Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:lischj02

Total Results:

90


Comparison of Late Urinary Symptoms Following SBRT and SBRT with IMRT Supplementation for Prostate Cancer

Feng, Li Rebekah; Suy, Simeng; Collins, Sean P; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Yuan, Berwin; Saligan, Leorey N
Background/UNASSIGNED:Prostate cancer survivors commonly experience late-onset lower urinary tract symptoms following radiotherapy. We aimed to compare lower urinary tract symptoms in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to those treated with a combination of lower dose SBRT and supplemental intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SBRT + IMRT). Methods/UNASSIGNED:Subjects with localized prostate carcinoma scheduled to receive SBRT or a combination of SBRT and IMRT were enrolled and followed for up to 2 years after treatment completion. Participants treated with SBRT received 35-36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, while those treated with SBRT + IMRT received 19.5 Gy of SBRT in 3 fractions followed by 45-50.4 Gy of IMRT in 25-28 fractions. Urinary symptoms were measured using the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score. Results/UNASSIGNED:Two hundred patients received SBRT (52% intermediate risk, 37.5% low risk according to D'Amico classification) and 145 patients received SBRT + IMRT (61.4% high risk, 35.2% intermediate risk). Both groups experienced a transient spike in urinary symptoms 1 month after treatment. More severe late urinary flare (increase in AUA scores ≥ 5 points from baseline to 1 year after treatment completion and an AUA score ≥ 15 at 1 year after treatment) was experienced by patients who received SBRT compared to those treated with SBRT + IMRT. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Participants who received SBRT and supplemental IMRT experienced less severe late urinary flare 1 year after treatment compared to those who received higher dose SBRT alone. This information can be used by clinicians to provide patients with anticipatory counseling to mitigate any psychological burden that comes with unanticipated late urinary toxicities.
PMCID:6036583
PMID: 29997466
ISSN: 1661-7649
CID: 5013332

Contemporary Analysis of the Prevalence of Illegal Match Questions During Medical Student Residency Interviews

Sura, Karna; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Grills, Inga S; Mundt, Arno J; Wilson, Lynn D; Vapiwala, Neha
PMID: 29485049
ISSN: 1879-355x
CID: 5013322

First Annual Report of the Resident Committee of the American College of Radiation Oncology [Editorial]

Lischalk, Jonathan W.; Sura, Karna; Repka, Michael C.; Leeman, Jonathan E.; Osborn, Virginia; Engel, Steven; Barry, Parul
ISI:000427760300001
ISSN: 1948-7894
CID: 3509072

Long-Term Outcomes Following Conventionally Fractionated Stereotactic Boost for High-Grade Gliomas in Close Proximity to Critical Organs at Risk

Repka, Michael C; Lei, Siyuan; Campbell, Lloyd; Suy, Simeng; Voyadzis, Jean-Marc; Kalhorn, Christopher; McGrail, Kevin; Jean, Walter; Subramaniam, Deepa S; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Collins, Sean P; Collins, Brian T
Purpose/Objective: High-grade glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the CNS, with death often resulting from uncontrollable intracranial disease. Radiation dose may be limited by the tolerance of critical structures, such as the brainstem and optic apparatus. In this report, long-term outcomes in patients treated with conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost for tumors in close proximity to critical structures are presented. Materials/Methods: Patients eligible for inclusion in this single institution retrospective review had a pathologically confirmed high-grade glioma status post-surgical resection. Inclusion criteria required tumor location within one centimeter of a critical structure, including the optic chiasm, optic nerve, and brainstem. Radiation therapy consisted of external beam radiation followed by a conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity were assessed. Results: Thirty patients eligible for study inclusion underwent resection of a high-grade glioma. The median initial adjuvant EBRT dose was 50 Gy with a median conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost of 10 Gy. All stereotactic treatments were given in 2 Gy daily fractions. Median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 38 months with a median overall survival of 45 months and 5-year overall survival of 32.5%. The median freedom from local progression was 45 months, and the 5-year freedom from local progression was 29.7%. Two cases of radiation retinopathy were identified following treatment. No patient experienced toxicity attributable to the optic chiasm, optic nerve, or brainstem and no grade 3+ radionecrosis was observed. Conclusions: Oncologic and toxicity outcomes in high-grade glioma patients with tumors in unfavorable locations treated with conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost are comparable to those reported in the literature. This treatment strategy is appropriate for those patients with resected high-grade glioma in close proximity to critical structures.
PMID: 30254985
ISSN: 2234-943x
CID: 3508922

Reduced PSA Surveillance Following SBRT for Favorable Prostate Cancer Decreases the Incidence of Anxiety-Promoting Benign PSA Bounces without Limiting the Early Detection of Biochemical Failures [Meeting Abstract]

Aghdam, N.; Smith, C. P.; Danner, M.; Ayoob, M. J.; Yung, T.; Lei, S.; Collins, B. T.; Lischalk, J. W.; Dritschilo, A.; Suy, S.; Collins, S. P.
ISI:000447811600220
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5013532

Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for intact breast tumors

Lischalk, Jonathan W; Chen, Hao; Repka, Michael C; Campbell, Lloyd D; Obayomi-Davies, Olusola; Kataria, Shaan; Kole, Thomas P; Rudra, Sonali; Collins, Brian T
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Few definitive treatment options exist for elderly patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer who are medically inoperable or refuse surgery. Historical data suggest very poor local control with hormone therapy alone. We examined the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and proton beam therapy (PBT) as a means of definitive treatment for early stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Fifteen patients with biopsy-proven early stage breast cancer with a clinically visible tumor on preoperative computed tomography scans were identified. Gross tumor volumes were contoured and correlated with known biopsy-proven malignancy on prior imaging. Treatment margins were created on the basis of set-up uncertainty and image guidance capabilities of the three radiation modalities analyzed (3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy [3D-CRT], SABR, and PBT) to deliver a total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Dose volume histograms were analyzed and compared between treatment techniques. RESULTS: < .0001) between treatment modalities. Overall target coverage of gross tumor and clinical target volumes was excellent with all three modalities. Both SABR and PBT demonstrated significant dosimetric improvements, each in its own unique manner, relative to 3D-CRT. Dose constraints to normal structures including ipsilateral/contralateral breast, bilateral lungs, and heart were all consistently achieved using SABR and PBT. However, skin or chest wall dose constraints were exceeded in some cases for both SABR and PBT plans and was dictated by the anatomic location of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS:Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy using SABR and PBT appears to be dosimetrically feasible for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. The anatomical location of the tumor relative to the skin and chest wall appears to be the primary limiting dosimetric factor.
PMCID:6128030
PMID: 30202812
ISSN: 2452-1094
CID: 5386922

Radiation Oncology Resident Mentorship: Results of a Resident-Coordinated Mentorship Program

Engel, Steven; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Barry, Parul; Hopkins, Shane; Welsh, James S; Fernandez, Eduardo; Mundt, Arno J
PMID: 28865723
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 5013312

Five-fraction SBRT for ultra-central NSCLC in-field recurrences following high-dose conventional radiation

Repka, Michael C; Aghdam, Nima; Kataria, Shaan K; Campbell, Lloyd; Suy, Simeng; Collins, Sean P; Anderson, Eric; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Collins, Brian T
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Local treatment options for patients with in-field non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence following conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising modality to achieve reasonable local control, although toxicity remains a concern. MATERIALS/METHODS/METHODS:Patients previously treated with high-dose CF-EBRT (≥59.4 Gy, ≤3 Gy/fraction) for non-metastatic NSCLC who underwent salvage SBRT for localized ultra-central in-field recurrence were included in this analysis. Ultra-central recurrences were defined as those abutting the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or esophagus and included both parenchymal and nodal recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control and overall survival. Durable local control was defined as ≥12 months. Toxicity was scored per the CTC-AE v4.0. RESULTS:Twenty patients were treated with five-fraction robotic SBRT for ultra-central in-field recurrence following CF-EBRT. Fifty percent of recurrences were adenocarcinoma, while 35% of tumors were classified as squamous cell carcinoma. The median interval between the end of CF-EBRT and SBRT was 23.3 months (range: 2.6 - 93.6 months). The median CF-EBRT dose was 63 Gy (range: 59.4 - 75 Gy), the median SBRT dose was 35 Gy (range: 25 - 45 Gy), and the median total equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 116 Gy (range: 91.3 - 136.7 Gy). At a median follow-up of 12 months for all patients and 37.5 months in surviving patients, the majority of patients (90%) have died. High-dose SBRT was associated with improved local control (p < .01), and the one-year overall survival and local control were 77.8% and 66.7% respectively in this sub-group. No late esophageal toxicity was noted, although a patient who received an SBRT dose of 45 Gy (total EQD2: 129.7 Gy) experienced grade 5 hemoptysis 35 months following treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Although the overall prognosis for patients with in-field ultra-central NSCLC recurrences following CF-EBRT remains grim, five-fraction SBRT was well tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile. Dose escalation above 35 Gy may offer improved local control, however caution is warranted when treating high-risk recurrences with aggressive regimens.
PMID: 29052514
ISSN: 1748-717x
CID: 3508942

Webinar-Based Contouring Education for Residents

Sura, Karna; Lischalk, Jonathan W; Leckie, James; Welsh, James S; Mundt, Arno J; Fernandez, Eduardo
PMID: 28551341
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 5013302

Radiation therapy for hepatobiliary malignancies

Lischalk, Jonathan W; Repka, Michael C; Unger, Keith
Hepatobiliary malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of diseases, which often arise in a background of underlying hepatic dysfunction complicating their local management. Surgical resection continues to be the standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC); unfortunately the majority of patients are inoperable at presentation. The aggressiveness of these lesions makes locoregional control of particular importance. Historical experience with less sophisticated radiotherapy resulted in underwhelming efficacy and oftentimes prohibitive liver toxicity. However, with the advent of extremely conformal and precise radiotherapy delivery, dose escalation to the tumor with sparing of surrounding normal tissue has yielded notable improvements in efficacy for this modality of treatment. Dose escalation has come in a variety of forms most notably as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated proton therapy. As radiation techniques continue to improve, their proper incorporation into the local management of hepatobiliary malignancies will be paramount in improving the prognosis of what is a grave diagnosis.
PMID: 28480067
ISSN: 2078-6891
CID: 3508912