Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We evaluated the effect of re-resection with wide margins (undertaken because initial resection performed elsewhere was incomplete) on survival in patients with spermatic cord sarcoma (SCS). METHODS:After excluding those with metastatic disease and those not undergoing surgical intervention, the records of 72 consecutive patients treated for SCS between 1981 and 2011 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were reviewed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method for comparing between the 48 patients who underwent wide re-resection (WRR) within 5 months of diagnosis and the 24 who did not. The relationship of age, tumor size, tumor histology, adjuvant radiation, and wide re-resection with recurrence and death was assessed by univariate Cox regression. RESULTS:WRR significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.16, 95%CI 0.07-0.37; P < 0.0001), despite the fact that patients receiving WRR had higher-grade disease. Tumor-positive margins upon WRR were strongly associated with both disease recurrence (HR 5.56; 95%CI 1.14-27.11, P = 0.034) and death from cancer (HR 6.16, 95%CI 1.25-30.29; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS:A WRR with negative margins is effective in the management of patients with SCS and leads to improved RFS.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the impact of timing of blood transfusion in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS:Outcomes of consecutive patients with UTUC treated with RNU were analyzed. Clinicopathologic factors were compared using Fisher's exact test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test between patients who received any transfusion and no transfusion, and between patients receiving intraoperative transfusion only and patients receiving no transfusion. Cancer-specific and overall survival were estimated and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the impact of timing of transfusion on clinical outcomes. RESULTS:Among 402 patients included in this study, 71 (17.6%) patients received a transfusion at any point and 27 (6.7%) patients received an intraoperative blood transfusion. Transfusion at any time, patient comorbidity, high grade, advanced stage, positive surgical margins, low preoperative hemoglobin, longer operative duration, and increased blood loss were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (DSS) on univariable analysis (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.20-2.85, p < 0.005). In the multivariable analysis, transfusion at any point was not a prognostic factor (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60-1.68, p = 0.99). When examining intraoperatively transfusion only, transfusion was significantly associated with DSS (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.01-3.59, p = 0.045) but no longer significant in multivariable analysis (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.32-1.65, p = 0.440). CONCLUSIONS:Our study indicates that the administration of blood transfusion either intraoperatively or postoperatively is not associated with clinical or oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma when adjusted for other factors in multivariable analysis. Further study is required.

BACKGROUND:Mannitol is currently used as a renal protective agent to mitigate the effects of renal ischemia during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). This routine practice lacks rigorous methodological study. OBJECTIVE:To assess the effect on renal function outcomes after surgery of mannitol infusion prior to renal ischemia during NSS. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS:scheduled for NSS; the trial was conducted between July 2012 and July 2015. INTERVENTION:Patients undergoing NSS were randomized to receive mannitol (12.5g) or placebo intravenously within 30min prior to renal vascular clamping. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:The primary outcome was the difference in eGFR (renal function) between the two groups at 6 mo following surgery assessed with an analysis of covariance model using preoperative eGFR, treatment group, and surgical approach as covariates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:. Comparing placebo with mannitol infusion, the adjusted difference of 0.2 eGFR units at 6 mo was not significant (p=0.9), with the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (-3.1 to 3.5) excluding a clinically relevant effect of mannitol. Limitations include evaluation of a single mannitol dose and patients all had excellent preoperative renal function. CONCLUSIONS:Intraoperative 12.5g mannitol infusion during NSS has no demonstrable clinical benefit when compared with standardized fluid hydration in patients with normal preoperative renal function, and its use in this setting is not warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY:In this randomized trial, patients with normal kidney function who received mannitol during surgery to remove part of their kidney had no better kidney function 6 mo after surgery than those who did not receive mannitol. We conclude that this routine practice should be discontinued.