Faculty Bibliography

Although B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children and while highly curable, it remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The outgrowth of tumor subclones carrying mutations in genes responsible for resistance to therapy has led to a Darwinian model of clonal selection. Previous work has indicated that alterations in the epigenome might contribute to clonal selection yet the extent to which the chromatin state is altered under the selective pressures of therapy is unknown. To address this, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation, gene expression analysis, and enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing on a cohort of paired diagnosis and relapse samples from individual patients who all but one relapsed within 36 months of initial diagnosis. The chromatin state at diagnosis varied widely among patients: while the majority of peaks remained stable between diagnosis and relapse, yet a significant fraction were either lost or newly gained with some patients showing few differences and others showing massive changes of the epigenetic state. Evolution of the epigenome was associated with pathways previously linked to therapy resistance as well as novel candidate pathways through alterations in pyrimidine biosynthesis and downregulation of polycomb repressive complex 2 targets. Three novel, relapse-specific super-enhancers were shared by a majority of patients including one associated with S100A8, the top upregulated gene seen at relapse in childhood B-ALL. Overall, our results support a role of the epigenome in clonal evolution and uncover new candidate pathways associated with relapse.

[Formula presented] Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with relapsed T-ALL and T-LL is dismal; the primary goal of T-ALL/T-LL treatment is to prevent relapse. AALL1231 was a COG phase 3 clinical trial that randomized children and young adults (age 1-30 years) to a modified augmented BFM (aBFM) backbone +/- the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib during induction and delayed intensification (DI) (1.3mg/m² x 4 doses per block). Bortezomib was tested in frontline therapy based on strong preclinical data and data in relapse on COG AALL07P1. Pts were stratified as standard (SR), intermediate (IR), or very high risk (VHR), primarily based on disease response: morphologic and minimal residual disease (MRD) at end induction and end consolidation (T-ALL) and radiographic response (T-LL). To eliminate cranial radiation (CXRT) in all pts, (except VHR: Day 29 M3 marrow or EOC MRD >0.1% or pts with overt CNS leukemia at diagnosis, CNS3), the aBFM backbone was modified to use dexamethasone (dex) as the sole corticosteroid and an extra pegaspargase dose was added in both induction and DI, following the MRC strategy. IR pts received a second interim maintenance (IM) phase (one Capizzi MTX; one HD-MTX). Following consolidation, VHR pts received 3 BFM high-risk intensification blocks in lieu of IM.
Result(s): AALL1231 accrued 847 patients (824 eligible and evaluable) of 1400 anticipated from 2014 until early closure in 2017 when COG AALL0434 established that nelarabine (NEL) improved DFS in T-ALL (AALL1231 did not include NEL). The 3-year EFS for Arm A (no bortezomib) vs Arm B (bortezomib) were 81.7+/-2.4% and 85.1+/-2.2 % (HR=0.782, p=0.074) (3/31/20 data cut-off; see Table 1 for additional outcomes). SR and IR pts, who account for 95% of pts, had significantly improved EFS on Arm B as compared with Arm A. Yet, VHR patients had improved EFS on Arm A. Patients with T-LL had improved EFS and OS with bortezomib: 3-year EFS (76.5+/-5.9% vs 88.3+/-4.5%; p = 0.01); 3-year OS (78.0+/-5.8% vs 89.5+/-4.2%, p = 0.007). A similar improvement in EFS and OS was not seen in T-ALL; however, with longer follow-up this may change. No excess toxicity was seen on Arm B. A dex-based Induction did result in lower MRD rates; more T-ALL pts on AALL1231 had Day 29 MRD <0.1% as compared with AALL0434 which used a prednisone-based Induction (AALL1231 Arm A: 69.6%; Arm B: 72.2%; AALL0434: 64.6%; p = 0.02). However, this did not translate into improved survival. Indeed OS, but not EFS was worse on AALL1231 than AALL0434. On-going analyses are investigating the increased mortality on AALL1231, but preliminary analyses suggest a combination of increased toxic deaths and overall poor outcome in the VHR group. On AALL0434, 90.8% of T-ALL pts received CXRT. On AALL1231, 9.5% of subjects were scheduled to receive CXRT (CNS3 T-ALL/T-LL: 5.7%; VHR T-ALL: 4.1%). A comparison of AALL0434 pts that received CXRT with similar AALL1231 pts not receiving CXRT on AALL1231 demonstrated similar EFS (p = 0.14) and OS (p = 0.42) (Table 2). CNS relapse rates were higher in these pts on AALL1231 (4.5%) as compared with AALL0434 (1.7%), but overall relapse rates were the same (6.5% vs 6.4%). Notably the benefit of NEL in AALL0434 was due to reduction of CNS relapses. 128 AALL1231 pts came off protocol therapy after the study was closed for physician or patient/parent choice. Data collection is underway to understand the reasons for removal, including if it was to receive NEL.
Conclusion(s): Outcomes for SR and IR pts with T-ALL and T-LL treated with bortezomib were excellent despite the elimination of prophylactic CXRT. Bortezomib significantly improved 3-year EFS for these groups, comprising ~95% of pts. Outcomes for VHR pts were dismal and worse on the bortezomib arm. T-LL pts had significantly improved EFS and OS with bortezomib on the AALL1231 backbone. This is the first trial to demonstrate an OS benefit for de novo pediatric T-LL with a new agent; however, longer follow-up is needed. Therapy intensification allowed elimination of CXRT in the majority of pts without excessive relapse. These results should be interpreted cautiously as the 3-yr OS on AALL1231 was inferior to AALL0434. Nevertheless, incorporating bortezomib into standard therapy for de novo T-LL appears advantageous. Future COG T-ALL/T-LLy trials will build on the positive findings from AALL0434 and AALL1231, balancing intensity while mitigating toxicity to maintain high cure rates without routine cranial radiation. (MLL, SPH, EAR contributed equally) [Formula presented] Disclosures: Teachey: Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; La Roche: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Dunsmore: Dexcom: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Galardy: Abbott: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Harker-Murray: Regerenon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hermiston: Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shimano: Novartis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McKay: Immunogen: Current Employment. Bollard: Mana Therapeutics: Other: IP. Loh: Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding. Hunger: Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria. Raetz: Celgene/BMS: Other; Pfizer: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Bortezomib for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia under an IND
Copyright

[Formula presented] Current risk stratification for COG ALL patients (pts) relies on National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk group (RG) at diagnosis, somatic genetics, and early response to therapy as measured by specific thresholds of minimal residual disease (MRD) using flow cytometry on day 8 peripheral blood (D8 PB) and day 29 bone marrow (D29 BM). NCI RG is defined as age 1-10 years (yrs) and white blood cell count (WBC) <50,000/uL (Standard Risk, SR); all other non-infant patients are high risk (HR). Using COG risk stratification, current therapies for SR and HR patients are based on 5-year projected event-free survival (EFS) of 92-97%, and 65-86%. Currently, two subsets, Ph-like and very high risk (VHR) ALL are identified with additional assays-genomic sequencing for Ph-like, and persistent BM MRD on D29 and at end of consolidation for VHR, and are eligible for different treatments. However, as UK investigators recently published (O'Connor, JCO 2018; Enshaei, Blood 2020), using multiple continuous variables as threshold-defined categorical data may diminish the power of accurately predicting relapse, and thus prescribe inappropriate post induction therapy. We tested the UK approach of transforming categorical variables into continuous data on 13,870 NCI SR and 7308 NCI HR B-ALL pts treated on two generations of COG trials: AALL0331 (SR; n=5094), AALL0932 (SR; n=8776), AALL0232 (HR; n=2883), and AALL1131 (HR; n=4425). Down syndrome and Ph+ pts were excluded from analysis. Clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. ETV6-RUNX1 (25.24%) and double trisomies of chromosome 4, 10 (DT) (23.77%) comprised the favorable risk genetic RG (FRG) group (48.15% of risk classified) while KTM2A rearranged (1.71%), hypodiploidy (1.67%), and iAMP21 (2.56%) comprised the unfavorable risk genetic RG (URG) (6.26%). All others with genetic information were classified as intermediate risk genetic RG (IRG) (45.59% of risk classified). Among 4873 pts tested, 20.46% had Ph-like ALL. D8 PB and D29 BM MRD data were available for 76.42% and 96.69% pts, respectively. We first log transformed WBC, D8 and D29 MRD and displayed these by treatment protocol, NCI RG, and FRG/URG (separating out Ph-like independently). Age and WBC followed the normal expected distribution with the median age of SR pts 4.0 yrs (range 1-9) and HR 12 yrs (range 1-30). Transformed MRD was displayed as a variable t(MRD), corresponding to the negative log; max t(D29 MRD) was 13.82, corresponding to MRD <1.0 x 10^-5.The great majority of pts were MRD-positive at D8 (mean t(D8 MRD) 7.42); but there was broad distribution of values, with NCI SR and FRG pts having lower t(D8 MRD) (mean 7.52 and 8.08) than NCI HR and URG pts (mean 7.20 and 6.56) (p < 0.001). The great majority of pts were D29 MRD-negative (mean t(D29 MRD) 12.08), with NCI SR and FRG pts achieving lower D29 MRD (mean t(D29 MRD) 12.43 and 12.73) than NCI HR and URG pts (mean 11.40 and 10.95) (p< 0.0001). Ph-like ALL pts had a mean t(D8 MRD) and t(D29 MRD) of 6.22 and 9.37. We next conducted a univariate analysis for risk factors for relapse, including sex, age, WBClog, CNS status, protocol-defined rapid early response status, FRG, URG, t(D8 MRD), and t(D29 MRD); all variables except CNS status were significant p < 0.0001). Multivariable modeling showed that WBClog, FRG, URG, t(D8 MRD), t(D29 MRD) retained significance (p < 0.0001). Finally, we applied the UK Prognostic Index (PIUKALL) equation [t(d29 MRD) x -0.218 + CYTO-GR x -0.440 + CYTO-HR x 1.066 + WBClog x 0.138] to the COG data using protocol, NCI RG, FRG, URG, IRG, or Ph-like RG in the model and validated the trends for relapse-free survival (RFS), which were similar in our groups with an overall median PIUKALL of -2.63 (mean -2.32, SD -.90, min -3.54, max 1.79). We next added in t(D8 MRD) to define a PICOG and determined that D8 PB MRD added significantly to the model, mostly through discriminating between the hazard ratios of the FRG and the URG RGs. Importantly, the D8 PB MRD led to a qualitatively more distinctive group with a potentially lower predicted RFS in NCI SR pts, a group that has been more difficult to predict in the past, and yet comprises nearly half of all relapse events. Our analyses of 21,178 COG B-ALL pts confirm and extend the utility of integrating WBC and MRD as continuous rather than categorical values to refine risk stratification for patient treatment and trial design. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Loh: Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borowitz: Amgen: Honoraria. Zweidler-McKay: ImmunoGen, Inc.: Current Employment. Mattano: Melinta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hunger: Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Raetz: Celgene/BMS: Other; Pfizer: Research Funding. Mullighan: Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding.
Copyright

Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has remained challenging to treat in children with survival rates lagging well behind those observed at initial diagnosis. Although there have been some improvements in outcomes over the past few decades, only approximately 50% of children with first relapse of ALL survive long term, and outcome are much worse with second or later relapses. Recurrences that occur within three years of diagnosis and any T-ALL relapses are particularly difficult to salvage. Until recently, treatment options were limited to intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy with or without site-directed, radiotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the past decade, several promising immunotherapeutics have been developed, changing the treatment landscape for children with relapsed ALL. Current research in this field is focusing on how to best incorporate immunotherapeutics into salvage regimens and investigate long-term survival and side effects, and when these might replace HSCT. As more knowledge is gained about the biology of relapse through comprehensive genomic profiling, incorporation of molecularly targeted therapies is another area of active investigation. These advances in treatment offer real promise for less toxic and more effective therapy for children with relapsed ALL and we present several cases highlighting contemporary treatment decision-making.

Leukemia, most commonly B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), accounts for about 30% of childhood cancer diagnoses. While there have been dramatic improvements in childhood ALL outcomes, certain subgroups-particularly those who relapse-fare poorly. In addition, cure is associated with significant short- and long-term side effects. Given these challenges, there is great interest in novel, targeted approaches to therapy. A number of new immunotherapeutic agents have proven to be efficacious in relapsed or refractory disease and are now being investigated in frontline treatment regimens. Blinatumomab (a bispecific T-cell engager that targets cluster of differentiation [CD]-19) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (a humanized antibody-drug conjugate to CD22) have shown the most promise. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, a form of adoptive immunotherapy, rely on the transfer of genetically modified effector T cells that have the potential to persist in vivo for years, providing ongoing long-term disease control. In this article, we discuss the clinical biology and treatment of B-ALL with an emphasis on the role of immunotherapy in overcoming the challenges of conventional cytotoxic therapy. As immunotherapy continues to move into the frontline of pediatric B-ALL therapy, we also discuss strategies to address unique side effects associated with these agents and efforts to overcome mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Nelarabine is effective in inducing remission in patients with relapsed and refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) but has not been fully evaluated in those with newly diagnosed disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:From 2007 to 2014, Children's Oncology Group trial AALL0434 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00408005) enrolled 1,562 evaluable patients with T-ALL age 1-31 years who received the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (ABFM) regimen with a 2 × 2 pseudo-factorial randomization to receive escalating-dose methotrexate (MTX) without leucovorin rescue plus pegaspargase (C-MTX) or high-dose MTX (HDMTX) with leucovorin rescue. Intermediate- and high-risk patients were also randomly assigned after induction to receive or not receive six 5-day courses of nelarabine that was incorporated into ABFM. Patients who experienced induction failure were nonrandomly assigned to HDMTX plus nelarabine. Patients with overt CNS disease (CNS3; ≥ 5 WBCs/μL with blasts) received HDMTX and were randomly assigned to receive or not receive nelarabine. All patients, except those with low-risk disease, received cranial irradiation. RESULTS:= .0001). Toxicities, including neurotoxicity, were acceptable and similar between all four arms. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The addition of nelarabine to ABFM therapy improved DFS for children and young adults with newly diagnosed T-ALL without increased toxicity.

Importance/UNASSIGNED:Suboptimal adherence to oral mercaptopurine treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) increases the risk of relapse. A frequently expressed barrier to adherence is forgetfulness, which is often overcome by parental vigilance. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To determine whether a multicomponent intervention, compared with education alone, will result in a higher proportion of patients with ALL who have mercaptopurine adherence rates 95% or higher, for all study participants and among patients younger than 12 years and vs those aged 12 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants/UNASSIGNED:The adherence intervention trial was an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional, parallel-group, unblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted between July 16, 2012, and August 8, 2018, at 59 Children's Oncology Group institutions in the US, enrolling patients with ALL diagnosed through age 21 years and receiving mercaptopurine for maintenance. The date of final follow-up was January 2, 2019. Data analysis was performed from February to October 2019. Interventions/UNASSIGNED:Patients were randomized 1:1 to education alone or the intervention package, which consisted of education and personalized text message reminders daily to prompt directly supervised therapy. Four weeks of baseline adherence monitoring were followed with a 16-week intervention. Main Outcomes and Measures/UNASSIGNED:The primary end point was the proportion of patients with adherence rates 95% or higher over the duration of the intervention for all study participants, and for those younger than 12 years vs those aged 12 years and older. Results/UNASSIGNED:There were 444 evaluable patients (median age, 8.1 years; interquartile range, 5.3-14.3 years), including 230 in the intervention group and 214 in the education group. Three hundred two patients (68.0%) were boys, 180 (40.5%) were non-Hispanic White, 170 (38.3%) were Hispanic, 43 (9.7%) were African American, and 51 (11.5%) were Asian or of mixed race/ethnicity. The proportion of patients with adherence rates 95% or higher did not differ between the intervention vs education groups (65% vs 59%; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0; P = .08). Exploratory analyses showed that among patients aged 12 years and older, those in the intervention group had higher mean (SE) adherence rates than those in the education group (93.1% [1.1%] vs 90.0% [1.3%]; difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.0%; P = .04). In particular, among patients aged 12 years and older with baseline adherence less than 90%, those in the intervention group had higher mean (SE) adherence rates than those in the education group (83.4% [2.5%] vs 74.6% [3.4%]; difference, 8.8%; 95% CI, 2.2%-15.4%; P = .008). No safety concerns were identified. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:Although this multicomponent intervention did not result in an increase in the proportion of patients with ALL who had mercaptopurine adherence rates 95% or higher, it did identify a high-risk subpopulation to target for future adherence intervention strategies: adolescents with low baseline adherence. Trial Registration/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01503632.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol AALL0434 evaluated the safety and efficacy of multi-agent chemotherapy with Capizzi-based methotrexate/pegaspargase (C-MTX) in patients with newly diagnosed pediatric T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL) and gained preliminary data using nelarabine in high-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:The trial enrolled 299 patients, age 1-31 years. High-risk (HR) patients had ≥ 1% minimal detectable disease (MDD) in the bone marrow at diagnosis or received prior steroid treatment. Induction failure was defined as failure to achieve a partial response (PR) by the end of the 4-week induction. All patients received the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (ABFM) C-MTX regimen. HR patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive 6 5-day courses of nelarabine incorporated into ABFM. Patients with induction failure were nonrandomly assigned to ABFM C-MTX plus nelarabine. No patients received prophylactic cranial radiation; however, patients with CNS3 disease (CSF WBC ≥ 5/μL with blasts or cranial nerve palsies, brain/eye involvement, or hypothalamic syndrome) were ineligible. RESULTS:= .55). Disease stage, tumor response, and MDD at diagnosis did not demonstrate thresholds that resulted in differences in EFS. Nelarabine did not show an advantage for HR patients. CNS relapse occurred in only 4 patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:COG AALL0434 produced excellent outcomes in one of the largest trials ever conducted for patients with newly diagnosed T-LL. The COG ABFM regimen with C-MTX provided excellent EFS and OS without cranial radiation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The high-risk stratum of Children's Oncology Group Study AALL1131 was designed to test the hypothesis that postinduction CNS prophylaxis with intrathecal triple therapy (ITT) including methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine would improve the postinduction 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) compared with intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX), when given on a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Children with newly diagnosed National Cancer Institute (NCI) high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR B-ALL) or NCI standard-risk B-ALL with defined minimal residual disease thresholds during induction were randomly assigned to receive postinduction IT MTX or ITT. Patients with CNS3-status disease were not eligible. Postinduction IT therapy was given for a total of 21 to 26 doses. Neurocognitive assessments were performed during therapy and during 1 year off therapy. RESULTS:= .77), respectively. There were no differences in the cumulative incidence of isolated bone marrow relapse, isolated CNS relapse, or combined bone marrow and CNS relapse rates, or in toxicities observed for patients receiving IT MTX compared with ITT. There were no significant differences in neurocognitive outcomes for patients receiving IT MTX compared with ITT. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postinduction CNS prophylaxis with ITT did not improve 5-year DFS for children with HR B-ALL. The standard of care for CNS prophylaxis for children with B-ALL and no overt CNS involvement remains IT MTX.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:substitution or complete ASNase discontinuation is unknown. METHODS:but receiving all doses versus not receiving all ASNase doses. RESULTS:= .03). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:shortages.