Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:mohamt03

Total Results:

130


ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients

Suh, Robert D; Genshaft, Scott J; Kirsch, Jacobo; Kanne, Jeffrey P; Chung, Jonathan H; Donnelly, Edwin F; Ginsburg, Mark E; Heitkamp, Darel E; Henry, Travis S; Kazerooni, Ella A; Ketai, Loren H; McComb, Barbara L; Ravenel, James G; Saleh, Anthony G; Shah, Rakesh D; Steiner, Robert M; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H
Portable chest radiography is a fundamental and frequently utilized examination in the critically ill patient population. The chest radiograph often represents a timely investigation of new or rapidly evolving clinical findings and an evaluation of proper positioning of support tubes and catheters. Thoughtful consideration of the use of this simple yet valuable resource is crucial as medical cost containment becomes even more mandatory. This review addresses the role of chest radiography in the intensive care unit on the basis of the existing literature and as formed by a consensus of an expert panel on thoracic imaging through the American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
PMID: 26439890
ISSN: 1536-0237
CID: 5847032

Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy: Case Presentation with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Literature Review [Case Report]

Saeedan, Mnahi Bin; Fathala, Ahmed L; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H
Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy is a very rare condition, yet believed to be often overlooked. It is thought to be caused by the developmental arrest in embryogenesis and characterized by an increase in the noncompacted, trabeculated myocardium adjacent to compacted myocardium in the left ventricular. The clinical presentations of this type of cardiomyopathy are of variable severity. Echocardiography used to be the diagnostic modality, but recent reports suggest that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has higher sensitivity and specificity by showing a ratio of the noncompacted myocardium to compacted myocardium of >2.3.
PMCID:4738500
PMID: 26900424
ISSN: 1995-705x
CID: 5847072

CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY [Review]

Bin Saeedan, Mnahi; Mohammed, Shamayel Faheem; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000439654800009
ISSN: 0363-0188
CID: 5847662

Breast Lesions on Chest Computed Tomography: Pictorial Review With Mammography and Ultrasound Correlation [Review]

Bin Saeedan, Mnahi; Mobara, Maram; Arafah, Maria Abdulrahim; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000439649400005
ISSN: 0363-0188
CID: 5847682

CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY [Correction]

Jokerst, Clinton; Oliva, Isabel; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000439654800010
ISSN: 0363-0188
CID: 5847762

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Imaging in the Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Moriarty, John M.; Bandyk, Dennis E.; Broderick, Daniel E.; Cornelius, Rebecca S.; Dill, Karin E.; Francois, Christopher J.; Gerhard-Herman, Marie D.; Ginsburg, Mark E.; Hanley, Michael; Kalva, Sanjeeva P.; Kanne, Jeffley P.; Ketai, Loren H.; Majdalany, Bill S.; Ravenel, James G.; Roth, Christopher J.; Saleh, Anthony G.; Schenker, Matthew P.; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.; Rybicki, Frank J.
ISI:000354420900005
ISSN: 1546-1440
CID: 5848022

"ACR Appropriateness Criteria\x,"

Suh, Robert D.; Genshaft, Scott J.; Kirsch, Jacobo; Kanne, Jeffrey P.; Chung, Jonathan H.; Donnelly, Edwin F.; Ginsburg, Mark E.; Heitkamp, Darel E.; Henry, Travis S.; Kazerooni, Ella A.; Ketai, Loren H.; McComb, Barbara L.; Ravenel, James G.; Saleh, Anthony G.; Shah, Rakesh D.; Steiner, Robert M.; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000364282900002
ISSN: 0883-5993
CID: 5848042

Pulmonary Calcifications: A Pictorial Review and Approach to Formulating a Differential Diagnosis [Review]

Amin, Sagar B.; Slater, Robbie; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000439652100007
ISSN: 0363-0188
CID: 5848062

Mentoring Matters [Editorial]

Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H.
ISI:000439654800001
ISSN: 0363-0188
CID: 5848192

ACR appropriateness criteria blunt chest trauma

Chung, Jonathan H; Cox, Christian W; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien H; Kirsch, Jacobo; Brown, Kathleen; Dyer, Debra Sue; Ginsburg, Mark E; Heitkamp, Darel E; Kanne, Jeffrey P; Kazerooni, Ella A; Ketai, Loren H; Ravenel, James G; Saleh, Anthony G; Shah, Rakesh D; Steiner, Robert M; Suh, Robert D
Imaging is paramount in the setting of blunt trauma and is now the standard of care at any trauma center. Although anteroposterior radiography has inherent limitations, the ability to acquire a radiograph in the trauma bay with little interruption in clinical survey, monitoring, and treatment, as well as radiography's accepted role in screening for traumatic aortic injury, supports the routine use of chest radiography. Chest CT or CT angiography is the gold-standard routine imaging modality for detecting thoracic injuries caused by blunt trauma. There is disagreement on whether routine chest CT is necessary in all patients with histories of blunt trauma. Ultimately, the frequency and timing of CT chest imaging should be site specific and should depend on the local resources of the trauma center as well as patient status. Ultrasound may be beneficial in the detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial hemorrhage; transesophageal echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool in the setting of suspected cardiac injury. In the blunt trauma setting, MRI and nuclear medicine likely play no role in the acute setting, although these modalities may be helpful as problem-solving tools after initial assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
PMID: 24603073
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 5846912