Faculty Bibliography

Retrospective studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) have linked these antibodies to allograft injury. Because rising healthcare costs dictate judicious use of laboratory testing, we sought to define characteristics of kidney transplant recipients who may benefit from screening for non-HLA antibodies. Kidney recipients transplanted between 2011 and 2016 at Johns Hopkins, were evaluated for AT1R-Ab and AECA. Pre-transplant antibody levels were compared to clinical and biopsy indications of graft dysfunction. Biopsies were graded using the Banff' 2009-2013 criteria. AT1R-Ab and AECA were detected using ELISA and endothelial cell crossmatches, respectively. AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients who were positive for AECAs. Re-transplanted patients (p < 0.0001), males (p = 0.008) and those with FSGS (p = 0.04) and younger (p = 0.04) at time of transplantation were more likely to be positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation. Recipients who were positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation had increases in serum creatinine within 3 months post-transplantation (p < 0.0001) and developed abnormal biopsies earlier than did AT1R-Ab negative patients (126 days versus 368 days respectively; p = 0.02). Defining a clinical protocol to identify and preemptively treat patients at risk for acute rejection with detectable non-HLA antibodies is an important objective for the transplant community.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Kidney transplantation is the first-line therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease since it offers greater long-term survival and improved quality of life when compared to dialysis. The advent of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based maintenance immunosuppression has led to a clinically significant decline in the rate of acute rejection and better short-term graft survival rates. However, these gains have not translated into improvement in long-term graft survival. CNI-related nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects are thought to be partly responsible for this. Case Presentation/UNASSIGNED:Here, we report the conversion of a highly sensitized renal transplant recipient with pretransplant donor-specific antibodies from tacrolimus to belatacept within 1 week of transplantation. This substitution was necessitated by the diagnosis of CNI-induced de novo post-transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Belatacept is a novel costimulation blocker that is devoid of the nephrotoxic properties of CNIs and has been shown to positively impact long-term graft survival and preserve renal allograft function in low-immunologic-risk kidney transplant recipients. Data regarding its use in patients who are broadly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens are scarce, and the increased risk of rejection associated with belatacept has been a deterrent to more widespread use of this immunosuppressive agent. This case serves as an example of a highly sensitized patient that has been successfully converted to a belatacept-based CNI-free regimen.

Background: Inheritance of two APOL1 risk variants accounts for the excess risk of non-diabetic ESRD in African Americans when compared to Caucasian, Hispanic and Asian Americans. African American living donors have a higher risk of ESRD than matched non-black donors. APOL1 genotyping in potential kidney donors of African descent may identify individuals at risk for progressive CKD following donation.
Method(s): We report the retrospective analysis of APOL1 genotyping in a cohort of African American potential kidney donors. In July 2016, we initiated targeted genotyping of all African American kidney donor candidates. African American candidates with two APOL1 risk variants were excluded from kidney donation.
Result(s): A total of 28 African American kidney donor candidates were evaluated between July 2016 and April 2018. 2 (7%) were found to have two APOL1 risk variants (high risk genotype). Low risk genotype was identified in 10 (36%) candidates who had one risk variant and 16 (57%) candidates who had none. To date, 15 candidates have completed their donor work-up. Of these, 7 (47%) have already undergone donor nephrectomy, and 4 (27%) were cleared for surgery and are awaiting operation. 4 (27%) of the candidates did not meet our center specific criteria for donation. 2 out these 4 candidates who were excluded from donation were ruled out expressly for having been found to have two APOL1 risk variants.
Conclusion(s): APOL1 genotyping led to the exclusion of two donors who might have previously been allowed to donate, possibly mitigating their risk of CKD/ESRD and suboptimal graft outcomes in recipients. (Table Presented)

Successful renal transplantation requires low-pressure venous drainage to permit adequate outflow from the allograft. We report here a series of three patients in whom the inferior vena cava as well as bilateral iliac veins were thrombosed, making it necessary to explore less traditional vessels for venous drainage of the renal allograft. We utilized the splanchnic vasculature in two cases, and the native left renal vein in another. The resulting atypical intra-abdominal locations of these allografts also presented difficulties for arterial anastomoses and for urinary drainage. Arterial conduits were utilized in two cases to facilitate anastomosis to the common iliac artery or the aorta and in the third case, the splenic artery was used for arterial inflow. A traditional ureterocystostomy was technically feasible for only one patient. In another, ureteroureterostomy to the native ureter was performed, and in the third case the creation of an ileal conduit was necessary. All three patients had antibodies to human leukocyte antigens and two required desensitization. All three kidneys had immediate graft function and continued to function at one year post-transplant. With a combination of planning, creativity, and persistence, patients with IVC thrombosis can enjoy the benefits of renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE:To test whether frailty, a novel measure of physiologic reserve, is associated with longer kidney transplant (KT) length of stay (LOS), and modifies the association between LOS and mortality. BACKGROUND:Better understanding of LOS is necessary for informed consent and discharge planning. Mortality resulting from longer LOS has important regulatory implications for hospital and transplant programs. Which recipients are at risk of prolonged LOS and its effect on mortality are unclear. Frailty is a novel preoperative predictor of poor KT outcomes including delayed graft function, early hospital readmission, immunosuppression intolerance, and mortality. METHODS:We used registry-augmented hybrid methods, a novel approach to risk adjustment, to adjust for LOS risk factors from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 74,859) and tested whether (1) frailty, measured immediately before KT in a novel cohort (n = 589), was associated with LOS (LOS: negative binomial regression; LOS ≥2 weeks: logistic regression) and (2) whether frailty modified the association between LOS and mortality (interaction term analysis). RESULTS:Frailty was independently associated with longer LOS [relative risk = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.29; P = 0.01] and LOS ≥2 weeks (odds ratio = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06-2.33; P = 0.03) after accounting for registry-based risk factors, including delayed graft function. Frailty also attenuated the association between LOS and mortality (nonfrail hazard rate = 1.55 95% CI: 1.30-1.86; P < 0.001; frail hazard rate = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19, P = 0.80; P for interaction = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Frail KT recipients are more likely to experience a longer LOS. Longer LOS among nonfrail recipients may be a marker of increased mortality risk. Frailty is a measure of physiologic reserve that may be an important clinical marker of longer surgical LOS.

The required intensity of monitoring for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation is not clearly formulized. We retrospectively evaluated a single-center cohort of 115 ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplant recipients, of which 32% were also HLA-incompatible (ABOi/HLAi) with their donors. We used an adjusted negative binomial model to evaluate risk factors for late AMR. Using this model, we risk-stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups for the development of late AMR. 26% of patients had at least one AMR episode. 49% of AMR episodes occurred within 30-days after transplant and were considered early AMR. Patients with an early AMR episode had a 5.5-fold greater incidence of developing late AMR (IRR=5.5,[95%CI:1.5-19.3],p=0.01). ABOi/HLAi recipients trended towards increased late AMR risk (IRR=1.9,[95%CI:0.5-6.6],p=0.3). High-risk recipients (those with an early AMR or those who were ABOi/HLAi) had a 6-fold increased incidence of late AMR (IRR=6.3,[95%CI:1.6-24.6],p=0.008) versus low-risk recipients. The overall incidence of late AMR was 20.8% versus 1.5% in low-risk recipients. Changes in anti-A/B titer did not correlate with late AMR (IRR=0.9 per log titer increase, p=0.7). This risk-stratification scheme uses information available within 30-days of ABOi transplantation to determine risk for late AMR and can help direct longitudinal follow-up for individual patients

BACKGROUND:Frailty increases early hospital readmission and mortality risk among kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. Although frailty represents a high-risk state for this population, the correlates of frailty, the patterns of the 5 frailty components, and the risk associated with these patterns are unclear. METHODS:Six hundred sixty-three KT recipients were enrolled in a cohort study of frailty in transplantation (12/2008-8/2015). Frailty, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL (IADL) disability, Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale depression, education, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were measured. We used multinomial regression to identify frailty correlates. We identified which patterns of the 5 components were associated with mortality using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:Frailty prevalence was 19.5%. Older recipients (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.07) were more likely to be frail. The only other factors that were independently associated with frailty were IADL disability (PR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.72-6.06), depressive symptoms (PR, 11.31; 95% CI, 4.02-31.82), less than a high school education (PR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.30-7.36), and low HRQOL (fair/poor: PR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.48-9.31). The most common pattern was poor grip strength, low physical activity, and slowed walk speed (19.4%). Only 2 patterns of the 5 components emerged as having an association with post-KT mortality. KT recipients with exhaustion and slowed walking speed (hazards ratio = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.17-5.03) and poor grip strength, exhaustion, and slowed walking speed (hazard ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.14-5.97) were at increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS:Age was the only conventional factor associated with frailty among KT recipients; however, factors rarely measured as part of clinical practice, namely, HRQOL, IADL disability, and depressive symptoms, were significant correlates of frailty. Redefining the frailty phenotype may be needed to improve risk stratification for KT recipients.