patients. Anti-DNA and anti-PS antibodies determined upon hospital admission correlated strongly with later development of severe disease, showing a positive predictive value of 85.7% and 92.8%, respectively. Patients with positive values for at least one of the two autoantibodies accounted for 24% of total severe cases. Statistical analysis identified strong correlations between anti-DNA antibodies and markers of cell injury, coagulation, neutrophil levels and erythrocyte size. Anti-DNA and anti-PS autoantibodies may play an important role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and could be developed as predictive biomarkers for disease severity and specific clinical manifestations.

OBJECTIVES:In lupus nephritis the pathological diagnosis from tissue retrieved during kidney biopsy drives treatment and management. Despite recent approval of new drugs, complete remission rates remain well under aspirational levels, necessitating identification of new therapeutic targets by greater dissection of the pathways to tissue inflammation and injury. This study assessed the safety of kidney biopsies in patients with SLE enrolled in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a consortium formed to molecularly deconstruct nephritis. METHODS:475 patients with SLE across 15 clinical sites in the USA consented to obtain tissue for research purposes during a clinically indicated kidney biopsy. Adverse events (AEs) were documented for 30 days following the procedure and were determined to be related or unrelated by all site investigators. Serious AEs were defined according to the National Institutes of Health reporting guidelines. RESULTS:34 patients (7.2%) experienced a procedure-related AE: 30 with haematoma, 2 with jets, 1 with pain and 1 with an arteriovenous fistula. Eighteen (3.8%) experienced a serious AE requiring hospitalisation; four patients (0.8%) required a blood transfusion related to the kidney biopsy. At one site where the number of cores retrieved during the biopsy was recorded, the mean was 3.4 for those who experienced a related AE (n=9) and 3.07 for those who did not experience any AE (n=140). All related AEs resolved. CONCLUSIONS:Procurement of research tissue should be considered feasible, accompanied by a complication risk likely no greater than that incurred for standard clinical purposes. In the quest for targeted treatments personalised based on molecular findings, enhanced diagnostics beyond histology will likely be required.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at risk of developing COVID-19 due to underlying immune abnormalities and regular use of immunosuppressant medications. We aimed to evaluate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in patients with SLE with or without previous COVID-19-related symptoms or RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods/UNASSIGNED:For this analysis, we included patients with SLE from two cohorts based in New York City: the Web-based Assessment of Autoimmune, Immune-Mediated and Rheumatic Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic (WARCOV) study; and the NYU Lupus Cohort (a prospective registry of patients at NYU Langone Health and NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue). Patients in both cohorts were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies via commercially available immunoassays, processed through hospital or outpatient laboratories. Patients recruited from the NYU Lupus Cohort, referred from affiliated providers, or admitted to hospital with COVID-19 were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies as part of routine surveillance during follow-up clinical visits. Findings/UNASSIGNED:67 [24%] of 278). Other demographic variables, SLE-specific factors, and immunosuppressant use were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Of the 29 patients with COVID-19 previously confirmed by RT-PCR, 18 (62%) were on immunosuppressants; 24 (83%) of 29 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Of 17 patients who had symptoms of COVID-19 but negative concurrent RT-PCR testing, one (6%) developed an antibody response. Of 26 patients who had COVID-19-related symptoms but did not undergo RT-PCR testing, six (23%) developed an antibody response. Of 83 patients who had no symptoms of COVID-19 and no RT-PCR testing, four (5%) developed an antibody response. Among 36 patients who were initially SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, the majority maintained reactivity serially (88% up to 10 weeks, 83% up to 20 weeks, and 80% up to 30 weeks). Seven (70%) of ten patients with confirmed COVID-19 had antibody positivity beyond 30 weeks from disease onset. Interpretation/UNASSIGNED:Most patients with SLE and confirmed COVID-19 were able to produce and maintain a serological response despite the use of a variety of immunosuppressants, providing reassurance about the efficacy and durability of humoral immunity and possible protection against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Funding/UNASSIGNED:National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Bloomberg Philanthropies COVID-19 Response Initiative Grant.

Objective/UNASSIGNED:To investigate the humoral and cellular immune response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunomodulatory treatment. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Established patients at NYU Langone Health with IMID (n=51) receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination were assessed at baseline and after second immunization. Healthy subjects served as controls (n=26). IgG antibody responses to the spike protein were analyzed for humoral response. Cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 was further analyzed using high-parameter spectral flow cytometry. A second independent, validation cohort of controls (n=182) and patients with IMID (n=31) from Erlangen, Germany were also analyzed for humoral immune response. Results/UNASSIGNED:Although healthy subjects (n=208) and IMID patients on biologic treatments (mostly on TNF blockers, n=37) demonstrate robust antibody responses (over 90%), those patients with IMID on background methotrexate (n=45) achieve an adequate response in only 62.2% of cases. Similarly, IMID patients do not demonstrate an increase in CD8+ T cell activation after vaccination. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:In two independent cohorts of IMID patients, methotrexate, a widely used immunomodulator for the treatment of several IMIDs, adversely affected humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Although precise cut offs for immunogenicity that correlate with vaccine efficacy are yet to be established, our findings suggest that different strategies may need to be explored in patients with IMID taking methotrexate to increase the chances of immunization efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 as has been demonstrated for augmenting immunogenicity to other viral vaccines. KEY MESSAGES/UNASSIGNED:These results suggest that patients on methotrexate may need alternate vaccination strategies such as additional doses of vaccine, dose modification of methotrexate, or even a temporary discontinuation of this drug. Further studies will be required to explore the effect of these approaches on mRNA vaccine immunogenicity.