Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Insulin resistance (IR) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type-2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore simple measures of IR have been proposed to screen the at-risk patient. A fasting serum glucose (mg/dl) to plasma insulin (microU/ml) ratio (FGIR) of < 7 was recently suggested as a screening tool for IR in certain pediatric patients. METHODS:To determine the utility of simple indicators of IR, the FGIR of < 7 was applied to a group of patients with established risk for IR. The study group was comprised of non-growth hormone (GH)-deficient patients with Turner syndrome (TS, n = 92) and idiopathic short stature (ISS, n = 73) receiving GH. The occurrence of a FGIR of < 7 in these cohorts was compared to data from previous publications. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The application of a FGIR of < 7 confirmed a rise in IR with GH therapy in both groups as well as a higher occurrence in the TS group, rising from 22 to 48% between 12 and 24 months of GH therapy. We conclude that simple measures of IR such as the FGIR may be useful in screening and following patients at risk for IR.

The potential role of exogenous GH in treating short children born small for gestational age (SGA) has been discussed since the early 1960s. Pivotal studies in Europe during the last 10 years have shown that GH treatment of short children born SGA during childhood and early puberty (1) normalizes stature, (2) increases final height above predicted height and (3) allows children to reach their target height. A study now under way in the USA will provide additional much needed data about efficacy and safety of GH treatment in intrauterine growth retardation/SGA.

Saizen (recombinant growth hormone [GH]), 0.2 mg/(kg x wk), was given in an open-label fashion for an average of 51 mo to 27 children with presumed idiopathic GH deficiency who had withdrawn from a trial of Geref (recombinant GH-releasing hormone [GHRH] 1-29) because of inadequate height velocity (HV) (25 children), the onset of puberty (1 child), or injection site reactions (1 child). Measurements were made every 3-12 mo of a number of auxologic variables, including HV, height standard deviation score, and bone age. The children in the study showed excellent responses to Saizen. Moreover, first-year growth during Saizen therapy was inversely correlated with the GH response to provocative GHRH testing carried out 6 and 12 mo after the initiation of Geref treatment. These findings indicate that GH is effective in accelerating growth in GH-deficient children who do not show or maintain a satisfactory response to treatment with GHRH. In addition, they suggest that the initial response to GH therapy used in this way can be predicted by means of provoc-ative testing.

GH production rates markedly increase during human puberty, mostly as an amplitude-modulated phenomenon. However, GH-deficient children have been dosed on a standard per kg BW basis similar to prepubertal children. This randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy (group I, 0.3 mg/kg x week) vs. high dose therapy (group II, 0.7 mg/kg x week) in GH-deficient adolescents previously treated with rhGH for at least 6 months. Ninety-seven children with documented evidence of GH deficiency (peak GH in response to stimuli, <10 ng/mL), with either organic or idiopathic pathology, were recruited. Both groups were matched for sex (group I, 42 males and 7 females; group II, 41 males and 7 females), age [group I, 14.0+/-1.6 (+/-SD) yr; group II, 13.7+/-1.6], standardized height (group I, -1.4+/-1.1; group II, -1.2+/-1.1), bone age (group I, 13.1+/-1.3 yr; group II, 13.1+/-1.3) etiology, maximum stimulated GH, previous growth rate, and midparental target height. All subjects were in puberty (Tanner stage 2-5) at study entry. Of the 97 subjects enrolled, 45 were treated for 3 yr or more; 48 completed the study. Of the subjects who discontinued the study, the most common reason was satisfaction with their height, although others discontinued for adverse events or personal reasons. The frequency of patients who discontinued was the same in both groups. The primary efficacy analysis was the difference between dose groups for near-adult height, defined as the height attained at a bone age of 16 yr or more in males and 14 yr or more in girls; all subjects who qualified were included in the analysis. This difference was statistically significant at 4.6 cm by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; P < 0.001; n = 75). For subjects who received at least 4 yr of rhGH treatment, the difference between dose groups at that time point was 5.7 cm (by ANCOVA, P = 0.024; n = 20). The mean height SD score at near-adult height was -0.7+/-0.9 in the standard dose group and 0.0+/-1.2 in the high dose group. At 36 months the cumulative change in height (centimeters) was 21.5+/-5.3 cm (group I) vs. 25.1+/-4.9 (group II; P < 0.001, by ANCOVA); the change in Bayley-Pinneau predicted adult height was 4.8+/-4.2 cm (group I) vs. 8.4+/-5.7 (group II; P = 0.032). Median plasma IGF-I concentrations at baseline were 427 microg/L (range, 204-649) in group I and 435 microg/L (range, 104-837) in group II; at 36 months they were 651 microg/L (range, 139-1079) in group I vs. 910 microg/L (range, 251-1843) in group II (P = NS). No difference in change in bone age was detected between groups at any interval. High dose rhGH was well tolerated, with a similar safety profile as standard dose treatment and no difference in hemoglobin A1c or glucose concentrations between groups. In summary, compared to conventional treatment, high dose rhGH therapy in adolescents 1) increased near-adult height and height SD scores significantly, 2) did not increase the rate of skeletal maturation, and 3) appears to be well tolerated and safe. In conclusion, high dose rhGH therapy may have a beneficial effect in adolescent GH-deficient patients, particularly those who are most growth retarded at the start of puberty.