Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:np9

Total Results:

75


Post-traumatic thumb reconstruction

Elbeshbeshy B; Paksima N
Many options exist for the management of post-traumatic thumb reconstruction. While the single most important factor for determining the most appropriate procedure is the level of the amputation, many other factors must be considered including patient considerations regarding function and cosmesis as well as the nature of the injury and the expertise of the surgeon. Patients must be included in the decision-making process and their needs and expectations must be clearly defined and addressed. The patient who is most concerned with cosmesis rather than function is more likely to be satisfied with a prosthesis than with even the most cutting-edge surgical procedure
PMID: 12102399
ISSN: 0018-5647
CID: 36172

Complications of treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations

Guttmann D; Paksima NE; Zuckerman JD
PMID: 10829192
ISSN: 0065-6895
CID: 22627

Operative treatment of displaced surgical neck of humerus fractures

Paksima, N; Koval, K; Cuomo, F
SCOPUS:15944413491
ISSN: 1048-6666
CID: 564452

A new technique for arthroscopic resection of a bucket handle tear

Paksima N; Ceccarelli B; Vitols A
The authors present a previously undescribed technique for excision of a bucket handle tear. The technique uses a Caspari suture punch to pass a suture through the meniscus and use the suture as a tool to maneuver the meniscus so that its posterior horn attachment can be cut. The technique is noteworthy in that it eliminates the need for establishing an additional portal
PMID: 9681551
ISSN: 0749-8063
CID: 22629

Management of recurrent, complex instability of the elbow with a hinged external fixator

McKee MD; Bowden SH; King GJ; Patterson SD; Jupiter JB; Bamberger HB; Paksima N
We have treated 16 patients with recurrent complex elbow instability using a hinged external fixator. All patients had instability, dislocation or subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint. The injuries were open in eight patients and were associated with 20 other fractures and five peripheral nerve injuries. Two patients had received initial treatment from us; 14 had previously had a mean of 2.1 unsuccessful surgical procedures (1 to 6). The fixator was applied at a mean of 4.8 weeks (0 to 9) after the injury and remained on the elbow for a mean of 8.5 weeks (6 to 11). After treatment we found the mean range of flexion-extension to be 105 degrees (65 to 140). At a final follow-up of 23 months (14 to 40), the mean Morrey score was 84 (49 to 96): this translated into one poor, three fair, ten good and two excellent results. Complications included one fractured humeral pin, one temporary palsy of the radial nerve, one recurrent instability, one wound infection, one severe pin-track infection and one patient with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Although technically demanding, the use of the fixator is an important advance in the management of recurrent complex elbow instability after failure of conventional treatment
PMID: 9853498
ISSN: 0301-620x
CID: 22628